web
counter
 

Spider-Man 4: Dead. Done. Buried. Nada.

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (30)



spider-man3.jpg

The headline and subheadline tell you all you really need to know about this story — according to Nikki Finke, Sony Pictures has completely scrapped Spider-Man 4. No Malkovich. No Raimi. No Maguire. And no Dunst (small favors, I suppose). Sam Raimi couldn’t meet the release date, so he apparently decided to leave the project. Or Sony pushed him out. Who knows?

Instead, Sony will now focus their attention on a Spider-Man reboot franchise, working off of a script from Jamie Vanderbilt (Zodiac).

What does it all mean? Beats me. I’m actually kind of sad about it — not really because there won’t be a Spider-Man 4, but because the last one will be Raimi’s last. He’s a great director; Spider-Man 3 was a terrible movie; and I hate to see him go out like that.

And so a new round of casting (and now directing) rumors begins.

More as it develops, I’m sure.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



MTV to Remake "Dawn of the Dead" as a TV Series | Pajiba After Dark 1/11/10









Comments

Where's all the geek-hate now, Dustin?

Congrats to Sony for killing the franchise for the time being. I agree that Spiderman 3 shouldn't be the last movie made, goddamn what a piece of shit that was. If I wanted to see something steaming like that, I could go to a friend of mine's barn.

Posted by: bignick at January 11, 2010 5:41 PM

Goddammit at least be consistent, Rowles!

With the punctuation, I mean.

I liked the story Spider-Man 3 wanted to tell, so I couldn't give it too much stick. Same with "The Phantom Menace". Execution was flawed, but I liked the meaning.

Posted by: Jay at January 11, 2010 5:43 PM

Director: Zack Snyder
Peter Parker: Michael Angarano
MJ: Isla Fisher?

= PROFIT

Posted by: Brian at January 11, 2010 5:47 PM

Why do we need a "reboot" for a franchise that already gave us three movies and began less than eight years ago? This is even more egregious than the Hulk. I guess "franchise" truly is the operative word. I hope this doesn't mean that we have to watch yet another boring superhero origin story with all the same beats yet again and that "reboot" really just means "recasting." If they have to do this, ditch the narrative baggage and just give us an adult Spiderman at some point down the road. Drop Mary Jane as a character and give us the Black Cat as a romantic interest or something else completely divergent.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 11, 2010 5:52 PM

I believe the answer would be: integrate him into the growing Marvel Universe. Five, six years or so you could make Civil War!

Posted by: Jay at January 11, 2010 5:55 PM

Ugh, thank Godtopus.

Now let's look for a new Peter Parker and Mary Jane. STAT.

Posted by: figgy at January 11, 2010 5:57 PM

I'm with figz on this one.

Which reminds me: I saw Little Women for the first time this weekend, and what the heck happened to Kirsten Dunst??? She was so adorable!! And a decent child actress? And now she's nothing more than an unnecessarily melodramatic line delivery system and some wicked incisors.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 11, 2010 6:27 PM

Dustin, this may be the best news I've heard all day. Also, Malkovich.

Posted by: Peanut_Butter_And_James at January 11, 2010 6:30 PM

I stand by my original statement in the previous thread about what should be done for the next Spider-Man movie.

It doesn't matter if the parts of director and lead actor have changed hands, the important thing is to be sure the story is done right to begin with- heaven knows they have enough material to go by.

Posted by: bleujayone at January 11, 2010 6:35 PM

Heh, geeee maybe they should bring in Jar Jar and his Transformers writing team.

You know, bring in some new blood, get rid of all that comic book continuity that just stifles creativity.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 11, 2010 6:39 PM

How could they even reboot it?
I mean, they cant go darker, Spiderman (IMO, comic book fans) is not like say, Batman or the X-Men which can and have succesfully be rejiggered for older, smarter audiences...its...sort of goofy...

Ah well, there will be a new Spidey I guess. Tobey nailed the geek. But that was it. He was a nerd and didnt fly as an uber buff super hero.

Posted by: Nadine at January 11, 2010 6:39 PM

I am not much of a Maguire fan, but he made a perfect Peter Parker. He was probably starting to get a little old for the part though.

Posted by: EricD at January 11, 2010 6:42 PM

Whooooooooooooooooooo! Now, cast Christian Bale. We need more growl.

Posted by: admin at January 11, 2010 6:45 PM

Perfect casting opportunity for Michael Cera, he can play Peter Parker as Micheal Cera and Spiderman as....*ahem* Francois.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 11, 2010 6:51 PM

MOTHERFUCKER!

Posted by: superasente at January 11, 2010 7:31 PM

Good. Now they can cast Bryce Dallas Howard as Mary Jane as it should have been from the start. She was a better Mary Jane for her 10 minutes of screentime in Spiderman 3 than Kirsten Dunst was in three films and she wasn't even playing Mary Jane. And they can get a Spiderman who doesn't look like he's hiding a basketball under his shirt as soon as filming is done. I can guarantee you there are no shortage of attractive dimunitive theater actors who could take on the role and kill it.

Posted by: Robert at January 11, 2010 7:51 PM

Naw. I'm not down with a re-boot so fucking fast. How many years has it been since the first movie? Fuck them and their franchise.

Posted by: Candy at January 11, 2010 8:58 PM

Jay said "I believe the answer would be: integrate him into the growing Marvel Universe. Five, six years or so you could make Civil War!". Yes, yes, yes, and more yes.

Posted by: Kris at January 11, 2010 9:10 PM

I'm puttin' this out there:

The new Spidey should be black.

/The Secret

Posted by: welldressed at January 11, 2010 9:14 PM

Add me to the "ditto Figgy" list. I could not accept McGuire or Dunst.

Posted by: Cindy at January 11, 2010 9:18 PM

Kris and Jay: While I'm all about Spidey teaming up with Iron Man and the Avengers someday, I think we should embrace the strong likelihood that this will never happen. Because while Marvel owns the movie rights to the later characters, the do not own the movie rights to Spider-Man. They also don't own the movie rights to the Fantastic Four or the X-Men. Or Daredevil.

Ghost Rider maybe?

Anyway, I'm not going to hold my breath and I suggest the same to both of you -- tragic though it may be.

Posted by: superasente at January 11, 2010 9:21 PM

I'm with Darth Corleone on this one. Why a reboot so soon? Do they think it will really pull in a ton of cash? "Spider-Man" made a gajillion dollars when it came out, and for a lot of people, that movie is still very fresh in their minds (it's only been seven and a half years!). By the time this reboot comes out, it will have been exactly 10 years since "Spider-Man" was released. Won't most people just say, "Screw it, I've already seen this, why shell out $10?" I can't see it being hugely popular unless they drastically alter some things, like a previous poster said - changing Spider-Man's race, or maybe setting it in one of Marvel's alternate timelines.

Have we really become such a short-term memory society where we have to reboot stuff that's more than 10 seconds old?

Posted by: luthien26 at January 11, 2010 9:26 PM

I also agree with Figgy. I might actually be interested in another Spider-Man with some different leads.

Posted by: lainiefig at January 11, 2010 9:59 PM

I hope they go with an adult spiderman instead of a reboot. Do the studios think anyone will sit through an origin story again so soon? and peter parker being picked on in highschool is just bankrupt for drama or comic relief.

I really liked spiderman 3, i have no idea what people hate so much about it.

be a shame if the marvel comic movie empire starts to topple; i was just getting used to having fun comic movies at regular intervals. but then came ghost rider, and xmen 3, and wolverine and it seemed like a mini-era was ending. though i liked iron man well enough and loved the Hulk reboot.

Posted by: idleprimate at January 11, 2010 11:40 PM

DMtH spoilers

Dear Sam,
Now that you have come to your senses and jettisoned from the rapidly deteriorating Spider-man franchise it's time to turn your focus toward more meaningful projects. Namely to "Drag Her out of Hell". There was a reason Justin Long is staring at the button so intently in his hand at the end, right? So let's use that as a jumping off point. Out of his mind with grief, he takes the button to Ram, after all it was the focal point of the curse, and together they devise a horribly risky, never tried before plan to rescue Christine from the Inferno. Add in some Deadites, buckets and buckets of goo, and turn KNB loose to create some of the most twisted creations seen on screen.

Make this happen and I won't even sue you for stealing my idea, such will be my gratitude.

Your friend,
TylerDFC

Posted by: TylerDFC at January 12, 2010 6:19 AM

They definitely goofed when they killed off Green Goblin & Doc Ock...those fuckers are franchise players. A reboot means more of these 2 villains, plus who knows what else, but yeah, this reboot movie will probably make Spider-Man 3 look like Spider-Man 2. Look forward to a Spider-Man movie for the High School Musical set.

Posted by: the new transported man at January 12, 2010 9:06 AM

Will this, in ANY WAY, taint my perfect image of Zodiac?

If it will, I DONWANNAIT MAMA!

Posted by: Miss D at January 12, 2010 9:21 AM

I'm still down with Gyllenhaal being Spidey, I always thought he was a better choice than Maguire.

Emo Spidey 4eva.

Posted by: Mebe at January 12, 2010 10:19 AM

I just came to see someone offended by the inevitable joke Michael Cera casting. Not disappointed.

Casting Call Comment Diversion?

Posted by: AmbroseKalifornia at January 12, 2010 12:27 PM

I actually REALLY liked Spider-Man 3. The main reasons people didn't like it is because of the issues with forgiveness, hardly any time for Venom, Peter Parker's sad, emotional responses to Mary Jane breaking up with him (which probably reminds people of their personal experiences in life), and that Pete was acting very confident/bold with the alien black symbiote suit's negative affect on him (which I think the dancing down the street and pointing at the women was quite hilarious and added humor that the movie needed with all of the darkness). Personally to me, forgiveness is a good thing; Peter looks and was a lot cooler in the black suit than Eddie Brock was in the comics; Pete's sad responses to MJ pushing him away was expected because of his growing arrogance with fame as Spidey and at the same time Harry would hurt him and even her, if she didn't comply; and I think that people making fun of Pete acting "emo" dancing down the street and in the club doesn't make sense to me (that's how you guys would probably act with evil suit on). Last thing: I never did like Venom too much because I don't like him being evil and I don't like him being so hulkish looking (I'd rather him look cut like Bruce Lee which Spidey is). So... when it comes right down to it Spider-Man 3 wasn't a terrible movie. And look what happens at the end: Mary Jane thinks that she doesn't have anyone left because of Harry's passing and she doesn't trust Pete, BUT when Pete shows up in the club- they hug and make up, knowing their weaknesses and everything turns out good. If Pete hadn't gone to the club with the black suit on, Venom wasn't "born", and Mary Jane found out about that Pete used the black suit to hurt the somewhat evil Harry; because MJ and Pete DO care about each other, eventually she would have gotten back with him no matter what, would tell Pete that Harry used her, and she would know that it's the black suit's fault. Come on people, Spidey 3 really wasn't that bad; the story was written the way it was to have a lot of unexpected drama, suspense, and darkness, so that it would attract people's attention instead of there being a boring, dull film. The only thing that I didn't like about the movie was that Pete wasn't shown swinging, wall-crawling, and fighting criminals with the black suit on which I was highly expecting before the movie came out.

Posted by: Chris K. at February 19, 2010 6:37 PM