free counter with statistics The Bourne Pajiba | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

bourne.jpg
The Bourne Pajiba

The Weekly Trade Round-Up / The Pajiba Staff

Trade News | October 5, 2006 | Comments (34)


Item #1: It’s tough to come across good action movies, and The Bourne Identity was a really good one, right down to the shameless casting of Franka Potente in the hopes of conjuring a Run, Lola, Run vibe for some of the chase scenes (and it totally worked). It was even an educational film: I now know to always plan an escape route when traveling in a foreign city and which car to check in a parking lot if I’m hunting for a gun. The sequel, The Bourne Supremacy, passed on directing duties from Doug Liman to Paul Greengrass, who’s also heading up next year’s The Bourne Ultimatum. The film is still without a villain, though word is that an offer for the role has gone out to Gael Garcia Bernal (Y Tu Mama Tambien, Bad Education). Garcia Bernal is a talented actor, but he doesn’t seem to have any kind of physical edge whatsoever over Damon, or even the rough presence a villain requires; then again, pitting the boundless energy of Tom Cruise against the doughy charms of Philip Seymour Hoffman seemed brutally unfair until it turned out Hoffman absolutely owned Cruise. So who knows, things could work out for the best. — Daniel Carlson

Item #2: It’s been a tough couple of years for Scarlett Johansson. By my count, she’s only had three new films this year, and only nine scheduled for release in 2007, including roles as Napoleon’s love interest, a Gladiatrix (!?), and the title character in The Nanny Diaries. And now she can add another role to her résumé, Mary Queen of Scots, affording Ms. Johansson the opportunity to do what she does best: wear a bustier, pout, and bat her eyes until she is beheaded (most audience members, I suspect, won’t even notice anything is missing above the neck). For those of you who skipped Western Civ, Mary Queen of Scots was appointed as such because the male bloodline had run dry and was crowned when she was only nine months old. Henry VIII over in England attempted to arrange a marriage (by military force) between his son and Mary Queen of Scotts, ironic because Mary Boleyn (whom Johansson will also be portraying in another film) was a mistress of Henry VIII. But the real beef in Mary Stuart’s life was with Henry VIII’s successor and her cousin, Elizabeth I, who ultimately had Stuart beheaded for allegedly plotting to appear in every single motherfucking film released for the next 10 years. Fortunately for us, within the next decade the string in Ms. Johansson’s back will eventually snap, at which time the studios will simply post her plasticene, half-melted remains on eBay. — Dustin Rowles

Item #3: I never saw Fantastic Four. It seems impossible, I know; I’m a young guy, and supposedly not immune to the charms of Jessica Alba, so much so that I’d be willing to cough up $10 and two hours to watch her run around in something snug. But I just never got around to it. However, it seems that pretty much everyone else saw it, which is why the sequel, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, is already in production. This week it was announced that Andre Braugher and Beau Garrett will be joining the cast; Braugher will play a general tasked with capturing the Silver Surfer (good luck, man; it doesn’t even look like that guy has eyes), while Garrett will play the love interest of Johnny Storm (Chris Evans), aka the Human Torch. That latter bit of casting had me confused at first, wondering if director Tim Story had decided to take the film in a whole new direction and make the Human Torch an entirely different breed of flaming superhero, but it turns out that Beau Garrett is a chick. Really. She’s even been on “Entourage,” so you know she can act. — DC

Item #4: I know we covered this a while back, when Jon Favreau was tapped to direct, but now that one of the best actors in Hollywood has been attached, I think it’s worth rehashing. Indeed, Marvel Entertainment has cast Robert Downey Jr. to play Iron Man in the feature of the same name. Honestly, I don’t know a damn thing about comic books, beyond the pitiless excuses most studios offer up as a form of entertainment (I’ll exclude the Spider-Man films and a few of the Batman entries), but I know this: Robert Downey Jr. is one of the most underappreciated actors working today, and (save for The Shaggy Dog) I’m willing to give the man the benefit of the doubt, even if he’s playing a character wearing a “high-tech suit of armor” and asked to “save the world.” If anyone can convince me there is an actual human being residing beneath a veneer of iron, it is Downey, who could break the heart of Epictetus with those eyes. And speculation that Terrence Howard will come on board (presumably as War Machine, whoever the hell that is) makes this project even more appealing. Now, if we can only keep Scarlett Johansson from appearing in the film, Iron Man may actually have a shot. — DR

Item #5: Well, everyone talked about how there were too many new serial dramas coming on this fall, and it looks like we may have our first death of one of the too many. “Kidnapped,” which I’ve quite enjoyed so far, has not been doing very well in the ratings, and it’s likely to do far worse now that it’ll be up against widely hyped and much anticipated “The Nine,” which comes hot off the lead of that “Lost” show (this gets posted before last night’s numbers are out, but I’d bet dollars to donuts that “The Nine” utterly creamed “Kidnapped”). So it comes as no huge surprise to hear TV Guide’s Mike Ausiello report that the show has been told to halt production after 13 episodes. To add even more fuel to the fire, a head exec at NBC recently referred to “Kidnapped” as an example of a show that may be too complicated for viewers (not sure that I agree with this assessment) and talked of it in the dearly-departed past tense. Word has it that the show runners do have a way of concluding it, however, even with a short run, so I’m still going to stick with it until its bitter end. — Seth Freilich

Item #6: Over the weekend, the top draw at the box office was Open Season, a film we didn’t even bother covering, since we’ve had a difficult time finding critics willing to take on the damn near-weekly CGI-animation releases since the lovely Maryscott O’Connor left us (we also assume there isn’t much interest on Pajiba for reviews of non-Pixar kiddie flicks). The Guardian debuted at the second position, meaning that Ashton Kutcher somehow managed to star in the week’s top two films (take that, Justin Timberlake). Jackass Number Two fell to number three, increasing its total take over the $50 million mark. Buoyed by these box office figures, Hollywood studios have since signed Ashton Kutcher to appear in Jackass Number Three, a film that will feature the “Punk’d” star appearing in front of a white screen for 90 minutes. At number four, Jon Heder has proven that not even gifted actors with a wide range of dramatic abilities can always succeed, as School for Scoundrels pulled in with a miserable $8.6 million (take that, Justin Timberlake*).

This weekend, it looks like we’ll finally have a film that (hopefully) won’t disappoint, as Martin Scorsese arrives with The Departed. Sometimes, damn it, it’s just nice to go to the theater and see guns, cops, betrayal, and Nicholson. And sometimes a moviegoer just to wants to see Jessica Simpson flaunt her cleavage and hurt her pretty little head trying to memorize lines that no one bothers listening to,** which is why we have Employee of the Month. And then there are yet other people who prefer to see second-rate, Jessica Simpson-type bimbos have various body parts removed via a loud instrument used to cut down trees, ergo The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning. In addition, we’ll also be bringing you reviews of Shortbus, which is not about special-ed kids, and The Queen, who miraculously will not be played by Scarlett Johansson. — DR

* I have no apparent reason for taunting Mr. Timberlake — I just like the way the phrase sounds in my head.

** I don’t know any of these people.


Zip It! | Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, The



Comments

i was really excited to find out that ggb was being offered the villain part -- other than the fact that he makes me wet my panties every time i see him, he is actually a talented guy (although he DID look too much like julia roberts in "bad education").


although -- maybe the producers can give this latest bourne film a twist -- maybe feature a shower scene with ggb and matt damon? pretty boy and mama's boy, together? mmm.


talk about a bourne identity crisis.

Posted by: ina at October 5, 2006 4:32 AM

Another Fantastic Four movie? I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

Posted by: Tina at October 5, 2006 5:20 AM

Is the person scheduled to review "The Departed" even remotely familier with the Hong Kong movie trilogy it was based on?

I'm extremely interested in hearing Pajiba's take on the comparison.

Posted by: Stephen at October 5, 2006 5:52 AM

Infernal Affairs is one of the best movies to come out of HK for years. A friend and i watched it at different times and each saw a different ending. Are they doing that with The Departed?

Posted by: nevin at October 5, 2006 7:03 AM

Finally, the Pajiba Shortbus review! I am really interested in getting your guys' take on this buzzworthy movie.

Posted by: Eric at October 5, 2006 10:47 AM

"who could break the heart of Epictetus with those eyes."

I love you guys.

Posted by: Erin at October 5, 2006 11:58 AM

Another Fantastic Four movie? I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

Hee, I know. If nothing else, seeing Jessica Alba play the Director of Genetic Research or some such title such had me rolling the first time, so perhaps I can get a good laugh the 2nd time. That is, once it comes on HBO. No way in hell I'd pay to see that crap in a theater or even via Netflix.

You know, Scarlett is well on her way to being more overexposed than Paris Hilton. And that can't be a good thing, especially as I have yet to be impressed by a performance of hers.

Posted by: Daphne at October 5, 2006 12:24 PM

Jesus--the last time I saw a literary reference to Epictetus was in James Lackington's 1794 "Memoirs".

Someone either really went whole-hog at university or ravaged Wikipedia some time yesterday afternoon.

It works for me either way.

Posted by: ranylt at October 5, 2006 1:05 PM

Hey guys, long time reader, first time poster, love the site. I, for one, would like to welcome our Scarlett Johansson overlords. I also know that there are some real acting chops above that delightful busom and deliciously curvy body....excuse me. I realize that she's been in a bevy of movies this year, but name one female lead that isn't Cameron Diaz-annoying, or bereft of any talent what-so-ever (Jessica Simpson) that you would rather take on actaul roles with depth that require actual acting and not jiggling. Until Ashley Juggs returns to celluloid, I will be happy to leer and enjoy the acting prowess of one S. Johansson. It beats a vapid Jessica Alba...Sin City stripper outfit included or not.

Rock on Pajiba!

Posted by: Max at October 5, 2006 1:33 PM

"name one female lead that isn't... "

Hmm. I'll take your challenge.
Diane Lane.
Jodi Foster.
Juliette Lewis.
Kate Winslet.
Toni Collette.
Helena Bonham Carter.
Julianne Moore.
Winona Ryder.
Julia Stiles.
Parker Posey.
Carrie-Anne Moss.
Rosario Dawson
and even Jessica Biel.

There you go. A baker's dozen. And that's just from movies released in the past two months. Pajiba's servers can't support the list in its entirety of actresses better suited for most roles than the ridiculously overrated Ms. Johansson. One good movie (Lost in Translation) does not a respectable actress make.

Posted by: Mikey at October 5, 2006 2:22 PM

who the hell decided fantastic four rated a sequel?? I'm so ashamed that I contributed to the box office of that mess - it was actually almost as bad as ultraviolet. Poor Chris Evans. I thought he might go somewhere after cellular, but playing Jessica Alba's idiot brother TWICE can't be good for anyone's career...please tell me Micheal Chiklis is skipping this one o.O

Posted by: boo at October 5, 2006 2:44 PM

Mikey-

ONE good movie? C'mon man. You know, I could list a few other quality movies that S.J. has starrred in during a "young" career, but I'm sure your tastes would not juve with mine on a certain level and I'm not about to argue "what good art is" cause I don't hav ethat kind of time. It's like trying to argue that Winona Ryder has had more than one good movie. Jessica Biel? on the same level as Johansson? Is being the lead in Texa Chainsaw Massacre's remake respectable? Julia Stiles? For what, Save the Last Dance?
Personally, I could wittle your "bakers dozen" to a "half", and that's with forgiving Rasario for stariing in the LCD sequal to Clerks.
While many of these women are easy on the eyes, they don't posess the other half of my equation, being talent. Yes, I know, through history there are those who would lay waste to S.J. But I'm only backing her up in the respect that I would rather see 8 S.J. movies next year than 1 with Lindsay Lohan. Hell, I'd rather see Diane Lane or Kate Winslet as well...but there is also something cool about watching a pretty good actress mature. My argument is all about perspective. (Just for perspective: Ghost World/Girl with a pearl earring/Match Point/Love Song for Bobby Long/and Sponge Bob Square pants the Movie!!!)

Posted by: max at October 5, 2006 2:51 PM

BTW apologies for the terrible spelling and grammar above.

Posted by: max at October 5, 2006 2:54 PM

Don't go making freel all guilty and shit, man. I have happily pawned off the kiddie flick duty to various friends and relatives for MONTHS, now, and cannot TELL you how much better my life is now that I have no maudlin cliché plots, moronic and lazy pop culture references masquerading as humurous dialogue and -- well, you get the picture. So to speak.

I've been seeing ads for the DVD release of Curious George and they're giving me horrible flashbacks.

Still, the next timje I DO attend a kiddie flick, I'll jot down my thoughts in the form of a reviewish thingy and toss it your way -- bet you dollars to doughnuts you don't bother publishing whatever crapola I can muster. I mean, how many times can one come up with different ways to say... HIJINKS ENSUE... ?

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at October 5, 2006 3:19 PM

Young actresses with more talent than Scarlet Johanson (in no particular order):

Kate Winslet
Evan Rachel Wood (criminally underused)
Diane Lane (I don't give a fuck if she's 40, she could play 25 better than most 25 year olds)
Hillary Swank
Sarah Polley
Selma Blair
Ellen Page

Actresses hotter than Scarlet Johansson:
...
....
**crickets chirping**

Posted by: TK at October 5, 2006 3:28 PM

Juliette Lewis is AT LEAST as annoying as Cameron Diaz.

Posted by: Adam at October 5, 2006 4:31 PM

Sorry, but Angelina Jolie and Salma Hayek have my vote for actresses hotter than Scarlett, and they fill the bill for being hotter as well.

Posted by: em at October 5, 2006 4:38 PM

Hey guys, long time reader, first time poster, love the site. I, for one, would like to welcome our Scarlett Johansson overlords.


Hey now let's keep the slashdot memes out of here ok?

Posted by: jbrader at October 5, 2006 4:41 PM

Em, and you had to pick two of the more divisive "beauties" didn't you?

I equate their hotness factor to Christina Ricci's, sure someone might see it, but I don't.

But aside from that, I came in here because there is no comment option for the "Pajiba Love" entry.

It's Ooh Rah not Hoo Rah for the Marine Corps.

Posted by: Stephen at October 5, 2006 6:13 PM

Actresses hotter than Scarlet Johansson:
...
....
**crickets chirping**

Hee. TK, I find myself usually agreeing with you. Not so, this time. Maybe it's because I'm a woman, but I think Diane Lane and Kate Winslet best ScarJo. I would also humbly submit Rachel Weisz (to both lists), Catherine Zeta-Jones (to the latter list), and, in agreement with em, Salma Hayek.

Angelina Jolie has absolutely no figure (pencil with two erasers for breasts, anyone?), but she carries herself well, so I can understand those who find her hot.

One thing that all of those women have in common, to me at least, is that they don't 1) try too hard, as young Scar seems to do in all of her photos (i.e. "must....pucker....my lips...push up my breasts....more"), and 2) don't look like they have a team of stylists put their looks together - simple elegance, they have. ScarJo looks that way to me, especially in recent photos. The others may have a team as well, but they at least appear to make it look effortless.

Posted by: Daphne at October 5, 2006 7:14 PM

IMO, the only good thing to come from the Fantastic four sequel will be the (hopefully) inevitable silver surfer spinoff that ensues. If wolverine is worthy of a spinoff, than a guy who is silver, rides a surfboard through space at the speed of light which is controlled by him telepathically, and fights a ginormous planet-eating being known as galactus who was once his slave master is indeed worthy as well.

And, if you read comics some, you know that a silver surfer movie and sequels might eventually lead to a movie with my all-time favorite Marvel villain, Thanos, and the infinity gauntlet run-off where he gets this weapon that is so powerful that all of the worlds superheros try to take it from him, and he kills them all, each and every one. really, name a marvel comic book movie of the last 10 years and they die. Final four, spiderman, cyclops and the x-men, wolverine, hulk, everybody.

Badass. sorry for the winding rant.

Posted by: fozzy da bear at October 6, 2006 2:52 AM

Daphne, my omission of Rachel Weisz was nothing short of criminal. Seriously. I should be brought up on war crimes charges, because I love me some Weisz.

Honestly, I can have an argument all day about hot actresses, because I am a scumbag at heart. But Scarlett has a special place for me. I'm not gonna argue about Diane Lane or Kate Winslett, because I love them both, and if I was casting a movie, I'd certainly call them before I called ScarJo. But we're nitpicking now.

And I actually do find Angelina Jolie attractive, but not in any sort of classy, sophisticated way. More in a Tuesday late-shift Jersey stripper way.

Wait... that's not really that attractive, is it?

I may have had too much coffee today.

Posted by: TK at October 6, 2006 12:56 PM

Man, I just clicked on Maryscott O'Conner's link. Thank Christ she isn't on this site anymore.

Posted by: Sarcastro at October 6, 2006 4:05 PM

Um, dude. Look behind you.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at October 8, 2006 7:21 AM

"Juliette Lewis is AT LEAST as annoying as Cameron Diaz.
Posted by: Adam at October 5, 2006 04:31 PM"

She's weird for sure, but did you catch her guest spot on "My Name Is Earl"? It totally raised her in my esteem! :)

Posted by: Loob at October 8, 2006 9:25 PM

Dustin:

Where's that "Shortbus" review? I'm on tenterhooks.

Ranylt: Should be up tonight or tomorrow. We're trying to keep it out of the glut of Friday reviews.

Posted by: ranylt at October 9, 2006 9:34 AM

I'd love a discussion of actresses in which there wasn't even one mention made of their appearance. I know this is a fantasy, however. The female actresses on HBO shows - many of them not great beauties or, equally important, not cast solely for their appearance - could out-act about 75% of the actresses listed on this thread, if given the chance.

And if you're going to bring up Ghost World, please, please, please at least admit that the true talent of that film was Thora Birch (also somebody who could easily be cast in Scarlett's place, would Hollywood even once take a chance on a normal-looking actress).

Posted by: Samantha T at October 9, 2006 1:20 PM

As usual, I hear you, Samantha T.

Posted by: MaiGirl at October 9, 2006 3:30 PM

scarlett johansson is one of my favorite actresses now working.
and i can't wait to see her play mary boleyn.
but yeah, we do need to see more of thora birch. she was really good in ghost world, and i LOVED her in american beauty.

Posted by: cassie at October 12, 2006 6:36 PM

The female actresses on HBO shows - many of them not great beauties or, equally important, not cast solely for their appearance - could out-act about 75% of the actresses listed on this thread, if given the chance.
Maybe so, but comparing TV and movie actresses seem to be apples and oranges to me. For one thing, TV actresses have a lot more opportunity to show depth and breadth of ability because of character arcs in a season. Movie actresses have a lot shorter time to convey those things to the viewer. Also, TV writers seem to do a better job writing female characters than movie writers, IMO. Therefore, many times the (movie)actress doesn't always have a lot to work with.

Posted by: Daphne at October 13, 2006 8:08 PM

"and make the Human Torch an entirely different breed of flaming superhero,"

This line had me in stitches. I, too, was misled into thinking that "Beau" was a man. I was very suprised that a hollywood studio would put a homosexual relationship on an otherwise heterocentric genre, but in actuality Beau is a willowy and gaunt looking model, a very close look a like to Kate Moss. Dang! I was so looking forward to a "Brokeback themed superhero movie" I would've paid money to see it, or maybe not.

Posted by: carrie at October 15, 2006 7:45 PM

Thanks 123 adware

Posted by: Mike Stranger at March 16, 2007 4:55 PM

Thanks 123 adware

Posted by: Mike Stranger at March 17, 2007 1:34 AM

Thanks 123 adware

Posted by: Mike Stranger at March 17, 2007 1:34 AM