free counter with statistics The Devil Wears ... Pajiba! | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

prada.jpg
The Devil Wears … Pajiba!

The Weekly Trade Round-Up / The Pajiba Staff

Trade News | July 1, 2006 | Comments (30)


Item #1:We kid a lot around here about having to ingest large amounts of narcotics to suffer through some of the films we have to see, but aside from a brief encounter with paint huffing, most of us lay off the hard stuff. But when it comes to recreational drug use, there was no bigger proponent of the good stuff than Timothy Leary. I mean, this guy invented an entire freakin’ religion with LSD as its holy sacrament — that’s dedication, y’all. And who better than the prince of the biopic, Leonardo DiCaprio, to bring the formulator of the eight-circuit model of consciousness to the big screen. DiCaprio, via his production company, has hired playwright Craig Lucas to write a script based on Leary’s life as a possible starring vehicle. And while I’m largely indifferent to DiCaprio, you have to admit that — with his last three films — he has quietly begun to fulfill the acting potential he displayed in What’s Eating Gilbert Grape. And whether you agree with his theories or not, you have to hand it to Leary: He had one helluva fascinating life, and I have no doubt there’ll be quite a few DiCaprio fans looking forward to the chapter on Hedonic Engineering. — Dustin Rowles

Item #2: Charlize Theron is a good actress. I know this because she did what beautiful people in Hollywood do when they want to get serious: They get ugly. A year after Nicole Kidman donned a prosthetic nose and got all mopey in The Hours, Theron packed on 30 pounds and some rough make-up for Monster, which is the kind of good movie I was able to admire while also fervently wishing I was anywhere else but the theater. Theron’s performance was an impressive one, and even garnered her a Best Actress Oscar like Kidman before her, but the film was one of the more uncomfortable viewing experiences of my young, tender life. (Not that rape is ever just a blast to see on film, but man, this one takes the cake. The bitter, serial-killing cake.) Perhaps sensing that (1) it’s time to return to the spotlight, since people are starting to talk about Reindeer Games again, and (2) it’s OK if you’re freakishly attractive, since that’s what people pay to see, Theron has persuaded British director Alan Parker to helm her passion project Ice at the Bottom of the World. The film deals with a Navy captain who returns home to find his daughter (Theron) has become a heroin addict and the mother of a multi-racial child. Granted, heroin addicts aren’t exactly a hygienic bunch, but the plot — a shameless run at the Academy Awards if ever there was one — at least promises that Theron won’t have to go through another brutal physical transformation. We Americans do like our stars pretty. — Daniel Carlson

Item #3: Mmm, nothing says sacrilege like gay vampires. Gothic novelist Anne Rice rose to cult fame with the publication of her Vampire Chronicles series, the first installment of which, Interview with the Vampire, was turned into a turgid, plodding film in 1994. Who could forget Brad Pitt’s incessant weeping? Kirsten Dunst’s oddly compelling screen presence? The fact that seeing Tom Cruise in all those ruffles made a lot of sense? Despite the success of her book series, Rice returned to the Catholicism of her youth in the late 1990s, and in 2005 she announced her intention to write “only for the Lord.” She soon published Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt, the first novel in a trilogy following the life of Jesus. Rice’s intentions are admirable, especially her commitment to turning her back on the stories that brought her fame and fortune to pursue a kind of spiritual renewal, so it’s with that in mind that I advise her to lay low for a while. The film rights for Christ the Lord have been acquired by Good News Holdings, but once word gets out that the latest big-screen story of Christ’s young life came from the woman who gave the world Lestat, Pat Robertson is going to amass an army and storm Los Angeles once and for all. He’ll probably appoint Kirk Cameron as his general, and they’ll ride into town to sweep out the gays and the Jews and the gay Jews and anyone else that smells funny. I haven’t read Rice’s book, but her apparently honest desire to serve God and the story she’s writing will likely end in agony: Honesty only gets you so far nowadays, and Robertson isn’t afraid to publicly declare his desire to assassinate somebody. Good luck, lady. You’re gonna need it. — DC

Item #4: Ever since Walter Matthau and Jack Lemmon exited life stage left, the geriatric buddy-comedy has never been the same. And, really, who better to rectify the situation than the best 69-year-old actors around, Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman, who possess more acting talent in their varicose veins than 98 percent of the rest of Hollywood. Unfortunately, the project they chose to work together on is a movie entitled The Bucket List, which sounds a bit like Last Holiday 2: The Flatulent Geezers crossed with a very special “Golden Girls” episode of “My Name Is Earl.” The film, to be directed by Rob Reiner — who hasn’t hit paydirt in over a decade — follows the two terminally-ill bastards, who decide to escape their nursing home in their quest to cross off the things they want to do before keeling over. I’m not entirely sure what their list entails, but I sure as hell hope it doesn’t involve a Vegas hotel, half a bottle of Levitra, and a pillow fight. — DR

Item #5: For those who argue that reality television is the sign of our society’s obvious decline, here’s some evidence to bolster your case. On Tuesday, the winner of “Survivor Thailand,” former used-car salesman Brian Heidik, was arrested and tossed in the clink on two separate charges. First, in late June, the wonderful Mr. Heidik beat up his wife, from whom he’s now separated but still living with. Then, around 3:30 Tuesday morning, a neighbor’s puppy happened to walk onto his property, and he decided the best way to handle it was to shoot the poor puppy with an arrow (happily, word is that the pooch will be fine). Heidik’s soon-to-be-ex-wife says that he’s been a mess ever since appearing on “Survivor:” “I don’t think he’s ever adapted to real life since then. He thinks he can do anything. He thinks he’s invincible.” — Seth Freilich

Item #6: Over the long weekend, Superman Returns grossed around $74 million to bring its six-day haul to $106 million, which is kind of a bust considering its $204 million production cost, plus the $40 million the studio spent on the version that never made it past development stage, which as I recall was to be directed by Tim Burton, starring Nicholas Cage, with a script from Kevin Smith (or, at least, all three were attached to it at one time or another). I’m not so sure, even with Nic Cage on board, that the previous version wouldn’t have fared better, particularly had Smith been able to sneak Jay and Silent Bob in as advisors to Lex Luthor, who — with Burton as director — would’ve no doubt been played by Johnny Depp. If Burton could’ve also recruited Helena Bonham Carter to star as Lois Lane, we would’ve witnessed one helluva movie, even if it did forever taint Superman’s patriotic associations. But then again, what the hell do I know? The Devil Wears Prada came in at number two and, since I’m feeling a little gun shy about it at the moment, I’ll just mention that it made around $40 million over the five day weekend and leave it at that. And, at number three, Click continued its assault upon America’s mentally-challenged demographic, stealing their hard-earned wages received for stuffing envelopes.

This weekend introduces probably the one flick this summer that absolutely, positively cannot fail: Booty Call 2: A Pirate’s Ode to Keira Knightley’s Concavity, which — as I understand it — is to follow Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) as he attempts to convince Elizabeth Swann (Knightley) of the life-saving virtues of a treasured substance known mysteriously as “food.” Otherwise, Keanu Reeves, Winona Ryder, Woody Harrelson, and Robert Downey, Jr. will appear in Richard Linklater’s A Scanner Darkly, which is an animated film that uses rotoscoping to collectively remove the box-office poison from the featured cast. Seriously, though, it looks pretty fucking great, which makes it almost certain to disappoint. Also, as many of you will be reading this mere minutes after the Emmy nominations are announced, allow me to announce that the TV Whore will be doing his usual rundown sometime this weekend, replete with references to cocksuckers, the Bluths, and — if things go well — Mandy Moore’s ex-boyfriend.

Finally, unless assignments shift tomorrow, I’ll be taking a review break this weekend, meaning that — for a few days, at least — Pajiba will once again be a “safe space” for the ladies. And though it (fucking) pains me to break character here, for what it’s worth, I do regret that some of our female readers have, at times, felt as though my reviews were more alienating to them than our readership in general. I am oftentimes unnaturally predisposed toward the “scathing” and “bitchy” in our tagline, and inasmuch as that can tweak some of our female readership, I am respectfully contrite. Seriously. However, I offer no such apologies to Lohan freaks, Perez lovers, fraternity brethren, or Adam Sandler fans — you folks are still as dumb as igneous rock. — Dustin Rowles


Born on the Fourth of Pajiba | Adventures in Pajiba



Comments

On the second pirate movie...it's going to be awesome. Why, you ask? I say unto you, pirates. Fucking PIRATES, man, fuckin' pirates are fuckin' AWESOME.

My work here is done.

Posted by: Justin at July 6, 2006 4:53 AM

I am so disappointed Orlando Bloom is still in Hollywood. He gives bland and overprocessed muesli a bad name, and always seems lost on the screen (must...have...charisma...now) especially with lovely ham actors disguised as sexy pirates dancing around his slight, gauche body. It's not just the useless facial expressions that get my goat though; physically, he has no interest whatsoever. I adore all "ugly" actors who transcend their looks (or their dwarfness) to appear as Alpha heroes. Bloom manages a superb paradox: his nudeniable good looks just vacuum him away.

Posted by: Stage Booty at July 6, 2006 5:15 AM

I think nudeniable is a better word...shoulda stuck with it.

Posted by: WordFan at July 6, 2006 8:26 AM

Ex-boyfriend of Mandy Moore? Who knew. All I know is that Turk (or Mocha Bear, whichever you prefer), Carla, Elliott, Janitor, and Dr. Cox need some damn recognition as well.

Posted by: em at July 6, 2006 11:45 AM

As I read this the Emmy noms were announced. No "best actor" for Ian McShane???? What are those people smoking? It was bad enough that he didn't win last year, but not even a nomination. I give up. If anyone can explain this, please be my guest.

Posted by: Siobhan at July 6, 2006 12:23 PM

re.: Item 4: I know, I know... we are all supposed to get in line and avow that Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman are great actors, but
they both play the same character in the same way in almost every
movie they do, and for every "Shawshank Redemption" and "About
Schmidt", we get about ten "Bruce Almighty"'s and "Anger Managment"s. Freeman is always wise and serene and Nicholson is
always mugging and a tad deranged. These guys shovel out the same performance over and over because that's what the business requires. They're not actors... they're product.

And I agree with Siobhan- to overlook Ian McShane is such a crime.

Posted by: BitterB at July 6, 2006 1:21 PM

Not a SINGLE fucking nomination for Deadwood.

Unbefuckinglievable.

The Academy has its collective head up its collective motherfucking ass.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at July 6, 2006 1:25 PM

Daniel, as much as I want to marry you and have your babies (well, ok, you and Jeremy's - polygamy laws be damned), I loathe the whole concept of "pretty actresses are all of a sudden good actresses because they get ugly for roles." I am probably the only person on the planet who thinks so, but Charlize was actually good before Monster, as Nicole was before The Hours. I do find Halle Berry overrated, though. Anyway, Charlize has turned me off by her insistent run for old Oscar since her win, and methinks she's trying way too hard.

I'll let you off the hook this time, but you're on notice.

Dustin, I appreciate your quest to be an equal opportunity dealer of insults. If nothing else, you don't waver, and I haven't been put off of the site. I might say your fatal flaw is intellectual snobbery, but I guess it's the price you pay for being a freakin' Pajiba genius.

Posted by: Daphne at July 6, 2006 1:46 PM

I loathe the whole concept of "pretty actresses are all of a sudden good actresses because they get ugly for roles."

I agree with you wholeheartedly...but this is not Pajiba's rule--it's Hollywood's rule.

The rule for male actors is similar: if you want an Oscar nomination, play a mental defective (e.g., Dustin Hoffman, Sean Penn, Geoffrey Rush).

Posted by: Jerce at July 6, 2006 3:24 PM

Indeed, the hooplehead cocksuckers who apparently have the knowledge to determine the "best" in television have so totally missed the boat that it defies logic, much like a whore learning her numbers.

As sure as EB's palms are sweaty, the entire Emmy Awards community should have a date with Wu's swine.

Posted by: Scott at July 6, 2006 6:51 PM

Jerce, you're absolutely right. I may have miscontrued Daniel's intentions, but I got the feeling he agreed with it. Which is why I was half-jokingly chewing him out for it. You're probably right about the male rule, but it doesn't seem to be as prevalent.

Posted by: Daphne at July 6, 2006 7:37 PM

I'm so looking forwad to seeing A Scanner Darkly. A drug trip through Science Fiction in comic style. Yummy.

Posted by: Yetused at July 6, 2006 7:43 PM

Um, vampires aren't the worst thing Anne Rice has ever done. She used to write literary porn.
The Beauty series by A. N. Roquelaure involves hard BDSM, pony play, orgies and whatever else you can think of. As a matter of fact, I think she crucifies a man in one of the books but it differs because I don't think they stuck giant wooden dildos up Jesus's butt.
Good luck marketing that movie!

Posted by: Allieloopy at July 6, 2006 8:14 PM

Wow, Deadwood didn't get any emmys or emmy anys?
Could that be , because it's a filthy mess? Or because the word "c--ks----r" penetrates any type of wall construction? Or that David Milch has a diseased mind and should be institutionalized?
Maybe not. It's probably because its audience doesn't buy anything. And steals its cable.

Posted by: Curtis LeMay at July 6, 2006 9:50 PM

Eddie Olmos and Mary McDonnell fully deserved to be nominated - those two act the hell out of every scene they're in - but I've given up expecting genre shows to be nominated a long time ago (except in the effects categories, of course.. I'm as anxious as a schoolgirl before prom night to see who wins Best Single-Camera Editing for a Drama Series!)

I'm (genuinely) ecstatic, however, about my Goby's nomination.

Posted by: Lisa at July 7, 2006 10:46 AM

I just don't understand where all the whining about sexism and misogynistic undertones is coming from. I'm never offended by the reviews. I think some people are overly sensitive and whiny. Keep up with what you've been doing -- I don't always agree, but I am always entertained.

Posted by: A Girl at July 7, 2006 1:42 PM

I guess those Emmy cocksuckers were tired of handing trophies over to HBO, now that the 4 sluts are gone.

"scathing" and "bitchy" hell, that's why I read! Skinny, fat, ugly, pretty...who cares! Vapid is probably the best way to describe them. And anyone who takes up for them far that matter.

Posted by: MRod at July 7, 2006 1:50 PM

I agree with 1:42. I can't say I've ever been offended by the reviews, but maybe it's because my vagina lacks sand.

Posted by: Sarah at July 7, 2006 3:37 PM

I have been offended by some of the reviews but I don't think that makes me overly sensitive or whiny, I think that makes me an individual with a personal point of view. We're all entitled to at least that much.

Posted by: Nique at July 7, 2006 5:10 PM

The reason, "A girl" (if that is your real name), that people feel compelled to speak up about sexism and misogyny is because it is ingrained in our socialization and the language that we speak. Until it is pointed out and discussed, many aren't even aware. Remember, "one for the road" used to make sense to people just as "all women secretly want to be raped" or "Ham's curse" still make sense to some of the commenters on this site.

Posted by: LordTentacle at July 7, 2006 7:59 PM

oh, please please tell me what "Ham's curse" is. I haven't heard that one.
seriously, I am asking

Posted by: tttfffppp at July 8, 2006 8:43 PM

A Scanner Darkly is the only film I'm probably going to see this month, firstly because I loved the rotoscoping technique that Linklater used for Waking Life, secondly, I'm currently going through a Phillip K. Dick phase so A Scanner Darkly was my next choice to read, and it was a coincidence really that this film came out. I also think the actors chosen for this movie were spot-on, Woody Harrelson as a druggie can't be beat, and Keanu is the quintessential stoner of the 1990s (Bill & Ted's, Point Break) so this should be good. If not, well at least I get a headache from watching the film (like some people did when the first saw Waking Life).

Posted by: Gina at July 9, 2006 7:52 PM

It's a shame that Anne Rice went all religious, her gay vampires were fucking interesting, although the movies made from the books were pretty bad...Interview was at least entertaining, Brad Pitt was weepy but looked quite tasty...that was probably the best acting job Kirsten Dunst has EVER done...

Posted by: Gina at July 9, 2006 7:54 PM

"The Beauty series by A. N. Roquelaure involves hard BDSM, pony play, orgies and whatever else you can think of. As a matter of fact, I think she crucifies a man in one of the books but it differs because I don't think they stuck giant wooden dildos up Jesus's butt.
Good luck marketing that movie!"


Three words:

"Exit To Eden".

(shudder.)

Posted by: Vi at July 9, 2006 9:36 PM

"oh, please please tell me what "Ham's curse" is. I haven't heard that one.
seriously, I am asking

Posted by: tttfffppp at July 8, 2006 08:43 PM"




Okay, tttfffppp(if that is your real name), Since I have been oft symied by terms and colloquialisms used here, I offer this from Wikipedia:




"Curse of Ham (more properly called the curse of Canaan) refers to the curse that Noah placed upon Canaan (the son of Ham), after Ham saw Noah naked because of drunkenness in his tent.


Some Biblical scholars see the "curse of Ham" story as an early Hebrew rationalization for Israel's conquest and enslavement of the Canaanites, who were presumed to descend from Canaan.


Much more controversially, however, the "curse of Ham" has been used by some members of major Abrahamic religions to justify racism and the enslavement of people of African ancestry, who were thought to be descendants of Ham (often called Hamites), either through Canaan or his older brothers. This racist theory was common during the 18th-20th centuries, but has been largely abandoned even by the most conservative theologians since the mid-20th century."




[Note that "mid-20th" century = 1950, and that is "theologians" not "mainstream America" and the kids that grew up with that philosophy in their household, i.e., the old white men who now run the country. But that's just me.]

Posted by: LordTentacle at July 10, 2006 12:45 PM

Dustin, I hope that your contrition for a few ruffled feathers doesn't lead to a change in a style. Censoring material so that the infinite groups of America didn't get offended was the first step towards the totalitarian, book-burning society in Fahrenheit 451. If people can't take the jokes and the humor as just that and not as a serious attack on an entire sex (seriously, how knee-jerk do you have to be to think like that?) then I suggest they start their own website of scathing reviews for PC people.

Posted by: MAtt D. at July 10, 2006 1:33 PM

Hey, Matt D.,
The knee-jerk reaction comes easy. All you have to do is study a little bit and understand that language forms thought and thought is deed. Speaking up whenever you feel strong enough is the first step in changing that.

The most insidious oppression is the one we don't see or even realize is oppression. The first step is noticing it.

The people wiping out First Nations thought in all righteousness they were doing the Right thing in the Right Way and couldn't understand those few who stood up and tried to call attention to it -- with "knee-jerk" reactions.

It doesn't make a person popular, and it seems thin-skinned and petty (as does taking it personally), but it goes to the bedrock foundations of our patriarchal, misogynistic culture. Until we make changes in our thinking and socialization of children, we will continue to live in a rape culture in the good ole USA and around the world.

There will come a day when "women" or "gay" jokes and perjoratives go the way of Polack jokes and Black jokes and pejoratives, but it starts with us.

And change ain't ever easy.

Posted by: LordTentacle at July 10, 2006 6:28 PM

I have studied up, and I recognize that by and large, we shape our reality through our language. But "language forms thought and thought is deed"? That kind of black and white thinking is what leads to Free Speech Zones. What your argument hasn't acknowledged is that language always comes with context.

This site is humorously named for a piece of anatomy in the way a third grader or person who is "afraid" of dirty words might say it (a la Eliot from "Scrubs"). On its face this might seem juvenile or even misogynistic, but when contrasted with the wordy, thoughtful, and humorous reviews here, and voila, context is established. This is a funny place, and not all language found here should be taken seriously.

Context is what gives language its power. Would Hitler's ideas about the Jews have been so easily bought if Germany were not in a post-WWI depression? What's the context of the n-word these days? If you dropped it in casual conversation, how well do you think it would be recieved? Do people gush about how awesome the misogynism on Pajiba is? Is that where their new traffic comes from, people saying, "check out this site that's kind of about movies, but mostly about hating women"?

Final point about the context being important. Your chosen moniker "LordTentacle" makes me think at a knee-jerk level that you might be into tentacle hentai, a style of animated porn that often depicts brutal rape. And since the knee-jerk is easy, and working out the context is hard, I could just stop here. But your speaking out about rape culture gives me enough context to dismiss that idea, and even wonder if perhaps the name was ironically chosen. Who knows, maybe you're just a lifelong fan of Maniac Mansion. I have no context other than your comments, but again in the case of Dustin, we have more context than that - the often humorous tone of the site, his tendency to put everyone in his crosshairs, not just women, his numerous rebuttals, etc.

Posted by: MAtt D. at July 11, 2006 11:01 AM

I've been referring to Pirates 2 as "Jack and Will's Big Gay Boat Ride". Whether or not I'll pony up $10 to see it remains another question (after my best friend dismissed it as "filler in which Johnny Depp looks hot in makeup.")

As for Anne Rice's now Catholic books.. *snif* I've been waiting for a second adaptation of the books forever, and it isn't looking good. (Before you ask, I don't consider Queen of the Damned a literary adaptation.) I find it strange that she goes from writing books about gay vampires and castrati singers in love to.. well, Jesus.

Posted by: Mara at July 12, 2006 12:10 PM

alan richard bunston is a convicted sex offender
alan richard bunston is a convicted sex offender
alan richard bunston is a convicted sex offender
alan richard bunston is a convicted sex offender
alan richard bunston is a convicted sex offender
alan richard bunston is a convicted sex offender
alan richard bunston is a convicted sex offender
alan richard bunston is a convicted sex offender
alan richard bunston is a convicted sex offender

Posted by: alan bunston at May 19, 2007 12:28 AM