web
counter
 

New Sherlock Holmes a Family-Friendly Bromance?

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (43)



agadgadg.jpg

USA Today has an early look at Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes, which opens this Christmas, and stars Robert Downey, Jr. and Jude Law. I’d been fairly stoked about this particular adapation — Downey, Jr. and Ritchie seemed perfect for a dark, frenetic, and possibly violent version of the Arthur Conan Doyle character. But, this paragraph in the USA Today story has me a little concerned:

The language has been tamed for this PG-13 outing. But manly bonding between bohemian Holmes and bourgeois Watson is at the core of the story. Trendy types might even describe it as a “bromance,” especially when Downey’s detective bristles at the very thought of his friend’s nuptials coming between them. But the relationship takes its cues from a long line of what used to be known simply as buddy films.

A PG-13 bromance? Also, there’s no cocaine, a “nod to the family-friendly rating.”


I don’t want family friendly, goddamnit. I want blood. I want Sherlock to shoot someone in the face and say, “Elementary.” I want full-on doublebacking, coke snorting, and a hardcore murder mystery. I don’t want a family friendly Sherlock Holmes. Damnit.

Anyway, USA Today also has some early images for the set. You can go over there to check out the full gallery, but here’s a sampling:

_1241601478.jpg


_1241601484.jpg

_1241601491.jpg

_1241601497.jpg









Karate Kid Remake Not a Remake | Every Little Step Review













Comments

How is that your first post of the day isn't about Ryan Reynolds getting a Deadpool movie? Or are you too busy running in circles whispering Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God! and you've hyperventilated and fainted?

Or am I just behind on the news and you posted about it yesterday?

Posted by: Henry at May 6, 2009 10:45 AM

Between the news and photos, this movie just became 50% less interesting.

Posted by: ed newman at May 6, 2009 10:47 AM

I think he smokes Opium, not snorted coke..

Posted by: Magiel at May 6, 2009 10:50 AM

Well The Dark Knight was pretty dark with a PG13 rating, perhaps Sherlock holmes...but, with cocaine...violent horse fetishes...ZOO!

That's it for me.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at May 6, 2009 10:50 AM

Henry, sometimes, if you sroll down, you can see other stories. I know! It's crazy!

Posted by: Kolby at May 6, 2009 10:51 AM

Well, how lame am I? I hit refresh and you have posted on it.

I suck.

Posted by: Henry at May 6, 2009 10:53 AM

Give me my hyper, snotty intellectuals who think they are too good for the world. And since Jeremy Brett has sadly passed, bring it on, RDJ.

pleasedon'tletthismoviesuckpleaseplease...

Posted by: twig at May 6, 2009 11:00 AM

He didn't snort coke, he drank it in some way. Also, there's one story where he smoked opium, because he was undercover in an opium den - although he clearly liked it. That's just how he roll.

Posted by: AM at May 6, 2009 11:00 AM

Holy shit! RDJ is looking a lot like a young Ian McShane in those photos. Also, I know it's like pissing in the wind here, but the Holmes-Watson relationship is not a bromance: it's a friendship built on shared intellectual curiosity. At times they don't even like each other that much. I was going to bypass this based purely on the presence of Jude Law but now I'm thinking there are even more compelling reasons to keep $10.50.

Posted by: PaddyDog at May 6, 2009 11:01 AM

Guy Ritchie doing a PG-13 movie? I've got a Monday-to-Friday plane to catch.

Posted by: branded at May 6, 2009 11:08 AM

@ Magiel at May:

He injects liquid cocaine. From The Sign of the Four:

Sherlock Holmes took his bottle from the corner of the mantelpiece, and his hypodermic syringe from its neat morocco case. With his long, white, nervous fingers he adjusted the delicate needle and rolled back his left shirtcuff. For some little time his eyes rested thoughtfully upon the sinewy forearm and wrist, all dotted and scarred with innumerable puncture-marks. Finally, he thrust the sharp point home, pressed down the tiny piston, and sank back into the velvet-lined armchair with a long sigh of satisfaction.

Three times a day for many months I had witnessed this performance, but custom had not reconciled my mind to it. On the contrary, from day to day I had become more irritable at the sight, and my conscience swelled nightly within me at the thought that I had lacked the courage to protest. Again and again I had registered a vow that I should deliver my soul upon the subject; but there was that in the cool, nonchalant air of my companion which made him the last man with whom one would care to take anything approaching to a liberty. His great powers, his masterly manner, and the experience which I had had of his many extraordinary qualities, all made me diffident and backward in crossing him.

Yet upon that afternoon, whether it was the Beaune which I had taken with my lunch or the additional exasperation produced by the extreme deliberation of his manner, I suddenly felt that I could hold out no longer.

"Which is it to-day," I asked, "morphine or cocaine?"

He raised his eyes languidly from the old black-letter volume which he had opened.

"It is cocaine," he said, "a seven-per-cent solution. Would you care to try it?"

Posted by: Mike B. at May 6, 2009 11:10 AM

PaddyDog

It's just this year's buzzword bingo. Remakes are reboots, and 'friendship' just doesn't have that same pizazz. *jazz hands*

I don't get it either.

Posted by: twig at May 6, 2009 11:12 AM

especially when Downey’s detective bristles at the very thought of his friend’s nuptials coming between them.

I could be wrong...but isn't there a bit in one of the stories where Holmes does express regret that Watson's marriage keeps them apart so much?

Posted by: Annie_Reckson at May 6, 2009 11:16 AM

Where's the Deerstalker hat?

Where's the pipe?

Where's the needle with the 7 percent solution?

Pah! Once again Hollywood has to dick around with the classics to "update" them.

What next? Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn go down the Mississippi on jet skis?

Posted by: Uncle JR at May 6, 2009 11:19 AM

I still think this gonna be...ahem..."OfF DA' HOOK"

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 6, 2009 11:26 AM

Uncle JR wrote: "What next? Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn go down the Mississippi on jet skis?"

Worse: they'll disguise themselves as women and board an Olivia cruise. It'll be like Boat Trip, only with more racial slurs.

Posted by: Mike B. at May 6, 2009 11:26 AM

Thanks Twig:

You know I get all het up about these things. I shall dial the indignation down to 11.

Posted by: PaddyDog at May 6, 2009 11:27 AM

Kolby: [insert sound of raspberry here]

Posted by: Henry at May 6, 2009 11:31 AM

Paddy;

Oh, I wouldn't know the first thing about having to hold back from beating someone for using texting language outside of a cell phone. Never.

(that song, Sk8er Boi? The one no one else remembers. Oh, I remember it. Oh yes.)

Posted by: twig at May 6, 2009 11:34 AM

Sk8er Boi? Egad! Is it somehow easier to type the "i" key than the "y" key?

Posted by: PaddyDog at May 6, 2009 11:39 AM

Egads. Maybe I'll just rewatch the Young Sherlock Holmes from back in the day.

Posted by: Captain Steve at May 6, 2009 11:51 AM

I kind of want to have a four-way with the third picture down.....

Posted by: meaux at May 6, 2009 12:18 PM

Fuck family friendly.

Seriously, it's bad enough people bring little kids into movies where little kids have no business being (like, 10 pm showings of... well any movie really, it's their fucking bedtime). But now Hollywood is lightening up movies so that these family troupes can be indulged? Fuck that. Listen, I love kids, they're great. But it's gotten to the point where I can't go to my local cinema on a Friday night because some asshole parents drop off their dicksnot pubescent kids and let them run loose in what ever PG-13 movie is available. And you know what they do? If you said "Watch the movie," you're fucking wrong. The sit in every row of the theatre texting each other and talking loudly like the little shits they are.

Fuck PG-13 movies, all that says to me is that parents are using a movie theatre as a babysitter. Kids these days got no damn respect.

Posted by: Kayanne at May 6, 2009 12:25 PM

If it's any consolation, Kayanne, my thoughts are not family-friendly at all.....

Posted by: meaux at May 6, 2009 12:32 PM

RDJ holding a (what I think is) a whip in the last one makes me very happy.

Posted by: Sofía at May 6, 2009 12:44 PM

Sorry Sofia. It's a violin bow. It's a Sherlock Holmes thing.

Posted by: Henry at May 6, 2009 12:46 PM

I kind of want to have a four-way with the third picture down.....

And I want to watch that four-way with my videocamera.

Ferreelz, if we can't have Holmes and Watson shucking their tweeds and deerstalkers and cloaks and getting hopped up on coke and grog and tag-teaming some tavern wench in a Himalayan Harmonica while Professor Moriarty peeps through a hole in the closet door while masturbating and tweaking a bound Rachel McAdams' nipples with a velvet-covered forceps, only to have the door burst open by the thugs from the subplot, with Watson whirling around to use the wench as a human shield while pulling out his trusty anus deringer (specially designed in Holmes' study with the gently curved barrel for maximum comfort AND pleasure) and Sherlock going all Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon on their asses and snapping necks and turning right angles in forearms with some kung fu shit he learned from a Chinese elder during an opium dream ...

Well why bother with the stupid movie?

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 6, 2009 12:52 PM

RDJ holding a (what I think is) a whip in the last one makes me very happy.

Violin bow, Sofi. Would you prefer that he play your fiddle, or fiddle your diddle?

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 6, 2009 12:53 PM

OK it's officially time to retire the word "bromance' from the universe.

I FUCKING HATE THAT WORD.

Posted by: figgy at May 6, 2009 1:01 PM

What's Judy Garland doing in the 3rd picture down?

Posted by: BWeaves at May 6, 2009 1:04 PM

Mike B. thank you for stepping in before I had to smack a bitch. Holmes injected a 7 percent solution of cocaine and sterile (for Victorian England) water. Dude was BAD-ASS.

And, in the last picture, I'm pretty sure RDJ is holding a violin bow, since Holmes played the violin, much to the chagrin of Watson. It's just as good as a whip...he can spank me with that, too.

And, yes, in the original stories, he DID resent Watson's marriage, in that it took time away from their friendship and adventures.

And, Dustin, I want blood. I want Sherlock to shoot someone in the face and say, “Elementary.” I want full-on doublebacking, coke snorting, and a hardcore murder mystery..... second that.

Posted by: dammitjanet at May 6, 2009 1:07 PM

Fuck PG-13 movies, all that says to me is that parents are using a movie theatre as a babysitter. Kids these days got no damn respect.

PG-13 has been fucking up action movies for at least the past couple of years.

PG-13 Die Hard 4, anyone? Yippie ky yay Monday-thru-Friday?

Posted by: twig at May 6, 2009 1:19 PM

What's Judy Garland doing in the 3rd picture down?

I assume you're referring to RDJ as a 50-year-old Judy Garland, and not the loverly Rachel McAdams as ANY Judy Garland. Don't make me choke a bitch.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 6, 2009 1:22 PM

dammitjanet wrote: "And, yes, in the original stories, he DID resent Watson's marriage, in that it took time away from their friendship and adventures."

There's a lovely sort of Brokeback Mountain moment (though with less awkward rose stemming filmed in half-dark so a homo can't tell what the hell is going on, exactly, in that tent) in one of the short stories where Watson is shot while in pursuit of the bad guy. It's just a flesh wound, but Holmes is all over it:

"It was worth a wound; it was worth many wounds; to know the depth of loyalty and love which lay behind that cold mask. The clear, hard eyes were dimmed for a moment, and the firm lips were shaking. For the one and only time I caught a glimpse of a great heart as well as of a great brain. All my years of humble but single-minded service culminated in that moment of revelation."

Posted by: Mike B. at May 6, 2009 1:35 PM

Am I the only one here who would try her hardest to wreck Jude Law in nakedy ways?

Posted by: Janey at May 6, 2009 1:38 PM

Mike B., great quote. True, true. Their friendship was....hard to categorize. I devoured these books as a kid, and have memorized most of them. I am so psyched about a really good adaptation. Basil Rathbone was a pretty damn good Holmes, but when they gave him Caesar hair, and put him in WWII, they lost me. RDJ will kick Victorian ass and take Victorian names!!

And, Janey, I will SOOOOO help you in your quest for the Jude. Not bragging, but for my fiance' reminds me of him A LOT....and that is NOT a bad thing!!!

Posted by: dammitjanet at May 6, 2009 1:42 PM

PG-13 is the land of compromise: Parents walk out thinking there wasn't enough substance, but thank Jebus there wasn't too much nudity to influence Little Johnny's impressionable mind, and the kids walk out thinking it was a half-stepping piece of shit that didn't go far enough (grit-wise) with the material.

Bra-fucking-vo.

Posted by: Recondite at May 6, 2009 1:48 PM

Well, at least they look pretty damn hot. If I want hardcore, drug-infused mysteries, I can always reread the originals.

Posted by: cleverpeach at May 6, 2009 2:44 PM

Folks, this is why you need brew'n'views in your towns. 21 and over.
That means it's legal to punch them in the face if they talk during the movie.
Or, as they used to show at the 'Mo, cue a clip of a bad 70's thriller movie with a sniper taking someone out in a darkened theater, followed by the sign: "Don't talk during the movie, or we'll take your ass out".

Posted by: Stella at May 6, 2009 2:59 PM

Stella that sounds like heaven.

Also, I should apologize for my earlier rant. My blood sugar was low.

Posted by: Kayanne at May 6, 2009 3:23 PM

My "OMGYAY!!!!" has now officially been downgraded to a "cautiously optimistic." Phooey.

I'm flabbergasted at the idea of Guy Ritchie making a PG-13 movie. My brain can't even process it.

Posted by: Mimi at May 6, 2009 3:32 PM

Oooooo I can't wait for this to come out. Not just because I'm an RDJ fan, but cos Sherlock Holmes KICKS ASS. Jude Law... not so much... But RDJ in the role should be cool enough for the both of them.

And why the hell did they go and pg-13 in it.... GODDAMN kiddie appeal... kids shouldn't be allowed to see Sherlock Holmes... its way to good for them.... 14+ I say....

Posted by: Meimi132 at May 6, 2009 5:43 PM

For a great idiosyncratic take on Sherlock Holmes, I highly recommend Billy Wilder's The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes...I do like slightly "revisionist" versions of Holmes, so I'm looking forward to seeing with RDJ does with the part.

Posted by: Jesse M. at May 7, 2009 11:24 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time