free counter with statistics Sky Captain and the World of Pajiba | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

angelina-jolie-viper-06.jpg

Sky Captain and the World of Pajiba!

The Daily Trade Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | August 21, 2007 | Comments (60)


We’re going to start today with Wanted, if only because a few images from filming have leaked out onto the gossip-sphere and the purveyors are expectedly frothing like rabid Pitt bulls (oh Jesus, that’s the worst pun in the history of puns; I’m so sorry) over the idea of Angelina Jolie wearing a dress on the hood of a sports car while carrying automatic weapons. It’s pretty much the reason that Titties & Ammo is the top-selling magazine in America — because most men love the idea of a beautiful woman mowing them down in a machine-gun spray of bullets while simultaneously fucking a car. Here’s a sample image (from Just Jared):

angelina-jolie-viper-06.jpg

Clearly, plot, director, co-stars, and script are irrelevant to the success of the film; the studio has seemingly done all the marketing necessary to guarantee a $100 million opening. Indeed, after the inevitable success of Wanted, we can all look forward to a series of progressively more aggressive car-porn flicks, involving women fornicating with weaponry while operating heavy machinery up and until we’re given Anal Tractor: Plowing the Fields and the fad eventually dies.

For the record, however, Wanted also stars James McAvoy, who will be sporadically filling in for the car as the love interest, and Morgan Freeman, who will no doubt provide the voice of moral reason, warning of the dangers of auto-eroticism. No, actually, it involves some assassins (Jolie is of the super-villain variety, while McAvoy is being trained by Freeman to be another) and good ole Timur Bekmambetov will be directing from a script by Michael Brandt (2 Fast 2 Furious) and Dean Georgaris (Paycheck and Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life). And, as though it weren’t obvious, Wanted is based on a comic book; in fact, Wanted is said to be the Watchmen for super-villains and, I suspect for quite a few folks, that’s even more arousing than the thought of Jolie making it with a Viper.

Elsewhere, if you’ve ever considered what the dullest, blandest, coldest, dead-eyeist romantic couple imaginable might look like, just go check out The Readers when it eventually hits theaters, because it will feature a Ralph Fiennes’ character who is awakened erotically by another woman, here played by Nicole Kidman. The film, based upon German writer Bernhard Schlink’s novel, will be directed by Stephen Daldry and produced by Anthony Minghella, so basically what has been assembled is the team and principal cast behind The Hours and The English Patient. Dear God, shoot me dead. In the head. With one of Angelina Jolie’s automatic weapons, because there is almost nothing I’d rather not see than another one of these dreary literary dramas that exist, not to entertain, but to amass Oscar nominations for suffocating, nondescript performances from characters who bitch about trifling indignities and die for passionless love. Oh, for fuck’s sake — wouldn’t it be cool to see Fiennes and Kidman star in a bad Farrelly Brothers movie instead of taking themselves so goddamn seriously all the time. I think I’d actually pay $10 to see Kidman pass gas and Fiennes get his scrote caught in a zipper.

Whatever. Anyway, for those of you not turned on by Jolie making mad passionate love to environmentally toxic sports car, then how about Nathan Fillion in a movie about … truck drivers? Actually, about a female truck driver (Michelle Monaghan, presumably sans gun), whose life of freedom is lost when the father (Benjamin Bratt) is hospitalized. Trucker comes from a script written by James Mottern, who gave us the television movie, Car Crash Tech. It doesn’t sound like a terribly interesting pic, nor are there any details on what role Fillion will play (or the film’s other star, Arkansas’ own Joey Lauren Adams), but I do know how y’all love your Fillion news and I’m aimin’ to o-blige.

Moving on: In casting news, the leads for He’s Just Not That Into You have been amassed, and they include the good: Bradley Whitford, Justin Long, Kevin Connelly, and Ginnifer Goodwin; the bad: Jennifer Connelly, Jennifer Aniston, Drew Barrymore; and the ugly: Scarlett Johansson. If you don’t recall, He’s Just Not That Into You was a ridiculously popular novel that Dan referred to as “reductive and mildly insulting gender-based pop-lit”; the movie will follow several different storylines that deal with the “challenges of reading or misreading human behavior.” So, what? It’s an autism comedy?

Finally, in one other casting tidbit, it does appear that Rose McGowan will play the lead in Barbarella, directed by Robert Rodriquez. Man, I don’t care. I just don’t care.

Out on DVD this week, check it out: The Ex, Broken English, The Lives of Others, and Redline. In other words, little to get excited about.

Finally, in the trailer watch, it’s hard not to get excited about a Jake Kasdan (Zero Effect) directed flick co-written by Kasdan and Judd Apatow, starring John C. Reilly, Jenna Fischer, Kristen Wiig, and freakin’ Jack White as Elvis Presley. It’s an awesome collection of talent, but why does the trailer for Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story put me off ever-so-slightly? It just seems like they tried a little too hard, and the absurdist flourishes are a little too absurd. I dunno. It just doesn’t do it for me.

… and then right before publication, my world flipped when I saw this trailer. We’ve been gently poking fun at the idea behind the Bob Dylan biopic, I’m Not There for a while now. I mean, I can see Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, and maybe even Richard Gere playing Dylan, as each will be doing in the film. But Cate Blanchett? Preposterous, right? And then, 60 seconds and a few guitar strums from “Like a Rolling Stone,” and I’m not only convinced, I’m about to jump out of my skin excited. So, sit back, relax, and let your curls toe, boys and girls. Here’s the trailer.


High School Musical 2 | Pajiba Love 08/21/07



Comments

Okay, I'll admit, Dylan is an important pop musician. Hell, without him, The Beatles would've fizzled out in '65, but "the greatest artist of our time?" I DON'T THINK SO!


Go ahead, fling your stones at me. I don't care. Dylan's influential, sure, but he's highly overrated as well.

(Ducks for cover...)

Posted by: Armando at August 21, 2007 11:40 AM

Why haven't you guys made some sort of big deal about Kristen Bell being cast in Heroes next season? I mean, come on!

Posted by: Eric at August 21, 2007 11:49 AM

Yeah, what Eric said. I about jumped out of my chair when I read that I got to see more of Ms. Bell on TV AND on one of my other very favorite shows.

Posted by: lizzy at August 21, 2007 12:03 PM

For me, Dylan is one of those people who is more legend than anything else. Like The Beatles, The Doors, The Who, Led Zeppelin, etc., he inspires enough people to heights of rabid fanaticism that he probably gets more credit than he deserves. And while I like Dylan, and all those bands above, and recognize that they were(/are) talented and groundbreaking, I tend to think that they're overrated - mostly because it'd be impossible for anyone to be as inhumanly awesome as the diehard fans proclaim them to be.

Posted by: Geetch at August 21, 2007 12:04 PM

Apparently, this Armando hasn't verbally gotten the hell beat out of him enough, unlike the Armando of DailyKos and Scourge of the Liberal Internets.

But he'd write such similar provocative garbage.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at August 21, 2007 12:07 PM

Wait a minute, I'm confused about something: Benjamin Bratt is playing the FATHER of Michelle Monaghan in that film? Wow, that'll be a decent makeup job.

Ralph Fiennes and Nicole Kidman? Zzzz. But I would have to disagree with the dead eyes comment. That honor would go to Jonathan Rhys-Meyers. A decent actor, but my God, looking at his eyes just frightens me.

Is it wrong that I'm pissed for not having seen Brangelina while they were here in Chicago? The fan-girl in me is irate.

Posted by: Brie at August 21, 2007 12:14 PM

Wait, wait, Dustin! It's Christian BALE! Yahtzee!

Yikes. No idea what my mind was thinking when I typed that. Noted and corrected. As for Kristen Bell and "Heroes," movie news is on Tuesday and Thursday, and Seth covers TV on Wednesday. I'm absolutely positive he'll hit that note. Also, I suspect many have the same opinion of Dylan as I did of Citizen Kane. The difference here, of course, is that Dylan was every bit as good as the hype portends. Armando, bite your tongue. -- DR

Posted by: Kolby at August 21, 2007 12:15 PM

I was also expecting some comment about Kristen Bell in Heroes...anyway, the trailers seem good, tough the Bob Dylan one was sort of confusing (I'll be waiting for that movie)
Also, to Armando, I think Dylan is more famous/relevant in the US, his name doesn't ring many bells among people in other countries (tough I think he is a great artis).

Posted by: Radlum at August 21, 2007 12:15 PM

cate blanchett?

't the fuck?

i suppose i'm too...oh hell - what, really, is the point?

and how is six different people playing dylan any different than jack black as elvis? it's just a gimmick, right?

Posted by: matty blue at August 21, 2007 12:18 PM

You can get excited about Jack Black playing the same fucking role once more but list Jennifer Connelly (and Aniston) in the "bad" section? Come oooon, I love Pajiba but I have to call shenanigans this time.

That's Jack White I'm excited about. Jack Black would belong in the bad, along with post Dark Water Jennifer Connelly -- DR.

Posted by: Menelaos at August 21, 2007 12:20 PM

white. jack WHITE. don't know where that came from.

brings up an interesting conversation, though. hmm.

Posted by: matty blue at August 21, 2007 12:23 PM

I don't think it's possible to overrate Dylan's '63-'66 run.

Posted by: Bullfrog at August 21, 2007 12:23 PM

Have they left any Hollywood G/Jennifers out of the cast of He's Just Not That Into You? It sounds delightfully forgettable.

Posted by: Girl With Curious Hair at August 21, 2007 12:24 PM

Wasn't the last time Kidman stopped taking herself seriously, we got Bewitched? Are you sure you want to chance that again?

Wanted was pretty good, but that was mostly because I absolutely hated the characters. Weird sounding, yes, but I think it worked with a book filled with just supervillains. If they put the comic ending in the film, I can't wait for the comments about it.

Posted by: Vermillion at August 21, 2007 12:25 PM

...When I first looked at that Angelina still, I literally thought it was a picture of a doll posed on a toy car. She is seriously human Barbie.

He's Just Not That Into You isn't a novel; it's a dating advice book. Based on an episode of Sex and the City. It is basically an avatar for all things wrong with North American pop culture that this is a movie.

I love that Cate Blanchett is actually the most convincing-looking Dylan. SO psyched.

Posted by: Brenda at August 21, 2007 12:34 PM

OK, Apatow spoofing Walk the Line? Good. Apatow re conceiving the Beatles as Chris Parnell (Paul), Paul Rudd (John), Justin Long (George) and Schwartzman (Ringo)? GENIUS. I will watch it just for that scene.

Posted by: redbeaniegirl at August 21, 2007 12:41 PM

Jennifer Connelly gets listed under Bad and Bradley Whitford gets listed under Good?!?! I'll have some of whatever Dustin's smoking right now.

Posted by: Jeff at August 21, 2007 12:45 PM

Walk Hard just looks so... unambitious. Does the world need another "Top Secret!"?

Posted by: Godard at August 21, 2007 12:48 PM

God, I am just so freakin' tired of Angelina Jolie. There is not a single thing about her that interests me.

Posted by: Todd at August 21, 2007 1:00 PM

Oh, man! One of the extra clips shows Blancett as Dylan talking to Allen Ginsburg, who drives up beside her. Ginsburg is totally played by David Cross. I love him. Awesomness!

Posted by: <3alec at August 21, 2007 1:15 PM

"Apparently, this Armando hasn't verbally gotten the hell beat out of him enough, unlike the Armando of DailyKos and Scourge of the Liberal Internets.

But he'd write such similar provocative garbage.
""

Glad to hear I have namesakes out there pissing people like you off, idiotsynchronic. Hasta la victoria siempre! :-P

Posted by: Armando at August 21, 2007 1:16 PM

"For me, Dylan is one of those people who is more legend than anything else. Like The Beatles, The Doors, The Who, Led Zeppelin, etc., he inspires enough people to heights of rabid fanaticism that he probably gets more credit than he deserves. And while I like Dylan, and all those bands above, and recognize that they were(/are) talented and groundbreaking, I tend to think that they're overrated - mostly because it'd be impossible for anyone to be as inhumanly awesome as the diehard fans proclaim them to be."

Geetch, that's sort of my point (although, granted, in a far less provocative manner). I do like all of the bands you mention (I'm even teaching a course on The Beatles this year), but, like with any artist in any medium, with great success comes great mythmaking, which often makes us see our favorite artists through rose colored glasses.

Anyway, I'm just glad to do my part to get everybody riled up!

Posted by: Armando at August 21, 2007 1:18 PM

"I don't think it's possible to overrate Dylan's '63-'66 run. "

Perhaps. But greatest ARTIST of our TIME? There are other arts than music!

(Okay, I'm making a much bigger deal about this than it really is, but I don't want to be a drive-by poster since I'm apparently being so provocative.)

Posted by: Armando at August 21, 2007 1:21 PM

If Hollywood thinks that people are gonna buy into the idea of an emaciated/non-hot/crackwhore looking Angelina Jolie they are in for a harsh 100 million budget flushed down the drain awakening.

Ralph Fiennes and Nichole Kidman? in a pseudo-erotic flick? I can hear penises going flaccid and vaginas drying as I type this.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 21, 2007 1:34 PM

Bob Dylan, who more than any other artist this side of Nijinsky needs to be ingested with a huge grain of salt, now is the subject of a movie in which he is played by multiple young and attractive movie stars, based on the premise that he's the greatest living musician/ artist/poet/rabbi rodeo rider/AC/DC/harmonica player on earth.

I'm supposed to buy this, right?

Well, here's my $20 bucks, I'm in.

For the entire answer, I'd have to write a book, but here's the short version: given who he was, where he came from, where American Pop Culture was when he first came on to the Scene (one year Brenda Lee was America's #1 Female Singer, replaced the next by Joan Baez), and where it is now (you tell me), the tale of this tape is well worth telling. He's made a million foolish moves over the years, but he stayed in the ring long after he had scars on his scars, and so many times when he was wobbling so badly that the canvas looked liked it was reaching up for him, he'd land a truthful punch on the chin of the lies we live with everyday.

Flawed? Absolutely. Toxic to his friends? He better stay away from my daughters, lemme tell ya. Or me. Ask Phil Ochs. Narcissitic? Sure, aren't they all? Overrated? Sure, aren't they all? Ready to be replaced? Sure. Step right up. Always a fan of evolution. Live Aid? Farm Aid? Global Warming Gotcha Feelin' Good Aid? I don't see no takers.

So. He's calling your bluff. Maybe all he's got is the Jack of Hearts, but I haven't seen another one-person face card higher than that in the space between J. Edgar Hoover and Dick Cheney, and if I had to raise my kids in the space between Dick Cheney and the next Grand Moff Tarkin (or, for that matter, Paris Hilton and Fill In The Blank), I'd be interested in a long hard look at what it looks like to attempt to see, if not to tell, an American truth. You never know when you'll have a shot at that again.

Posted by: tomc at August 21, 2007 1:36 PM

2 fast 2 furious was written by a person? i just assumed that maybe a computer had spit that out.

Posted by: kb at August 21, 2007 1:41 PM

Aw, tomc, you beat me to it and said it better than I coulda dreamed.

Ready to be replaced? Sure. Step right up. Awesome.

Actually, Dustin, both trailers have got me kinda psyched. I was dubious about I'm Not There and indifferent to Walk Hard before viewing the trailers you've so considerately provided here, so thanks for both of them!

Posted by: Jerce at August 21, 2007 1:46 PM

I have to wonder how much they spent on the Dylan flick. If they aim to send him a love letter and MAYBE win some awards I guess they'll succeed. But except for the Gen X'ers I don't see many people giving a shit about Dylan to make this a box office success. The man comes off as a complete tool and we see enough of those, why would people wanna see one from the fucking sixties? (And he's got talent blah blah blah and I know all he did, so what?)

Waste of film, this was something that should have been left to the NEXT generation, we try to make legends too quickly nowadays.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 21, 2007 2:04 PM

"I think I'd actually pay $10 to see Kidman pass gas and Fiennes get his scrote caught in a zipper."

Agreed.

Posted by: smash at August 21, 2007 2:08 PM

I'm totally ripping this off from somewhere else, but I still think it is an interesting observation: So Angelina Jolie spends much of her free time campaigning against the war and violence that damages nations, yet she chooses movies like the above (heavy on the gunplay and violence) to pay her bills? Curiouser and curiouser.

Just the other day I saw some pictures of Angelina from a movie she made some years ago, "Random Hearts". I hadn't realized how different she looks now after dropping probably at least 25 lbs. Back then she had a spark and natural sensuality; now,she's all hard angles and bony limbs.

"Walk Hard" does veer over the top and it looks like all the funny scenes are crammed into the trailer. Also, I am bit protective of my man Johnny Cash. Just doesn't seem right, sending up such a cool dude.

Maybe I'm just musically goofy, but I never understood the appeal of Bob Dylan. Brilliant songwriter/poet, yes, by all means. Just please don't make me listen to him sing. Gah. That voice.

Is "I'm Not There" a Todd Haynes film? Interesting to see his take on Dylan after how he portrayed Bowie in "Velvet Goldmine".

Posted by: Alabamapink at August 21, 2007 2:18 PM

Maybe it's just me, but Angelina Jolie does absolutely nothing for me. I don't find her the least bit attractive and she's definitely overrated as an actress. To sum things up, I can't stand her.

Now, Scarlett Johansson. She makes me tingly in all the right places. She can do no wrong as far as I'm concerned. Except maybe for He's Just Not That Into You. I ain't to excited about that one. Drew Barrymore is in it. That's a good enough reason not to see it right there.

Posted by: RAT at August 21, 2007 2:19 PM

all i know is the wanted graphic novel sort of sucks...i mean..the main character is modeled after eminem. thats just stupid. and the movie is shooting down my street and i just dont care because the dark knight is also shooting down my street and that i do care about. and there is no way to overrate bob dylan. he can be rated to the point of oblivion and still not be regarded well enough. the man is INCREDIBLE. and also, woah, woah the beatles overrated? i guess, you know, inventing modern music as we know it wasnt enough for you people. jeeeezus.

Posted by: jordan at August 21, 2007 2:25 PM

If I hadn't heard that story about Ralph Fiennes shagging flight attendants in plane bathrooms, I don't think I'd believe he had a penis at all. And as for Nicole Kidman--don't they seal all orifices when they embalm a corpse? Just reading about that movie made me feel sleepy and dead inside.

Posted by: Cara at August 21, 2007 2:31 PM

"....you know, inventing modern music as we know it wasnt enough for you people...."

***************************************************

WHOA WHOA, nice way to leave out the African American contribution to that little phenomenon called Rock & Roll that was being laid down before those five douches were even born.

MY GOD, now I KNOW they're overrated.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 21, 2007 2:53 PM

There are very few lyricists who compare with Dylan - especially American, and especially who turn out years and years of quality work. Lots of artists write brilliant songs but to keep it up for decades doesn't happen often. Time out of mind was an amazing album and happened well past his prime.

Comparing Dylan to The Doors, The Who, Led Zeppelin, or even The Beatles is laughable - although Lennon was genius and plastic ono band was basically a perfect album. The Doors though - seriously? I think Dennis Leary said it best when he summed up the movie about the doors "I'm drunk I'm nobody, I'm drunk I'm famous, I'm drunk I'm fuckin dead."

Posted by: soda at August 21, 2007 3:06 PM

My view on Dylan is quite similar to Alabamapink's - brilliant writer and poet, shitty singer. I just can't get behind that voice.

But the conceit that those who don't view Dylan as some sort of musical demigod is sort of frustrating. I think it's important to acknowledge his talent and his contribution, but that doesn't mean you have to adore him, or call him the greatest anything.

And fyi - NO ONE "invented" modern music as we know it. But hundreds contributed to getting it to where it is today. That's the important part.

I was once talking to someone who asked me about the desert island CD's, and asked how I could leave off the Beatles or Dylan, etc. And my answer is that there is a colossal difference between the greatest artists of all time, and the albums I'd want to hear forever. I'm sorry, but neither Dylan, nor the Beatles, would make that cut.

Anyway, to make a short story fuckin' long... the movie DOES look interesting, but that's because Blanchett's on the same list as Bale - the list of actors who I'd watch paint a fence, or take a nap.

Posted by: TK at August 21, 2007 3:24 PM

So Angelina Jolie spends much of her free time campaigning against the war and violence that damages nations, yet she chooses movies like the above (heavy on the gunplay and violence) to pay her bills

Yes because action movies and genocide are the same thing. The last time I watched Die Hard I just had to go out and run over a box full of puppies.

I'd be looking forward to Wanted but I'm saving all my happiness for Shoot Em' Up... which I may have already said in a post that appears to have vanished, but what the hell. Clive Owen and Paul Giametti in the same action movie is worth twice my anticipation.

Posted by: twig at August 21, 2007 3:32 PM

Blech. Dylan is an automatic station changer for me; can't stand him at all. In fact, all I can think of is the part from Simon & Garfunkle's Simple Desultory Philippic:

I knew a man, his brain was so small,
He couldn't think of nothing at all.
He's not the same as you and me.
He doesn't dig poetry. he's so unhip that
When you say dylan, he thinks youre talking about dylan thomas,
Whoever he was.

Posted by: pinkcheese at August 21, 2007 3:52 PM

Is it true that I'm Not There is planned for a release in late September? If so, we've got a great month ahead of us for honest and meaningful cinema.

Across The Universe is due to debut on the 14th, and I'm also anticipating the upcoming Coen Brothers' adaptation of Cormac McCarthy's No Country for Old Men, for better or for worse. And, with the rumor I've heard that I'm Not There is coming out in September, it should be a good month, indeed. But, then again, that may be only an international release and/or for film festivals abroad.

Either way, I'm looking forward to seeing each actor's interpretation of Bob Dylan.

Posted by: Samuel B. Prime at August 21, 2007 4:07 PM

Also out on DVD this week: Serenity Collector's Edition. Buy it, watch it, love it. Cast commentary, y'all...

Posted by: Mandacat at August 21, 2007 4:45 PM

The comic series "Wanted" was utterly fucking shameless in its celebrity-pandering for movies. Pick it up in trade paperback (or, better, don't) and you'll see that the two leads are so obviously modeled on Eminem and Halle Barry that it's painful. Comic nerds mocked the creators for being so overt.

The comic believes itself to be a clever piss-take on the "Chosen One" story. Our Hero, however, is not the long-lost son of a great hero but rather a vicious villain. Rather than transcend his wussiness to become a better man, he becomes as vicious a fucker as his father.

Trust me when I say that my synopsis is more interesting than the actual comic. It plays out as naked wish fulfillment of the ooky, scary kind coupled with a really, really shitty "missing daddy" plot. Then throw in its pretentiousness, and you have a bad, bad comic.

Looks like a shit movie, too. Great.

Posted by: Soulless Merchant of Fear at August 21, 2007 5:09 PM

Either you like Dylan or you don't. The words paint a picture in your head or not. Who cares! It's called "pop" music, as in POPULAR music. Even the folks that don't like Dylan still appreciate his approach and writing and say that it's good. Like say, Tiger Woods, in golf. Like them or not, it just proves that someone is really THAT good at something.

I'm all over the place. Like a Dylan song.

Posted by: Slouchmonkey at August 21, 2007 5:39 PM

i think the movie is 'the reader', not 'the readers'. it's actually a purty goood book, but dear god if i can't imagine nicole kidman or ralph fiennes in either of those roles for the life of me.

Posted by: emilyb at August 21, 2007 8:10 PM

I'm not going to argue about his music, but I sure bet there are some good stories to tell about his life. I just find it interesting that they chose so many non-American actors to portray an American icon. Maybe it's some sort of payback for all the American actors who try to pull of accents and do it crappily. I pretty much have faith that all of those guys will do it well.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at August 21, 2007 8:25 PM

I'm just excited to see Broken English on DVD as it never got a cinema release over here - it's importin time add that to the Lives of Others and I have me a very nice Saturday afternoon in the near future.

I am deliberately avoiding any musical debate on principle.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 22, 2007 5:21 AM

Reading the comments and lately some reviews (God is not Great for example) i realized that Pajiba is turning slowly into something i don't really like anymore. I mean, if i want to read a wanna-be though guys opinion, decorated with the obligatory "fuck" and "shit", i tune into a regular forum.
It seems many Pajiba readers (judging from the comments only) aren't any better then the rest of the internet-folks i grew to hate.

Posted by: Arthur Dent at August 22, 2007 5:58 AM

Well, Arthur at least one thing about the Pajiba experience hasn't changed:

You should have written, "wannabe TOUGH guy".

And on the interweb you LOG you don't "tune", you're using analog terms in a digital world.

Is that the Pajiba you missed?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 22, 2007 6:26 AM

If you're gonna go all schoolmarmy, BS (ha!), you should make sure that your own post is error-free. You omitted two commas and misused another, and punctuation goes inside quotation marks.

Arthur, it's like this: Pajiba is good. Because it is good, it has gotten popular. Because it is popular, it is attracting many more people than it used to. Most of its newer commenters at least try to be thoughtful and articulate; but inevitably, any popular site will attract a certain percentage of trolls, bigots and booger-eatin' morons.

Also, these oblique complaints about the "smarty-pants tone" of Pajiba are starting to worry me a little. When did excellence become "elitism" and something to be ashamed of? I blame Karl Rove.

Posted by: Jerce at August 22, 2007 7:32 AM

Well said, but then again, I'm not the one complaining about "levels of excellence" or people who eat boogers.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 22, 2007 7:54 AM

Oh, and there's always the option of making it a password site, accessible to only those worthy of the privilege of getting invited, *they* who have absolute mastery of of grammar, political science, sociology...and... cinema. That way you can all wallow like smug jackasses without having to soil yourselves with the presence of *us*, the great unwashed masses.

Feel free to add and/or subtract commas as you see fit.

Aw, come on, Slim. You know you belong in the smug jackass category, your inclination to shop at Wal-Mart notwithstanding. If we ever become a password site (we won't), you know you'd be wallowing and laughing down at the unwashed masses. -- DR

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 22, 2007 8:09 AM

Ha! Pretendin' yer not a smug jackass (like me)?

You know what that is...

Posted by: TK at August 22, 2007 9:40 AM

I totally agree, Alex the Odd. I was so disheartened when I heard Ulrich Müle died. I was looking forward to seeing more from him. He fortunately left a good body of work behind him, if you can find it. I recommend Funny Games, but I haven't seen all his work yet.

Posted by: Darcy at August 22, 2007 9:50 AM

Is there ever going to be an infraction that doesn't warrant a Paddlin'?

Thanks for the recommendation Darcy I'll certainly check it out.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 22, 2007 9:55 AM

Damn my childish inability to close style tags.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 22, 2007 9:57 AM

BarbadoSlim, you are smug yet clever mo-fo and also my favorite troll on any site ever. Here is an emoticon in your honor:

8-)

Posted by: Jerce at August 22, 2007 10:30 AM

About a year ago, Jack White was starting to look a hell of a lot like Jack Black.

Luckily, White decided to step on a treadmill and now looks muy deliciouso once again.

Posted by: agent bedhead at August 22, 2007 11:19 AM

I really have not cared for Dylan musically even though my parents were hippies. But, it does not mean I do not understand his cultural importance.

Overrated? I am not of the proper ilk to say. Culturally important? Yep. Will this be a good movie? I hope so, becuase it think it is important for those that have had little or no exposure to him can make their own judgement.

Posted by: richmac at August 22, 2007 11:34 AM

Are you sure it's Brad Whitford for "He's Just Not That Into You"? I saw something about Bradley Cooper, but if it's Whitford I might have to see it...

Posted by: alissa at August 22, 2007 2:06 PM

Speaking as someone who has suffered the misfortune of reading Wanted, it's really more the Watchmen for idiot fratboys who find rape totally awesome and laugh at characters named Shithead and Fuckwit like Dane Cook just mispronounced "sandwich".

Posted by: Seamus Gentz at August 22, 2007 3:40 PM

I have to tell you guys, I saw a free screening of 'Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story', and despite a few bits of slow movement and the fact that it was a little long (of course this was just a screening, so I assume they'll still trim it a bit for theatrical release) I have to say it was better than I had expected. From what I understand, the idea behind it was to poke fun at all of the recent musicians bio-pics, and I think they've done a pretty good job of it. A few of the running gags are equally hilarious each time they occur, (everytime Dewey gets upset, he goes into the closest bathroom and rips the sink out of the wall, and water sprays everywhere) some others not so much, but I will definately go to see it in the theaters this December to see how they made out.

Posted by: jan at August 24, 2007 7:31 PM