200804_David.-O-Russell.jpg
Exclusive: Pride and Prejudice and Zombies Lands a Director


The Choice: Three Kings' David O. Russell / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | December 14, 2009 | Comments (10)


The development of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is moving quickly ahead. Last week, it was rumored that Natalie Portman would play the lead in the the adaptation of the Seth Grahame-Smith’s Jane Austen slash zombie mash-up was confirmed (she makes an excellent bridge between hipster and period piece, if I don’t say so myself. Also, she’s very pretty).

Today, we learned from a very reliable (and handsome) inside source familiar with the project that Pride and Prejudice and Zombies has found itself a director in the form of the temperamental directing genius, David O. Russell (Three Kings, I Heart Huckabees), who is finishing a deal to come aboard. Russell will also adapt.

Russell is an interesting choice — he’s certainly got the hipster cred, but no period piece experience on his resume or horror-movie experience, for that matter. I’m frankly surprised that Russell has even managed to land another project, given his history of on-set tyranny, not to mention the fact that his health-care comedy, Nailed, still hasn’t finished post-production, so far as we know. The movie had run into financial problems and, at one time, James Caan quit the production. (It takes some kind of asshole to scare James Caan off a project). Granted, Russell did finish lensing on Fighter last August, with Christian Bale and Mark Wahlberg (Matt Damon was smart enough to leave the project before it got off the ground). Can you imagine Bale and Russell working together? It must have been like two rocks having sex.

Given his history, and the fact that great actors continue to work with him, I suppose this is a matter of talent winning out over anything else. Good for Hollywood … ?

Please be nice to Portman. She’ll kill your fucking dog for fun, so don’t push her.

I’m not completely sold on Russell as director of this, either. I had hoped for an approach more similar to Grahame-Smith’s — a very straightforward adaptation of Pride and Prejudice with a smattering of zombies tossed into the mix, but not enough, really, to alter the flow of the original narrative. I’d expect a more meta wink-wink nudge nudge self-aware approach from Russell, and probably one suffused with his quirky brand of existential nihilism.

But maybe that’s a good thing. Thoughts?


Pajiba Love 12/14/09 | Princess and the Frog, The Review







Comments

Can you imagine Bale and Russell working together? It must have been like two rocks having sex.

HA! Thanks for that.

Posted by: TylerDFC at December 14, 2009 2:30 PM

It must have been like two rocks having sex.

Can I please be put between a rock and a hard place?

Posted by: esme at December 14, 2009 2:33 PM

I dragged my fiance to see Zombieland, and she loved it. And she f-ing HATES zombie movies.

This is next on the list.

Posted by: superasente at December 14, 2009 2:36 PM

it sounds too good!
next: Christian Bale acting zombie Darcy! LOL

Posted by: carrie at December 14, 2009 2:50 PM

Everyone seems to have missed the point that this Austen/Zombie mashup movie idea is so stupid it makes Ashlee Simpson look like Stephen Hawking. It is at least three billion times stupider than the "Battleship" movie.

Sheeee.

Posted by: Jerce at December 14, 2009 3:36 PM

Ok. I was meh about Natalie Portman before (though I loved her in The Professional but she was what? 13?) because her voice is annoying and her acting is not stellar. I'm also not a Star Wars fan.

And then she signed the Polanski petition, and said something about letting your dinner guests eat meat = tolerating rape. And now I'm completely soured on her.

Also - her doing kung fu and ninja moves, her kicking ass? Please, like that's believable.

Posted by: dene at December 14, 2009 4:15 PM

You know Jerce, you and I have clashed before on movie taste (notably, Peter's Friends) but here I have to give you a hearty AMEN.
I tried, I really tried with this, but the book was just stupid. It was P&P with the odd zombie scene thrown in. If one is going to do something like this, it has to be clever and the selected classic should be selected for a reason, not because a) it's currently popular or b) shock value. There is nothing clever about this. It's just a gimmick.
Now Wuthering Heights with zombies: that would be a movie. Oh how I'd love to see Catherine Earnshaw's head ripped off her cock-tease shoulders.

Posted by: PaddyDog at December 14, 2009 6:14 PM

I smell a franchise. Brains and Sensibility.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at December 14, 2009 7:24 PM

It's actually Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, if you can believe it.

Posted by: Smithy at December 15, 2009 4:38 AM

I'm watching G4's Attack of the Show right now and this exclusive was mentioned in the little text crawl across the bottom of the screen. I thought that was pretty cool.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at December 15, 2009 7:10 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.



Related Posts with Thumbnails









twitter_badge-thumb-300x110-5250.jpg facebook-thumb-300x112-5252.jpg




recentreview.jpg