blogspot
visitor
Shutter Island Changes Release Date | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

zz1b8f736.jpg
All You Suckas Gather 'Round, There's a New Movie Coming to Town


It's All The Same, Only the Dates Have Changed / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | August 25, 2009 | Comments (18)


Hollywood is screwing with their release schedule again, moving movies its movies around to take advantage of your box-office dollars. The big news — and what set a lot of the moves in motion — was the decision to move Shutter Island from its October, Oscar-baiting spot and into February of next year, where it’s virtually guaranteed not to receive any awards consideration in 2010. It’s a mysterious move, but according to Nikke Finke — who makes up the news, and everyone else makes it happen — they moved it because of awards season. They didn’t want to spend another $50 million marketing it as an awards contender. You really have to wonder, actually, how many films recoup their awards marketing budgets. Frost/Nixon, for instance, made $18 million at the box office despite all its nominations. And with an early October release date, Shutter Island is not the kind of movie that would be re-released in February and March to capitalize on the nominations.

Essentially, it’s a little more evidence to suggest that studios are more interested in the bottom line than they are in prestige, particularly given how little prestige an Oscar nomination actually affords a film these days.

The bad news: We’ll have to wait another several months to see Shutter Island. The good news: Zombieland is moving up a week to fill its spot. I was actually excited about that, because it meant that it wouldn’t be up against Whip It, and I kind of realy want to see both movies. But, of course, Whip It also moved back to the same week, and both will be competing against the re-release of Toy Story 1 and 2, which also leaves October 9th all to the pretty awful looking Couples Retreat starring Vince Vaughn, Kristen Bell, Jason Bateman, and Jon Favreau.

But wait! There’s more: Wes Anderson’s The Fantastic Mr. Fox, which had originally planned to open wide on Thanksgiving, will now be giving a limited release two weeks earlier, which suggests they have enough confidence in the movie that the limited release will help build buzz towards the wide open.

Meanwhile, that Michael Jackson movie comprised mostly of the rehearsal footage from the days leading up to his death is getting seriously fast-tracked. It will open on October 28th. They’re really not wasting any time in putting that together.

Elsewhere, I heard somewhere (I forget, honestly) that Werner Herzog’s Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans finally gets a release date: November 20th. I expect it will be a limited release only.

And just for the hell of it, let’s look ahead to May 2010, the start of the next summer blockbuster season, and see what we have in store: It kicks off with Iron Man 2, followed the next week by Ridley Scott’s Robin Hood film starring Russell Crowe. The week after that, it’s Shrek Forever and May ends with a face off between Prince of Persia: Sands of Time and Sex and the City 2. Good times.

Finally, one last note: Black Dynamite, which looks like a movie tailor-made for a trailer (and perhaps not much else) will be released in October. Let’s take another gander at the trailer, because, well, it’s awesome:


Hancock 2 Movie News | Citizen Cope Retrospective





Comments

YOU CAN'T GROW A BEARD, FOOL!

IT DOES NOT LOOK COOL!

SHAVE!

Posted by: Jay at August 25, 2009 11:42 AM

But the new Bad Lieutenant HAS to make it here. I must soak in all that Cage crazy. It nourishes me. It feeds the fires of my hatred.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at August 25, 2009 11:57 AM

Saw Black Dynamite at Tribeca. It was probably the best movie I ever saw that featured a Kung-Fu fighting Richard Nixon.

Posted by: Josh at August 25, 2009 12:01 PM

^^ Sizzling endorsement right there...

Posted by: PissBoy at August 25, 2009 12:07 PM

"He super-cool and he know kung-fu!"

And it's rated Awr-uh. How can anyone resist?

Posted by: Jerce at August 25, 2009 12:09 PM

Did I just hear "Baltimore Colts"? Man, that's the kinda shit that'll make people cry in Charm City. Or go on a shooting spree.

Any news that means I get to see Zombieland sooner is good news.

Posted by: Rusty (formerly Genny) at August 25, 2009 12:38 PM

Just reading the words "Iron Man 2" makes me spontaneously geekgasm.

Posted by: TK at August 25, 2009 12:39 PM

Rusty, was that in the trailer? Cuz I can't watch it here at work in INDY! INDIANAPOLIS COLTS!!!!

that's all I'm sayin'

Posted by: dammitjanet at August 25, 2009 12:54 PM

Jay, why are you getting so worked up over Leo's facial hair (or lack thereof)?

Dude's still attractive enough to me.

Meanwhile, I'm bummed about the SI move. I've seen the trailer twice this weekend and my creepometer was stoked.

Posted by: Cindy at August 25, 2009 12:58 PM

Ooh boy. Next summer we'll all be left drowning in fetid pools of disappointment. You just wait.

Posted by: figgy at August 25, 2009 1:04 PM

And yeah, Leo. Please say no to the beard. It'll never take.

Posted by: figgy at August 25, 2009 1:08 PM

I *knew* you were a Bon Jovi fan, D. *Knew* it.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at August 25, 2009 2:05 PM

In other news, I really, really wanna see Black Dynamite.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at August 25, 2009 2:13 PM

Dear Paramount,

Fuck you. No, seriously, fuck you for pulling the biggest cocktease I've seen in a while when it comes to Hollywood releases. I am sick as shit of you studio ASSHOLES pushing back movies I (and others) want to see, because of some sort of fucked up motivations?

Ok, so you pushed Sky Captain back a year for effects work. No biggie. Harry Potter gets pushed because of the Writer's Strike leaving a gaping hole in WB's release schedule? Didn't like it, but I'll put up with it b/c it's not as crippling a wait for Deathly Hallows.

But this? This is unacceptable, especially from YOU Paramount! You're just going to delay this film for AWARDS CONSIDERATION?! Here's a hint...The Oscars are biased against the Horror genre! Yes, it's a Scorsese picture; and yeah, Leo DiCaprio is a great actor, but if you're pushing for the whole hog then you really should be backing another horse.

This isn't fair, Paramount! I sat through your Star Trek movie (also pushed back) and marveled. I actually sat through it four times and loved it each time. I was even ready to forgive you for that time you tricked me into sitting down and watching Without a Paddle. Which, to be fair, is like having someone tell you you're not going to get (figuratively...can't upset the kids) anally raped, and then having them (figuratively) anally raped you twice as hard as they would have without any misdirection.

Hey, speaking of (figuratively) anally raped twice as hard, that's EXACTLY what you did to me this summer when I saw Transformers 2 and G.I. Joe. I'll admit I wasn't expecting Shakespeare, but I was expecting dumb fun that could at least be enjoyable. No sooner did I think that did Michael Bay put me over a (figurative) barrel and Stephen Sommers watched. I think George Lucas was (figuratively) licking his chops in the background too.

Point is, you burned me twice with colossal failures of entertainment, and I thought Shutter Island was going to be your payback. But then you shifted it to next February. What's wrong? Drew Barrymore's roller derby picture making you scared? It'll be fucking lucky to crack the top 10. You afraid of Zombieland?! Well...you kinda should be, but it would be a close show between the two of you. Maybe you're afraid of Jim Cameron's new Fox picture, is that it? You're afraid of the blue cat people invading cinemas in December, and you're so sad you're slitting your wrists with celluloid because you didn't co-finance this one? Well, your loss. I don't know if Avatar will even make its money back, but it'll sure be pretty to look at.

In short, I'm so sorry you're more worried about awards than releasing a much needed apology for the cinematic atrocities you've unleashed on us all this week. Go (literally) fuck yourself!

Sincerely,

Doctor Controversy

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at August 25, 2009 2:44 PM

Dr. C----

Wow. Just, wow. Well said, sir.

Hey Paramount....what he said.

Posted by: dammitjanet at August 25, 2009 3:51 PM

Can't they just release the movie and NOT spend the money to market it as an awards contender? Does that make too much sense? Who are they obligated to to market movie as such? The actors, producers, Scorsese? Isn't moving the movie and "saying oh too bad we can't market it for awards now" even worse than just saying "... yea we're not moving it or marketing it as much either"?

Posted by: Mick J at August 25, 2009 5:42 PM

Shrek Forever and ... Sex and the City 2.

Dude. How is it possible that this is the first I'm hearing of either of these? I mean, I knew sequels were likely in each franchise, but to think that they're coming so soon...I don't think that there'll be enough alcohol in the world by May 2010 to make another SATC movie watchable.

Posted by: Shay at August 25, 2009 8:00 PM

This movie could be the test of whether the new 10-slot Best Picture Oscar nomination system is a good idea. Theoreticaly, the wider field should mean that movies released earlier in the year and in non-traditional genres get some attention.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at August 25, 2009 8:15 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.