web
counter
 

Seth Rogen on James Franco's Oscar Hosting Gig: "They Hung Him Out to Dry"

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (14)



110228-ent-franco-oscars.380;380;jpg

“I think when you agree to do something like that, you put a certain amount of faith in the institution, hoping that they’ll take care of you, and I feel like they didn’t [take care of him]. Why hire James Franco and then give him Billy Crystal’s monologue? It was like, “Oh, we’ll hire these young hosts and then we’ll just do the same sh*t we do every f*cking year.” Which to me was really odd. I think they just approached it wrong. They didn’t think it through, and they were way underprepared. I think they hung him out to dry. So I wouldn’t do it unless they hired some better writers [laughs].”

(The Shortlist via Cinemablend)










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



9 Days Remain Until "Community" Leaves Us: The Countdown Continues with the "Beetlejuice" Easter Egg | Which Of These Two Mid-Season TV Promos Most Excites You? ("Alcatraz" and "The Firm" Teasers)









Comments

Oh lawd, this again?

Posted by: Pants at November 29, 2011 11:01 AM

Aww. I think it's sweet. Papa Bear protecting the cute little one.

Dunno what's going on with that Franco face up there though. He looks like a camp, dapper fascist.

Posted by: zeke the pig at November 29, 2011 11:22 AM

He's absolutely right about doing the same shit they've been doing since I was a child (which was a long time ago). The Oscars producers are stuck in a 1970s variety show warp that becomes more and more embarrassing every year to everyone involved every year.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 29, 2011 11:23 AM

I love weed as much as the next stoner but you just don't go tokin' and hostin' unless you're prepared for a big ol' collective side eye.

Posted by: sunny at November 29, 2011 11:40 AM

Yeah Seth, the Oscars had a meeting and decided to pick a hot young up and coming actor to destroy so he won’t go on to fame and fortune, cuz that’s the way they roll. Don’t blame the Oscars, maybe if Franco had an ounce of talent and not been preoccupied with putting shitty ass videos of his goddamn cat on youtube maybe he would have known that hosting the Oscars ain’t nothing to fuck around with and maybe he would have prepared himself better.

Posted by: Pookie at November 29, 2011 1:18 PM

No Seth, Franco sabotaged himself when the producers said no to his personal camera crew who were waiting to do some behind the curtain stuff live.

Posted by: haplo at November 29, 2011 1:54 PM

He's right, though ....

Posted by: Will at November 29, 2011 3:54 PM

I'm good with this explanation. I hate the Oscars because it is tired old shtick humor with a generous measure of grotesque ass kissery. So they have a chance with an interesting, quirky guy and they completely blew the opportunity. And then they threw it ALL on him. Pleeze.

And now its just back to same old crap. Fine. Blow yourselves. Just don't expect anyone with any brains to think that';s entertainment.

Posted by: klingonfree at November 29, 2011 5:19 PM

First, Anne 'I'm buzzing like a eighth-grader at her her first crack orgy. A little girl in a big city, that's me. No one bothered to arrest me, or ever slap the smug off of my face when I had the fucking gall to show up at that Occupy rally when my criminal boyfriend stole all that money on pretty necklaces for me, and I TOTALLY had no idea because I'm Diane Court and I'm super excited to annoy all of you important people--who are the true stars--today!' Frigging Hathaway. I saw about minutes, and guh-ugh.


Franco: while I agree you got a disproportionate amount of ire for your part in this, don't take the gig if you're 'too good' for it. Ooh, it's so artistic to dampen everyone's mood. Why can't we just exchange ideas about Michel Foucault, you wonder? Because we finished grade five, and moved past it, so *you* keep up with us, you self-regarding ponce. You're not a genius, you just have huge bags under your eyes and gross friends. Terry Richardson, oh droll! What are you going to deconstruct next? How he's managed to ride his father's equally lecherous coattails for decades despite the fact that he changes up his subject matter and technique as often as he changes his prop specs?

Rogen, huh? Just wake up? I thought it was your career that was slow on the uptake, now it's the alarm clock too, my baby? I even agree with you, but um, thanks for putting your neck out there a year after it would have meant something. Just send me your bill, hopefully I'll get it before you remember that you have allure without the baby fat and remember your place, sir.

I think all of the sleepwalkers responsible should've taken a hit of whatever it was that Anne was taking (after taking out the hit on her, I mean *really*), maybe they would've remembered that no one's obligated to watch this crap and realized that if they're feeling duty-bound to anyone who isn't running an ad, they could stand to make an effort into creating a show that isn't a candy-coated, circle-jerking prom queen abatoire. Ooh, call up Niven!

You know what? Do it. Do call him up, and have the audience place bets on whether he or Billy Crystal will moulder more efficiently before the orchestra cues get ignored.

If they're so devoted to the status quo, just get someone like Hugh Jackman to host. That seems to be his thing. Cromwell could cancel Christmas, but we can't get rid of the Oscars. Prayer circle, anyone?

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at November 29, 2011 7:51 PM

That was delightfully righteous, Jo Mama.

Posted by: Amanda6 at November 29, 2011 11:58 PM

Dear Seth Rogen – do you know why no one blames Anne Hathaway? Did you even notice that people blame James Franco but no one blames Anne Hathaway? She was giving the same shitty material as Franco. But she was professional and she tried. Tried to make it good and work her money.


While Franco stayed there like he was too good for this and looked like he was high on drugs.

Posted by: Shy at November 30, 2011 6:13 AM

He's right, and James Franco *is* better than this, so I can understand how that came across in his compering. OK, he shouldn't have accepted the gig - but the fact is he was given terrible material and it must have been extremely galling to find himself caught in this sewage.

Posted by: Caspar at November 30, 2011 7:07 AM

Shy -- I respectfully offer an alternate explanation: No one blames Hathaway because she is exactly right for that lame, flaccid, shtick-y humor. She's Liza Minelli-esque, complete with jazz hands. Annoying and hammy -- just like the Oscars.

Either that or no one blames Hathaway because you can't blame the "special" kid.

Posted by: klingonfree at November 30, 2011 8:29 AM

Shelving a near-universal dislike for pretty boy hipsters, people should be high-fiving James Franco for sticking it to those Academy dinosaurs. Those snobby, faux-liberal, middle-brow, maudlin, incestuous windbags...

Posted by: Chris JL at November 30, 2011 8:35 AM