web
counter
 

Side-by-Side Comparison of Average-Sized Woman with a Supermodel Will Blow Out Your Mindhole

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (174)



KatiaJan2012_4.jpg

The image above is of plus-sized model Katya Zharkova. I have no idea who that is, and I’m sure she’s wearing a lot of Fotoshop by Adobé. However, I’m sure we can all agree — except for the disgusting doucheball asshole pigs — that Katya is one hell of an attractive woman, and that her “plus-size” looks like a fairly average body type (actually, given the country’s propensity for over-eating, she probably falls well under the median weight).

Now, here’s the same woman standing with a fashion model.

KatiaJan2012_3-e1326228507297.jpg

Striking, isn’t it?

Here are the statistics that accompany the photospread in Plus Model magazine (via Fashionista):

  • Twenty years ago the average fashion model weighed 8% less than the average woman. Today, she weighs 23% less.

  • Ten years ago plus-size models averaged between size 12 and 18. Today the need for size diversity within the plus-size modeling industry continues to be questioned. The majority of plus-size models on agency boards are between a size 6 and 14, while the customers continue to express their dissatisfaction.

  • Most runway models meet the Body Mass Index physical criteria for Anorexia.

  • 50% of women wear a size 14 or larger, but most standard clothing outlets cater to sizes 14 or smaller.
  • Me? I prefer the “plus sized” woman; she’s bendy, see?

    KatiaJan2012_1-e1326225591787.jpg

    (Fun Fact: The fashion model also posed in this position; unfortunately, her body was unable to sustain the weight redistribution and her spine snapped in half. RIP Fashion Model).










    Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



    Five Ways Star Trek And Star Wars Are Better Than Each Other | Last Night on "SNL" Daniel Radcliffe Was Overshadowed By One of the Most Embarrassingly Awful Musical Performances in the Show's History









    Comments

    The "plus" sized model looks like a woman. The fashion model looks like a fuckin girl. That's the best way i can describe it I suppose. And I prefer women. Women have self-respect. Women are confident. THAT is hot.

    Posted by: PissBoy at January 12, 2012 10:10 AM

    Mindhole's not the only thing that's blown.

    Posted by: zeke the pig at January 12, 2012 10:10 AM

    Meat belongs on bones!!

    Posted by: Django at January 12, 2012 10:11 AM

    Crikey. Thanks for putting this up. As someone who struggles with an anorexic mind's eye, it's good for me to see a juxtaposition of what I prolly look like with what my brain keeps telling me I SHOULD look like. *See, brain - it ain't as pretty as the curvy one.*

    Posted by: Jami at January 12, 2012 10:15 AM

    My office chair really should come with a seat belt. I'll using some packing tape instead.

    Okay, I'm fastened in.

    Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 12, 2012 10:16 AM

    The non plus sized model looks like she belongs in a commercial asking for donation for starving children in Africa with a Sarah McLachlan song playing in the background.

    Posted by: John W at January 12, 2012 10:17 AM

    And on a serious note: the '14 year old anorexic = hot' is not just an aesthetic issue. Ever tried to fuck a too-skinny girl? All those angles flying about all over the place. Minor bruising is an optmistic outcome.

    PissBoy is 100% correct.

    Posted by: zeke the pig at January 12, 2012 10:18 AM

    I hope this defense of normal size woman doesn't turn into a comment thread of attacks on thin women. They all just look like attacks on women to me.

    Stop critiquing our bodies, assholes.

    Posted by: ERM at January 12, 2012 10:19 AM

    Check out the comments on the fashionista site - maybe I'm reading it wrong after only one cup of coffee this morning, but you'd think that all the pretty skinny girls are the victims in today's society.

    WTF.

    Posted by: Markus at January 12, 2012 10:20 AM

    This is a comparison of a slightly overweight woman with a supermodel. Slightly overweight might very well be the average size in the US by now, and probably in my own country of Austria too. I personally know women whose body size correlates with either of the two and none of them suffer from any eating disorders. They are just women with different body types.

    For the record, I find neither of them particularly attractive.

    Posted by: Qualtinger at January 12, 2012 10:22 AM

    Those arms, those are scary. But I think we all know as long as models are hangers for clothes, nothing is going to change. Watch Project Runway-designers cannot even contemplate clothes that drape over a normal human frame.

    Posted by: Mrcreosote at January 12, 2012 10:22 AM

    For the record, I never read this as "a healthy size 0 is bad," I've always taken these sort of things as more of a matter of "visible ribs probably equals health issues at some point down the road."

    Skinny is fine. Dangerously, unhealthily skinny for the sake of chasing some advertisement's image is not fine.

    Posted by: Markus at January 12, 2012 10:30 AM

    This is a fascinating juxtaposition. The only problem is that human beings seem to be incapable of a rational conversation about body types and expectations. Watch as this comment thread devolves into a series of veiled (or open) jabs at fat women, thin women, and men who prefer one or the other.
    I'm sorry. I just love Pajiba and this is a subject that never goes well. I hate to watch it unfold here in my safe, snarky place.

    Posted by: katyv at January 12, 2012 10:30 AM

    Here, here ERM!

    I am on the chubbier side. I have a friend who is quite a bit smaller then me. She's naturally slim and she's had a bunch of really awful things said to her about it. I've also had men (and women)scream at me for being "a fat bitch" because it was the easiest way they could think of to hurt my feelings.

    I don't like the pressure on women to be any one size.

    Posted by: Park at January 12, 2012 10:33 AM

    The fashion industry appears to have as a goal the normalization of body dysmorphia - a constant battle between our actual shapes and an ideal that few people can or should reach. This is not a case of suggesting people get fit, because that would allow for a variety of size ideals, most of which would not involve the extreme thinness required to be a fashion model. Rather, it is an insistence on a beauty standard that few people can meet, which keeps us in a perpetual state of anxiety that fosters a willingness to buy more and more products to "fix" us - or does if one doesn't work very hard to discard that narrative.

    And this is not only an issue for women. The more super-ripped men are presented in media as the most desirous (ignoring entirely the huge amount of time and effort it takes to maintain such muscular definition), the more men are becoming dissatisfied with their own, normal bodies.

    That being said, if your body tends to run toward skinny or you have the genetics to build and maintain muscle without that being your life's work, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, either. But don't think the narrative doesn't effect you, because you may find that strangers regard you with some hostility for presenting as the ideal they cannot achieve.

    The whole thing is insidious as hell.

    Posted by: Reba at January 12, 2012 10:42 AM

    I think that the negative comments on thin women come from a place of frustation. Many women (me included) spend all their lives fighting with the images of what they are told by the fashion world and tv they should look like vs. what is actually staring back from the mirror. I remember being about 11, tallest girl in my class I got my period and suddenly started developing into a woman. By fourteen I was done developing and had a (in hindsight) healthy athletic body and C cups. Of course compared to the little elves sourrounding me I felt like a fucking hippo. I think Piss Boy said it right: I looked like a woman and they looked like girls.

    It took me until today to get to the realization that it's just not in my genes to look like an elfin creature. I was built to be an amazon and can appreciate it now, but the way there fucking hurt.

    I feel for all the women who are naturally skinny and fight all their lives to just put on a few more pounds, they are just the other side of the spectrum.

    Posted by: Phedre at January 12, 2012 10:51 AM

    The fashion industry doesn't care what you think. The fashion industry knows what sells, ergo, the fashion industry knows you're lying.

    Having said that ... I don't get the focus on the skinny models. You'd think every model was skin and bones, but the VS-type models (usually, lingerie and swimsuit) usually look pretty curvy. Brooklyn Decker ain't skinny, and if you go old school I'm thinking of the likes of Cindy Crawford. But from the howling that erupts on this subject you'd think Kate Moss was the only model there was for teen girls to project their body images from.

    Posted by: , at January 12, 2012 10:54 AM

    I recently saw a documentary on runway models and I was shocked to find out that the majority of them are 15 years old. One girl was under contract for Gucci and she was 12.
    These are girls that shoot up like bean poles and have not developed their figures yet. One girl that was 16 covered in makeup looked much older.
    The body types are impossible to live up to because these girls themselves will not be able to have a career as their bodies develop.

    Posted by: daria at January 12, 2012 10:56 AM

    OK, that plus sized model is very pretty, but she is overweight. The regular model is definitely anorexic sized skinny.

    What I want to know is, "Where are the REGULAR sized models?" There has to be something between too thin and plus sized. I'm 5'5" tall and 130 lbs. I wear a regular size 6 or 8. Shouldn't that be the standard model size?

    I buy a lot of clothes online. I don't want to see clothes for me (5'5" tall, 130 lbs) modeled on someone 6'2" tall and 110 lbs. I can't tell from the photo how it's going to fit a normal person.

    Oh, and I was in Lane Bryant once to buy something for a friend, and the store used one of those regular (i.e. extra thin) models in their huge blowup photos in their store modeling their plus sized clothes. Let me tell you how ridiculous that looked. That's right plus sized clothes weren't even modeled by plus sized models in the plus sized store or catalog.

    Posted by: BWeaves at January 12, 2012 10:58 AM

    I do not think that any of the VS models approach "normal". That is exactly the problem. They are healthier looking than a fashion runway model but are still far away from what many women could achieve and more importantly maintain without serious effort.

    Posted by: Phedre at January 12, 2012 11:00 AM

    "50% of women wear a size 14 or larger, but most standard clothing outlets cater to sizes 14 or smaller."

    This makes me wonder why on Earth any clothing store would ever want to eliminate 50% of their potential customer base out of the equation to begin with- especially in a rotten economic climate. The fashion industry is the only one that I know of that manages to prosper despite deliberately not giving customers what they want or need. I really cannot understand why clothing lines insist that the problem is with the customers for not universally having the build of Olive Oyl, aside perhaps from making it easier for clothing designers to cut clothes that don't have to factor in such annoying features as "hips", "breasts" and "buttocks". They are outright demanding the public conform to unrealistic standards. In any other industry, a manufacturer that was so out-of-touch with reality wouldn't be praised for their work...they'd be unemployed.

    Show me a clothing store that has the same fashion lines and styles accessible to ALL women regardless of size or body type and take extra care not to make anyone feel shame for who they are. Make doubly sure they do not behave as though they're the ones doing people the big favor by making clothes that can actually be worn, because they're not. They're running a business. They're supposed to make people feel good about purchasing their product. Making someone feel shame is a very poor marketing strategy. Especially where the shame is nothing but a fabricated social stigma.

    If someone were to do all that, I'll show you someone who will have a legion of clientele and more money than they will ever know what to do with.

    Posted by: bleujayone at January 12, 2012 11:05 AM

    I never said they cared what we think. I said they bank on us trying to reach an impossible ideal, which they created for that very purpose. It is incredibly effective. It is also somewhat evil.

    Posted by: Reba at January 12, 2012 11:05 AM

    What katyv said.

    Also, people keep using the word "regular". I do not think it means what they think it means.

    Posted by: branded at January 12, 2012 11:08 AM

    "disgusting doucheball asshole pigg"

    I guess I'm one of those. When did average beocome attractive?

    Posted by: ComfortableMadness at January 12, 2012 11:10 AM

    Third what katyv said. I know people like to put people in a box, overweight, too skinny. Whatever, but how the hell do you know that from looking at picture. WTF? And normal and average are different. In the end I feel lucky b/c I work out and eat well for health, but I like my body. And that's super cool if you do too, but if you don't I honestly don't care. I truly wish I could pass this trait onto the majority of the world.

    Posted by: Nimue at January 12, 2012 11:13 AM

    @BWeaves

    Oh I'll take some "REGULAR" sized models over either of those two up there anyday.

    Posted by: ComfortableMadness at January 12, 2012 11:13 AM

    Show me a clothing store that has the same fashion lines and styles accessible to ALL women regardless of size or body type and take extra care not to make anyone feel shame for who they are.

    Dress Barn does that, mostly for office attire, and they are doing okay. They aren't high fashion, but they also aren't high priced, so they fill a certain niche. Most of their stores have both regular and plus-sized clothes on different sides of the same store, but in some places they are separate stores located near each other. I'd like them better if their sales staff wasn't forced to operate as if they are on commission when they are only getting an hourly wage.

    Posted by: Reba at January 12, 2012 11:14 AM

    Personally, I'm more curious about the stats they are using: "Twenty years ago the average fashion model weighed 8% less than the average woman. Today, she weighs 23% less" While models have obviously become slimmer and don't present regular society, the fact is the general population has also become larger so are these numbers supposed to be shocking or cause outrage? Basically, my point is that while that may be a "shocking" number, it's not as if it's completely one-sided. It's not only that models have become slimmer, the population has become larger, and neither one of those trends is a good thing. We are basically a society of extremes. Mindy Kaling made a bit of joke about this in her book - she said that with her body type, some of the stylists get annoyed and see it as "lack of commitment," meaning she should either commit to losing weight and being a skinny actress or commit to being fat and gain weight.

    Posted by: Jen K. at January 12, 2012 11:14 AM

    All I'm going to say is that she looks deliciously bendy.

    Posted by: admin at January 12, 2012 11:15 AM

    I am always mighty relieved to see pictures of women whose skin actually develops folds when they bend. There are so many bikini-model-pictures in which Adobés Fotoshop has banished these wrinkles, folds and creases, and all I can think of: Was this poor woman born in this pose? Hand-on-tilted-hip? When there's no fold, when this area of skin is actually tight... that means she won't be able to straighten up, ever. And that makes me kinda sad.

    Skimming through the comments I have to conclude that I am SO lucky. My heart goes out to all of you who are made to constantly fight against and be dissatisfied with their own bodies.

    Posted by: Rooks at January 12, 2012 11:21 AM

    I think "normal" is the problem and that normal is a moving target. Medically-defined standards are the only valid measurement. We can talk about what is common in our culture, or in other cultures (by which measurement westerners are often fat), and what expectations we have of ourselves, but the facts are that models are meant to be living hangers; North Americans all used to be thinner; most people get past their adolescent hormone-induced insanity on this issue; some people have other issues and would regardless of whatever the cultural beauty standard is; and, as a group, North Americans are in a collective denial about what is to be considered healthy weight. If you are comfortable in your skin, more power to you, but that doesn’t mean that you are a healthy weight as defined by medical professionals. It also doesn’t automatically mean that you are unhealthy, or that you should be made to feel bad about your appearance.

    I was raised by a woman who thought Audrey Hepburn was the pinnacle of female perfection. She was held up as the example of how to walk in heels (I’m serious), “Audrey Hepburn walks like this. Audrey Hepburn stands like this. (Audrey Hepburn who admitted to having food issues derived from the horrible time her family experienced during WWII.) The Dowager Julien is naturally built like Cher (her three daughters are definitely not) and is obsessed with weight. As such, I have some issues of my own and spent part of Christmas holidays showing old pictures of myself to Mr. Julien and saying, “I had been given to understand I was incredibly fat” when indeed I had been simply overweight. But I was overweight, and while that may be “normal” in the culture I live in, it does not make me any less overweight. I’m working on how I was trained to feel about it. It is a very hard thing to overcome: I was trained to believe I am fat, but I am technically “fat”, but I’m not supposed to hate myself for it. It’s a pickle. A pickle which has about 16 calories.

    Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 12, 2012 11:26 AM

    As usual, its the extremes that are unhealthy.

    But what I can't put my finger on is what this is supposed to say about our society. Are we a society of superficiality and vanity (thin model) or of gluttony and poor health (overweight model -- and yes, she is overweight).

    GROSS GENERALIZATION WARNING
    Both models are "unhealthy" to the extent that, and I'm just guessing here, neither is the "model" of aerobic of anaerobic fitness.

    We should be celebrating Gina Carano type models who EAT healthy, work out, aren't afraid to have muscles, and are actually good role models for our youth (boys and girls).

    Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 12, 2012 11:27 AM

    Brooklyn Decker, Cindy Crawford, and VS models are all very thin. They have larger breasts and hips than a pre-adolescent runway model, but rest assured that they are tiny people, and few women can achieve that figure.

    Posted by: blorft at January 12, 2012 11:30 AM

    check flingpartner dot 'c0m which can bring excitment to your boring life.

    Posted by: wallispat at January 12, 2012 11:30 AM

    Whats the number one killer of woman in the US?? Heart disease. Start exercising ladies. There's no reason to be "plus sized". The fashion industry is doing you a favor. Get skinny, get healthy FAT..i mean FAST!


    Posted by: lolwut at January 12, 2012 11:31 AM

    Most runway models meet the Body Mass Index physical criteria for Anorexia.

    In the interests of balanced approach to this subject it should also be stated that the plus-size model most likely meets the Body Mass Index for overweight and is not in a healthy place either. The fact that she's average for an American means nothing in health terms.

    Posted by: PaddyDog at January 12, 2012 11:32 AM

    aren't they both normal, really? i mean, people come in all shapes and sizes. i think what we're talking about here is the idealized form. for our society, at this time and place, it matters not that many people are overweight -- the ideal is still to be thinner. and ideals, not norms, sell.

    Posted by: ellyn at January 12, 2012 11:38 AM

    The last thing I'll add is that being overweight is not a disease and does not represent "bad health." It can be a risk factor for certain diseases, but weight loss isn't even a medical recommendation unless there are other health indicators that suggest, well, unhealthiness. And anorexia is a much more dangerous disease than all that; I don't think it's helpful to suggest that an anorexic person, who is underweight enough to sustain serious organ damage, is just as unhealthy as a woman who wears a size 12. Especially when you have no evidence to suggest that the size 12 is unhealthy.

    Also, this article was about fashion models, not about how fat Americans are, even though they are. You're not going to see a size 6 on the runway, either.

    Posted by: blorft at January 12, 2012 11:44 AM

    @blorft It depends how overweight. More than a little does definitely represent bad health, regardless of the fact that anorexia poses a more acute danger.

    Posted by: Qualtinger at January 12, 2012 11:51 AM

    Medically-defined standards are the only valid measurement.

    Not. A. Chance.

    I feel the medical community and its propaganda are almost as guilty as the fashion or entertainment industries. The foremost published piece of tripe is the Body Mass Index. When used in conjunction with other evaluation methods and common sense, it can be a general indicator of heath as related to weight, except its not and you start being evaluated with it from day one.

    According to the BMI I was overweight in high school. I was 5'6" and weighed 175 pounds... with a body fat percentage of 4. Now at 5'8" and 220 I'm obese. I'm hardly the paragon of physical fitness and could certainly stand to lose a few pounds (stupid potato chips!) but I could shed every spare fat cell in my body and never even come close to what that index considers normal.

    On the flip side, All of my kids are petite and skinny to the effect that they're considered underweight. Two of the little shits routinely eat more than I do.

    Normal, healthy, attractive are all pretty subjective terms depending on who you ask. Whether they're professional models or doctors.

    Posted by: admin at January 12, 2012 11:51 AM

    The caption did not say that the "skinny" model meets the anorexia criteria, just that a lot of them do. I know a woman who is super-model skinny because she naturally can't put on weight - her doctor has her on a special diet to try and bulk her up a little.

    The "skinny" model could be perfectly healthy, just with a great metabolism and commitment to exercise. She could also be that thin because has an eating disorder, or have high cholestrol and at risk for heart disease. You can't tell by looking at her.

    The "fat" model could be borderline obese, or she could also be perfectly healthy, with great blood pressure, perfect cholesterol, and a wonderful exercise regimen that gives her a good cardiovascular workout. You can't tell by looking at her.

    Bottom line, you cannot make judgements about a person's health just by the way they look, except at the extreme ends of the weight spectrum.

    Posted by: Three-nineteen at January 12, 2012 11:54 AM

    blorft:

    The bottom line is that if one is carrying more weight than one's frame is built for then one is putting abnormal stress on the bones, heart and lungs and yes, that is unhealthy. You can try to rationalize it any way you want, but it is unhealthy to be overweight. And I write this as someone who very much needs to lose 10 pounds so I am not writing it from an assumed superior perspective, but a realistic one.

    Posted by: PaddyDog at January 12, 2012 11:56 AM

    Lies, damned lies, and all that.

    Twenty years ago the average fashion model weighed 8% less than the average woman. Today, she weighs 23% less.

    In 2002, the average woman weighed about 25 pounds more than the average woman in 1960. 20 years ago, heroin-chic was the height of fashion. Models aren't getting skinnier, the rest of us are getting heavier.

    Most runway models meet the Body Mass Index physical criteria for Anorexia.

    Yeah, and most pro-athletes meet the BMI criteria for being overweight. BMI doesn't handle outliers well.

    Fun Fact: The fashion model also posed in this position; unfortunately, her body was unable to sustain the weight redistribution and her spine snapped in half. RIP Fashion Model

    At least we're not being asshole pigs though, right? Attacking a woman because of her size would be super douchbaggery.

    Anyway, thank goodness Plus-Model Mag was here to let women everywhere see that they don't need to compare themselves to unreasonable standards of beauty. Instead, they can compare themselves to a blonde-haired, blue-eyed Amazonian.

    Posted by: jon29 at January 12, 2012 11:57 AM

    This is fantastic - and this video/parody goes right along with it!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=S_vVUIYOmJM

    Posted by: Cara at January 12, 2012 12:19 PM

    Oh stop with the "runway models don't look like real women". Of course they don't! They aren't supposed to! Runway models are there to wear clothes. They are walking hangers. They need to have as little "body" as possible so that the lines and flow of the fabric can be seen. Sure, they often have pretty faces, but why on earth do we act like they are the pinnacle of feminine beauty?

    Posted by: fabgrrl at January 12, 2012 12:34 PM

    I think that the lesson learned from these sorts of postings is that women are

    -judged for being unhealthy looking

    -judged for being unrepresentative

    -judged for how they look

    -judged for not being someone's perception of sexy

    -judged.

    Posted by: linny at January 12, 2012 12:49 PM

    Actually, models are real women (or girls, in some cases). They are simply much thinner (for whatever reason) than a majority of women. We hold models up as a beauty ideal because they are the presented to us in ads for clothing, beauty products, jewelry, cars, etc. with the underlying message that their attractiveness is one we should strive for.* This is also why you have 25 year old women advertising anti-wrinkle creams. Youth has always held attraction (Shakespeare's sonnets come to mind), and beauty is beauty for a reason. The point being made in this campaign (aside from "please buy our magazine that is targeted at larger women") is that the standard of beauty in most advertising has narrowed to exclude most body types. Sort of hard to dispute that.

    *And if this was not the case, then the diet industry would not be such a behemoth. They also do not care what we think. They have products to sell, too.

    Posted by: Reba at January 12, 2012 12:56 PM

    Blofrt, recent medical studies have shown that carrying any extra weight, especially belly fat, is unhealthy. Nothing against large women but I like mine a little on the small side.

    Posted by: Roland at January 12, 2012 1:00 PM

    Reba,

    OK, they may not care what we think, but they sure know HOW we think. Which came first, the product or the demand?

    Posted by: blorft at January 12, 2012 11:30 AM

    Yeah, that's kinda what I meant.

    There's only, like, one time I ever -- EVER, cause I like a curvy girl -- wished a woman looked a little more waifish. I was watching the sex scene in "Girl With the Dragon Tattoo" and thinking, "Wait, in the book Lisbeth is flat chested but Rooney has TITS!"

    Mmmm, tits.

    Coco tits, sugar tits, frosted tits.

    Yes, I like boobsalot.

    Posted by: , at January 12, 2012 1:22 PM

    Who else has an "evans sizes 10-28 Winter Collection" ad at the top of the browser? This whole post is some elaborate product placement conspiracy. Damn you Pajiba, I thought you werre better than that.

    Apropos of nothing, I’ve lost 63 pounds and I’m only 20 away from the Wii admonishing me that I’m “overweight.” I can’t wait!

    Fatter, thinner, I'm still me and I like who I am. I don't get outside validation from models. Did I need to lose weight? yes. Am I a better or worse person? nope. I'm still a snarkypants who gets my validation from my favorite website.

    Posted by: anikitty at January 12, 2012 1:22 PM

    My penis was unprepared for that last picture.

    Posted by: Craigilicious at January 12, 2012 1:24 PM

    I'm a photographer who works a lot in the fashion scene and this is an issue that is talked about a lot in the circles I frequent. I've literally taken photos very similar to these (although without the intention of making it a comparison thing), simply because there is a wide range of body types and I'm keen on working with both. I feel that there are lot of terms that are bandied about in the industry that are hurtful on both sides. I rarely ever refer to any model as plus-sized, anorexic, skinny, fat or anything of the type. I also hate "real-sized" to describe a woman of median or plus-size (the term became really popular a couple of seasons ago when a model on Top Model used it to describe herself), because it's just as insulting but for the other end. Not all smaller models are small because they're anorexic and it doesn't pay to give them low self-esteem just because they don't look like the average American. Everyone should be happy with the body type they have, so long as they're not unhealthy.

    That said, the fashion and art photography industry is presently primarily focused on smaller models, which can be frustrating. People often criticize me for posting images I've found on the 'nets that I would like to emulate because "most of the photos you post are of skinny girls", but that's the state of things. The majority of photographers, when planning their conceptual shoots, consider skinny models first. When shooting larger models, they tend to feel like "plus sized" is already somehow a concept on their own, like just shooting a larger woman is already special enough. Myself and some others (particularly locally here in Minnesota) are trying to change that. We're all beautiful and everyone deserves to be represented!

    Posted by: Drayke at January 12, 2012 1:25 PM

    I have an ad for a waffle iron, anikitty .Read into that what you will.

    Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 12, 2012 1:35 PM

    It all part of the conspiracy Mrs. Julien. Will this cycle never end?

    Posted by: anikitty at January 12, 2012 1:41 PM

    @Pissboy:

    Correction: The fashion model looks like a 10 year-old BOY. Girls are even more recognizable in their femininity.


    Posted by: EKnievel at January 12, 2012 1:42 PM

    The poor grammar was Pajiba's attempt to discredit me...not my own inattention ot detail.

    Posted by: anikitty at January 12, 2012 1:42 PM

    Way to go annikitty. That's quite an achievement. Oh, how I wish I could have you mentor my niece.

    Posted by: PaddyDog at January 12, 2012 1:47 PM

    Again, being overweight, in the absence of other health indicators, doesn't equal unhealthy. Can't find a thing on Pubmed that says it does. Being overweight is a risk factor for certain diseases, but even then, the culprits are more likely sedentary lifestyle and poor nutrition. Those are actually pretty huge problems. And certainly, as you approach extreme weights, immobility and strain on the body become concerns, but it takes quite a bit of extra weight to get there (and too common; I get it).

    I'm sort of thinking about the distinction between overweight and obese, here, and I'm saying that overweight people are often about as healthy as normal weight people, and it's very possible to be active, eat healthily, and be overweight. I know lots of people like this. Lots of thin people are also unhealthy. Anecdotally, at my thinnest, my cholesterol was too high because my eating habits were terrible. I was totally cute, though.

    I know the study you're talking about with regard to waist size, and yes, it's associated with increased risk, but there are also studies saying that being overweight can be protective in terms of positive outcomes for cardiac procedures, dialysis, and other things. If you control for diet and exercise, a lot the differences disappear on both ends.

    This conversation always frustrates me, because the point is to be healthy, not to be thin. Shaming and discriminating against fat people doesn't help them lose weight, and it gives "normal" people a pass on a living healthy lifestyle. The very limited range or represented body types in the media just perpetuates this thin >= healthy idea. And the "unhealthy" argument is often a thinly veiled "not hot enough" argument.

    Posted by: blorft at January 12, 2012 1:47 PM

    ...gluttony and poor health (overweight model)...

    Seriously? I just looked at her website and, clothed, she doesn't look any bigger than Christina Hendricks. Jesus Christ, gluttony and poor health? What an incredible statement to make.

    Portfolio

    And since my linking ability sucks, here it is again:

    http://www.zharkova.com/index.php?view=category&catid=24

    Posted by: snapnhiss at January 12, 2012 1:50 PM

    The very limited range or represented body types in the media just perpetuates this thin >= healthy idea. And the "unhealthy" argument is often a thinly veiled "not hot enough" argument.

    This. A thousand times.

    You can be healthy and still be "overweight" according to charts, etc. Fitness is not the same as thinness, but does not exclude it, either. And there is no such thing as normal. There is what we want to perceive as normal. Since studies repeatedly tell us that most Americans are overweight, being overweight is therefore normal. I wish we could change the discussion to being more about healthy habits than size or shape. I think everyone would benefit from that.

    Posted by: Reba at January 12, 2012 1:56 PM

    PaddyDog--With the fervor of the newly converted, I am happy to share what I'm doing.

    Posted by: anikitty at January 12, 2012 2:00 PM

    Don't pick on the skinny model, please. I am no model, but I have always been about her size. I eat properly and I exercise, but I don't spend hours at the gym. I am just a small, thin person who is often ribbed mercilessly from friends and family about my size and how I "don't eat." Well, I do eat 3-6 x per day. At larger meals, I eat until I feel full. I rarely over-indulge, but I never deprive myself. I love sweets, and eat them every day. I will never look like the plus-sized model, nor do I want to. I like my size, and I am not unhealthy, though people often try to make me feel like I am.

    Posted by: Stella at January 12, 2012 2:28 PM

    Wow. So much posting. A little more on the nit-picky aspect of this campaign...sizes in the industry have changed. When I was 15, 5'3" and 108 pounds, I wore a size 8. 20 years later, I still wear a size 8 - even though I've added 30 pounds.

    Posted by: Sara Tonin at January 12, 2012 2:42 PM

    I don’t care if a broad is big or small; it’s all about the attitude and the shoes. If you broads only knew the power you have. Ladies it does not matter what you look like, it is all about the attitude, and the shoes to a lesser extent. The world had better be glad I’m not a billionaire, because if I were I’d be flying you goddamn broads in around the clock. We’d have an orgy at my palace and I’d be climbing over one broad just to get to the next.

    Posted by: Pookie at January 12, 2012 2:48 PM

    What Sara Tonin said. A thousand times, what Sara Tonin said.

    Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 12, 2012 2:49 PM

    That lady is NOT average size, not even in the statistically fattest country in the world, America. Obviously she's not obese or anything, but still on the high side of average. I unapologetically prefer the one on the left, and the article author is a total dick for saying "I’m sure we can all agree — except for the disgusting doucheball asshole pigs — that Katya is one hell of an attractive woman". Horseshit. My natural preference makes me a disgusting doucheball asshole pig?

    To draw a parallel, gay rights advocates have worked very hard to get everyone to accept the statement "We didn't choose to be attracted to the same sex, we were born this way, and we can't change that." Meanwhile, many guys are becoming increasingly vilified for being attracted to skinny girls, and skinny girls are being vilified for how they naturally look; and all of this in a country with an obesity epidemic.

    Posted by: Craig at January 12, 2012 2:54 PM

    my girl friend would be considered a +size model. she looks a lot like the woman here. and i think she is the most beautiful woman i have met, and i have met my fair share of beautiful women; +size and not. i think the classic renaissance curves are dead fucking sexy. and the creepy twig woman and please stay in the shadows. my 2 cents.
    p

    Posted by: paul mauer at January 12, 2012 3:05 PM

    "Twenty years ago the average fashion model weighed 8% less than the average woman. Today, she weighs 23% less"

    This is blatant data manipulation. It's been pointed out already, but bears repeating, that this statistic is a result of the general population getting fatter, not models getting skinnier. If the latter was the case, then the author simply would have said "the average model today weighs xx% less than the average model twenty years ago", which would be much simpler. But, since that's not the case, it's easier to skew the data to support your opinion.

    This author is a disgusting doucheball asshole pig, and I hope he breaks his spine posing for a picture.

    Posted by: Craig at January 12, 2012 3:07 PM

    @Craig

    I stand with you, you are totally correct in your assessments. Those ladies that are mad at you I guarantee you most of them are overweight. Me personally, I like big women, I like the way they handle their business. I’m not saying a small chick can’t handle her business, I just prefer girls on the larger size. I like the picture of those two girls getting close, that’s some hot stuff. I like the way that big girl is cupping that small broad's ass. I also like the way the small girl has slid up between the big girl's legs. Mmmmmm damn, I would love to take both of them on.

    Posted by: Pookie at January 12, 2012 3:09 PM

    @anikitty, that Wii Fit thing is a douchebag asshole wrapped in a software interface. I'm damned fit (crazed runner)but I drink a lot. Stupid Wii Fit called me unfit or fat or something. Idiot software cannot seem to take into account the Beer Factor. Talk about skewing data. I'm beautiful and fit no matter how drunk I am. Take that, WiiFit!

    Posted by: klingonfree at January 12, 2012 3:13 PM

    And I'm feelin kinda bad for ol Dustin: Between this article and last week's Catherine Bach-fest, dud cannot catch a break.

    Posted by: klingonfree at January 12, 2012 3:18 PM

    Two things.

    1. I read a few years ago that biologically, men are sexually drawn to women with curves (trying to state that as delicately as I can). That does not mean that they should be fat. But a little bit of meat seems to indicate our primate brain that a woman is healthy and a good candidate for procreation.

    2. Men have the same problem. I am a big guy and wear shirts sized XXL. But I have not been able to find a sweater that fits me for over two years now. Most of them are ridiculously tight. Shirts are not a problem, as they are categorized in "modern fit" and "regular fit". The current "ideal man" has wide shoulders (which I have) but also a waist that is so skinny that even plus sized clothing doesn't fit people that it's supposed to.

    I alternatively blame the hipsters and Michael Fassbender.

    Incidentally, does anyone have a bulletproof vest my size? I feel I'm going to need one.

    Posted by: FabMax at January 12, 2012 3:20 PM

    "healthy and a good candidate for procreation."

    I'm getting a t shirt with that on it. It's killer.

    Posted by: klingonfree at January 12, 2012 3:24 PM

    Yes, thank you blorft. I am overweight, though no longer obese. I tend to be obese right after having a baby--I've had 3--then I quickly lose enough to just be overweight. It is a lot harder to get back to what is technically a "normal" BMI (and I think the BMI is pretty stupid--I agree that I am overweight but my husband is also considered overweight by BMI standards and he really isn't at all).

    Anyway, as I said, perfectly ready to admit I am overweight but not that I am unhealthy. I do karate/kickboxing/Muay Thai at least 3 to 4 times a week and it is no slacker workout. I keep up and do well despite my size. I also eat a pretty clean diet and watch my portions. I've been losing weight but agonizingly slowly. And for all I know I could plateau next week and not lose weight again for years. It doesn't mean I'm a glutton and not committed to being healthy.

    It pisses me off that someone might assume I am unhealthy because I am a size 14 on top and a size 12 on bottom, but there are plenty of people who think that. I also try not to assume beanpole-types are anorexic and unhealthy.

    Posted by: pickled tink at January 12, 2012 3:39 PM

    Klingonfree, I think I didn't get something here...

    Posted by: FabMax at January 12, 2012 3:41 PM

    Oh hey, another article on Pajiba about women's bodies! Thank goodness. There just aren't enough of those! Hurry, someone mention Keira Knightley and/or Melissa McCarthy so we can all talk about how gross and horrible they are, respectively!

    Seriously, I'm so sick of this shit. Maybe the cultural obsession with how women should look would ease up a little if we all stopped obsessing about it.

    Posted by: Gine at January 12, 2012 3:45 PM

    @klingonfree-a perky fucking voice has told me "that's obese" for 86 days. How I relish showing that damn thing. It's not lying in my case but I feel your frustration.

    Posted by: anikitty at January 12, 2012 3:47 PM

    I was a fat kid. When I was 19 I starved myself down to 115lbs, which at 5'8ish was perilously thin. I could see every bone in my body, and wore a size 5-7 depending on the brand at the time. I doubt I could have walked a brisk mile without collapsing. And I STILL thought I was fat.
    Now, nearly 20 years later, and having gained and lost the same 50 lbs at least twice, I run an average of 100 miles a month, distances varying between 4-7 miles. I wear a 10 (and have jeans from over a decade ago that size that fit again, so not just the modern 10) and while I am not the thinnest I have been, I am undoubtedly the fittest. I don't know if I will ever lose the extraneous jiggly bits, but I think I would rather have a few extra pounds here and there than look like some of the cadaverous ladies I see. I fight the self loathing EVERY DAY, but just trying to focus on being proud of being FIT rather than a certain size helps.
    Not everyone can look like a super model, but everyone can be the best they can be.

    Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at January 12, 2012 3:49 PM

    Linny hit the nail on the head earlier. This post was fun to read and the pictures are interesting, but ultimately posts like this always and invariably devolve into judgment.
    I think the reason the topic inflames us all is because it turns into a discussion (usually veiled) of what is attractive. What do we like to look at? What are we sexually attracted to? Then we start casting around facts and figures and aphormisms that discredit the beauty / sex appeal / health / happiness of fat women, thin women, and the men who like them. Why do we feel the need to prove that our preferred body type is superior in some way? Do we experience better sex if we can denigrate other people's partners? Or do we feel more confident and sexy if we convince ourselves that the "other" body type is less desirable for x, y, and z reasons?
    I can't stand this conversation.
    It makes me feel ugly inside and out.

    Posted by: katyv at January 12, 2012 3:55 PM

    "Klingonfree, I think I didn't get something here..."

    No, no. I'm not gettin all judgy. I'm just thinking in my silly head that if I'm going to be judged by my appearance then I might as well be judged by the fact that I'm healthy and can have babies, right? But if someone can't tell that by looking at my family car, mom jeans and trail of kids lagging behind me then the t shirt will cinch the deal. Oooo, sexy mom jeans...

    Posted by: klingonfree at January 12, 2012 4:21 PM

    It is so nice to see my body!!!!!!!!!! On the larger gal. It was like looking into a mirror. All the curves and some of the cushion. Makes me feel better about my body and the fact that my problem areas could be worse.

    Posted by: Amber at January 12, 2012 4:28 PM

    As someone who works in genetics with collaborators and peers in cardiovascular and obesity-related fields, I have to co-sign blorft. Being overweight (not OBESE, just overweight) can correlate with adverse health outcomes, but it is not itself causal for CAD, type II diabetes, etc. It's been said about a million times online, but it bears repeating -- correlation does not equal causation.

    You have no idea how healthy someone is just by looking at them, so discussions about which of these two women is unhealthier are counter-productive.

    Posted by: Amanda6 at January 12, 2012 4:30 PM

    Also, the point above about the VS models reminded me of an interview Adriana Lima just gave about how she prepares, eating-wise, for the annual VS fashion show:

    "Lima drinks a gallon of water a day [during a three-week training period.] For nine days before the show, she will drink only protein shakes - "no solids". The concoctions include powdered egg. Two days before the show, she will abstain from the daily gallon of water, and "just drink normally". Then, 12 hours before the show, she will stop drinking entirely."

    During that whole period of time, she works out twice a day. Make no mistake -- that is disordered eating, even if it is not long-term. No doubt she is a naturally thin woman, and I am not speculating as to her overall health. It's just further reinforcement that what we're seeing even in what looks like real life, without the mask of careful soft lighting and Photoshop, comes via some pretty intense "training" that is not possible for most people.

    Posted by: Amanda6 at January 12, 2012 4:34 PM

    I am a naturally petite and slim woman. Whenever I read a comment about "real" women I feel the need to go grab the nearest person and shake them and scream "I EXIST". I think probably both the models above are very attractive; hard to say since you only see the face on one of them. And also since "sass", the main predictor of attractiveness in *my* (tiny) head, is also only on display for the one.

    Posted by: kucheza at January 12, 2012 4:59 PM

    I have to say I am disappointed in most of the people who cOmmented on this, and in turn the author. As a woman who weighs in under what my medical weight for my hight, I am insulted by the comments calling the fashion model a girl and the conclusion of the article. I understand that the hostile attitude is out if defense, but how do you expect yourself to be taken seriously if you are doing exactly what you are displeased with? You might be being a little hypocritical

    Posted by: Chloe at January 12, 2012 5:01 PM

    Wow! When the early comments began piling up this morning, I assumed it would turn into a shitshow and I couldn't bear to look. I'm pleased to see it's a pretty thoughtful back and forth. Well, save for Pookie.

    Posted by: Dustin Rowles at January 12, 2012 5:02 PM

    Can't we just appreciate the fact that two naked ladies are hugging?

    Posted by: Johnnyboy at January 12, 2012 5:13 PM

    The bottom line is that if one is carrying more weight than one's frame is built for then one is putting abnormal stress on the bones, heart and lungs and yes, that is unhealthy. You can try to rationalize it any way you want, but it is unhealthy to be overweight. And I write this as someone who very much needs to lose 10 pounds so I am not writing it from an assumed superior perspective, but a realistic one.

    Posted by: PaddyDog at January 12, 2012 11:56 AM

    PaddyDog, I don't think that 10 pounds is really doing anything to your health. Perhaps you've internalized the ad industry values more than you know.

    Posted by: John G. at January 12, 2012 5:30 PM

    Wow! When the early comments began piling up this morning, I assumed it would turn into a shitshow and I couldn't bear to look. I'm pleased to see it's a pretty thoughtful back and forth. Well, save for Pookie.

    Posted by: Dustin Rowles at January 12, 2012 5:02 PM

    _________


    Hey Rowles, I’ll be the first to admit that my farts don’t smell like Potpourri. But don’t think for one second that yours do. Look, you want to talk about society’s obsession with weight as it pertains to women, fine, then do it. But don’t sit up here and act like my comments are somehow bad for business, not when you got a picture of a woman totally naked and provocatively bent over wearing her best “F**k Me Shoes” and with her mouth wide open.

    You remind me of a group of women recently that walked around naked talking about they want to be taken more seriously, as if by showing the public your tits and ass the public suddenly will have its come to Jesus moment.

    Or PETA, when it gets some sexy young woman to walk around naked in fur. God forbid PETA ask some middle aged woman to do the naked fur walk.

    You want me to take this issue seriously? Well then present it to me in a serious manner, otherwise, pipe down.


    Posted by: Pookie at January 12, 2012 5:37 PM

    That lady is NOT average size...blah blah ... I unapologetically prefer the one on the left, and the article author...blah blah...My natural preference makes me a disgusting doucheball asshole pig?

    To draw a parallel, gay rights advocates .... blah blah blah

    Posted by: Craig at January 12, 2012 2:54 PM

    Basically, I agree with you. You sound exactly like a disgusting doucheball asshole pig. It has something to do with being unapologetic and drawing parallels to the struggle of homosexuals for equal rights. And your "preference" for anorexic women is not "your choice" but something you've been programmed with.

    Posted by: John G. at January 12, 2012 5:42 PM

    Fuck you Pajiba. EVERY SINGLE WOMAN WITH A VAGINA IS A REAL FUCKING WOMAN. Doesn't matter how much they fucking weigh or what they look like. Fuck this place.

    Posted by: JenA at January 12, 2012 6:24 PM

    Random thoughts (share?) from the strawberry-blonde in So CA.
    I'm 5'7.5" and about 202. The chart thingie at the Drs office says that = obese. I'm thicker in spots and have a belly pooch. I've been within 5# of this weight for about 2 decades. My clothing size is 16 top and 18 bottom. I'm not a big exerciser really (I blame super fair skin and a med problem re overheating), but I don't subsist on pizza, burgers, take out and gallons of alcohol. I eat mostly sushi, salad, shabu, a steak here and there, sometimes some pasta. I could with some time, coaching, money and effort... loose a bit and be happy to do so. I'm NOT opposed). There was a time about 20 yrs of age, when I was partaking in doing some things I shouldn't have and barely eating at all... and was a size 7 or 9. I honestly looked pretty weird and too thin on my frame. There pcitures look freaky. I can't shop at Lane Bryant as I'm on the lower size spectrum of their numbers and their sizing is for gals with more hips and alot of boob (I'm a decent B- in that regard). I've been attempting to date lately and my online description is put as "thicker" and "woman shaped". Most any reply I get is that I'm a BBW or pretty fat. So much for the menz enjoying the regular size gals. Meh, the search continues there.

    Posted by: Ms MoMo at January 12, 2012 7:13 PM

    To whomever mentioned Christina Hendricks -

    Look, I've seen her in person. She is NOT big. She's curvy - busty - but at the same time, she has a smaller frame than you would think.

    I'm about 5'6" and probably 145lbs. At the time I saw her, I was maybe 10lbs lighter, and she looked no bigger than I do - although, our weight is distributed differently (which is a nice way of saying that her boobs eclipse mine). She didn't appear to be all that much taller than me, either.

    I think she gets tagged with being larger for two reasons: 1) she's on a show with mostly petite women, and appears to not only be heavier, but also taller than most of them, and 2) she's in an industry with mostly petite/thin women. She stands out.

    Working within the film industry, it's really hard to be a gal who is not super skinny. And I will never be super skinny, not if I want to be healthy. When I've gotten down to my lowest weight, which is about 120lbs - incidentally, what I weighed in 6th grade - I look sick. I have no actual muscle-tone. And, I should mention, that weight has only ever been reached after serious bouts of depression that have brought on near anorexia (not as a means to look thinner, but simply because I lose my appetite when I'm that upset). Sadly, even at 120lbs, I would probably be told that I was too fat for this industry. I'm never not going to have hips, and never not going to have my ass (even when thinner), nor these shoulders, etc, etc.

    One would hope that I'd be judged on the merits of my good work and talent...that's just not the case in a lot of areas of the industry.

    Posted by: Danielle at January 12, 2012 7:26 PM

    Wait, which one is the fat one?

    Posted by: Salad_Is_Murder at January 12, 2012 7:42 PM

    @Lindsey with an "e"
    @admin

    Yesssss!!! People need to start forgetting about weight, BMI, and clothing sizes. They're just numbers. It's all about fitness.

    If people would be less focused on achieving a certain size or weight and more focused on things like cutting a minute off their mile time, doing a few more pull ups than the previous week, or lifting more weight than the last time they lifted, they would be setting and achieving absolutely realistic goals. In the process, one gains confidence and becomes far more fit and healthy, and I can speak to this from experience. Also, aesthetically pleasing does not always equal healthy. I'm a pretty well proportioned person, but I hardly have a six pack. Nonetheless, I find that I can lift more than a lot of much bigger guys who focus on lifting to look good because I keep functional strength and fitness as my goal.

    The human body is a high performance machine that comes in all shapes and sizes, and people should treat it as such.

    And if we're all going to comment on the women in the pictures, I do prefer the "thicker" one, but just in this case (you can't even see the smaller one's face!). Limiting yourself to just one body type is ridiculous. I've met plenty of pretty ladies from all areas of the spectrum :)

    Posted by: Patrick the Bunny at January 12, 2012 7:43 PM

    I didn't find Pookie's comments offensive. (I'll give you a minute for that to set in.) He basically said that he likes women with some curves and hot shoes, but that he's open to banging a wide spectrum of willing women with attitude and fancy footwear. Fair enough. I like guys with pretty eyes and a nice ass, especially if they're dressed well.

    Now, I don't much care for the shaming of anyone based on the size or shape of their bodies, especially since, as has been pointed out, you cannot determine a person's health based on their appearance. Nor can you determine a person's eating habits. More than that, no one should be attempting to do so, regardless of whether or not you find one body type more appealing.

    If we could dispense with the judgment, we could have a nice conversation about what we think is sexy. And where Pookie thinks I should buy my shoes.

    Posted by: Reba at January 12, 2012 8:00 PM

    Uh, you can totally determine a person's health based on appearance...are you high or something?

    Posted by: Salad_Is_Murder at January 12, 2012 8:09 PM

    the fashon model would be totaly hot if she just lost those last 5 lbs!

    Posted by: manny at January 12, 2012 8:18 PM

    The fashion industry doesn't care what you think. The fashion industry knows what sells, ergo, the fashion industry knows you're lying.

    Thank you, , . (It's always an odd sentence with you, dude)

    OK, that plus sized model is very pretty, but she is overweight. The regular model is definitely anorexic sized skinny.
    What I want to know is, "Where are the REGULAR sized models?"

    THANK YOU!

    I never said they cared what we think. I said they bank on us trying to reach an impossible ideal, which they created for that very purpose.

    I don't think that's quite the true dynamic here. Everyone is always looking for something insidious, and mostly a way that it's not our own faults, but it is. It's almost always about money and human nature. Yeah, they could be working, all of them together, in some mass cabal of destroying women's egos so that they can try to pick them up again with their "miracle" products, but the same truth that holds for everything else works here: We're all vain.

    Do you really think the Miracle Bra made an entire industry because Victoria's Secret started out by destroying women's self image? You're saying that the obsession with boobs started in the 90s?

    We all want to look great and we won't buy products displayed by people WE think are inferior, even if WE don't see it consciously.

    The fashion industry is no more capable of working together than our government is, yet people still try to place the blame on the industry when it's US who are to blame. We buy the stuff they sell, and we respond quicker and more passionately to the things we want - what we want to be, what we want to have, not who we are or what we have now. It's about 'becoming'. Whether we know we can reach that goal we set or not, we still hope for it and reach for it.

    The fashion industry does marketing research just like every other major company or industry. They respond to that research just like ABC or McDonald's does. Do you really think that fashion houses want to make us feel insecure and worthless? Of course not, they want us to feel beautiful and presenting a false image to get you to buy something only to feel cheated when you get home with your purchase flies in the face of any marketing research ever done. There is no way they want that. They want us to want their products and they want to frame them in the most pleasing way possible and market research, I'm sure, shows that we respond to our fantasy self image, not our reality self image.

    You can be mad that they only seem to trot out the plus sized models when they're doing a story about body image and the industry, but the blame is on us. We don't respond to so-called 'plus sized', we respond to our own messed up ideals of beauty. The fashion industry didn't create this, our entire culture is to blame and our entire culture hinges on what we want. It's a giant feedback loop and we're stuck in the noise we created.

    The only way I can see this being an industry problem is with the designers themselves. They live and work with these alien waifs every day and they design for them. They hire them, they groom them, they even declare publicly that they won't design for larger models or their clothes don't look good on larger models. But that isn't the industry, it's individuals within the industry flexing their own egos and their own prejudices. Or they simply do think their clothes look best on skinny models.

    I'm still waiting for how this is somehow my fault. Us middle aged white guys are the bane of all, apparently. For the record, I like skinny girls, I like regular girls and I like some so-called "plus" sized girls, within reason. But mostly if you're not overly obsessed with your body image, whoever you blame, I find you much more attractive than the alternative.

    All that said, I cringe whenever there's an argument over women's weight, because dammit, overweight is overweight and it is often unhealthy and yeah, unattractive. I'm not talking about "plus sized" like the model up there, I'm not talking about curves or 'regular' sized women. I'm talking about the people (not just women) who can't fit in a movie theater seat. I'm talking about the people who sit next to me on a plane, too large to fit in their seat, so large that I can't rest my arm on the armrest because it can't be put down because their legs are too fat. I'm talking about wheezing mouth breathing because your larynx is being crushed by fat. There is a thing as too much, and all the nice "don't hurt no one's feelings" sentiments in the world won't change that. This "everyone should feel good about their bodies" is fine, as long as we realize that feeling good at 300lbs is merely hiding from the truth that you need either self-control or medical help.

    No, I don't care how happy you are with your huge self, it's a lie you tell yourself and the rest of the world. Do I think everyone should be thin? Of course not. Unrealistic. But the idea that it's all okay is just as destructive in its way as the "shame on you fatty" crowd.

    As for the models, those two women are the body types they get. The plus model will never be the waif and the waif will never be as big as the plus model. There's not much wrong with either, unless of course, the plus model is stuffing it in so she can stay on that coveted plus model runway...that's not healthy.

    Posted by: Protoguy at January 12, 2012 8:23 PM

    So when my girlfriend slimmed down to 110 lbs and everyone told her how great she looked, she shouldn't have been upset because the impetus was a blood clot and subsequent drug interactions that gave her massive food allergies? After all, she looked just fine, so of course she MUST not have been going through a life-threatening situation with a life-altering result.

    Similarly, with healthy blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol, plus a regular work out routine, my being overweight means I am unhealthy rather than a by-product of medicine that allows me to move enough to do said work outs rather than being nigh-unto-immobile? I could slim down, if only I would give up the gym. And, you know, driving, walking, sex, and other pursuits of happiness.

    Or were you being sarcastic? I really, really hope you were, and I just missed it. In which case, I apologize for the rant, but however true it is. Perhaps if I was high, I'd be less reactionary.

    Posted by: Reba at January 12, 2012 8:27 PM

    Wait, is the fashion industry NOT influenced by the designers who only design for waif-thin women? If that's the case, where are the other high fashion shows? The ones with average sized models? I'd like to see those.

    Posted by: Reba at January 12, 2012 8:38 PM

    Typical fat chick belittling skinny women (no pun intended)

    Posted by: John at January 12, 2012 9:23 PM

    There are worse things than being fat or too skinny. Stupidity, bigotry, hatred, etc. It is a long list.

    Let's get back to just being snarky, that is way more fun.

    Posted by: MRod at January 12, 2012 9:23 PM

    I'm sorry. I just cannot enjoy the company of, or be intimate with a woman who outweighs me. I should be able to "Pick Her Up" to carry her across the threshold. Without doing serious bodily injury to myself.

    Posted by: Scooter at January 12, 2012 9:54 PM

    protoguy,

    I don't see how you can blame "us" over the fashion industry if it's all one big feedback loop. Seems like both parties contribute to a feedback loop. The images we see in our daily life contribute to our concept of what is the desirable body for our group. It takes advantage of our primate brain's awareness of social hierarchies. It is in this context, that the focus groups then tease out what we supposedly want based on a small selection of choices. That doesn't excuse them, though. Just as our bodies evolved to respond positively to sweet things, and junk food merchants have pumped their goods with all the right chemicals that we "want" to make us buy their products. Taking advantage of that doesn't make them blameless.

    Also, It's always interesting to me how much people seem to love to criticize obese people for their "lack of self control," but we laugh off other serious addictions all the time. Their lack of self control is comedic. You don't hear a lot of vitriolic disgust when it comes to alcoholics or drug addicts. Even extreme cases, like a Charlie Sheen, does not elicit the immense volume of disgust a mildly obese person just existing somewhere where you can see them does. True, an obese person makes it uncomfortable on a plane (how terrible for you), but no one is going to run over you kid, because they're driving under the influence of donuts.

    Posted by: John G. at January 12, 2012 9:57 PM

    I think the topic bears some discussion, although cruel remarks are not necessary. The thing is that I was well into my 30's before I had the shocking revelation that most men would rather a woman be 20# overweight than 20# underweight, and for that matter, any man worth having would be far more interested in a woman's personality than her physical details in the long run anyway. But all of that focuses on looking a certain way to attract men, which isn't really a worthwhile goal, or trying to impress other women, which is really never possible. Having the pride and self worth to take care of yourself for no one other than YOU is what is important. The empowerment one gets from being fit, capable, and meeting fitness goals is irreplaceable, and can't really be substituted by external approval. All I have to do is look around at the staggering number of people one sees all over the place who cannot even MOVE anymore due to years of neglect, and I want to go for a run. At a certain point you have to make the decision to either get old, or old and fat. Only one is within your control. And, if you choose to let yourself get poisoned by the endless supply of faux-tography or idealized imagery, that is fine, but I doubt it will ever make you any happier.
    Now, I have to go run miles 14-20 for this week with my little dog Ollie. I have to do it because I set a goal for June 2011 to run at least 20 miles a week, and I have not let myself down since then.
    Plus, our Pajiba Facebook group Pajoggers just can't WAIT to hear my daily updates. /joke

    Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at January 12, 2012 9:58 PM

    the sad thing is it is SOOOO easy to be healthy and keep a correct body weight while being fit, happy and healthy.
    we have become such a sick sad culture where gorging ourselves has become a source of comfort.
    we complain about ever escalating health care costs while letting our bodies rot from the inside.
    the mind boggling devastation that comes from being even a little overweight is well documented yet most continue to super size it on a daily basis.
    the funny thing is so many people have given up smoking yet the devastation of obesity makes lung cancer look like a picnic
    have some pride for christs sake

    Posted by: Chris at January 12, 2012 10:00 PM

    some women are tiny by nature. im tired of glorifying the full figured woman and suggesting that this is what it means to be a "real woman". that i am not a "real woman" because i am thin, petite, small breasted - women come in all sizes, and the big ones are no more "womanly" than the small ones. they are just FATTER. i think they are beautiful! and i also think thin women are beautiful! as long as a woman is healthy, at whatever size she is beautiful. everyone should be celebrated. but stop saying big = real and small = girl, because i am tiny, but i am a real woman!!! u offend me.

    Posted by: rebecca at January 12, 2012 10:13 PM

    John G. - My comment was mostly based on the idea that it's the evil industry manipulating us into hating our bodies and therefore buying their products.

    And I criticize people for being useless drunks or crackheads all the time. I definitely remember getting assrammed over my comments about Amy Winehouse. Do standards differ if we're talking about celebrities or only celebrities we like?

    I'm saying that our buying choices, our reactions to advertising and promotion - those things drive the industry, not the other way around. Yes, we are flooded with imagery every day, but not in some evil plan to befuddle us, but because retailers and those who live off them are desperate to know exactly what we want and spend MILLIONS of dollars to find that out. What's the point of marketing research if they then ignore it?

    Which is more likely, to work out some impossible joint conspiracy within an industry populated by fickle 'artists' and fashion mavens to manipulate us into liking what they want us to like, or finding out what we like and giving it to us? People give other people too much credit. Its hard enough for designers to get their shit to the runway, much less manage their part in some giant cross industry conspiracy. No, it's easier and safer to blame someone else for what we do to ourselves.

    I've been involved with someone who has a weight problem. She's had it as long as I've known her and I sympathize with her situation and was as supportive as anyone would want, but I also saw how often she sabotaged herself, starving herself and exercising only to dive into a big bag of M&Ms later. It's true that she had a difficult time getting her weight down, but it's also true that she was lying to herself about why she was heavy. Do I blame her or think she's a failure? No, but you can't ignore the truth that's there just because it makes you feel better to do so.

    And as I said, 300lbs is not just curvy. It's either put down the M&Ms or medical help. It sounds like you fall into the latter category, Reba (If you were referring to my post). Is that not the reality of your situation? Or are you mad at me because I dared call someone fat and not heavy or obese or plus sized? Pitty patting around words seems to be part of the problem here. We vilify the model for being too skinny, vilify the men and women who prefer slim over curvy, vilify the industry over our own complicity.

    No one's crying over calling the skinny girl bad things - mostly because it's safe to criticize skinny people I guess - what do they care? They're thin and happy right? Not likely.

    Posted by: Protoguy at January 12, 2012 10:23 PM

    Half of these comments are disgusting. I have the same shape as that model. Not because of annorexia, I'm just a tiny person, always have been, always will be. BOTH of these women are beautiful, and people are just talking crap about skinny people. People come in all shapes and sizes and they're all beautiful in some way. When you downgrade skinny girls, you're just like the people who downgrade plus size girls.

    Posted by: Andrea at January 12, 2012 10:56 PM

    The comments are TL;DR, but I'm sure it's been mentioned. I'm ALL for "thicker" models. These anorexic looking girls seriously gross me out, and that's because you don't look healthy. I'm about healthy and fit, not thin vs fat.

    What people should be fighting for is to be okay with your body, but make sure you are also healthy. I don't want to hurt feelings, but it's not okay to be obese, because you are more than likely not healthy and making your body work twice as hard, and so hard sometimes that it poops out.

    That's what I wish they would focus on more. Health.

    Posted by: Candee at January 12, 2012 11:01 PM

    People shouldn't have rolls of fat hanging off of their bodies. Just because "average" now means overweight does not make it acceptable to be so fat.

    Posted by: RLF at January 12, 2012 11:34 PM

    And the airplane comment was meant to illustrate extreme weight problems, not my discomfort with them. It was just a recent example I used instead of making shit up.

    But while we're on the subject (and yes I know seats are smaller than ever), it IS very annoying and uncomfortable and frustrating when I have to crowd into a plane with fat passengers struggling to claim seats, to find that all the empty seats left mean that I am going to have to sit on 60% of MY seat because my co-passenger is taking 140%. I am not being unreasonable to think I should be able to put my tray table down without worrying about pinching my neighbor's belly fat. I should be able to reach the button to recline my seat without having to reach behind my shoulder because my neighbor's legs are too fat to allow it to come down. I should be able to read my book without Miss This is My Body Size having full body apneac spasms rocking my seat. Any doctor will tell you that fat-induced sleep apnea is deadly, not something people of that "body size" need to endure to be happy with themselves. Babies can't really help that their ears get blocked, they're babies, but no, that second bag of chips you asked for and that second glass of red wine - adults can choose to not.

    I know it isn't easy, I know it's VERY hard sometimes, but excusing obesity (happy?) by saying it's your body size is bullshit. Some people are large, tall and bulky, and will always be so. That is a body type. Some people inherit gramma's butt and can't make it smaller. That's called being a Kardashian and it's genetics. Some people have medical or emotional issues that keep them from getting to a healthy weight, that is a health/psychology issue. And some people ARE lazy and DO eat too much damn food and get too little exercise. People are fat and lazy. People overindulge and have little or no self-control. Tough shit if saying so makes you cringe. My saying so doesn't mean I said YOU are fat. That's for you to decide I suppose, but the world will judge you for it whether you're lazy or have an endocrine disorder.

    I have been a little overweight all my life and I fully admit that it's because I enjoy eating and hate exercise. Maybe it's easier for me to admit since I never bumped over to full-on fat. I do know that once I hit 200 I did something about it.

    Posted by: Protoguy at January 12, 2012 11:35 PM

    Do you feel lonely? Are you looking for the one you love? flingpartner dot 'c o m is the place for you. sign up free, start dating right now!

    Posted by: kengao46 at January 13, 2012 1:08 AM

    After watching Eddie Izzard in Marathon Man, I decided to start jogging again. On Day Two of my new regime, my legs felt as if someone had driven a stake neatly through the top of each calf. I walked down stairs like a crab for two weeks and hobbled on the breezeway at school while everyone stared at me.

    Yesterday, I ran five miles.

    No matter how often I run, no matter how stretched and warmed-up I am, the first two miles are always the worst. In fact, I marvel at the mental gymnastics required to talk myself through the full five miles much more than the fact that my cankles will carry me that distance. Lindsey with an e is right: Forget about pleasing others. Find some physical activity that makes you feel like Sigourney Weaver in Aliens and kick some ass. (literally and figuratively; I'm training for the PajIron Man myself.)

    Posted by: Stinky at January 13, 2012 1:26 AM

    I don't know if I will ever lose the extraneous jiggly bits, but I think I would rather have a few extra pounds here and there than look like some of the cadaverous ladies I see.
    ---
    Lindsey,

    C'mere, you smokin' hot thing you ...

    Posted by: , at January 13, 2012 1:30 AM

    If you're fat then go to the fucking gym.

    Posted by: jason at January 13, 2012 2:19 AM

    The general consensus has always seemed to be that the fashion industry promotes negative body images out of ignorance, I call BS. They know exactly what they are doing, the same thing the diet industry does knowingly - make women feel inadequate so they will buy their overpriced product and they are not going to tell you that you wont look as good as their models AND you won't even think you look as good 6 months from now in that dress as you did when you bought it. Or that was last years fashion, and these shoes that cost a dollar to make in some Indonesian sweat shop is going to cost you $200. Mind tricks, cuz people are victims of their own fear. Be yourself its the only way to find out you are really beautiful!

    Posted by: Point at January 13, 2012 3:19 AM

    You know what´s too fucking funny? When everyone approaches this subject, purely and exclusively focusing on their own little experiences and preferences, and then generalizing them and calling everyone else an asshole, or fat, or "not a woman". That´s real entertainment, let me tell you.

    Posted by: Qualtinger at January 13, 2012 5:45 AM

    I think it is funny that now we know Pookie has a shoe fetish.

    Posted by: MRod at January 13, 2012 8:23 AM

    "I'm training for the PajIron Man myself."

    Gahdamnit, Stinky, I spent five minutes feverishly searching this site trying to see where I could register for this event. I hate me.

    Posted by: klingonfree at January 13, 2012 8:36 AM

    I like the societal critique. I DON'T like the parting shot / not so "fun fact" about the skinny model. the violence implicit in imagining her "spine snapping in half" gives me chills; it's untrue and unnecessary. And this post is by a man? Jeebus.

    Posted by: Brigid at January 13, 2012 8:48 AM

    You know, once upon a time in history the plus sized model's body was prized and desirable and the fashion model's body would have been considered unattractive, of low social standing, and unhealthy. When you look at the art work of the greats, do you see a lot of fashion model types, or full figured types? Enough said.

    Posted by: mandy at January 13, 2012 9:08 AM

    This comparison makes a good point about how skinny models are, but completely ignores the fact that it is not healthy for the average woman to be a size 14!!! While there are few exceptions (and they are few and far between) the fact that 50% of women are a larger size speaks to the obesity epidemic in the U.S., not a fashion industry conspiracy to marginalize big women. Even the plus sized model in this does not look like she is at a healthy weight to me, so why promote that as an acceptable standard?

    Posted by: claireunga at January 13, 2012 9:11 AM

    Also, any women who are offended that size 14 is also unhealthy and should not be the ideal are probably fat themselves.

    Posted by: claireunga at January 13, 2012 9:15 AM

    You know, once upon a time in history all kind of weird shit went down, mandy.

    Posted by: Qualtinger at January 13, 2012 10:12 AM

    Having been on both sides of the debate now (though I'm definitely not overweight), I can say that I feel much sexier having curves because I'm a woman, not a little girl. I've birthed 3 kids in 3 years and I'm proud to finally have hips and an ass. No one wants to fuck a stick. I don't think there is anything wrong with being skinny, I felt amazing when I was 115 (and I'm 5'8") but there is nothing wrong with curves either. I wish more women would understand this. And, at the end of the day, men find it most attractive when you can carry yourself with poise, honor, self-respect and pride. THAT is sexy.

    Posted by: B. Swank at January 13, 2012 12:09 PM

    claireunga hit it on the head. A size 14 isn't healthy either.

    Posted by: B. Swank at January 13, 2012 12:12 PM

    Come the fuck on with this shit. The big girl needs to get into a gym, and stop eating twinkies. I hate the blatant gen pop stupidity that can only argue by using the most hyperbolic and extreme examples.

    That big girl is too big - the other model - though we can't see much of her, doesn't look toned at all, like many 'thin' models do.

    Posted by: AB at January 13, 2012 1:34 PM

    "No one wants to fuck a stick. "

    Hey B Swank, you don't get to many internet porn sites, do you? There's someone/thing out there for everyone.

    Posted by: klingonfree at January 13, 2012 1:48 PM

    Oh, yeah, we need more fat pigs masquerading as normal. I'll take skinny every time.

    Posted by: Robert at January 13, 2012 2:28 PM

    Reba (If you were referring to my post). Is that not the reality of your situation? Or are you mad at me because I dared call someone fat and not heavy or obese or plus sized?

    Actually, Protoguy, my response was for the comment above yours, but I have no issue with using the word fat. It is a statement of fact, not a judgment. At least that's how I see it.

    I am, without a doubt, a fat woman. I am also a very healthy woman, save for the fact that my joints don't work so well - and didn't when I was much, much leaner (before going on the meds that make the joints work). I danced and did stage combat for a living for years. That's what killed my joints. Repeated falls are a bitch, and even the most careful planning doesn't prevent them.

    I go to the gym all the time. I eat a low-carb diet, because I like veggies way more than I do bread or sweets. I never eat fast food because it makes me ill. I grow a lot of my own food, which is a hell of a workout. I go on long walks with my dogs. I don't sit on the couch and pig out. But I am still fat.

    Like I said, I might be able to drop some weight if I stopped taking the medicine and pain killers, but I also would not be able to move. I'll take a few extra pounds and the ability to chase after my Ridgeback when he slips the leash. So, not all fat people are unhealthy and not all of them overeat, the same way that not all thin people are healthy and not all of them starve themselves. In both cases, some are and some do. But we still can't tell just by looking at them.

    Posted by: Reba at January 13, 2012 3:22 PM

    As a man, I get frustrated with the double-standard. Like society isn't telling men that they all have to look like Ryan Gosling with our shirts off too. Bottom-line, I think health, and realistic expectations should be the goal. The girl on the left is pretty skinny, and looks unhealthy. The girl on the right is average, but not necessarily healthy either. My girlfriend falls somewhere in the middle, eats a well rounded diet, and exercises regularly(but not excessively), and I think she's gorgeous.

    My problem with the dialog is that overweight women want to be told that they're attractive just the way they are, because like all Americans, men and women, they want everything without doing any work for it. I'd love for people to tell me that as well, but it ain't going to happen, and I'm never going to look like Ryan Gosling. But it doesn't mean I should just eat whatever I want and stop taking care of myself. We should all exercise, and eat better, and accept that whatever we look like at the end of the day is who we are, and stop comparing yourself to people who 1) are photoshoped, and 2) Are paid to do nothing but be "attractive", we'd all look that that if that's all we had to do all day.

    Posted by: Bob at January 13, 2012 4:35 PM

    You know what´s too fucking funny? When everyone approaches this subject, purely and exclusively focusing on their own little experiences and preferences, and then generalizing them and calling everyone else an asshole, or fat, or "not a woman". That´s real entertainment, let me tell you.

    Posted by: Qualtinger at January 13, 2012 5:45 AM

    and I think it's funny when people need to feel better than other people, so they point out how great and different from everyone they are.

    Posted by: John G. at January 13, 2012 4:55 PM

    The problem isn't that size 14 is considered overweight...it IS. The problem is when size 8 is. Saying that women who are too skinny shouldn't be the goal is correct, but that doesn't that all overweight women are now healthy. Just cause Obama is president doesn't mean there is no longer racism...

    Posted by: Joe at January 13, 2012 5:03 PM

    Protoguy,

    I am FAT, and you can call me FAT. I totally agree with you that you don't need to pretend obese people just naturally have an obese body type. I agree that people can be healthy when overweight, but obesity, by definition, is unhealthy. I agree with all of that. The problem I have is that people will show all kinds of hatred toward obese people and then when they're called on it, they pretend to be concerned with their health. They are not concerned with a stranger's health; they just like to point and laugh at obese people. And I'm even fine with that, if you just admit that's what you're doing.

    Also, you get a lot more comments like "just stop eating" and "go to the gym" then you do with other unhealthy habits, like alcholism or drug addictions. I never hear about people saying "stop drinking, you dumb fucking drunk" on the street like they do about obese people. When I have to fly, I buy two seats, making it way more expensive for me to fly. So, the next time you're drunk on a plane, can you get two seats, so I don't have to smell you or listen to you yell-talk?

    Posted by: John G. at January 13, 2012 5:04 PM

    Umm, I'm very thin and I am very confident. I'm a real Woman who eats. This is just another way to put down one group in order to feel better about another. Obnoxious.

    Posted by: Ashtar at January 13, 2012 5:53 PM

    Seriously though, the heavier woman looks unhealthy to me. Her belly (at her age) hanging the way it does indicates some sort of unhealthy imbalance. The skinny fashion model, while perhaps a bit underweight looks soooo much healthier and sexier!

    Posted by: Sean at January 13, 2012 5:54 PM

    Gross generalizations are just that - GROSS. Humans are by definition different from each other, and a visual look, especially of just a photo is not sufficient to assess health. What we like to look at and what feels best are almost never the same in REAL LIFE.

    Posted by: Subtle-t at January 13, 2012 7:12 PM

    It's unfortunate that people are on here berating both thin and thick women. Both are beautiful as long as they are healthy and, most importantly, confident in themselves.

    Don't worry girls, the men on here using words like "fat pigs" are probably the men hiding behind their keyboards unable to get any dates. I know plenty of men that absolutely love women with meat on their bones and curves to boot! And for all you thin women, don't take it personally when another woman makes a comment about the stick thin women being unnattractive; it is most likely because they are frustrated with the media portraying thin as the only way to be while, in reality, they may be bigger but still beautiful.

    Again, both sides of the spectrum can be attractive just so long as that woman is healthy! Bottom line that is number one.

    Posted by: EWP at January 13, 2012 9:02 PM

    EWP,

    You know you're like the 20th person to make this comment.

    Posted by: John G. at January 13, 2012 10:10 PM

    Uh Like Gross!!! Both those girls are total fatties!

    Posted by: Paris Hilton at January 13, 2012 11:19 PM

    (sigh)

    I feel like we go through this exact same debate every six months here. Each time we never get anywhere.

    Dustin, if your intent was to "stir the pot" you clearly succeeded. As a woman who has looked like the thin model in the photo above most of my adult life thanks to genetics, I find your "Fun Fact" quite disappointing.

    By the way, Pookie - I am so with you on those shoes. They are killer.

    Posted by: prairiegirl at January 14, 2012 12:10 AM

    FATTY, FATTY, FAT FAT!!! (The Simpsons)

    Posted by: ricardo at January 14, 2012 12:22 AM

    John G., or should I say FAT; that's a pretty massive false equivalent you're trying to pass off here.

    Maybe you should just eat less and go to the gym. Start smoking too, so that you can relax a little at the end of the day...and have a drink, it sounds like you could use one.

    Just, you know, not the whole bottle.

    Posted by: Salad_Is_Murder at January 14, 2012 5:10 AM

    Test, because my comment keeps getting rejected for an unspecified reason.

    Posted by: Craig at January 14, 2012 11:00 AM

    @John G
    "And your 'preference' for anorexic women is not 'your choice' but something you've been programmed with."

    Wow, I'm so glad that you know me better than I know myself! That should come in useful if I ever forget my phone number or my favorite pizza toppings! You misread what I wrote, as I said it's NOT my choice, but simply how I am. And I didn't say 'anorexic' either, just skinny.

    Posted by: Craig at January 14, 2012 11:03 AM

    @Pookie
    Thank you. We're all attracted to whom we're attracted to, and that's it. Nobody is a bad person for liking any particular size, ranging from super-thin to super-large, and nobody is a bad person for being any particular size.

    Posted by: Craig at January 14, 2012 11:04 AM

    Except you Craig, you are just the worst.

    Posted by: Salad_Is_Murder at January 14, 2012 2:48 PM

    I apologize for misunderstanding your comment, Reba. As I said, I know a lot of people struggle with it for many reasons.

    John G, while I can't disagree with what you've said, the problem, for me at least, is closer to just being tired of fat apologists. It's not always nature or genetics. I'm not rude or impolite to obese people, I don't shy away from them, though the guy I used to work with whose weight gave him horrible vein and skin problems on his legs and insisted on wearing shorts while delivering food - that guy I didn't want to be near. Or the lady at the restaurant with back boobs and flaky exzema who thought a spaghetti strap halter top was a good idea.

    I know obese people have a difficult life, but yes, sometimes, when I look at someone like that, I'm a bit grossed out. Not because they're fat, but because their fat has clearly caused health problems for them and no, I'm not as concerned about their health as I am about having to look at it while I eat or whatthefuckever I am doing, and then hear about how it's not their fault
    I'm shallow, big fucking deal. I don't call them out in public and shame them. I don't mumble under my breath about them, hoping they hear and get it. I know they get it, whatever their issues are. I'm just not going to play the pretend game so many seem to be on.

    And yes, people who do too many drugs or drink too much - as long as they're not celebrities - DO get ostracized and marginalized. My ex is a security guard who can't see her daughter for a reason. There's plenty of 'waah, poor me' to go around.

    Posted by: Protoguy at January 14, 2012 7:09 PM

    And being smelly or yell-talking on a plane as counter to being too large for a seat... Are you saying you can be 'not' fat if you tried to? Although I don't drink and shower regularly, and I don't really talk at all on a flight, those are all things I can change with little effort.

    Posted by: Protoguy at January 14, 2012 7:16 PM

    I'd also point out that miss Plus Size up there is 31. The thin model is likely 19 or younger. Not quite a fair comparison to be throwing at an already weight-sensitive public. It's not showing up disparity in image versus reality so much as it's trying desperately to provoke.

    It's exactly like the outrage over Photoshopped models. No one wants to see pimply faced wrinkles all over their models, but when they hide the flaws people cry foul.

    Posted by: Protoguy at January 14, 2012 7:24 PM

    @Protoguy
    You "don't drink and shower regularly"? Do you drink and drive regularly? Or, is it you don't drink and you don't shower? (In which case you might be a bit noisome to sit next to on a flight, even if you don't talk much.)

    I know, THIS coming from somebody called "Stinky."

    Posted by: Stinky at January 14, 2012 7:55 PM

    It would be really nice if they told you which rule you broke, so that you could fix it and get your comment posted.

    Posted by: Vera at January 14, 2012 8:20 PM

    I never drink and shower. C'mon man. That's just reckless.

    Posted by: Protoguy at January 14, 2012 9:02 PM

    And being smelly or yell-talking on a plane as counter to being too large for a seat... Are you saying you can be 'not' fat if you tried to?

    Of course I can, it's just really really hard. Just like it's hard for Craig to stop lusting after really skinny girls.

    Posted by: John G. at January 14, 2012 9:42 PM

    Well, I meant, like, instantaneously, or at least a couple of hours.

    We can't help what we lust for. Some guys lust for BBWs. Some lust for tiny women. Me, I lust for a sane woman my age who knows how to carry her own baggage. Maybe lust isn't the right word there. I lust after a cute brunette with big eyes and a great butt. jus sayin

    Posted by: Protoguy at January 14, 2012 9:52 PM

    Well, this is a lot more scandalous than it should be... I'm a "big girl". I am 6' and tip the scale at just under 215. I've been this size since I was 14 years old. I wear a 12-16 just depending on the pants, and I have a bit of a belly. Not huge, but enough that all the football team called fat all the way through high school. I finally got back at them when I outran them and tackled the QB (who was the worst offender).
    I understand wanting to lose weight, and I actually have a little bit since I started college. But I think as long as you're healthy, it shouldn't matter.
    My boyfriend is about the same height, but he is SKINNY! Even though he weighs 165ish, I swear he's about as big around as a toothpick. However, he doesn't judge me because I'm (as put in this article "plus sized"), he says I am beautiful. That's the best you could ask for right? Someone who doesn't judge you for being the way you are and loving you for it.
    So stop bitchin, start the lovin.

    Posted by: Aubrianna at January 15, 2012 4:27 AM

    I don't like the comment they make about 'Society' continuing to revere dangerously thin bodies. I don't know a single person, male or female of any age or ethnic background, who prefers superskinny women to average-sized. I think there's more of a problem with the fashion industry continuing to strive for superskinny models than there is for society calling for that.

    Posted by: Bronson at January 15, 2012 9:43 AM

    Life is sometimes boring. Have you ever felt that something wonderful should be injected? Come--Onenightcupid.cøm--, you are bound to find your saucy match with hundreds of thousands of cute guys and pretty girls from around the world eager for hookups, one night stands, and discreet affairs!

    Posted by: Alice at January 15, 2012 10:33 AM

    As a skinny dude, I like skinny girls. SKINNY girls, not anorexic ones. Curvy women may not be my type, but I'm very capable of appreciating their beauty (i.e. Christina Hendricks).

    Posted by: ApatheticAvenger at January 15, 2012 1:19 PM

    Why is everyone being so judgemental?!? My God, people, this is the Internet! Show a little decorum!


    Whether you're dainty, thin, athletic, curvy, obese, octagonal, or a non-corporeal being of pure malice (hi Fred!) check in with yourself and make sure you're happy and healthy. You are? Fantastic! The best part about being healthy is that there's no article, comment, dirty look or ray-gun* that can take that away from you.

    *exceptions for Fred, of course. I think he's susceptible to Ray Guns, CareBear Stares and Aspartame.

    Posted by: HookedOnBass at January 15, 2012 4:24 PM

    Can we all just agree, at least, to never trust a big butt and a smile?

    Posted by: L.O.V.E. at January 15, 2012 6:29 PM

    Buh, buh... a big butt and a smile is my favorite

    Posted by: Protoguy at January 15, 2012 7:53 PM

    Okay I'm just gonna call it: Neither woman is ridiculously attractive/ Why? Because neither one of them is in good shape. Since when did you have to accept that women are "attractive because they are overweight? The woman who is overweight (even if it's the norm) is just as unfit as the woman who is rail thin. Is everyone going to be athletic? no. but since when do I have to be forced to think that because the national average is to be fat that I am being the asshole for not liking it?

    Posted by: fluxion187 at January 15, 2012 8:26 PM

    You never believe that I met my mr.right on casualmingle dot 'c o m. It is a wonderful place I want to share with all of you. Try it now to connected with the man for you at once.

    Posted by: kengao46 at January 15, 2012 10:43 PM

    I didn't say Christina Hendricks was big, I said the model, in clothes, didn't look any bigger than Christina Hendricks. Knee jerk reaction much?

    Posted by: snapnhiss at January 16, 2012 7:26 AM

    90% of blonde models don't do a thing for me, too cookie-cutter and redundant in physical attractiveness.

    That blonde model in the header pic is absolutely stunning. More beautiful every time I go back to look at her. And I'm saving her picture to look at in the future.

    Thank you for that picture.

    Posted by: special snowflake at January 16, 2012 2:24 PM

    @John G.
    and I think it's funny when people need to feel better than other people, so they point out how great and different from everyone they are.

    Is that what I was doing? I assumed when I said "everyone" that it included myself, especially since I had taken part in the discussion from the beginning. Sounds like you´re eager to play butthurt.

    Posted by: Qualtinger at January 17, 2012 9:10 AM

    Fat chicks, am i right fellas?

    Posted by: Ted at January 17, 2012 4:35 PM

    I look forward to a similar story about men.

    Posted by: Kristin at January 17, 2012 5:47 PM

    I thought Pajiba would be better than this frustratingly WORTHLESS topic. These articles are cheap attention seekers - Let's all turn the other way.

    Posted by: dinka at January 17, 2012 6:43 PM

    @Kristin It could be John Goodman cupping DJ Qualls´ass or something.

    Posted by: Qualtinger at January 18, 2012 4:38 AM

    I have really enjoyied reading your well written article. It looks like you spend a lot of effort and time on your blog. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work!

    Posted by: Amelia at February 1, 2012 1:31 PM