web
counter
 

The 10 Best and Worst Reviewed Movies of 2010

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (27)



toy-story-by-pixar-thumb.jpg

Rotten Tomatoes handed out its Golden Tomatoes yesterday, the ten best and worst reviewed movies of the year. I offer them here for your approval/disapproval. I will point out that just because, say, 95 percent of critics liked a movie doesn’t necessarily mean they liked it a lot, which is something of a glitch in the RT system. Take, for instance, Unstoppable. A full 86 percent of critics “liked” Unstoppable (as did I), but I doubt many of them liked it with 86 percent enthusiasm (I liked it more than I didn’t, which is to say, around 60 percent enthusiasm). It also means that incredibly well made films that divide critics would not appear here. It’s a consensus thing (which also explains why Let Me In, a good but not great movie, is in the top ten).


Best Reviewed Wide Releases

1. Toy Story 3 (99 percent)

2. How to Train a Dragon (98 percent)

3. The Social Network (97 percent)

4. True Grit (95 percent)

5. The King’s Speech (95 percent)

6. The Town (94 percent)

7. The Kids Are All Right (94 percent)

* 8. Let Me In (89 percent)

9. The Fighter (90 percent)

10. The Black Swan (88 percent)

* (I don’t know why an 89 percent movie is rated higher than a 90 percent movie, unless additional reviews came in after the rankings were set)

Here’s the top ten among limited release movies.

1. The Last Train Home (100 percent)

2. Marwencol (100 percent)

3. Waste Land (100 percent)

4. A Prophet (97 percent)

5. Restrepo (96 percent)

6. Exit Through the Gift Shop (98 percent)

7. Inside Job (97 percent)

8. Ajami (97 percent)

9. Animal Kingdom (96 percent)

10. A Film Unfinished (96 percent)

Finally, here are the ten worst reviewed movies of the year. I reviewed five of these, and I cannot disagree with their placement.

1. The Movie That Will Not Be Named

2.The Last Airbender

3. The Bounty Hunter

4. Furry Vengeance

5. My Soul to Take

6. Grown Ups

7. Little Fockers

8.Marmaduke

9. Saw 3D

10. Killers

There are several other categories that you may be interested in, and you can check those out by clicking on this link.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



We've Done This To Ourselves! | 10 Dipsh*ts Movie Characters Who Brought Their Fates Upon Themselves | The 10 Best Instances of Female Cinematic De-Prettification | Presenting the New Lisbeth Salander









Comments

Sorry, which one is this again (I am asking seriously) - The Movie That Will Not Be Named

Posted by: Brian at January 12, 2011 3:00 PM

Brian - Try to imagine something worse than a Twilight movie.

Posted by: Simon at January 12, 2011 3:03 PM

But that is also, y'know, based on a Twilight movie.

Posted by: RobP at January 12, 2011 3:12 PM

It goes without saying that the ten worst aren't necessarily the ten worst because a critic not digging a film isn't the same as a critic thinking a film is horrible. I don't remember, for example, wide-spread vitriol over My Soul To Take, just disappointment. That certainly puts it in a different class that shitfest Saw 3D: Turn Off the Dark.

Posted by: Robert at January 12, 2011 3:20 PM

I will not, only, that just because, say, 95 percent of critics liked a movie doesn’t necessarily mean they liked it a lot, which is something of a glitch in the RT system.

Is it that I'm tired from shovelling and it being day's end, or does this sentence not resemble actual English?

Posted by: KatSings at January 12, 2011 3:22 PM

Simon - I'm kind of happy that I can't. I do keep seeing an image of Katherine Heigel though

Posted by: Brian at January 12, 2011 3:33 PM

I would like to point out that Daniel gave 3 of the best reviewed movies of the year Toy Story 3, True Grit, and Black Swan bad reviews. Which bugs because he LOOKS for things to hate. All three of those reviews were reviews that I WAITED for pajiba to review. I had so looked forward to seeing what Dustin, Prisco, Bedhead had to say about them, but alas, I get here and Daniel is crapping all over them.

Honestly, no offense Daniel, but why do you even do this? Do you even like movies?

Posted by: Mebe at January 12, 2011 4:16 PM

I am happy to say I have not seen any of the movies on the ten worst reviewed list. Because I have this thing where I do not go see movies where based on the previews and/or cast, I know they are going to be bad. This makes me feel even better about my decisions.

Posted by: DominaNefret at January 12, 2011 4:21 PM

Sorry, which one is this again (I am asking seriously) - The Movie That Will Not Be Named

The first rule of The Movie That Shall Not Be Named is that it shall not be named.
The second rule of The Movie That Shall Not Be Named is that YOU WILL BUY ME CHOCOLATE OR I WILL EAT YOUR BABIES! HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Posted by: superasente at January 12, 2011 4:32 PM

I would like to point out that Daniel gave 3 of the best reviewed movies of the year Toy Story 3, True Grit, and Black Swan bad reviews. Which bugs because he LOOKS for things to hate.

I'm not going to go back and read those reviews because I am lazy, but I don't remember those reviews as bad so much as I remember Carlson discussing the weaker parts of the movies in an intelligent way, rather than just fawning all over them because every-damn-body loves fucking "Toy Story 3" (I haven't seen it, so I have no opinion). To me, this points to a great love and respect for movies.

Posted by: Lee at January 12, 2011 4:37 PM

Also, I'm with Brian. I got nothin' on what that movie is, except it has something to do with vampires and sucks.

Posted by: Lee at January 12, 2011 4:39 PM

Oooohhhh...Pun not intended. At all.

Posted by: Lee at January 12, 2011 4:41 PM

I just watched 'Killers' on cable over the weekend. I'm not sure how it ends, because part-way through the film I believe my brain imploded. If there had been any energy left in my body I believe I would have started crying.

I've seen a lot of films I never want to see again. This one made me never want to see ANY film ever again.

This is the Nickelback of movies is what this is.

Posted by: 93curr at January 12, 2011 4:42 PM

I would like to point out that Daniel gave 3 of the best reviewed movies of the year Toy Story 3, True Grit, and Black Swan bad reviews. Which bugs because he LOOKS for things to hate.

I'm not going to go back and read those reviews because I am lazy, but I don't remember those reviews as bad so much as I remember Carlson discussing the weaker parts of the movies in an intelligent way, rather than just fawning all over them because every-damn-body loves fucking "Toy Story 3" (I haven't seen it, so I have no opinion). To me, this points to a great love and respect for movies.
Posted by: Lee

I'm about halfway between you and Mebe. When I read a Daniel Carlson review I expect it to be negative, which is kind of sad. What I tend to see in his reviews are general statements about the movie's quality then specific statements about how it fails. This can be interesting at times, sure.

And other reviewers on this site don't necessarily fawn all over movies; you've set up a weak comparison.

Posted by: Brenton at January 12, 2011 5:09 PM

Lee: My problem with Daniel's reviews are that he is overly critical. He's obscenely nit-picky and I think he does it just to be contrary. It's always what he didn't like about a movie, and it's always a buzz-kill when he reviews a movie I've been looking forward to.

Is he a good writer with a decent vocabulary? Yes, he is. If he wants to write his own stuff, I fully support his endeavor. He is a good writer, but I don't like his reviews, no matter how well written.

If you don't enjoy good movies, why be a reviewer at all?

Posted by: Mebe at January 12, 2011 5:12 PM

@Mebe Hear Hear!

@Lee You should be ashamed for not seeing Toy Story 3. It's the best reviewed trilogy of all time for a reason... because they are awesome!

Posted by: Malware at January 12, 2011 5:16 PM

"To me, this points to a great love and respect for movies."

No, it doesn't, it doesn't mean that at all. If you can't have respect for the good things about movies and are unaware of how movies make people feel then you should not be in this profession.

I would like to re-iterate that I think he really is a talented and intelligent writer, I just don't like his reviews.

Posted by: Mebe at January 12, 2011 5:24 PM

and the award for repeating yourself goes to me! Score!

Posted by: Mebe at January 12, 2011 5:27 PM

How to Train YOUR Dragon. Not A Dragon. Otherwise they would have to change the porno-version to How to Train A Cock.

Posted by: Vick at January 12, 2011 7:06 PM

RT's limitation on reviews makes me double check metacritic.

Posted by: Matt at January 12, 2011 8:37 PM

I still don't understand why some people consider a not-100%-glowing review of a movie they liked to be a personal affront. Sheesh.

Posted by: meaux at January 12, 2011 10:44 PM

Please, he titled the Toy Story 3 review "Played Out." He was trying to be incendiary with that title.


Posted by: Mebe at January 13, 2011 1:12 AM

I don't think Daniel is negative. Maybe because he disagreed with your opinions of a couple of key films you felt it more strongly.

He is my favourite reviewer on the site; keep up the good work, buddy.

Posted by: Peter G at January 13, 2011 1:29 AM

Don't try to ignore Vampires Suck. Since garnering the dubious honor of being the worst reviewed movie, Vampires Suck has now peak the interest of people wanting to know just how bad it truly is. They will rent Vampires Sucks and then forget what their names are because all brain cells will turn to dust just like the vampires do in Vampires Suck.

Posted by: Dingle Berry at January 13, 2011 7:54 AM

Now, you should do a comparison of how both lists did at the box office. I know Toy Story did amazingly well, but what about the others?

Posted by: Figgy at January 13, 2011 9:47 AM

*sigh* I can't help it:

It's not How to Train A Dragon, it's How to Train YOUR Dragon, as Vick pointed out.

It's not THE Black Swan, it's Black Swan.

You need a good copy editor. Or to read your posts at least twice.

Posted by: Carlos at January 13, 2011 1:50 PM

Why was that Dragon movie so highly rated? It was a dreadful cliche from start to finish. And did no one notice a bunch of Scandinavian vikings with SCOTTISH accents?

Posted by: Fuckchop at January 13, 2011 7:14 PM