web
counter
 

RDJ Takes on Iron Giant and the Obscene Sexualization of our Nation's Toddlers

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (49)



002459889422.jpg

Two videos for you tonight, folks. I’d say it was because I was feeling generous, but — while the first video (from branded) will amaze you, the second will completely stupefy you.

The first one is actually a couple of years old, but it’s the first I’ve seen of it, and if the YouTube count is any indication, it hasn’t exactly gotten around yet (unless the YouTuber ripped it off of someone else’s YouTube video, which is a total douche move). Anyway, with Iron Man 2 in theaters, it’s culturally relevant at the moment, and by God, it’s just too cool not to present. Here you go: Iron Man vs. Iron Giant



Now, this second video I caught on Vulture today, and Jesus Mother of Mary Chain, someone needs to put these little girls in some goddamn clothes, like, yesterday. This is pathetic, and the parents who allowed their daughters to do this ought to have their breeding capabilities taken away.

Am I being melodramatic? I dunno. You tell me.


(If you made it more than 43 seconds into that video, and you’re over the age of 18, please go ahead and turn yourself into the authorities).









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 5/12/10 | Book Review: Robert Graves's "I, Claudius"









Comments

If they were wearing BURKAS, that would still be complete trash.

Posted by: superEdna at May 12, 2010 8:28 PM

That has to be a goof like that Scarface thing, right? ...Right?

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 12, 2010 8:34 PM

Where are their parents? Jesus Suffering Fuck that is inappropriate!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 12, 2010 8:40 PM

*vomits*

*all three segments at once shrivel up and die*

Posted by: Human Centipede at May 12, 2010 8:55 PM

I'll turn myself as soon as the people responsible for putting that display on do...

Posted by: John W at May 12, 2010 8:57 PM

Fortunately, I can divorce the two vids in my mind so that I can enjoy the header pic in all its glory.

Mmm, RDJness...

Posted by: Jelinas at May 12, 2010 8:57 PM

Yeah...I'm gonna take a pass, thank you.

But for those who need to scrub their brains of All The Single Toddlers, here's a grownup version featuring Brittany from Glee. I'm told she was brought aboard to teach the Gleesters the choreography, and ended up as part of the cast.

http://tinyurl.com/n7kc6j

Posted by: sansho1 at May 12, 2010 8:59 PM

Darth, even if it is staged, it's just awful that those girls were taught to perform like that. I mean, look at what they're wearing, for crap's sake!! Does NO ONE have a coat or sweater or snuggie to cover them with??? It's like raising your daughter to be a prostitute from birth.

Like Miley Cyrus. *shudders*

And now I'm no longer enjoying the header pic. CURSE YOU, ROWLES!!! A POX ON THEE!!!

Posted by: Jelinas at May 12, 2010 9:01 PM

I will give them this, at least the girls can dance. Painful and inappropriate as it was, the dance skills were impressive. What I couldn't get over was the cheering from the crowd. No one in the audience found it wrong.

Posted by: Morgan LaFai at May 12, 2010 9:12 PM

I made it 29 seconds before I couldn't take it anymore. Oh, lord...I can't believe it.

Posted by: Jim Doggie at May 12, 2010 9:13 PM

Sweet suffering JonBenet Ramsey, my eyes!!! Seriously, I'm not even a guy, but I'll turn myself in to the authorities promptly first thing tomorrow morning.

Posted by: MM at May 12, 2010 9:14 PM

I wanted to cry and vomit at the same time. I have 2 daughters and would rather die than ever see them do anything so fucking trashy. Who are these parents???

Posted by: merandmamom at May 12, 2010 9:28 PM

I could do without the fuck-me boots and I would've liked a longer halter but it's a dance competition. It's just like a bikini halter and bike shorts with a ruffle. When I was younger and danced, I remember there were little ones in just bikinis shaking their baby booties and it was adorable. I probably did some moves that could've been perceived as too sexual but I never thought anything of it 'cause no one ever fussed over it. All I knew was that I was copying my favorite dancers and doing it well. I managed to not grow up into a giant slut-bag. There are kids younger than that doing latin ballroom and that's pretty hot stuff. I don't think it's a big deal. I was just impressed by how these kids were busting a move.

Posted by: AbbyNormal at May 12, 2010 9:29 PM

17 seconds. Or 14 seconds too long.

Sadly, not surprised. Worse, my goddaughter is 10 (almost 11) going on 30. So, what, 12-14 years to go before I sleep peacefully again?

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at May 12, 2010 9:32 PM

Dustin, sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.

Posted by: Lindsay at May 12, 2010 9:38 PM

Now I know who I'm going to mail the first batch of Crabs to, and the other 20!!!

Posted by: peanut at May 12, 2010 9:47 PM

So. Wow. Had to think my response through for a full ten minutes.

I have a four year old daughter, and I'll freely admit she has a sense of pre-sexuality to her - likes to be nude, show off her bits (to my eternal misery and stress) and knows that some parts of her body feel just GREAT! These little girls are dancing very well, in a supportive environment. Those things, I can live with just fine.

BUT. The choice to use that song, the outfits and the gestalt imagery they provoke, and the delighted audience - loving it because, 'wow those girls are sexing it up and going hard core just like adults - isn't that a wonder to see?!' I don't let any of them off the hook here - either for allowing that sexualized aspect to enter into their competitions and for indulging their appetite for titillation over the best possible interests of the talented kids.

Could they not have chosen a Missy Elliot song that wasn't too racy? Something just as kickin' to dance to? I like the kid dancers in her videos. And does it REALLY take 'Preteens plus Peaches' to make an impact? I'm far from a puritan, but I don't see how they couldn't have kicked just as much ass in a more age appropriate setting.

The difference here, and the reason why I would support halting this shit straight up, is that this is about adult audiences, adult tastes. This ascendancy of prurient interests into a passive social atmosphere does not bode well for children's psychological safety in modern times.

Posted by: replica at May 12, 2010 9:51 PM

Eloquent Eloquence be damned, Lindsay just had the funniest comment this week.

Posted by: Blank at May 12, 2010 10:00 PM

Sadly, not surprised. Worse, my goddaughter is 10 (almost 11) going on 30. So, what, 12-14 years to go before I sleep peacefully again?

Oh yeah. You should have seen what they tried to have the "girls" wear in the goddaughter's dance recital last fall. I had suppressed that memory, so thanks a lot.

I mean, I'm all for tarting it up - Meghan who cuts my hair was rocking the thigh-high boots over skinny jeans today. As in daaaaaaaamn.

BUT that's icing. When we teach the younglings that pop-tarting their wares, is who they are, we've blown it. Not in a good way.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at May 12, 2010 10:07 PM

Thanks for the mention, Dustin. I seriously spend too much time on the internet.


This ascendancy of prurient interests into a passive social atmosphere does not bode well for children's psychological safety in modern times.

Have I talked about how much I love rep? Because I do.

Posted by: branded at May 12, 2010 10:14 PM

"This is pathetic, and the parents who allowed their daughters to do this ought to have their breeding capabilities taken away."

And you are so much better posting it on this website, helping to distribute it as much as possible? Why the fuck would you choose to post that video if you have such moral problems with it?

Posted by: ERM at May 12, 2010 10:24 PM

sansho1, that made my evening. Which has been filled with nothing but math, and therefore needed brightening. Especially after the 6 seconds of that second video I sat through before realizing it wasn't worth the procrastination.

Posted by: esme at May 12, 2010 10:24 PM

Excellent. Most excellent.


Dustin, sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.

Posted by: Lindsay at May 12, 2010 9:38 PM

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at May 12, 2010 10:31 PM

If I tarted myself up like that and writhed around a stage even now, I am positive it would cause my family to have simultaneous heart attacks from the shame. Who are these parents? And who is CHEERING like banshees in the audience? It's like Thunderdome, perverted lech edition.

Posted by: Dorothy Snarker at May 12, 2010 10:34 PM

Replica, the last sentence of your comment is the best sentence I have ever read. And I've read Virgil.

Posted by: stardust at May 12, 2010 10:50 PM

Ye Gods, that second video is just wrong. That would be a killer routine if those were women, not little girls. How old are those girls anyway?

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at May 12, 2010 10:55 PM

sansho that was AWESOME. I had no idea Brittany had that kind of badass rep on her. LOVE it.

Posted by: figgy at May 12, 2010 11:42 PM

"Two videos for you tonight, folks. I’d say it was because I was feeling generous, but — while the first video (from branded) will amaze you, the second will completely stupefy you. ..."


Meant to say: GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

/FTFY

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 12, 2010 11:44 PM

It seems to me that that song was featured in the Alvin and the Chipmunks movie, being performed by the Chipettes. (Seriously, I saw it in a trailer, I did NOT see that movie. Honest. I didn't. What. Stop looking at me.)So, it has been marketed to children already.
Running around in hotpants and halter tops seems pretty white bread compared to some of the ridiculous nonsense that pageant kids get tarted up in. Age appropriate? Maybe not. But in the dance and pageant worlds that is not very provocative at all. I am not saying it is right, or a good idea, but it is certainly not unprecedented.
Those are some pretty snazzy dancers, ya gotta hand it to them.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at May 13, 2010 2:36 AM

... some of the ridiculous nonsense that pageant kids get tarted up in.

And that's another repressed memory recovered - thanks for nothing.

Posted by: BioerceAmbrose at May 13, 2010 3:21 AM

I'll bet one (or all) of these girls saw the moves on music videos and mimicked them, having absolutely no idea what they signify. To them, it's just a fun dance, something done by the singers they look up to and want to emulate.

But at some point, adults were involved, and they knew exactly what those moves were about. So what, in the name of all that is holy, were they thinking when they dressed them that way, and sent them out on stage to gyrate unformed hips and jiggle breasts that weren't there?

Posted by: ScienceGeek at May 13, 2010 5:33 AM

I had only to read Rowles' description and see the still image of the second video to know to stay away from the second video. I'm having enough of an internal battle these days keeping myself from going Michael Myers on the general populace. Watching that video would put me over the edge. Fucking idiots who do that to their children......

Moving on, for the sake of humanity....


That Iron Man/Iron Giant mash-up was, as advertised, FRIGGIN AWSM, though.

Posted by: Rykker at May 13, 2010 6:14 AM

Those little girls were doing a really impressive job, and if they had more clothes on I would say, "hey, might not be what I want my kid doing, but good job!" But since they're dressed like prostitots, it's just too much!

Posted by: peachfish at May 13, 2010 9:17 AM

Dustin only put up the second video to throw us all off the scent that he has a major problem. Yes people, Rowles has Downey Syndrome. His conversion to Downeyism: "Iron Man has renewed my faith" has lead him to exclude others:
"My biggest fear about the movie was quelled, too, which was that all of the extra characters would take the focus off the movie’s biggest asset: Robert Downey, Jr."
Dustin's self confessed "man crush" could possibly go BrokeBack. He's told us that he has "seen Robert Downey’s visage plastered into every light-reflecting nook and crevice".
Here Rowles lucidly describes its physical effects:
"It will make your nipples hard and thump them, then it will rock your face off."
Here he calmly justifies this with: "But I suppose you gotta give something to the 14-year-old boys to cling to."
Euphorically he re-tells the story of another encounter that was "a slam fuck that doesn’t exactly break your pelvis, but you may walk away with a limp."
Dustin has been known to preach: "Robert Downey, Jr. is in the eye of it, motherfuckers."
After which "the fanboys will have blissfully rolled over and passed out in their own juices."

Its cool man we don't judge, RDJ is cool and all but you got to know your limitations.

Posted by: p at May 13, 2010 9:22 AM

Honestly, the thing that made my bile rise (cuz yeah, I made it the whole way through. Pray.) was the main girl spent half of the fuggin routine with her legs wide open. That kind of standing split thing, you know - literally half of the routine.

Child abuse, plain and simple. I may cry.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at May 13, 2010 9:31 AM

peachfish, when I read "prostitots" I thought you made a typo, then I realized you made a great funny. Like how my boyfriend in college called the Tri Delts "sorostitutes." Also, is your sn a Tom Robbins reference? Because, LOVE.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 9:42 AM

I posted this vib on FB last night. My own reaction was a 90/10 split of utter horror and mind blowing impressedness at their dancing.

For the sake of honesty I'll admit, once I ignored the costumes and some of the trashier moves, I was cheering the kids on for their talent.

Then i felt dirty inside and gave myself a bleach detox.

Posted by: Nadine at May 13, 2010 9:43 AM

coveredinbees, another zinger is Kinderwhore but it's less funny because it could seriously be applied to child prostitutes.

So it's relevant HERE

Posted by: Nadine at May 13, 2010 9:45 AM

Sciencegeek makes a great point, kids that age mimic without necessarily(had to spell check that word FIVE times) knowing that what they're doing is bad or wrong.
So the kids PROBABLY weren't up on stage thinking about how sexy they looked.
But mimicking bad behaviour is still bad behaviour and yeah, at some point an adult said that aggressive pelvic thrusts, mexican wave bootie drops(which would look awesome performed by ADULT dancers) and standing splits, all while wearing lingerie i can literally go and buy in a store that sells that exact set along side dildos and lube, was okay.
And it's not.

The kids are incredible, incredible dancers, especially the one who takes lead for the last 30 seconds but this shit is wrong on INFINITE levels.

The only solace is I THINK they have tights on under their...well..I dont want to say panties because these days it has saucy implications so their...shorts, shall we say?
We wondered last night if it was a full body sock but there are belly buttons on them kids so its only the lower half.
The tights dont make it okay but...I dont know, I find a weird comfort in them.
Like I say, STILL NOT OKAY but my head continues to go 'at least they have tights on though, there's that'

Blerch, now i'm grossed out.

Disclaimer: Despite what my above comments might suggest to anyone, 'specially people looking for a fight or trolling-I do not condone the videos nor find the girls incredible abilities as reason to excuse the wrongness of whats going on. They could have worn more modest costumes, and certain moves could have been replaced by something more appropriate. So dont get all riled up.

Posted by: Nadine at May 13, 2010 9:53 AM

You know, I think I disliked it so much BECAUSE those girls are actually talented. I'd really like to see them do something that doesn't make me throw up in my mouth. And sure, when I was younger little girls emulated Madonna and Britney, and knew the salacious choreography but Beyonce in her (AWESOME) video crosses the line from suggestion to, well, FULL ON FUCKING LATERAL CROTCH GRINDING. Not cool, not cool.

Posted by: coveredinbees at May 13, 2010 10:01 AM

If these little tarts are such good dancers then perhaps they could have done something that didn't look like a burlesque show's pee-wee division.

What I find so ironic is that there areas in the South where this kind of parental behavior is most socially acceptable, is also the most likely place where you'll hear outcries regarding the content of TV, movies, music, books...etc being offensive and sinful.

JonBenet Ramsey and all the A&E series aside, this is a sickness. Why it is more acceptable to treat a child like a juvenile avatar through which parents express their unrealized fantasies (sexual or otherwise)is beyond me. If a stranger does this to a child, we all collectively fire up the torches like angry villagers after Frankenstein. But when parents do this to their own children, it's somehow cute and rewarding. Given what I just saw, how long before one of these acts incorporates a stripper pole? When some prepubescent debutant twirls on it and hangs upside-down by her inner thighs, what do you want to bet some people will cheer wildly and her momma will be crying with pride? The blame doesn't lie with the children, it lies with their brain-dead parents.

I am rather thankful that most of you in here seem to be just as repulsed of this display as I am. If I ever saw my daughter presented like this, I'd show you a dance instructor broken in half by the next day. As parents, it is their responsibility to do what's best for their children. These people have failed epically.

Posted by: bleujayone at May 13, 2010 11:02 AM

I'm with the folks who are disappointed that those girls, who have serious dance skills, were put in such ridiculous costumes and had overly sexual moves in their routine. It totally detracted from their dancing. And it wasn't just that they were wearing halters and hot pants, but their sheer gloves and above-the-knee socks/stockings added to the overall over-sexualized image. Just so inappropriate. They have real skills and they deserved better--their dancing should have been center stage.

Posted by: tamatha at May 13, 2010 11:33 AM

22 seconds... I hate that song anyway, but the little girls bumping and grinding did add that extra "ick" factor.

Hey, strippers gotta come from somewhere. Thanks, crappy parents, for making sure that the sex industry need never face a labor shortage.

Posted by: Slash at May 13, 2010 11:39 AM

From a technical aspect, the kids' dancing was impressive. But what the hell was the choreographer thinking? Putting eight year olds (who in some countries are considered old enough for betrothal) in frilly booty shorts and making them dance to a song telling a man he should have proposed when he had the chance is problematic in so many ways. A good choreographer is one who designs routines appropriate for the dancers; in this case a good choreographer would have let the little girls look and dance like little girls instead of mini-Beyonces.

Posted by: Inaras at May 13, 2010 2:53 PM

Should I catch my goddaughter wearing something like that prior to turning 21, I'll be putting her into a burlap sack and tying it off at the top with a couple of eyeholes in it.

Posted by: Drake at May 13, 2010 8:22 PM

23 seconds before my outrage took over.

What's sad is this is nothing new. Ever see some of those shorts from Ye Olden Days where Shirley Temple and assorted other children are acting like flappers and pretending to party it up and carry on elaborate romantic entanglements? The audience is meant to go, "They're acting like tiny adults! IT'S ADORABLE!" but there's this whole uncomfortable vibe to it that I'm completely unable to get past, and that's the part where the whole fucking thing smells of child abuse.

The kids in the second video are this generation's Tiny Flappers In a Speakeasy.

Posted by: Craig at May 13, 2010 8:34 PM

If you put "Military" and "flirting" together. You will get a place to meet military singles and admirers in the world! Are you a civilian looking to meet someone in the military? Are you serving in the military? You've come to the right place! We bring together single members of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, Coast Guard, Police Force, and Firefighters -- as well as civilians, veterans. Over the years, we have achieved tremendous success in bringing military singles and admirers together.

Posted by: lily at May 13, 2010 10:00 PM

Oh my sweet merciful Christ.

Right around 1:45 is the most horrifying move, I think.

Just...no. I hope I never have a daughter.

Posted by: K at May 14, 2010 11:52 AM

I hope Chris Hanson came out after that and said to the audience, "I'd like all of you to take a seat."

I mean fuck, they dress kids up like sex objects, make them act like sex objects, present models with childlike bodies as the sexual ideal, and then wave their hands in shocked dismay when they discover pedophilia. It's like shitting on the floor and then asking where the smell is coming from.

And the extra bit of fucked-upness comes from knowing that if they had boys dressed in skimpy clothes and moving like that, there'd be a massive outcry and investigation.

Why can't we just let kids be kids?

Posted by: Franzibald at May 17, 2010 6:46 AM