web
counter
 

Our Public Education System Is Broken. We're Failing Our Kids

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (65)



waiting_for_superman.jpg

Earlier today, I posted a review of the Frontline Doc, College, Inc., which is about how for-profit colleges like University of Phoenix are taking advantage of both taxpayers and the misinformed and disadvantaged people who attend those mostly online schools. Davis Guggenheim’s (An Inconvenient Truth) documentary, Waiting for Superman explores the public education system and, perhaps, why it is that so many people end up attending an institution like the University of Phoenix in the first place: Because our public education system is broken, we’re failing our kids, and Americans are arrogantly stubborn about facing up to it.

Waiting for Superman follows a handful of promising children as they navigate the public school system, as it surveys the drop-out factories, and dissects the problems with the system. It looks like an amazing, powerful documentary, filled with heartbreak and inspiration, and I reallyfuckingwanttosee it. Watch this trailer.

If someone could tell me what that song is in the end, I’d appreciate it, too. I know that John Legend is involved in this documentary, and he’s contributed this (really great) song to it, but I’d love to know what the one in the trailer is, too.

The documentary, a break-out hit at this year’s Sundance Festival, is due to be released this fall. And if it sounds like I’m being a shill, it’s because I am. I have no connection to the doc, of course, because I run a website that rhymes with the female anatomy. But just because I don’t profit from it doesn’t mean I can’t be a shill for a film I haven’t even seen yet. Take that and stick it in your hipster nihilism, Armond White.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba's 2010 Comic-Con Coverage | More Than How Cool the Trailers Looked | Nixon Goes to Utah









Comments

When I first saw this trailer, I just wept. Many of my friends are teachers, and they are ready for this to come out and highlight some of our major issues.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at July 21, 2010 4:21 PM

I can't even imagine having to depend on your number being called in order to get a good education. That's just fucking wrong.

Posted by: admin at July 21, 2010 4:23 PM

Wow.

I'm aware of some of the issues facing our educations system, but I know there is so much I am not even cognizant of. This trailer really makes me want to see this. However, I know for a fact that I'll probably be crying during that lottery scene. Watching kids crushed at the turn of a bingo jumbler would wreck me.

Posted by: Kayanne at July 21, 2010 4:25 PM

Haha. I typed "educations system." Yes, I went to public school in North Carolina, why do you ask?

Posted by: Kayanne at July 21, 2010 4:26 PM

"It looks like an amazing, powerful documentary, filled with heartbreak and inspiration, and I reallyfuckingwanttosee it.."

This reads like copy. Found ourselves a little promotional side gig now, Rowles?

I keed keed ...looks as you say, powerful and amazing.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 21, 2010 4:28 PM

Sorry, what is the lottery for? I do not understand the lottery thing at all but I'm pretty sure it's going to make me cry

Posted by: Nadine at July 21, 2010 4:29 PM

Yeah, if that last lottery ball isn't "#3", I may have to check out of that. I had a hard enough time watching those ficticious kids in "The Wire" get chewed up by the education system. I'm not sure how well I could stomach watching real kids go through the same type of thing.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at July 21, 2010 4:29 PM

Can't wait to see this. I'll be seeing it as soon as it comes out. Also, the song at the end of the trailer is Matisyahu's One Day.

Posted by: beckster at July 21, 2010 4:31 PM

I am a product of public school and a private Catholic school education as a child. I went to a state college. I bit my lip and went to the Catholic high school because it was a good school, not because my family agreed with the Catholic Church. In my public school in junior high I was thrown into lockers, knocked down the stairs, ostracized for "mean girl" style fights, and did not receive an entire year's worth of math in the 7th grade because the teacher quit and they had no one to replace her.

I have worked or volunteered in public schools in Maine, Massachusetts and New York. I have had chairs thrown at me, been sexual harassed by teenagers, kids who had teeth rotting out of their heads and no breakfast in their stomachs, but we were not allowed to get involved for fear of a lawsuit. The violent and sexual predatory students were always allowed back in class because public schools cannot deny them an education.

I have my ESL certification and when the economy gets better I plan to tutor adults who want to learn English. Unless I am in a relationship with a reasonably wealthy man in my future and we can send our kid(s) to schools in the suburbs for small class ratios, I plan on sending them to private or charter schools; even if that means they have a Jewish, Catholic or Islamic base. As suffocating as the Catholic rhetoric was, if a student sexual harassed someone or assaulted a teacher they were expelled, period. I am the most tree-hugging liberal in the world, but after dealing with red tape in one of the biggest cities in the country, I firmly believe the public school system in the U.S. is broken beyond repair.

Posted by: scorzi at July 21, 2010 4:31 PM

Seriously though, what is the lottery?

I literally cant understand what that is and if it's what I think I have a lot of raging to go and do so...anyone?

Posted by: Nadine at July 21, 2010 4:36 PM

Nadine, as I understand, the lottery is to see which few children are accepted into the only decent school available. Essentially, if your number isn't called, you have no hope and no future.

Weeping yet?

Posted by: Patty O'Green at July 21, 2010 4:47 PM

Yes, Patty, I am.

What the FUCK, you guys?

Posted by: Nadine at July 21, 2010 4:57 PM

As a product of the New York/Jersey/PR public school system I once felt proud of having gotten an education that has taken me to a fairly comfortable place. Now, not so much, it pains and angers me to see what has happened to a system with soooooo many resources as it is being pounded into the ground BY THE STUDENTS AND the PARENTS first and foremost. Mrs. Slim (who is a product of Catholic private school)is a very dedicated teacher and you people wouldn't believe how these people just suck the life and love for teaching out of her and her fellow teachers. EVERY day it's something. These fucking people, entitled laid-back, unemployed worthless scum are all about "rights" and demands for their precious future welfare recipients and ZERO, absolutely ZERO responsibilities.
They don't care to follow-up on their kids education or have a civilized meeting with an educator but they will drop their TV remote to come, into a school, and assault a teacher if they feel their kid has been "dissed" (meaning they student was taken to task for acting a fool and disrupting the class).
I see all that shit and it makes me feel ashamed 'cause I came from there, but damn enough is enough. One day, not very far in the future, there won't be a Public System and they'll have themselves to blame and folks who can afford to pay for a basic education won't care for those who can't. I know I'm beyond caring already, they had it and they blew it.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 21, 2010 4:57 PM

Nadine,

New York and D.C. have large amounts of charter schools. A charter school is like a private school or a Montessori school that is independently run but receives money from the state. Most students wear uniforms and the school revolves around a certain curriculum (ex. government, environment, a language, etc). If your neighborhood public school is not that good, you can apply to a charter school (or as many as you want--New York City has over 100 of them.) While a lot of them have interview processes, most rely on the lottery system, especially for kindergarten and pre-k.

Example: You have a child that lives in a poor, typically inner city area with a failing public school. You find a charter school nearby that you like, so you fill out all the paperwork, take junior to visit the school, and have an interview with potential teachers. Say junior is in first grade, and there are only 25 people that can be in that first grade, so there are 25 open spots. But in a lot of impoverished neighborhoods, you have 50-100 kids trying to get into those 25 spots. So all the potential students and families meet on a certain day at an auditorium or school location, the principal or headmaster pulls 25 names out of a box or 25 balls from the lotto machine, and those are the students that get to go to that school. Everyone else has to apply to another charter school or go to the public school. If there are no other private, Montessori or charter schools, your child is forced to go the public school.

Posted by: scorzi at July 21, 2010 5:02 PM

They need a rule where if you repeatedly flunk courses, never show up, assault people or sexual harass people, you're out. Done. No high school for you. I know it sounds totalitarian but those kids being disruptive are ruining it for everyone else.

Posted by: scorzi at July 21, 2010 5:04 PM

Well now I'm good and fucking depressed.
I know kids can miss out on their ideal schools but fucking HELL.

Posted by: Nadine at July 21, 2010 5:06 PM

Have. To. See. This. I'm a public school teacher, have been for 8 years. At a school with almost 100% free/reduced lunch rates (almost 100% of the kids live in homes below the poverty line). These kids come from families who can't get or keep jobs; rent-jump constantly to avoid having to pay the weekly or monthly rents at the slum hotels down the street; who have drug-addicted or sexually abusive parents who are only concerned with their own wants and needs. And I'm still held accountable for making sure that every kid in my class "meets standard" for the year, despite the fact that when they came to me, they hadn't "met standard" for several years before. Our system is broken - but mainly because it has shifted blame from the students and their parents to the teachers. Geoffrey Canada (briefly pictured in the trailer) and his Harlem Project (I think - correct me on the name, please) have managed to create a system that works - but it REQUIRES PARENT INVOLVEMENT, from birth through college. When our system starts demanding accountability from PARENTS, things will start to change.

Posted by: randomlurker at July 21, 2010 5:13 PM

scorzi - I can't tell you how many kids I've had to accept into my classroom after they've been expelled from another school for bringing a weapon to school or assaulting an adult. Fourth and fifth graders. Yeah, they got expelled, but because we can't deny them an education, they just get placed at the nearest school to the last one. That's the system's fault, but even worse is the schools that have completely worthless administration. The kids who mouth off, never show up or fail multiple classes don't see anything happen to them - for fear of a lawsuit.

Posted by: randomlurker at July 21, 2010 5:20 PM

The scary thing is that, even if the system worked in producing one great talent out of the thousands it fails, you could kinda accept it. Hey, there's one at least, right?

But we're not even getting that one! In fact most of the talented kids have to leave school in order to hone their skills.

Posted by: Fredo at July 21, 2010 5:24 PM

My mom was a speech pathologist in the Baltimore Public School System a little over 20 years ago. One day, a student punched a teacher in the face (this was in an elementary school). The teacher, who was a good friend of my mother, went to the principal and showed the bruise and clear marks of assault. When the mother of the child was called in, she stormed into the principal's office and yelled at him for having the audacity to try and expel the child and insist upon disciplinary action. The principal conceded that he was in the wrong and the teacher who was assaulted left for the greener pastures of private school.

That was over 20 years ago and tragically, things just keep getting worse.

It's almost as if parents expect school to be little more than a free day care center for their kids. And that's a best case scenario. My college was located in a county where most of the schools were extremely underfunded (I think the county average was half of the kids were on free or reduced lunches, but in some schools the percentage was much higher). Kids would go to school to get breakfast or lunch and those would be their only meals. There were programs in place that would try and drum up parental involvement, but it was often futile.

It's not to say that there aren't people out there who are not cut out for education (I once had a teacher announce to the class that she was tenured and close to retirement so she didn't much care if anybody passed or failed any way and another teacher who verbally abused many students), but I feel like they are the minority. Most teachers are amazing, they just don't always have the resources necessary (time, money, parental involvement, basic classroom supplies, etc.).

It's really, really heartbreaking. And the lottery thing still makes me miserable.

Posted by: Kayanne at July 21, 2010 5:26 PM

re: music on the trailer.

The last bit at the end of trailer as the image fades... it sounds like a cover of Alphaville's "Forever Young". Not sure who is doing the cover, tho.

Posted by: jon at July 21, 2010 5:31 PM

The lottery thing is for a charter school! NOT just to get an education!

And around these parts (Texas), charter schools are not better than public. Those in favor of taking money away from the public schools WANT them to be, but so far, they are not. Charter schools are where we send our suckiest teachers and we pull the decent teachers FROM them, if that tells you anything.

I need to watch this trailer, but am running out the door. The only thing I wince at about stuff like this is the inevitable knee-jerk reaction of "OH THAT TEARS IT, THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE 100% SUCK, GET RID OF THEM." There ARE problems, big ones, too. But they're all fixable. Just depends on how badly we, as a society, want to fix them.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at July 21, 2010 5:41 PM

It's almost as if parents expect school to be little more than a free day care center for their kids.

It's far worse. Teachers are now expected to raise the kids too. I've actually had to tell the teachers in my daughters school to back off. I'm the parent, you're the teacher. You do your job and I'll do mine. Actually, I'll help you with yours too. They were very confused by my position.

BSlim That type of shit doesn't just happen in low income situations. Our school is pretty middle class and the teachers still have no fucking authority to do anything. It's a disgrace.

Posted by: admin at July 21, 2010 5:53 PM

Americans should be ashamed of the state of public education. Most of all, they should be ashamed that the teachers appear to be shouldering most of the blame, when it's really parents, politicians and school administrators who should be answering for shitty test scores.

But parents refuse to accept responsibility, and the gutless administrators and politicians won't even try to make them. I guess they figure there are more parents than teachers, so it's OK to shit all over the teachers. I couldn't be a teacher (in public school, anyway) for even one day. The stories I've heard/read about how teachers are treated have scared me away from ever considering it. It's been very clear to me from the beginning that teachers are the scapegoats for incompetence and failure that they did nothing to create.

I also care less and less about those people who don't bother to educate themselves or their children. I feel kinda bad for their kids, but it doesn't matter if I feel bad about it, they obviously don't. I don't know what kind of person doesn't care if their kid ends up uneducated and unemployable. A worthless asshole, I guess.

Posted by: Slash at July 21, 2010 6:11 PM

I'm glad the comments haven't been horrible to teachers so far. I teach high school, and I struggle with the same issues many of you have mentioned (disruptive students who face little consequences, apathetic and entitled parents, spineless administrators, etc.). There is no doubt that education in the U.S. is pretty shoddy, but it makes my head boil when I hear people place all of the blame on teachers.
Education is not a service, and students and their parents are not customers. Students and parents must also work a great deal in order to learn; it's not simply a matter of completely meaningless busywork and expecting to pass. I have had several students not understand why they have failed my class when they have done all of their homework but flunked the tests and papers. On the flip side of that, I do think schools need to emphasize reading comprehension, logic, and critical thinking skills more. I'm sick to death of trying to prepare my students for the 4 state and county mandated standardized tests that they take every year. Life is not made up of multiple choice questions.

Posted by: Sarahcat at July 21, 2010 6:22 PM

I'm a public-school elementary teacher of inner-city kids. I am here to tell you: If your kids are not enrolled in a "special" program---meaning, magnet, charter or hybrid--then, they are not getting an acceptable "education."

There is tremendous pressure within school districts to "make" the lowest-performing students succeed---which means that teachers spend the majority of their time (like I have done for many years) with the "lowest" students. These low-performing students' parents are poor, ignorant, and, for the most part, lack basic parenting skills. Some---precious few---make me wanna cry because they are so amazing and resilient. But, that's 5 to 10 percent of them. The majority of them frighten me half to death, and have the attitude that their kid is my responsibility to educate and socialize.

I switched my own kids to private school as soon as I realized my district's mantra.

If your child is average or---God forbid, above-average--he/she is getting little-to-no-attention from his/her teacher. This is the way it is in public education, and until parents put a stop to it, nothing is going to happen.

If you didn't know, now you do.

Contact your County Superintendents of Education and tell them, "Enough is enough!" Give ALL children equal access to a quality education. And, hold parents (somewhat) responsible for the outcome.

Posted by: Stinky at July 21, 2010 6:35 PM

jon, the last bit of music is actually still part of "One Day."

Youth Group actually has a really good cover of "Forever Young." I didn't even realize it was a cover until I read your comment and looked it up. Learn something new every day.

Posted by: Soothsayer at July 21, 2010 6:50 PM

I am interested in seeing this documentary, but it's going to be difficult for the Director to have a coherent narrative given just how many issues are in play in today's education system.

First, Charter schools are as much about breaking the teacher's unions as anything else, and unfortunately their business model doesn't truly scale - remember the scene in the trailer where the young guy with the beard is saying 'someone has taken an interest in you, someone loves you, and someone recognizes the importance of education'? That is at the core of the charter school scalability problem; there is a limited number of good teachers and good parents who recognize the value of education. At some point charter schools skim the cream off the top and no matter what you the next school will underperform.

Second is Parenting, several other posts talk about this, but for the most part the broken education system is most apparent in low income areas. Regardless of race, one thing low income areas have in common is a high incidence of single parenting. And it's just plain tougher to make sure you meet all the needs of your children with only one adult in the house. That doesn't mean being a single parent is bad, or that there aren't plenty of happy single parent households, it's just a 'hours in the day' problem that makes it harder for single parents. So what has happened is that the school system has become more and more of a parent, but at the same time, school administrators and school boards have taken away more of the tools teachers need to be a good surrogate parent - including the ability to punish, to channel misapplied energy to a music, arts or sports program.

Third; teacher wages and control continue to not keep pace. Right now in Arizona, a starting teacher will make quite a bit less than a store manager at a pizza hut. Nevermind that the store manager likely did not have to spend 4 years for a degree, nor will that store manager be required to get a Masters in the next 5 years in order to have a hope of keeping the job. Moreover, the store manager has far more control over his environment. He hires people, fires them, sets schedules, has input into marketing decisions. Meanwhile in the post "No Child" world, teachers have no control over curriculum, no control over class size, little or no ability to move disruptive students out of a class, nor input into the schools' extracurricular activities.

Fourth, Administrators vs. Teachers vs. Unions. Administrators complain that it is impossible to get rid of "bad teachers". But for the most part, school administrators are so risk-adverse that they don't even bother to do the steps needed to fire a "bad teacher" instead they try to shovel the bad apples off to other schools, or worse, stick them teaching remedial classes. Teachers hate "bad teachers" far more than Administrators, but they are even MORE powerless to do anything about it - and in part that is because, unlike any other union situation, the Union doesn't play ANY role in hiring the teacher. When you are hired by a school for the first time, you are not hired through the Union, instead you are hired by the school and then join the Union (should you choose). This means that, unlike the electricians Union, which plays a role in setting skill levels, and essentially vouchsafes for the quality of worker, the teacher's Union get's the end product and has to support it.

And then there's the gender issue. Today people talk about teaching as an "Avocation" - a job you do because you love it, not because it's financially rewarding. Prior to the shift in women's rights, most women had very few choices for employment. Teaching, Nursing, Secretary. Yes, there were women doctors and lawyers, but they were rare. So during the 40's and 50's lots and lots of smart, motivated women ended up as teachers by default, now they end up at Earnst and Young. Unless we find a way to make teaching more attractive in general, we will never get the same volume of highly motivated individuals we had in previous decades. We need to put more money into salaries, and give teachers more control over their environment.

Posted by: morganew at July 21, 2010 6:53 PM

Another consequence of the post-NCLB system is exactly what Stinky mentioned. For the last 6 years or so our school has used "hotlists" of students who were either close to passing or just barely passed the previous year's state test. These were the kids on whom we were supposed to concentrate our efforts. Who cares about the gifted kids - they're going to pass! Who cares about the lowest kids - they're too low to pass, so they're not worth our efforts! I left that school because I was so tired of everything - even though those kids needed me and my understanding of them, I couldn't keep teaching them with everything holding me and them back. I got a job for next year in a school with half of the poverty base of my previous school. I couldn't do it anymore.

Posted by: randomlurker at July 21, 2010 7:11 PM

Of all the people involved, the worthless parents make me the angriest. A lot of public education problems could be mitigated by parents who give a shit. But when the teachers spend half their time trying to deal with the students whose parents don't give a shit, that fucks everything up for everybody.

Posted by: Slash at July 21, 2010 7:15 PM

When I moved from Texas to Georgia in the middle of my junior year I was six months ahead in all of my classes. Basically, the first half of junior year in Georgia was the last half of my sophomore year. In fact, I already had the credits to graduate when I moved here.

I've already accepted the fact that if I have children they are going to a private school.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 21, 2010 7:17 PM

I can't wait to see this film. The trailer alone has me sobbing. Even growing up semi-rurally, this hits home for me

In 2001, when I started high school in a small town southern Illinois, the freshman class boasted more than 300 students. Only 212 of us walked across the stage in our crumbling, un-air conditioned, water-damaged gym four years later.

In the case of SoIL schools, budget cuts have just driven them into the ground for more than a decade. Since the inception of no child left behind, almost every school in a tri-county area has been forced to send a letter out at the beginning of each school year telling parents that their child's school is failing and by law, the child is eligible to transfer to a better school in the district, but that there are no suitable schools in the region currently accepting new students. It's a slap in the face, really, tucked in there with the free lunch applications and immunization forms every fall.

It's sickening.

Posted by: thenchonto at July 21, 2010 7:29 PM

Charter school teacher here. All I can tell you with regards to charter vs. traditional public schools is based on how things are in Florida.

First, charter schools *are* public schools. We have to adhere to all the requirements of every other public school in our district. We are not-for-profit.

How it works - you apply to get in, and receive a spot based either on a wait list or a lottery. You can live anywhere in the county and attend the school, as opposed to only being able to pick from the schools in your zone (and getting what you want based on a lottery). Practically every high school in the county has a "specialty" so that's not just a charter school thing.

The good - we can cap class size because we are under no obligation to take everyone. We stay small (our HS has about half the kids of the other schools) so we literally know all our kids by name, and where they need to be. We alleviate overcrowding in the other schools cheaply, since we build our own facilities (grant monies not related to state Ed funds). We can kick a kid out after a major infraction, since they can always go to their "usual" zoned schools. We require 80 community volunteer hours for graduation, and 20 hours/year from the parents for enrollment.

The bad - funding, funding, funding. We don't get nearly the amount of money per kid that the "regular" public schools do, and there is a bill currently before the Senate which wants to cut charter schools funds even further. I get paid less than a public school teacher with my background. We haven't gotten raises in years. We scramble for basic supplies. We cannot offer all the "extras" of a usual HS (like a stadium). We have no tenure. The district and unions regard us with suspicion.

Despite the bads, our charter schools have school grades higher than at least 2/3 of our other district schools. Personally, I am gifted with an administration that backs me up, lets me do my thing, and supports my outside family activities (like leaving school to be at all of my elementary-aged kids' functions). And I only have a 10 minute ride to school.

All I am saying is that charter schools are not trying to take over the world. We are just offering another option.

Posted by: Kate at July 21, 2010 7:33 PM

I didn't know this film existed. *excited* Can't wait to see it. (Though I do have issues with dome of the Gates Foundation's assumptions about education. sigh.)

Jonathan Kozol - look him up if education reform really interests you and read his books! - spoke at a conference I attended. He's from Boston, went to Harvard and Oxford, and has a a number of well-to-do friends with school-age children. He recounted a story when at a dinner party, some of the guests were arguing about education reform in a friendly debate (covering funding, teacher competence, etc.)

Finally, one said, "You know, money really isn't the issue; it won't solve anything."

To which Mr. Kozol replied, "If not, then why do you pay for private school for your kids?"

That summed up a lot for me.

Posted by: bonbiz at July 21, 2010 7:38 PM

morganew--You are brilliant! You said a lot more of what I would like to have said. Alas, so many thoughts in my head, so little space...

I am in the process of building a giant book case for my classroom. I explained my project to the guy at Lowe's yesterday, who immediately brightened up, "YOU'RE a TEACHER?" he said.

"Yeah."

"I wanna be a teacher," he announced, almost triumphantly, for some unexplained reason.

I encouraged Lowe's Guy to become a teacher, gave him alternative cert. web URLS, and whatnot, despite the fact that our county is cutting teachers right and left and has no respect for the remaining ones.

We need male teachers. I adore all the guys we get at school (the one or two each year). Wish we had more.

And, randomlurker, AMEN!

Posted by: Stinky at July 21, 2010 7:39 PM

It's amazing what a difference attitude makes. If dropout rates were similar to the US or the UK for that matter, where I'm from, there would be war.

I have the good fortune to come from a country where the education system (while not even close to perfect) is valued highly. And more importantly seen as accessible to all, up to and including university.

How a country, and how a parent values education makes a huge difference in a child's life.

A lottery for school places is unbelievably cruel.

Posted by: captainfireypants at July 21, 2010 7:48 PM

Oooh! I had the privilege of interviewing Jonathan Kozol in 1996.

I asked him, "What, ultimately, is the purpose of education?"

"To make us better people," he said, without hesitation.

He went on to say that Americans have no problem justifying spending, say, $10,000 for a Rolex, yet, take issue with the same principle when it comes to education.

Kozol said, "People say, 'Oh, you're just throwing money at the problem,' but nobody ever says 'You're just throwing money at the watch' when they buy a Rolex. Doesn't it stand to reason that if you pay more money for a watch you GET a better watch, and if you pay a little bit more for education, you get a better system?"

I would issue some caveats, but I like the sentiment.

Posted by: Stinky at July 21, 2010 7:52 PM

There has been more than one conversation at my home about me going back to school and getting a so called "back-up plan" among them was going back to get a teaching degree. Hell to the No.

Several reasons come to mind, some because I've attended public schools and the problems have only magnified since I went and partially from the horror stories several of my family member who are teachers have brought home.

One reason that stands out in my memories was one in which two boys at my high school got in a fight in the cafeteria and proceeded to beat the bloody hell out of each other in a very short time. All the teachers and staff just stood by and allowed this slugfest to continue, and while a few kids did start cheering on the melee like some lunch-time bloodsport, many of us were just stunned it continued on for so long.

Finally someone did step in, Mr. Thomas, a 73 year-old grizzly bear of man and former gridiron warrior. Despite his age he had a large booming voice and ran study hall with everyone's love & respect. I don't know if he was always capable of this physical feat, but he flew in with the speed of a linebacker in his prime, grabbed both junior pugilists in mid-air and slammed them both to the floor. He barked out with the tenacity of a gunnery sergeant, "I said, STOP FIGHTING NOW, DAMMIT!" Both boys laid there blood covered and agape. I have no doubt bladder control was lost, and the lunchroom was so silent you could hear a mouse fart. Mr. Thomas got up and glared at some of the more vocal spectators and told them to get back to lunch. He then demanded to know what was wrong with the other teachers that they allowed these two idiots to pummel each other into hamburger and do nothing. One of them sheepishly said they didn't want to get sued for touching them.

Sure enough, Mr. Thomas was called into the administrator's office and given a dress down. One of the kids' parents claimed their little snowflake sustained a sprain from Mr. Thomas's attempt at breaking up the fight and better still both sets of parents' lawyers teamed up to sue the school.

In short, Mr. Thomas ended up invited to finally retire, neither one of the boys were suspended, and the teachers were just as scared shitless as before not to intervene, fighting, bullying, drugs or any other foul behavior. And we lost one of the few teachers who was brave enough to outwardly give a damn.

I don't think I could go to a job where my hands were tied and the lunatics ran the asylum. Some of these little shitpokes need to be given stricter discipline- either that or get kicked out altogether because by allowing them free reign, they make everyone suffer for it.

Posted by: bleujayone at July 21, 2010 8:01 PM

Stinky, I LIKE you.

Even with your caveats.

Posted by: bonbiz at July 21, 2010 8:02 PM

song -- "One Day" by Matisyahu: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgULq1yCz70

(it was also featured prominently in NBC's coverage of the 2010 Winter Olympics)

Posted by: Mandy at July 21, 2010 8:13 PM

I seriously am almost constantly amazed by the fact that teachers are such a low paying profession.

These are the people in charge of the future of a country and yet they are treated like shit is just baffling to me.

Posted by: Ben at July 21, 2010 9:30 PM

I work for a school system at the county level, and can tell you it doesn't get much better there. County admins are just as powerless as teachers to do much of anything and just as understaffed and underpaid.
Really, the focus of your attention/letter writing campaigns or anything like else needs to be at the state level as that's the lowest level where any decisions of consequence are made, generally speaking.

Posted by: Ali at July 21, 2010 9:41 PM

School starts back in two weeks here. I was at Target the other day stocking up on school supplies (not for my children—I don't have children—but for my high school students who will show up for school without even a pen or paper) and I saw a mother and her middle-school age son shopping with a "required supplies" list from his school. I heard the mother say, "Five notebooks?! This list says five notebooks. There's no way I am buying you five notebooks! Pick two."
The notebooks were on sale for 25 cents each. I am sure this same mother will be happy to blame the school for her child's lack of success in school, or the fact that he doesn't see the value in education.
*sigh*

Posted by: kimmyhula at July 21, 2010 11:54 PM

What's both interesting and disheartening to see is that the same issues you all are discussing (re: American public school system)are also occurring in public secondary (you would call them high schools) in Trinidad.

I've been teaching in that system for almost 6 years and all the violence, lack of parental support, lack of administrative support are all happening in the Caribbean as well.

In the school I teach and many others like it, parents DO treat the system as a chance for free babysitting. Many of the students come from homes where there is a lack of appreciation for the value of eduaction by their parents. When they come to school, it's because they were forced to, or in some cases, it's the only safe haven they have.

However, recent governments have made the situation even worse. In an attempt to secure votes they created a feeling of entitlement among both students and parents. The original intent may have been partly honest, but in the end, the students as a whole lose out.

Students are entitled to free breakfast, lunch, transportation and books. The only thing parent's have to buy are the uniforms. I have no problem with that because the cost of those items can seriously tax a parent's budget. They accept the free food and transport, however many students destroy the text books they receive. Sometimes within the first week of receiving them. And their parents DO NOT CARE. If they had to pay for the books I'm sure it would have been a different story.

Parents don't want you speaking too harshly to students and some have even entered schools to physically assault the teachers who may have berated their children. Never mind that back in the day EVERYBODY used to get a serious "cut-ass" if they step out of line.

Depending on which school you go to, the level of discipline depends on how well the staff holds together. Yes, we have teachers who are simply killing time before they get their law degree, but there are many hard-working teachers who try to help their students, at their own expense as well.

However, many of the problems do lie at home, with parents who have no respect for education and just wanting to keep their children out of their way for the day and able to "get a wuk" when they reach Form 5 (16 years of age).

I'm stopping now. It's just too frustrating to think about. And I don't want to be banned for blathering on too much. I can relate to your trials, but when you care, you march on and dive back into the trenches. Despite the manipulative governments and narrow-minded parents.

Posted by: Four Eyes at July 22, 2010 12:16 AM

Every so often we get these rally cries of "education is failing our kids." Charter schools are viewed as some miraculous cure-all, but it's all a bit too convenient and self-serving. It's real easy to sit back and complain about a broken system, but when are people going to make suggestions as to how to fix it? And when do people start considering the deeper societal issues that have such a profound effect on that system? Most importantly, when is someone going to have the balls to question the purpose of education so that we can bend our public system toward that end?

From it's earliest beginnings in this country, public education has been about assimilation. We lie to ourselves and say it's about bettering people, but in the end, it has always come down to creating workers. This misconstrued Horatio Alger myth is a false ideal that allows us to sit back and blame without guilt. "Those parents" and "those kids" don't value education, so they don't deserve it. But realistically, how many of those kids are going to have the opportunity to acheive that American dream through education? Schools in low income areas suck and those parents aren't involved in their children's education. This lack of equity should be something to be addressed rather than the offensive rallying cry it seems to have become. The fact is, even with a high school diploma, the majority of those kids futures are pretty bleak. It just really pisses me off when people do all this bitching about how kids should have the opportunity to go to a better school. Why aren't we fixing the crappy schools for EVERYONE?

I am a teacher because I believe in public education as an ideal. I think the purpose of education has to change from the chance at a more financially successful life to the chance for a more fulfilling life. Fuck the standards and the high-stakes tests. (Interesting side note: the geniuses in charge expect all students to ultimately perform above average... ponder that statistical impossibility for a moment) In our mindless pursuit of results we could look at in a pretty pie chart, we stopped teaching our kids how to think.

Posted by: bel at July 22, 2010 2:13 AM

I'm 22, soon to be 23, I'm going to be a college grad in December.

I was raised four about oh.....10 years in a public school, and frankly I hated it, and my parents hated it as well, I was, as a child, specified as "Special Needs," because I had bad spatial coordination, bad math skills, and a couple other things, that for the life of me I don't remember, nor do I care about now. I went to a private elementary/middle/high school thereafter until I graduated. during the most of 5th grade (which was when I started at the new school) I was mainly in the special needs class, which its intent was to make sure the kids learned at their own pace. Once again, I'm only in there because my math sucks and I have cognitive something or other.

It's about then that I became interested in the idea of teaching, and it's why I pursued a literary degree in college, in part because I believe that communication skills are an important thing for the future, but also because I'm a writer.

Looking back on the private school, which was a religious school, I think I coulda done better at public school, they were more about the bible and saving people's souls then they were about teaching, I kid you not, the load of hogwash they taught there, I could have taught; blindfolded, on drugs and drunk. That being said, the school has gone downhill, (well when I showed up it was already on a downhill slope) and its gotten worse.

College was better for me, I went to a Quaker University (George Fox University, Newberg Oregon) and am currently majoring in Writing/Literature, and then getting my masters in communications after that. My plan is to teach at some point in my life, if I get the chance. Ideally, I want to go to Korea and teach after I graduate, but if my job with Costco comes through, then I won't be doing that, I might do some local volunteer teaching and whatnot.

My point that I'm trying to make here, is that too many kids today aren't given what they need, they have everything, except the ideal education. I believe that homeschooling is okay and should be done if you can't find a decent school, but it should only be done through high school, at which point they need to find a school, and have social interactions and development and stuff like that, because they need to be prepared for college. I know a lot of home schooled kids at my college......they turned out okay, they could've and should've gone to regular school for at least 3-4 years 'fore college. Hell, even the public school students from schools that sucked, do okay here.

Posted by: LordNinja at July 22, 2010 2:29 AM

File me in the "It could be worse" camp. I taught in Thailand last year and... holy shit. Thailand is not a third world country and I did not teach at a public school. I taught at a private Catholic School with a shining reputation. There was not a class with less than 50 kids. So many kids the teachers brough loudspeakers to class. A lot of people talk about the parents and teachers bearing no responsiblity for the education. Take that to the nth degree in Thailand. They literally expect you to take a child who pays no attention and cheats his way through everything and somehow mind-meld that child into learning something. That's the culture, it's all put on the teacher, and that's normal. There's no such thing as a parent involved invested in their child's education. I've taught in a couple countries, including Cambodia, and Thailand was the worst. The worst, laziest cheatingest students I have ever seen in my life. And you just pass them to the next grade no matter how badly they do. Unsurprisingly, the professional classes there cannot do their effing jobs. I had a doctor who was unable to diagnose a simple bacterial infection in my lungs. I went to him five times, every time he said it must be the flu and gave me flu medicine. I finally diagnosed myself and bought prescription medicine over the counter. I did a better job than a doctor. Think about that. I had a dentist jam a filling in my mouth so wrong my tooth broke within a week and I had to get a root canal. I went to Cambodia to do it because everyone I encountered in Thailand was so freaking incompetent because of their piss poor educational system. The Cambodians did an excellent job. The people who grew up in a third world country that thirty years ago had 2/7 ths of their population killed off. They are more motivated.

Anyways, I realize there are significant problems in the American school system and it breaks my heart cuz I got a great education, my parents moved to get it for me. But at least those problems are concievably fixable. At least out culture isn't the foundation for a fundamentally flawed educational system.

Posted by: Prigs at July 22, 2010 2:38 AM

Morganew - well stated! Thank you for speaking out.
I have been an elementary school teacher for 16 years in California's public school system. Please know I TRULY AM a teacher - heart and soul. Four weeks ago, I resigned. I am relocating to the L.A. area but am in no way actively seeking out a teaching position. I have very little desire to return to the classroom at this point especially not in California. The desire to really teach/reach the students who desperately need it is no longer enough to overcome the obstacles in order to do so.
Everyday and all day, we are faced with challenges caused by the lack of accountability, the lack of respect, and the lack of financial, administrative, union, and parental support - from the students, their families, the principals and other administrators, the school board, and the county office of education, and, of course, the state and federal government.
Our destruction of the public school system is tragic and seemingly insurmountable. I can only hope that this film opens the eyes and reaches the minds of at least a few that will be willing and capable of bring about some essential changes.

Posted by: jennephik at July 22, 2010 4:14 AM

Important note: If this 'spectacular' program and these amazing teachers are the ones mentioned in Po Bronson's What Do You Want to Do With your Life, he discusses how the teachers make this successful, awesome school their entire life.

The teachers he talks to don't have social lives, don't really have personal lives - they invest everything they have in helping these students succeed.

You're not going to be able to make something like that work on a national level. There simply isn't going to be an inexhaustible supply of people willing to push teaching to a level that consumes the rest of their life.

Posted by: twig at July 22, 2010 9:25 AM

The biggest problem, which a lot of people have pointed out, is not so much the schools or the teachers or the policies- it's the people. That's not to excuse bad schools, bad teachers, or bad policy but there is only so much you can do with parents and children that have no interest in learning. You can't pry their eyes open Clockwork Orange-style and force the education into them. If they have no discipline, no parental support, or if basic human needs for food and safety aren't being met then there is only so much the school can do.

So we can complain about the schools all day long but the real issues are before that. The real reason charter schools, lottery schools, and private schools perform better is because of the self-selection of the kids that go into them. If your parents care enough about your education to put you on the list for charter school or pay for you to go to private school then they are more likely to be more involved. The kids in those schools are more likely to be able to behave and the teachers can stop being babysitters and start teaching. The perception is that the school is "better" but really it's that the students are better before they even walk in the door. In an environment where the good students overwhelm the bad ones you can elevate the achievement of some bad students (unfortunately, when the bad outweigh the good the kids with potential get pulled down. That's why loosing the lottery is so devastating, these are the kids who could go either way...)

Is there an answer? Probably not an easy one. Season 4 of The Wire suggested separating the worst kids- the ones who were not capable of functioning in the normal classroom environment- and developing an alternate curriculum for them. It's a process called 'tracking' and it is pretty controversial. Essentially you are segregating the school, only based on ability instead of race (and sometimes, sadly, there it's hard to avoid the perception of the latter). Most schools do this to an extent with honors classes and special ed classes. Some districts do this with magnet schools and charter schools. It's hard to avoid the perception that you are abandoning whole groups of kids to a lesser education, and it's easy to see how kids with potential could make a few mistakes and be condemned to the lower track. It's tough to rationalize, even for supporters, but most damning of all is that anything that accepts reality is accused of accepting failure and we can't have any children left behind, can we?

Fuck, I don't know. When I think about it there is more despair then hope. The one thing I do know is that my daughter will get a great education and have the brightest future I can provide. And it has little to do with what school we send her to and lots to do with being raised by us surrounded with books and encouraged and challenged every step of the way. (not that I think she would survive in a terrible inner-city school, but your average Midwestern public school or Catholic school will do just fine.

Posted by: Yossarian at July 22, 2010 9:28 AM

scorzi, thank you for eloquently explaining the lottery - I knew someone could.

morganew, slow clap.

I definitely agree, bel, that we are viewing education incorrectly as a means to a job. My husband complains (a lot) that he was told as a child that having a college degree means you make more money. Not so much. I'm not sure who told him that, but it holds no water.

If we teach our children (and society as a whole) that education equals money, we not only sell short our entire goal, but we are only furthering ill intentions. Do we really want our kids to start focusing on their income at age 7? Is that what we want them to find most important?

A good friend of mine went to a teacher conference recently focused on a new plan, "No Excuses". Essentially they teach their students (elementary) that they ARE going to college, no matter what.

"Your power went out because your mother can't pay the electricity bill? Well how did you see to eat? A candle? Then you could have done your homework by candlelight."

The system only works if the teachers hold it as well - they cannot use excuses, either. It sounds a bit "tough love" at times, but I think it has a lot of merit.

One of the speakers told of an exercise she did with her students. She had them hold a 10-pound wrench in one hand and a pencil in the other and then hold out both arms in front of them. As their arms got tired, she said, "This is the difference between a job and a career." She wasn't saying there is anything wrong with a labor-centric job (many of these kids had parents that were plumbers, electricians, etc). She only wanted them to see the difference between physically exhaustive work and mentally stimulating work.

I'm rambling now, but as I plan to have kids in the next few years, this issue is very important to me. I'm still trying to formulate my position.

PS: I love you bitches. This thread has made my morning, because I am so proud to "know" you all.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at July 22, 2010 9:48 AM

I run a website that rhymes with the female anatomy.
---
Don't start that again. It DOES NOT RHYME.

Posted by: , at July 22, 2010 10:55 AM

Yeah, it seems clear to me that a percentage of students are not going to ever succeed in the way that they are being expected to (ie standardized test scores). They do seem to be set up to fail, and then when they do, we criticize them, which isn't really fair. Having "tracks" ie, some are college-bound, others go into what was called (in my day) vo-tech, seems like a smarter way to spend education dollars and time, rather than wasting money trying to make every kid learn and appreciate Shakespeare. Not every kid is gonna grow up to be Bill Clinton or Obama. As long as he/she doesn't grow up to be a drug dealer or pimp or hooker or addict or convict, that'd be good enough for me. That'd be real progress.

It does seem inevitable that any suggestion along these lines will be criticized as "the soft bigotry of low expectations" and result only in self-serving speeches by Jesse Jackson.

But the way we're doing it now isn't working.

Posted by: Slash at July 22, 2010 11:39 AM

I went to a public school that was above average, but certainly not great. The school was good at everything but the actual educating bit. We had several community outreach programs, successful sports teams (go team!), and more clubs than you could imagine (anime debate club, not a joke). The district spent a ton of money getting the newest computers and smartboards for every classroom. The teachers were a mixed bag; some were excellent, some were...clearly not qualified to teach in their subject (I had a calculus teacher who did not understand basic math, or english). But the worst was the silly bureaucracy of the school. The class registration system made it nearly impossible to get all the classes you needed to graduate, most people had to resort to summer school to graduate on time. While teachers were allowed a good bit of freedom to teach the curriculum, the final exams were standardized and designed by the district, not the teachers, under the misguided notion of being fair.
What I'm trying to say is, even a good chunk of money and fairly intelligent students does not make a good school.

Posted by: elisenavidad at July 22, 2010 5:10 PM

Free Mr. Clark! Free Mr. Clark!

Posted by: patchfire at July 22, 2010 6:11 PM

This article really good! I like to read . Thanks for sharing a nice info.I came across your web site and it really is Beautiful for my situation. It covers excellent and beneficial posts. I read just about all of them and got so much from them. If you ask me, you are Carry through an excellent work. Keep on! I would like to thank you for making a Brilliant web site.

Posted by: liver cancer at August 9, 2010 12:03 PM

A characteristic of Pattaya is its tremendous community of roads. Beach Highway runs North-South alongside the Bay, bordering the primary beach, Pattaya 2d Street and Pattaya Third Street as well as the primary Sukhumvit Highway coastal highway. Seashore Road and the 2nd Street are both one-means routes, running parallel to each other. A number of east-west streets (locally referred to as sois) connect those two primary roads. Any other well-known Pattaya roads are North Pattaya Highway, Relevant Pattaya Road and South Pattaya Road.

Posted by: Pattaya Places at December 4, 2010 9:37 AM

Very usefull blog. i will follow this blog. keep up the good work.

Posted by: Burton Haynes at December 30, 2010 5:41 PM

Undeniably believe that which you said. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the net the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about worries that they just do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

Posted by: increase serp at January 26, 2011 5:05 PM

Definitely believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the net the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people consider worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

Posted by: increase serp at January 27, 2011 5:41 PM

Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people think about worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

Posted by: increase serp at January 27, 2011 5:58 PM

Undeniably believe that which you said. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about worries that they plainly don't know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

Posted by: increase serp at January 27, 2011 8:19 PM

Wonderful blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News. Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thank you. wholesale nhl jerseys.

Posted by: Buffalo Sabres NHL hockey jerseys at February 12, 2011 1:25 PM

As a result of France's extensive colonial ambitions between the 17th and 20th centuries, French was introduced to America, Africa, Polynesia, South-East Asia, and the Caribbean.

Posted by: learn french software at March 2, 2011 2:14 PM

Hello, just wanted to let you kow how much of an interesting read this was. Look forward to the next installment.

Posted by: where does justin bieber live at March 5, 2011 5:51 AM