web counter
 

Rachel Weisz and Monicca Belluci Together At Last.

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (31)

monica-bellucci-15.jpg

Hi! Welcome to this post about Monicca Belluci and Rachel Weisz sharing the same screen in a movie that involves sex! Thank you for clicking on the provocative headline of this post. I couldn’t decide whether to use an image of Belluci or Weisz, but I ultimately went with Belluci, because she’s the more sexual actress, plus look at that leopard print! I figure there’s a great deal in that outfit for all of you to discuss in the comment section, and hopefully it will distract you from the fact that the actual news in this item is really not all that exciting. Which is to say: I’m sorry for getting your hopes up (as well as your pleats — ew) only to shatter them, like a kitten’s head against a boulder.

But it is true: Weisz and Belluci are in a movie about sex. Sex trafficking, to be exact. Weisz will play a Nebraska cop serving as a peackeeper in post-war Bosnia. While on the job, she discovers that the UN is covering up a sex-trafficking scandal. Appropriately enough, the title of the movie is The Whistleblower. Vanessa Redgrave and David Strathairn also star.

No word, yet, on the role that Belluci will play. But for the edification of those who clicked on this article because of the headline, let’s just assume she’s not playing one of the sex-trafficked women, and that she plays a lesbian love goddess who has a thing for female Nebraskan cops.

Happy now?

(H/T Screendaily)







← Old Dogs Trailer 2 | The Ten Most Generic-Looking Hollywood Actresses →













Comments

Happy now?

Yes.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 20, 2009 11:37 AM

gaah..mmmmggfff.... bunk.. but... sex trafficking bad... lesbian love goddess good... it wins out... bunk

Posted by: TSF at October 20, 2009 11:39 AM

They are two of the most gorgeous women EVER.

Posted by: Julie at October 20, 2009 11:40 AM

Big not-at-all-out-of-the-ballpark guess, Strathairn is the one covering everything up. Because the rest of the cast is female, it's a movie about sex, and David Strathairn plays too good of a bad guy to make a movie in which all men don't look like scumbags. Unless we get to see more than the usual amount of Bellucci and Weisz, I'll pass.

Posted by: Christian H. at October 20, 2009 11:41 AM

Beautiful woman, terrible photoshop.

Posted by: Jadashay at October 20, 2009 11:44 AM

Although Monica Bellucci disappoints me by signing the "support Polanski" petition, I still think she's one of the most beautiful women alive.

Posted by: MM at October 20, 2009 11:49 AM

I would so willingly go gay for either of these luscious ladies. Mr. Dammit has some fantasies along these lines.......so, I'm just putting that out there girls.

Posted by: dammitjanet at October 20, 2009 11:55 AM

*pfffft*

I see better looking women at my local Wal-Mart

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 20, 2009 11:59 AM

I would do vile, vile things to their vaginas.

Posted by: spideychris at October 20, 2009 12:04 PM

I do hope this movie realistically portrays sex trafficking. There are so many women involved in trafficking people, but it seems to be assumed that it's only men who traffic women for sex.

Posted by: pissant at October 20, 2009 12:07 PM

Either BSlim lives in the greatest suburb of all time or he's got really fucked up taste in women. I'm guessing it's the latter.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at October 20, 2009 12:08 PM

Appropriately enough, the title of the movie is The Whistleblower.

I see what you did there. Now these pants are never going to come clean.

Posted by: admin at October 20, 2009 12:16 PM

Could someone give me a quick recap of Dustin's news post? Every time I look at it, all I see is:

"Monicca Belluci and Rachel Weisz...a movie that involves sex! Belluci...Weisz...Belluci...sexual actress...leopard print!

Weisz and Belluci are in a movie about sex. Sex trafficking...Weisz...sex-trafficking scandal... The Whistleblower.

Belluci...sex-trafficked...she plays a lesbian love goddess who has a thing for female Nebraskan cops."

It's all wonderfully confusing to me.

Posted by: David at October 20, 2009 12:17 PM

I'd like to officially put in my bid to portray the whistle.

Posted by: Bistro at October 20, 2009 12:41 PM

I'll go gay for Monica Bellucci just as soon as I'm done with her husband.

Posted by: Cindy at October 20, 2009 12:42 PM

I would normally be super psyched about this but Monica has been crossed off my girl crush just like Natalie Portman since they both signed the Polanski petition.

Posted by: Michelle at October 20, 2009 12:55 PM

How did the words "glistening", "heaving" and "straining" not make this post?

Posted by: mrcreosote at October 20, 2009 1:25 PM

mrcreosote raises an excellent point. Dustin, you're losing your game.

Posted by: admin at October 20, 2009 1:30 PM

Monica Bellucci is so hot, she gets an extra C in her name.

Posted by: Slash at October 20, 2009 1:43 PM

No word, yet, on the role that Belluci will play. But for the edification of those who clicked on this article because of the headline, let’s just assume she’s not playing one of the sex-trafficked women, and that she plays a lesbian love goddess who has a thing for female Nebraskan cops.

One can only hope, and for god's sake, be sure to tuck that tent your pitching under your belt before your boss finds out.

Posted by: George at October 20, 2009 1:46 PM

(as well as your pleats — ew)

Hey, don't "ew" us --you mentioned it (I was gonna say "brought it up," but that's an ew, too)-- it was your own sick thought.

It's not like I still had pants on by the time the page loaded, anyway.

Posted by: Rykker at October 20, 2009 1:48 PM

Let's can the euphemisms...it's time to manipulate my penis to ejaculation!

Posted by: stryker1121 at October 20, 2009 2:34 PM

Some of you read this site with your pants on?

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at October 20, 2009 2:37 PM

Y'all joke, but this post actually did directly lead to bunk time for me.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 20, 2009 2:47 PM

Some of us read it wearing only chaps.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 20, 2009 3:09 PM

We don't wear pleats, Rowles!

Assless chaps Lindsey?

Posted by: John Denver's Wingman at October 20, 2009 3:43 PM

All chaps are ass-less. Otherwise they would just be leather pants.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 20, 2009 5:07 PM

Rachel Weisz and Monica Bellucci? I'll see it for them alone, the sex is an added bonus and this: she plays a lesbian love goddess who has a thing for female Nebraskan cops. that'd be the fucking lotto!

Posted by: Eyvi at October 20, 2009 5:23 PM

Either BSlim lives in the greatest suburb of all time or he's got really fucked up taste in women. I'm guessing it's the latter.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at October 20, 2009 12:08 PM


----------------------------------------------


So basically, you hate America.

That's what you wrote, Muhammed.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 20, 2009 8:22 PM

Some of us read it wearing only chaps.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 20, 2009 3:09 PM
---
*sproingggg*

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at October 21, 2009 12:07 AM

M: Rachel Weisz
F: Monica Bellucci
K: a few hours in my bunk.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at October 21, 2009 1:13 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time