web
counter
 

It's Official: Robert Downey's Best Friend is an Invisible Rabbit

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (25)



Robert Downey, Jr.-ASG-012245.jpg

The rumor has been floating around for a few weeks, but I didn’t really want to announce it here until it was confirmed, otherwise I’d have to write a second post detailing exactly what I revealed in the first, but it’s (mostly) official, according to The L.A. Times: Robert Downey, Jr. is set to play the lead in Steven Spielberg’s remake of Harvey.

I don’t think you could’ve found a better guy to take the role,

Most folk assumed that Tom Hanks would ultimately land the role, but he had no interest. I think Downey is an even better choice,anyway. For the unfamiliar, Harvey is about a man named Elwood whose best friend is a 6’3 rabbit named Harvey. People think he’s crazy. They think he’s a drunk. Mental institutionalization is pursued. And it’s hard to know whether Harvey exists or not. But it doesn’t matter; all that matters, in the end, is that Elwood believes it and that Harvey makes him happy.

It’s right in Spielberg’s wheelhouse — a well-made film chock full of sentimentality. And Downey, a former drunk of sorts himself, seems ideal for the role of Elwood.

Granted, it’s hard to imagine anyone improving on the original, and not even RDJ could top Jimmy Stewart, but remakes are inevitable, and as long as we’re succumbing to their inevitability, we may as well appreciate that the right modern actors and directors are remaking them. (Although, it’s only fair, then, that someone turn around and remake Close Encounters or E.T. to spite Spielberg).

The important thing, really, is that Harvey remain absent in the film. Other than that, I trust Spielberg and RDJ will make the right movie.

Also, in related RDJ news, Jamie Foxx — who worked with RDJ on The Soloist — has joined the cast of Due Date, Todd Phllips’ follow-up to The Hangover. Foxx will play the best friend of RDJ’s character, who has to travel across country with his college buddy (Zach Galifianakis) to see the birth of his child (the wife will be played by Michelle Monaghan). Great cast — and it’s good to see both RDJ and Foxx take on comedic roles, especially the latter, as Foxx’s attempts to recapture Oscar glory have become both heavy-handed and transparent since Ray.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"The Middle" Review | Pajiba After Dark 10/01/09









Comments

why is RDJ looking at me so lustfully?

Posted by: gp at October 1, 2009 6:04 PM

Help! Italics make it unclear whether these words are your own or part of an extended quote! Why am I yelling?

Posted by: MM at October 1, 2009 6:11 PM

Please, gp, it's me he's gazing upon.

This will be a good movie, Godtopus wills it to be so.

Posted by: Spender at October 1, 2009 6:13 PM

Hell, the Jake Gyllenhaal remake won me over; I'm sure this one will too.

Posted by: laredo at October 1, 2009 6:21 PM

I refuse to read this until the italics are fixed. It's like you're punishing me for being astigmatic!

Posted by: Kayanne at October 1, 2009 6:33 PM

I've never trusted rabbits.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 1, 2009 6:46 PM

I love RDJ, but I'm not sure about this choice of role. The defining characteristic of Elwood P. Dowd (and boy, do I hope they keep that name) is that he is the kind of person who takes his time, stops and smells the roses, and just sits back and enjoys the hell out of life. It's not just how Stewart played the role - it's one of the main themes of the movie. Has Downey played that before? The thing I can always count on in a Downey performance is energy, which isn't right for this role. But Downey is hella talented, so I will give him the benefit of the doubt and go back to squealing excitedly.

One more time, for fun: Dowd, Elwood P.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at October 1, 2009 6:47 PM

A part of me thought, "can J-Foxx and RDJ do comedy?"
Then another part thought "Dumbass, they started out on SNL and In Living Color (respectively)"
Then the first part and several other, heretofore inactive parts, said in unison "like I said...can J-Foxx and RDJ do comedy?"

We were all really disparaging the shows more than the actors, and we all concur that, yes, yes they can.

Posted by: laredo at October 1, 2009 6:50 PM

I am totally down for this.

Oops. Wait.

I am totally down for this.

Posted by: Ken Hart at October 1, 2009 6:56 PM

The italics are forcing me to read this with my head at a slant. It's awkward.

Posted by: antoinette jeanine at October 1, 2009 7:01 PM

Watching James Stewart play Elwood was what first made me want to (go back in time and) fuck James Stewart.

If you haven't seen it, watch the movie and I promise you, ladies (and fey guys), you'll see what I mean.

Posted by: Jerce at October 1, 2009 7:05 PM

As long as they don't pull a "Beaver" on it and make hime shove his hand up Harvey's ass.

Posted by: Odnon at October 1, 2009 7:16 PM

As long as they don't pull a "Beaver" and make him shove his hand up Harvey's ass..

Posted by: Odnon at October 1, 2009 7:20 PM

Stupid italics made me double post

*Slips book under keyboard*

Posted by: Odnon at October 1, 2009 7:32 PM

If there has to be a remake, at least it seems they want to do it right. Screenwriter is the next big hurdle before I start getting excited. One concern is weather Speilberg can do a small personal movie that relies solely on the script and the abilities of the actors.

Steve, for me, pull in the reigns.

I know what DVD is coming off the shelf tonight.

Posted by: LwoodPDowd at October 1, 2009 7:43 PM

Italian! Two truths and the lie!

Posted by: zito at October 1, 2009 8:11 PM

I don't care who's making it or who's in it. I would rather die than see a remake of my beloved Harvey.

Posted by: Todd at October 1, 2009 8:27 PM

I wouldn't mind it, just to get the taint of the Harry Anderson version out of my head. It concerns me that there are likely people who only know Harvey through that piece of crap.

If you get a chance, when done well on stage it can feel almost as magical as the first time you saw the movie. By that measure I've had my rabbit hymen broken 3 times, but I still don't know if I'll ever get over the Night Court of the Lepus raping.

Posted by: LwoodPDowd at October 1, 2009 8:55 PM

I love the original film. I'm going to have to remain on the fence about this news for now. I'm starting to get the feeling we're going to be force fed RDJ until we want to vomit. And I like RDJ, but I don't want to get sick of him.

Posted by: Cindy at October 1, 2009 10:37 PM

you fools, NEVER mention the italics because when they go away, everyone else is like, wtf?

i was first (first) in this thread and i didn't mention that either.

also, you guys smell.

Posted by: gp at October 1, 2009 11:20 PM

also, you guys smell.

Posted by: gp at October 1, 2009 11:20 PM

We ALL want to smell... like gp.

Posted by: Spender at October 2, 2009 12:21 AM

Fuck you Hollywood.

Because of this a year from now we will have a remake of Mr Smith Goes to Washington on our hands as well.

We are all to blame for allowing this to happen...

Posted by: AlannaJudith at October 2, 2009 1:08 AM

Spielberg is now officially dead to me.

Posted by: april_kitty at October 2, 2009 1:56 AM

RDJ might (and it's a big MIGHT) be able to pull off the laid back style of Elwood, but who in the hell are they going to get for Veta? I can't think of anyone who can pull off slapstick the way Josephine Hull (also one of the daffy aunts from Arsenic and Old Lace) did. Judi Dench is the right age and has the right look, but I can't see her doing the scene where they try to give Veta a bath at the sanitarium, or even when she comes homes all upset and tells Myrtle Mae not to be naive.

If they can find the right supporting cast, it may turn out all right.

Posted by: Carolina Girl at October 2, 2009 9:58 AM

It's always been one of my favorite films. Witty, sad, quirky, silly, surreal (in more ways than one for this girl--imagine hearing your relatively unusual last name said THAT many times in such a short space), touching, and incredibly fun. James Stewart is wonderful, but you know what? I trust RDJ not to bollocks this up. Maybe I'm being foolish, but there it is. I have hope that this may be a lovely remake (if such a thing exists). And, in the end, if it isn't a great film hopefully we can all leave the theatre with Elwood's words to think on. "I always have a wonderful time wherever I am, whomever I'm with."

Posted by: muttley crew at October 2, 2009 12:22 PM