web
counter
 

Oh Mickey, You Used To Be So Fine, But You've Lost Your Mind

By Cindy Davis | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (19)



RourkeThomas.jpg

Continuing on his tour of playing people whose jobs might explain a mussed up face, Mickey Rourke has announced that he’ll be playing gay rugby player, Gareth Thomas. Oopsie, I said that wrong - according to the Mickster - he’ll be playing “a man who plays rugby who is gay”. See, if you say it the first way, you’re defining him by his sexuality, never mind that his sexuality is the major point of interest in making a movie about Gareth Thomas. Asked the first question about this role, Rourke immediately corrected the interviewer, saying “You’re not supposed to say that. …this is one thing that he and I talked about. This is something that’s really important. We’re doing a movie about a man who plays rugby who is gay.”

I understand and agree with the underlying point. A man or woman should never be defined by his or her sexuality. For the most part, a person’s lawful bedroom practices are not public business. But in a time where gay rights are being fought for and people come out to either make a stance or to be supportive to their fellow man/woman, that proclamation could be a turning point in another person’s life. From his statements, Thomas clearly wants to inspire younger people and let them know it’s okay to come out so they can be accepted as “talented, gay rugby player(s)”. He also supports a telephone service that provides counsel to young people and has said that if his coming out “…makes one young lad pick up the phone, it will have been worth it.”

Now admittedly, I know little about rugby and up until now, nothing much about Gareth Thomas - but I do know that in the manly-man sports world, coming out is a big deal. Thomas is currently the only professional team sport athlete who is openly gay. (SI) And like it or not the whole point of a movie about Gareth Thomas will be that he is a professional rugby player who came out; his story is an inspirational one. The language of how Gareth is referred to is clearly important to him in his own life, but for the purpose of a film, by gum he’s going to be a gay rugby player. And I certainly hope and believe he is proud of that fact. He is, by all accounts, a great rugby player and I look forward to the day he is known as just that. For now, in a time when all people are not treated equally, a film that tells the story of his life struggle and own acceptance of himself is a gift he can give to everyone. I hope Mickey gets it right.


(Source: Bleeding Cool)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



You Make The Rockin' World Go Round | A Musical Musing | There's Trouble in Lindsey-with-an-e Country | The Oregonian Trailer









Comments

What sort of casting director picks Rourke (aged 58) to play Gareth Thomas (aged 36). Mickey's great in the right role, but I doubt he'd be believable as a professional sportsman who is still playing to this day.

p.s. Gareth Thomas is awesome and deserves to be elevated onto many pedestals.

Posted by: Simon at December 29, 2010 5:31 PM

Reading that Bleeding Cool link, adds a little extra level to the story. The chat show host he was lecturing to was the very openly gay Alan Carr.

On a side note, I think we've reached a point where all our prime time chat show hosts are openly gay (Alan Carr, Graham Norton, Paul O'Grady). Lovely.

Posted by: Simon at December 29, 2010 5:39 PM

I don't know much about rugby but I read an article on Thomas a few months ago. Though the article was mostly about his being openly gay in a manly world, what shone through was the man himself and he really is a lot more than just the first openly gay athlete. He's an incredible person regardless of that certain hurdle. I think if I could find a dentist's waiting room magazine article about the guy to be enthralling then I think it will be easy to make this movie great without focusing on just his sexuality.

Of course, it will also be easy for them to screw this up and just make it a cliche. I don't know what to think about Rourke playing him though.

Posted by: Paultera at December 29, 2010 5:44 PM

The time machine, or CGI needed to make Rourke look the part alone will make the budget too big to make money on the film. I could at least buy into the idea of Statham playing the part.

Posted by: Matt at December 29, 2010 5:45 PM

Who was dropped on their head and thought that Mickey Rourke playing a Welshman was a good idea, let alone the legend that is Gareth Thomas?
Why can't they just pump Rhy Ifans full of steroids and teach him how to thump someone with conviction?
To be fair though, I am sure both of them can nail a scorching monkey sex scene, but a Welsh accent?
Also Mickey Rourke is built like a fucking prop not a back. The idiot who thought of this needs a fucking poesklap!

Posted by: peanut at December 29, 2010 5:50 PM

Is this the first time that the actor playing the subject of the biopic is old enough to be the subject's father?

Oh, Statham is an interesting idea.

I heard about this project a while ago, somewhere, and I was sort of ignoring it, hoping Rourke would decide he wanted to produce only.

Oh, well. If wishes were horses, I wouldn't be moving because my bitch of a ex-roommate wouldn't have left me high and dry in a place I can't afford on my own, or however that saying goes.

Posted by: SavageCats at December 29, 2010 6:18 PM

Statham won't do it because he isn't ready to come out.

Whaaaaaat?!?!

I think the role is perfect for Tom Cruise, though.

Wink. Wink.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at December 29, 2010 6:32 PM

“a man who plays rugby who is gay”

As in, don't define him by either his profession or his sexual orientation.

But why restrict him to being a "man". Is he not a human, who is male, who plays rugby, who is gay?

Have we become so politically correct that any attributive adjective that references sex, race or creed must come after the noun, lest we dare minimize that person's existence to a single attribute.

The guy is a gay rugby player. Not the only one, for sure, but the first to admit it.

Jackie Robinson was a black baseball player. He doesn't get remembered for being a "baseball player who is black". He is remembered because the players today who follow in his footsteps are baseball players who happen to be black.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at December 29, 2010 6:45 PM

Personally, I see no issues with a 58 year old man playing a 36 year old professional athlete. And a really fit pro athlete at that. Not like a bowler or golfer or some other shit. Plus this will give the Mickey another chance to rock his British Isles accent skills. Just like he did with that Irish accent in A Prayer for the Dying!

:(

Oh Mickey, Mickey, Mickey. Step away from the role. Keep your hands up, and step away!

Posted by: Groundloop at December 29, 2010 7:15 PM

I looked up this rugby dude and found a quote from Gareth Thomas, "I don't want to be known as a gay rugby player. I am a rugby player, first and foremost I am a man".
I totally get why they picked Rourke. Can't you see the resemblance between the 2 photos? If Mickey took his shirt off they would practically be twins.
How about Vin Diesel? He's bald and was at one time rumored to be gay until he had a daughter.

Posted by: Dingle Berry at December 29, 2010 9:39 PM

if Statham can act, he could be perfect! but i'm not sure if he can act.
so i would be totally unoriginal, i'm going to say Damon(he yet acted a rugbyman) or Bale((no need to give explanation)

Posted by: caro at December 29, 2010 9:56 PM

I have a man-crush/ role-model fixation on Mickey. Haggard, insane, and jacked. All my life goals rolled into one glorious individual.

Posted by: JohnnyVonAwesome at December 29, 2010 10:28 PM

When there is Gay Rugby then you may call him a gay rugby player. The scrums may get very interesting in that sport ;-)

Good God, that man is buff; can I play?

Posted by: wildflower at December 30, 2010 12:04 AM

Sure yeah, why not.

Posted by: zeke the pig at December 30, 2010 4:23 AM

I thought ALL the rugby guys were gay?


I kid!


Is Mickey gonna play this while reminiscing in his rocking chair?

Posted by: logan at December 30, 2010 9:34 AM

The only way I see him managing a passable accent is if he has a stroke and his brain mangles its way to it, so, yes; hopefully rocking chair.

Posted by: zeke the pig at December 30, 2010 10:05 AM

Ok, I don't know squat about rugby or this Gareth person...I am assuming that is him in the right hand pic?

Cause when I first saw it I thought, DAYUM! Andrew Lincoln has really pumped up!

Posted by: dammitjanet at December 30, 2010 1:29 PM

The first question to ask would be "if Gareth weren't gay, would this film get made?"

We all know the answer to that question - no. Sure, Gareth may be a wonderful person, but the hook is the setting for open homosexuality (which is tremendous that Gareth is breaking such ground). But without that, this is a nothing movie. Hell, it's not even a Sunday style section cheer you up fluff piece. The movie only sells on the gay themes and thus Rourke and Thomas are being a bit rich by relegating the gay part as if it were some sort of postscript/afterthought/incidental fact.

They cheapen it by denying the reality of what it is and why it is dramatic (a story worth telling).

That said, I've never been one who likes sexual orientation as the first (or any) adjective used to describe someone (Gay this, Lesbian that), sexuality shouldn't be part of the descriptive equation (unless that is what the person explicitly wants). So I see where Rourke and Thomas are coming from. But that changes when you are trying to sell a film where the only reason it is getting made is because of that sexuality.

Posted by: pattonbt at December 30, 2010 8:45 PM

paattonbt, you are exactly right.

Posted by: Cindy at December 30, 2010 11:14 PM