web
counter
 

The Good News is that Russell T Davies has a New Show...

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (17)



amy-pond-fashion.jpg

The bad news is that this is the plot description:

“From the dark side of the moon, aliens are scanning the Earth searching for magic and are prepared to destroy everything in their path to get it. All that stands in the way of Earth’s imminent destruction are two 16-year old schoolboys, Tom and Benny. It’s ray guns vs wands; science vs magic and aliens vs wizards.

“Tom Clarke lives a seemingly ordinary life with his dad and grandmother. However he hides a deep secret — Tom’s family are wizards and when the Nekross arrive, hungry for magic, they find themselves on the menu. The Nekross may be equipped with ray guns, teleports and high-tech robots but they haven’t reckoned on Tom and his friend, science super-brain Benny. They form an extraordinary duo, using Tom’s magic and Benny’s science to battle the Nekross and save the Earth.”

To be fair, it is being pitched as a children’s show, as a sort of spiritual replacement for “Sarah Jane Adventures,” but also to be fair, just because it’s for kids doesn’t mean that it has to be lousy. Aliens versus wizards? Anything being pitched using the “versus” construction doesn’t have the best track record for quality. That’s the refuge of the unoriginal writer who can’t make ideas themselves interesting.

And the ideas are not themselves uninteresting. While at face value, magic versus science is just a simplistic melding of disparate genres, unlike two genres selected at random (say erotica and musicals), these two are at least nominally sides of the same coin. This could make for deep and fascinating stories, grounded in the duality of rationalism and the strangeness of the human psyche. Science is based on an rational universe, in which we can trace the consistent and replicable laws through applied empiricism. Magic though is not simply wands in place of lasers, it is at its best a fundamentally different view of the world. It’s a system of the world in which empiricism means nothing, in which the laws of the universe change at a whim, in which the strangeness of the universe is not merely unknown, but unknowable.

Too much fiction blurs the line between fantasy and science fiction by not understanding that nuance. Fantasy in particular has eroded into representing magic as anything but magic. If grinding up belladonna, a newt’s left testicle, and the blood of a virgin let’s you shoot a fireball out of your finger with the help of the right words of ancient Sumerian, that’s not magic, that’s just science with a different set of physical laws. It’s the holy word of empiricism that makes science what it is, this notion that we can actually figure out how this universe works. Magic comes from a darker place inside us, one that fears that things we cannot understand lurk in the darkness, but it’s also the well spring of miracles, of the hope that the impossible can be worked.

Aliens versus wizards does not light up my interest, but if Davies is latching onto exploring the nature of science and the nature of magic in the context of a children’s adventure, that could be something legendary.

(source: Blastr)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



'Family Feud' Will See Your Donkey Punch, 'Jeopardy,' and Raise You an Inappropriate 'Schlong' | One Of These Cast Members Of "The Walking Dead" May Not Survive The Season









Comments

You've thought a lot about this.

That's a compliment.

Posted by: Jay at January 24, 2012 10:07 AM

Russell's partner has cancer so his planned showtime show was put on hold so they could relocate to the UK. I imagine he just wants to do something light at the moment and he's good at kids tv - it's where he got his start and Sarah Jane was wonderful. Can't wait for the Showtime show to get back on track though, I think it's called Cucumber?

Posted by: Katie at January 24, 2012 10:26 AM

Muahahaha.....Erotica and Musicals. I want to see this done.

Debbie Does Chicago
Evita, MILF
The Diddler on the Roof
Seven Brides For One Brother
Schwinging in the Rain

Posted by: NateS1973 at January 24, 2012 10:36 AM

The more I watch the solo Moffat "Doctor Who" the more I realize how much I can't stand Davies.

Posted by: Rob at January 24, 2012 10:53 AM

Sorry, Russell, but I did Astrophysics at university, and once when walking home after class I was ambushed by a crackhead ex-illusionist. Dickhead tried to mug me, but I lamped him in the face with a weighty Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences tome, and he went down like a lead balloon. Science versus magic already happened, and science beat the shit out of magic.

Posted by: zeke the pig at January 24, 2012 10:59 AM

Science versus magic already happened, and science beat the shit out of magic.

Except in Kansas and Texas where they teach "intelligent design" in the schools.

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 24, 2012 11:29 AM

The GoodBad News is that Russell T Davies has a New Show...

Posted by: TheOtherGreg at January 24, 2012 11:50 AM

Science vs. magic? Except I bet the "science" won't resemble real science at all, but will be technobabbly fantasy magic vs. hocus pocusy fantasy magic.

Posted by: BWeaves at January 24, 2012 12:22 PM

Steven

I have to disagree with your fundamental premise. You are working from a overly simplistic reduction of “Magic” to your own definition, and anyone who doesn’t do it your way, is wrong. For you, magic must create a world in which “empiricism means nothing, in which the laws of the universe change at a whim, in which the strangeness of the universe is not merely unknown, but unknowable.” This describes a narrative universe without logical consistency, wherein a repeated process or action might produce completely unexpected and/or dangerously unpredictable results -- a world in which nothing magical could be counted on. Most readers or viewers have a tendency to feel that stories that don’t follow their own rules (logical systems) are “cheating” and mostly find this less satisfying. Most writers do not use magic in this way -- there are almost always rules of some sort, even if they are as simple as “no bright lights and don’t feed after midnight.” Even Gandalf has rules that he must obey.


You write disparagingly that “fantasy in particular has eroded into representing magic as anything but magic.” In your worst case scenario, what passes for magic is just “science with a different set of physical laws.” You haven’t thought this all the way through. All magic in fiction has some kind of rules, but you seem to be arguing that it is these rules which “erode” magic away from “true” magic. On the contrary, “magic” without any rules at all isn’t magic at all, it’s deus ex machina.

Posted by: Kosmic Koyote at January 24, 2012 12:27 PM

I'm glad I saw your comment, Kosmic Koyote, because I was going to post something similar but much less eloquent.

SLW, could you give us an example of a good fantasy that follows your concept of magic?

Posted by: Three-nineteen at January 24, 2012 12:43 PM

And if you're going to talk about Davies, the least you could do is put up a picture of Ten. That header pic you have is of Moffat's show, not Davies's. Captain Jack would also be acceptable.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at January 24, 2012 12:46 PM

NateS1973 - sounds like we could write these ourselves:

The Wizard of Ahhhhhs
Hair (Down There)!
Pirates of Penn's Ass
Lez Miserables
Orgy and Bess
Jesus Christ Superstud

We'd be a regular Rogers and Hammer-her-stein.

Posted by: Bert at January 24, 2012 2:08 PM

When I read that headline, I thought the next line was going to be "...and the bad news is that it's Doctor Who! Looks like they gave it back!"

Aliens vs. Wizards is fine as long as they keep that man away from the TARDIS.

Posted by: A-schaef at January 24, 2012 2:56 PM

I'm agreeing with Kosmic Koyote too - phrased more eloquently than I could have put it.

Also, "vs" has an excellent track record for Mr. Davies. Dr. Who vs. The Daleks?

Posted by: Sara Tonin at January 24, 2012 3:03 PM

Rob, I am going to have to disagree with you completely.
I just finished rewatching Donna's season and just keep thnking that I want Davies back. Moffat is fantastic at writing individual episodes, Davies was a considerably better show runner. That Donna season was where nuWho peaked, and it hasn't been as good since. I could write entire essays on why, but I don't want to completely derail this thread.

I, for one, think that this sounds like it could be wonderful.

Posted by: DominaNefret at January 24, 2012 4:16 PM

Dude: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -Arthur C. Clarke.

Sci-fi diehards tend to dismiss fantasy because of the "magic has no rules" concept. However, any avid fantasy (well, good fantasy) reader knows that magic always has its own rules (and usually its own costs - to quote from Once Upon a Time). Honestly, the only real difference between sci-fi and fantasy is the name we want to call the magic. Wand, sonic screwdriver -- take your pick.

Posted by: TheHobo at January 25, 2012 12:45 AM

I don't know where you're getting this definition of magic from. As far back as we can confirm that humans had a concept of the supernatural, they saw it as something that could be defined, categorized, and controlled. Mixing specific ingredients and saying incantations aren't something JK Rowling pulled out of her ass: that's the kind of thing "real" magic practitioners did! Smear lamb's blood on your mantle to keep away the angel of death. Touch the holy cross to cure your illness. Preserve the pharaoh's organs so he can use them in the afterlife. Cut out a man's heart to ensure a good harvest. Don't walk under a ladder, or you'll have bad luck. No pre-scientific shaman worth his salt would say, "I have no idea how the universe works, anything could happen, just hope for the best." No one would listen to that guy. Magic has always been a form of pseudoscience, and that system of thought lead eventually to deductive reasoning and empiricism.

Posted by: Frodo Baggins at January 25, 2012 1:44 PM