web
counter
 

Oscar Winning Director Hired to Fancy-Up the Twilight Series

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (18)



l_1099212_bf0becbc.jpg

I think of those who like or dislike the Twilight series, there’s one thing we can all agree upon: It’s trash. Maybe you embrace the trash, or maybe you reject it. But the appeal of the series seems to rely, in part, on its trashiness, especially among those who aren’t buying the three principals — Taylor Lautner, Kristen Stewart, and Rob Pattinson — as sex objects.

What I don’t understand, then, is why Summit doesn’t embrace that aspect of the films in the way it casts the picture. I understand that, perhaps, Twilight began as a very low-budget series that no one expected to catch on, at least not in the way it has. But it seems to be, budget and talent-wise, that Summit has been trying to play catch up, replacing a low-rent actress with Bryce Dallas Howard, adding Dakota Fanning and Michael Sheen to the proceedings, and increasing the talent level of the directors each time out.

They’ve finally reached what can only be considered the talent pinnacle for this kind of movie: They’ve hired Bill Condon, the Oscar winning screenwriter and director behind movies like Dreamgirls, Kinsey and Chicago (he only penned the latter). He’ll be directing both installments of the Breaking Dawn movie, which has been split into two parts.

I don’t really understand the decision, to be honest. It’s evident from the first two movies that Summit molds the directors to fit the Twilight template, rather than the other way around. They could hire just about anyone with even the slightest level of competence to direct — it would seem that haste is the biggest priority (since these movies are shat out once a year). It’s not that the Twilight series won’t still be trashy with Condon, but they are trying to shine it on, I guess. It’s kind of like Ain’t It Cool News hiring Roger Ebert. Given the way that AICN is set up (and the design behind it), not even Ebert could fancy up the place. But, it’d give the site some credibility.

I just don’t know what Twilight needs with credibility when they’re making $300 million a film.

(Source: IESB)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Art of Cussing | Comment Diversion | Pajiba After Dark 4/28/10









Comments

Maybe they want to go out with a bang? Something that's not trash?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at April 28, 2010 5:12 PM

Not trash? They're only slightly higher than SyFy movies on the evolutionary scale of film! And I could be wrong 'cause I haven't seen the piranha film yet!

Posted by: Four Eyes at April 28, 2010 5:20 PM

Oh come on, this is exactly the move you should have expected. They may be focused on wringing as much cash as they can from the franchise but don't mistake greed for cynicism. You can't half-ass it with Twilight Part Four, that billion-dollar baby.

For all the indulgent guilty-pleasure page hits you get on a site like Pajiba the real business of Twilight is the core of true believers who believe in the fantasy, who lack guile as much as they lack taste. Alienate them with schlock and gags and you risk the whole house of cards tumbling down. The studio is fully committed to giving the impression of quality, even if they care fuck all for the execution.

To build your Twilight franchise you must try to buy respectability, at least enough to convince the base. It isn't about the art it is about the kitsch, it's about manufacturing the impression of art. There will be no winking to the audience, no irony, no fun. It has to look serious, classy; that's the bottom line. And you and I may know that the emperor wears no clothes but the success of Twilight is in all the people that buy in and don't question it. That's who this move is for.

Posted by: Yossarian at April 28, 2010 6:16 PM

Damnit. I was really hoping for David Cronenberg. Only he could the full horror of Renesme justice.

Posted by: fionna at April 28, 2010 6:26 PM

Have you ever read Breaking Dawn? If you have then you know why they need an Oscar-winning director, because it would take a pretty damn amazing director to turn that plot with its many offensive and uncomfortable plot points into a good movie. I don't want to give you spoilers, but OMG it would take some serious talent to turn that into anything watchable.

Posted by: Mishi at April 28, 2010 6:29 PM

Indeed, Twilightville Productions (aka Summit Entertainment) do appear to be giving their directors a strict set of instructions to follow, judging from what Twilight-2 was and how Twilight-3 trailer looks. Personally, I have every intention of watching Twilight-3 – just out of morbid curiosity ... ah, the promise of a spectacle as director No. 3 fights a mighty losing battle against a crappy script based on a crappy book about a sulky teenager in love with a brooding vampire whilst at the same time trying to figure out her feelings for another teenager who also happens to be a werewolf ... that’s just too much to resist. When I saw David Slade’s name on it I thought, “Funny, the dude has a similar name to the director of Hard Candy”. Then it turned out it was the same guy (as opposed to his nowhere twin whom his parents named the same as his brother as some sort of a sick joke a’la Major Major Major). Holy sweet son of a cow! But that’s nothing when compared to Twilight-4 and -5. Bill Condon. Now the morbid curiosity takes on a different flavour. I never thought I'd say this about a run of a mill teenage flick, but gee this whole Twilight business is getting seriously fun!!

Posted by: sb at April 28, 2010 6:33 PM

I'm with fionna. Only Cronenberg could really bring the birthing scene to life. Well, Cronenberg or Argento.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at April 28, 2010 6:52 PM

I agree wholeheartedly. What sort of makes Twilight hard/a joy to stomach is the absolute earnestness of the films so far. They mean fuckin' business--sparkly, emotionally taut business. If the Twilight films were good they would be bad.

Posted by: sheshakes at April 28, 2010 8:13 PM

My one hope in them hiring the Kinsey director is that they'll hire Liam Neeson to take notes on the hardcore vampire sex for a book on vampire sexuality which will then be subsequently boycotted by the Catholic church.

Or at least have Peter Sarsgaard bang the wolf-boy.

Posted by: Christianh at April 28, 2010 8:36 PM

I was hoping more for John Waters (who takes family kitsch and disturbing images to new levels) or for Thing-era John Carpenter (just for the birthing scene).

Posted by: Fredo at April 28, 2010 9:09 PM

as opposed to his nowhere twin whom his parents named the same as his brother as some sort of a sick joke a’la Major Major Major

I thought Yosarrian already posted on this thread...

Posted by: pissant at April 29, 2010 1:47 AM

It's being split in two? Why? All four of these things could be summarised in four minutes, nothing happens.

Posted by: Steph at April 29, 2010 8:48 AM

Makes sense.

Twilight: It’s all about the bloodless love. Lots of close-ups and spinning camera angles highlighting the non-sex. Girl director.
New Moon: Annoying, cloying angst but fursploding wolves… tough balance. Need to hint at Bella-the-cutter, but really it’s the wolves we want to see. Guy director.
Eclipse: Will They or Won’t They and Oh My God We Actually Have to Make this Seem Legitimate and Action Packed so the Boyfriends won’t Totally Hate Going to See the Movie. Besides, we're two movies in, SOMETHING better happen. Guy Director.
Breaking Dawn Pts 1&2: WHAT THE FUCK? Vampire coitus, unplanned death-baby pregnancy, spine-snapping childbirth, vampire conversion, mutant growth-accelerated baby/child, glossed-over pedophile ties with werewolf, triumph over baddies thanks to previously bland and pointless character acquiring super panty shield of protection. Has to be a an Oscar Guy Director.

Posted by: courtney at April 29, 2010 9:13 AM

Oh, MelBiv! Argento! That would be SO COMPLETELY AWSE it would DEFY THE VERY LAWS OF AWSE!!!

Posted by: Anna von Beaversmack at April 29, 2010 9:38 AM

I myself am really looking forward to the Fosse style music number when the baby chews its way out of her uterus. And 5,6,7,8!

Posted by: sarahk at April 29, 2010 11:21 AM

Actually, the book depicts Edward chewing Renesmee out of Whatsherface's uterus. It was, to borrow a response from Aro, "Mesmerizing." Still entirely unfilmable though, but I do appreciate the sentiment that the father's actually doing something during childbirth. How modern and fresh.

What interests me more, however, is that Edward ends up not only chewing holes in the pillows but also the headboard during the sexy scenes. That's pure ceomedy.

Posted by: agent bedhead at April 29, 2010 11:41 AM

This is the one I'm waiting for, man. If we don't get to watch in gruesome close up as Edward chews the baby out of Bella, in a room splattered with blood, and his pretty his face besmeared with gore I will never forgive those bitches.

Posted by: Jaime at April 29, 2010 11:42 AM

i hope it's true that the actor really are ghetting married because that is exactly the relationship i would of had with my very first true love if mine hadn't fizzled out. i have a tremndous amount of respect for this series because for once immortality was not portrayed as a curse. it was a gift to be united with your entire family. i would be proud to be a cullen
i just got my result from e harmony they said i was too perfect for any woman.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo cullen at April 29, 2010 12:33 PM