web
counter
 

The Hardest Working Person In Hollywood? Megan Fox's Publicist

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (33)



200906_megan-fox-as-buffy.jpg

I have a friend who works in Hollywood who once told me that celebrity actors, particularly struggling ones, often like to float rumors about themselves in order to create interest. If you slap your name on enough rumors, it might even trigger a thought in one of the animatronic suits that run Hollywood studios. He even knew of a few specific examples, which I won’t reveal so as not to betray confidences. In any respect, that certainly seems what Megan Fox is trying to do of late. After she was fired or left Transformers 3 (depending on whose account you believe), there have been a number of rumors attaching Fox to high-profile projects. And after three straight bombs (Jennifer’s Body, Jonah Hex, Passion Play), those rumors are the only thing keeping her name afloat.

We’ll start with the most recent and, perhaps, most absurd: A rumor, floated by a “Hollywood Insider,” which suggests that Fox is courting the role of Bat Girl. Not a Bat Girl in a Christopher Nolan movie, mind you. A Bat Girl in her own stand-alone film. Somebody’s publicist clearly knows how to get a clients name out in the world: The mere mention of a bat character is enough to ensure a day’s coverage on the pop-culture blogs. And look! It worked. I’m writing about it here, even if it is to suggest that Fox’s publicist be a little less transparent by, say, floating rumors that she’s involved with movies that she actually has a shot to be cast in, like Garfield 3: Pussy Whipped or Thomas Kinkade’s Portrait Above Your Toilet.

Before Bat Girl, of course, there was a more grave rumor drifting about that Fox was up for the role of Carrie in a remake of the Stephen King movie. That one was also floated by “someone close to Megan Fox,” who claimed that the actress was looking to star in “more serious roles.” And of course, the way to gain goodwill for your client is to associate her name with a movie that no one wants remade. If Fox really wanted to be considered for more serious roles, she should float a rumor that she’s involved in the cancer movie, Megan Fox, Die of It.

There was also that rumor a while back involving the Buffy the Vampire Slayer remake (without Joss Whedon’s involvement)? Remember that? Remember the blister in your brain that you had to have removed? Good times! That movie is in development, and apparently, an unknown source purportedly said that Fox’s name was being thrown around as Buffy. Whedon Nation would die. Seriously, the servers over at Whedonesque would melt and Whedon fans everywhere would start suffocating studio execs with their brown coats.

It’s not always been this way, of course. There was a time when Megan Fox’s publicist main job was disassociating her name from particular projects. In fact, before she was dumped from Transformers 3, Megan Fox’s publicist was the master of turning down roles for which she was probably never considered in the first place. Remember the 2009 rumor that suggested Megan Fox would be the next Bond girl? How do you turn that denial into a bitchy positive? Ask Fox’s publicist, who said that Fox turned down that role because “she wanted a bigger part.” That same year, Fox was purportedly offered the role of Lara Croft in the Tomb Raider reboot. That reboot Is in development, but according to Fox’s rep, she was not involved. Somehow, I think in 2011 Megan Fox’s rep would be all too happy to help foster that rumor. “What movie? Tomb Raider? Oh, yes. Yes! Of course, she’s attached. Are there any other rumors you need me to confirm? What’s that? They’re remaking Gorillas in the Mist? Oh, I knew that. Megan received the script last night. She’s mulling over the offer.”










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Why Russell Crowe Is Not the Best Choice to Play Superman's Pops, Jor-El | His Eyes Are Up Here! Ryan Reynolds, Is More Than The Sum Of His Incredibly Well-Toned Parts









Comments

Tell me again why we all need to stone Megan Fox? Cuz the Transformers movies sucked? I'm pretty sure they would have sucked either way. I'm just sayin...

Posted by: logan at June 17, 2011 11:07 AM

Because she is SUPREMELY untalented. And she's biting her thumb at me. I've dueled over less.

Posted by: I Need More Allowance at June 17, 2011 11:11 AM

Did you mean drooled or dueled?

Posted by: logan at June 17, 2011 11:14 AM

On the other hand, I'd watch a Batgirl movie.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at June 17, 2011 11:32 AM

Y'know, Fox would make an excellent Cordelia Chase in the new Buffy mov-- What? Because Whedon isn't involved, none of the great supporting characters from the TV series will be in the remake? Why are they bothering, again?

Posted by: RobP at June 17, 2011 11:32 AM

Dustin I don’t doubt your agent friend in Hollywood. The thing is even the big stars have their names attached to all kinds of projects. But I’m willing to cede the point that Julia Roberts name won’t be floated around the remake of “Carrie.”

Posted by: Pookie at June 17, 2011 11:36 AM

If they ever cast Megan Fox as Barbara Gordon I would KILL somebody. Seriously.

Posted by: Todd at June 17, 2011 11:39 AM

Yeah but she is hot. I await her "leaked" sex tape.

Posted by: junierizzle at June 17, 2011 11:40 AM

A Batgirl movie? Didn't we learn anything from Catwoman?

Posted by: Pooter at June 17, 2011 11:43 AM

i never hear no one of your rumors of Fox except she was one of Bay's girlfriend and after her marriage,she didn't want more

Posted by: caro at June 17, 2011 11:57 AM

She needs a new agent, or the ability to turn down roles that require her to be nothing more than eye candy. If she can act, let her prove it in a smaller role where she keeps most of her clothes on. I don't need Josh Brolin's play-by-play of how they basically strip searched her for guns in Jonah Hex.

Posted by: Markus at June 17, 2011 12:09 PM

Todd,
How about Megan Fox as the Cassandra Cain Batgirl?

Posted by: Pat C. at June 17, 2011 12:11 PM

I ended up turning off the first Transformer movie before it was over but not because she's such a dismal actress... I thought she was actually rather good considering the crappy lines she had to deliver. And I kind of like her from some of the interview snippets I've read. It's too bad she gets so much disrespect, I don't think she's any worse than Kirsten Dunst or Scarlett Mouthbreather.

Posted by: snapnhiss at June 17, 2011 12:13 PM

TBF, his agent is doing what all agents are supposed to do: keep his client's name out in the public. It's no different to what sports agents do for their clients. "Of course my client is looking at various teams. But we'll choose the one that gets us closer to a title."

I think it says more about how quickly the cycle turns for starlets than anything else. Two years ago, Megan Fox was the "hottest" in the world and Blake Lively was fighting Leighton Meester for #1 status on a CW show. Now Lively is opening up a new movie and Fox is hoping to not have to settle for some reality TV show on E! co-starring Brian Austin Green.

Posted by: Fredo at June 17, 2011 12:17 PM

"there was a more grave rumor drifting about that Fox was up for the role of Carrie in a remake of the Stephen King movie"

Ha! That works on at least three different levels.

I for one would love it if Megan Fox were cast as Buffy. I can't think of a faster way to kill that new franchise dead dead dead.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at June 17, 2011 12:22 PM

Since TK hasn't gone off about it yet: It's "Batgirl", not "Bat Girl".

/nerd

Posted by: Bates at June 17, 2011 12:23 PM

All agents do this for all kinds of celebrities. Megan Fox and other young starlets aren't the only ones tossed into the rumor mill by their reps by any stretch of the imagination, so I'm not quite sure why we're singling her out for this.

Posted by: beckster at June 17, 2011 12:26 PM

I don't know much about Cassandra Cain, Pat C. (though I do have her first appearance). My understanding is that DC has been mishandling her character for years, so I doubt they'd make a movie about her. I would quip that if Fox was a non-speaking Cassandra it would be the best-case scenario... but then she'd have to carry the role with just facial and body expressiveness. And yeah, I don't see that happening.

Posted by: Todd at June 17, 2011 12:26 PM

I think most of us who read Carrie pictured her as a phenomenally beautiful woman in her mid-twenties.

Posted by: CopRock at June 17, 2011 12:38 PM

Agreed, Todd, especially since DC is rebooting Barbara Gordon as Batgirl in September.

Maybe Fox as Huntress? Think she'd do a better job than January Jones as Emma Frost (bleargh).

Posted by: Bates at June 17, 2011 12:38 PM

She's very pretty. That is all.

Posted by: daria at June 17, 2011 12:54 PM

To give her some credit (just a little bit mind) she has two projects in the works that sound interesting. She has a part in Judd Apatow's Knocked Up spin off and a role in Friends with Kids by Jennifer Westfeldt (Kissing Jessica Stein) co-starring Jon Hamm, Kristen Wiig, Maya Rudolph and Adam Scott (swoon). Surely these are smart choices considering her limited talent? And I think the new chick in Transformers 3, Rosie whatsit, looks terrible. Really, really terrible. We may actually miss Megan's plastic face and presence in that sure to be shitfest.

Posted by: Katie at June 17, 2011 1:35 PM

Correction: Kristen Stewart's publicist who planted Lois Lane rumours and many others.
Somehow they convinced the public she is a misunderstood shy talented actress when in truth she is a talentless Valley bitch with parents who work in the industry.

Posted by: Publicist at June 17, 2011 1:50 PM

See what happens when you can't stop biting your thumbnails!!

Posted by: Laredo at June 17, 2011 2:07 PM

"Oh, I new that." or OH, I KNEW THAT

Posted by: Eddy Gordo at June 17, 2011 2:30 PM

Thanks.

Posted by: Eddy Gordo at June 17, 2011 2:37 PM

I am playing on team Megan at this point. After that idiotic statement by Shia the Beef saying that she was too much into "girl power" to continue working for Michael Bay, I just plumb gave up. How else can we expect people to behave when they are surrounded by sheer idiocy?

Posted by: greer at June 17, 2011 7:35 PM

...And somewhere I'm sure there is a photo of this girl where she is not biting her thumb, sticking out her tongue or sucking on a piece of fruit. So, as a favor to me, please find it?

kthanksbye

Posted by: greer at June 17, 2011 7:38 PM

What a stupid article this is. Megan Fox is filming a movie with JUDD APATOW right now. And she just finished filming a movie with Jon Hamm and Kristin Wiig. I'd hardly say she is struggling. People's criticism of her acting is absolutely overblown and ridiculous.

When Passion Play came out, it bombed but her acting was praised (but you didn't feel inclined to include that in your snark). People mock her because she's a pin up girl, and they are way harsher on her than they would be on a guy like say, that guy from Twilight edward or whatever. He's a terrible actor, but their is no mass contempt and mockery of him the way their is with Fox. Sexism.

Posted by: melanie at June 17, 2011 9:36 PM

@Three-ninteen

Good point! Hopefully if that's true, that will hopefully happen.

However, what a disaster it would be if it became successful...

Posted by: Candee at June 17, 2011 10:04 PM

Thomas Kinkade’s Portrait Above Your Toilet

Dustin, you bring back such sweet, sweet memories of your review of that Thomas Kinkade movie with Jared Padalecki.

Oh, what? Megan Fox? Meh.

Posted by: MM at June 18, 2011 2:45 AM

"When Passion Play came out, it bombed but her acting was praised"

Why don't you provide some links to your good reviews, Megan?

Posted by: jess at June 18, 2011 4:33 AM

Did you seriously just wish cancer on someone, Dustin?

Dude, I don't even bust that out, and I'm me.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at June 18, 2011 4:53 PM