free counter with statistics Octopajiba | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

bond3.jpg

Octopajiba

The Daily Trade Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | May 22, 2007 | Comments (69)


The news out of Hollywood this week so far isn’t all that thrilling, but the round-up must go on, if only to give you good folks a target to aim your daggers (that’d be both the projects in question, and your humble messenger). And, unfortunately, due to jury duty (karmic punishment for my Shrek the Third review), today’s round-up is also semi-abbreviated.

So, here we go: First up, guess who’s in line to direct the 22nd installment of the James Bond franchise? Brian Robbins? No. Brian Levant? Uh huh. Actually, it’s not a bad director, though I’m skeptical of the choice, given the nature of the film: Marc Forster is rumored to be taking over the directorial duties, after Martin Campbell offered up the serviceable, uneven (thanks to the overlong poker sequences and ridiculous love story) Casino Royale. You may recall Forster from his helming duties on Finding Neverland, Monster’s Ball and the surprisingly fantastic Stranger than Fiction. He certainly has a talent for drama, but who knows how well that will extend toward an action film. Then again, who would’ve pegged Alfonso Cuaron as the Harry Potter franchise’s best director following Great Expectations and Y tu mama tambien? A good director, apparently, is a good director, regardless of genre (which is not to suggest that Great Expecation was a particularly good film). And if Forster does take over directing duties, it may be the first Bond film I actually look forward to seeing — of course, Tony Scott is also rumored to be up for the job, which is just a terrible idea. His talents might be best served on that long-rumored Amanda Bynes/Hilary Duff buddy-cop pic.

In Dark Knight casting news, a surprising (bewildering? bumblefucked?) announcement was made over the weekend: Anthony Michael Hall has an unspecified role in the film. Yeah — Weird Science’s Gary will have a part, though he’s been sworn to secrecy as to what it entails. According to the L.A. Times, Hall says, “I signed a confidentiality agreement, and I can’t say which part I’m playing … I can’t give away the suspense.” Methinks that’s just Hall’s gentle way of saying, “I’m a crowd scene extra,” though I do understand he repeatedly utters the line, “Gimme da keys, I’ll drive,” while sniffing a pair of Molly Ringwald’s panties. Sadly, he wasn’t wearing a microphone at the time. (I mean no disrespect to the hours and hours of enjoyment you’ve given me, Farmer Ted.)

In semi-devastating news for the world of fanboy geekdom out there (I don’t swing that way, but I know many of you do), the Star Wars obsession film, Fanboys, has been delayed yet again. The film is about a group of Star Wars geeks who make a cross-country venture to George Lucas’ Ranch to see Episode I — The Phantom Menance as it should be seen (though in my estimation, it’s best seen with earplugs and a blindfold). Apparently, the studio was so excited (ahem) about the film that they’ve decided to do a lot of reshoots and push back the release from this summer to January, which — as we all know — is when the best films are released, that way the massive droves of people who don’t attend movies after the new year will have something not to watch. After watching the trailer, I can’t say that I’m all that surprised: It appears as though it’s a decent premise, with a cool cast of players (including Jay Baruchel, Kristen Bell, and Seth Rogen in what appears to be a cameo) that is poorly executed. And unless the reshoots involve deleting Dan Fogler from the film entirely, I wouldn’t expect much improvement over what the trailer has to offer.

Finally, America’s sweetheart (or at least the America that shops at Target (c’mon — it’s a joke; too soon, huh? Damnit — I’ll put the tail back between the ass cheeks) Julia Roberts is set to play Joan Root in a biopic of her life. For those of you not familiar with her life, Root “was a Kenyan native and wildlife documentary film maker, whose life’s work came to … zzzzzzzzzzz.” No no … I kid. I kid. I’m sure that Root led a fascinating life and that the film will be a respectful tribute to it, which is why the filmmakers chose to cast the actress best known for romanticizing prostitution. I mean, it makes perfect sense to get Julia Roberts to play this woman. Can’t you see the resemblance?

And if you folks aren’t infuriated enough with the state of Hollywood right now, this ought to do it: Elijah Wood will play Iggy Pop in an Iggy biopic. My lust for life has just shriveled like George Costanza in a large body of cold water.

Out in DVD this week, feast your eyes on the amazing Epic Movie, which may hold the title for the worst non-straight-to-DVD release of the year. There is also Apocalypto for the bloodthirsty amongst you, Amazing Grace for the extremely desperate for entertainment amongst you, and The Good German for those who want to see a film that you could’ve sworn was based on a Graham Greene novel (it’s not). Clint Eastwood’s Oscar-nominated Letters From Iwo Jima will also be released today, as well as Fay Grim, which just opened in theaters on Friday (how’s that for turnaround?). We should have that review up soon — travel-related logistics have held it up thus far.

Finally, in the trailer watch, will someone please tell me who in God’s name has the tiniest inkling of interest in the Hairspray remake? What worked for John Waters does not work for Adam Shankman, you know? And who the hell wants to see John Travolta take a role popularized by Divine? It’s only a matter of time before they remake all the cult classics as mainstream films — just wait until we’re somebody gets the bright idea to remake Harold and Maude with Topher Grace and Catherine Zeta-Jones. It’ll happen, too. Sons of bitches — all of them.


Pajiba Love 05/21/07 | I Guess There are Some Things a Hero Can't Save



Comments

Jesus, Joan Root and Julie Roberts could be sisters. Not kidding.

Elijah Wood will play Iggy Pop in an Iggy biopic

Step back, everyone--stardust savant is going to lay a massive egg of rage when she gets here (to go along with the one I just popped out on reading that ort of absurdity).

Posted by: Ranylt at May 22, 2007 9:22 AM

Just when you thought that hollywood had bottomed out with Kiki Dunst as Debbie Harry along comes Elijah to ruin everyone's day.

What did Iggy ever do to them?

Posted by: Alex the Odd at May 22, 2007 9:40 AM

Dustin, honey, good work overall; but I would put this column at a seventy-two, and as you know you are supposed to be at eighty-nine.

I put it down to that damn jury duty thing. Oh, and on that topic, I urge you to find 'em all guilty, give 'em the needle and then break for lunch.

Posted by: Jerce at May 22, 2007 9:47 AM

Ow. Oweewowowowowow. Please, complete moratorium on EVER showing Travolta in drag again. Please. Something tells me that in the inevitable review here, Travolta is going to be the main problem with the film (besides the whole remaking a classic thing). And now Walken has been ruined for me. That's right, what Balls of Fury didn't manage to hurt, Hairspray destroyed outright. I am gonna go find that "cowbell" video now. Good times.

My fear is that Forster is going to be too unsure of himself, being used to making dramas and such, that he may overcompensate for the action and leave out any real development. But I have some confidence in him. Anyone that puts Maggie G. in front of a camera yelling at IRS agents is golden in my book.

And don't be so down on Anthony Michael Hall. He is pretty good on The Dead Zone. He is probably playing a cameo for another villain to be inserted into a later flick, which seems to be en vogue nowadays.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 22, 2007 10:01 AM

Wait, wait, wait,

A Hairspray without John Watters or Divine?

Forgive me for asking, but,

what's the point?

No, really, what's the point?

The only good that can come from something iike that is if they get Travolta to be part of a remake of 'pink flamingos,' and get him to eat a big chunk of dog shit.

Posted by: Some guy at May 22, 2007 10:04 AM

Interesting news on the Bond front - perhaps Forster will find a way to make this one less utterly boring. Here's a weird thing - I'm pretty sure I've seen EVERY Bond movie, and remember some to all of the lot of them.

Casino Royale? It's like I never saw it. It was THAT dull.

I'm actually kind of psyched for Farmer Ted in the Batman movie. I'm at the point where Nolan can do no wrong, so my faith is unshaken. Coupled with the badass Joker pic, and I'm officially excited.

Elijah Wood as Iggy Pop? Jesus... does Iggy know? I'd be pissed if I learned that the fuckin' hobbit from Flipper was playing me. Hell, I'm not Iggy Pop and I'm pissed.

Posted by: TK at May 22, 2007 10:09 AM

Any (sort of) Daniel Craig news is good news.

Jerce, Tinmo, Ranylt, and everyone else: Sorry for the "perspicacity" of my Shrek the Third comments (but thanks for the support, Jerce). I despise the suggestion that folks should "vanilla" their commentary about society's by-and-large crappy tastes, especially the "nerds and geeks" who actually spend some time sampling and analyzing the contemplative, the difficult-to-understand, and the simply beautiful-for-beautiful's-sake. People here should call it like they see it -- if that's smug, then I'm down with a little self-satisfaction.

BUT -- everyone I know always seems to have a big but -- as I worked my way through a fifth of gin on Saturday, I felt the juvenile need to do some foot-stomping. (Like with Mel Gibson: I blame the booze, Stupid ....)

Dustin, I love the site, especially the comments. I won't hassle you any more about the greatest marketing idea of the 21st century (see my handle for more details!). I shall remain, your loyal servant, socalledonlycousins.

Posted by: socalledonlypajibapajamas at May 22, 2007 10:10 AM

What's this I hear about a Point Break sequel starring Swayze?

Link to Moviehole article

Maybe the Pajiba! staff didn't find this newsworthy enough for this site. Oh well, for those who do care then.


Of course we (PB lovers and haters) should all avoid this film at any cost.

Posted by: Jeff K at May 22, 2007 10:14 AM

The only good that can come from something iike that is if they get Travolta to be part of a remake of 'pink flamingos,' and get him to eat a big chunk of dog shit.

But would he suck cock on screen (and validate all the rumors)?

Posted by: Marianne at May 22, 2007 10:19 AM

I'm smack dab in the middle of the generation that Fanboys is supposed to appeal to, and I have to admit, the beginning of the trailer had me pretty excited. It wanes in the middle as it starts to look like a non-Stranger-than-Fiction-Will-Farrell-Movie (known in the industry as a NSTFWFM), but the trash compactor scene brought me back. It looks like a definite rental.

Posted by: bartap at May 22, 2007 10:28 AM

I was bummed when Hairspray was twisted into saccharine musical theatre but now this trifling adaptation of the musical? With John Travolta?? Was Harvey Feinstein not available? At least he would have done a serviceable job, but Travolta looks like the bogeyman in a dress.

Hey now. I Heart Target. I do not however Heart Shrek the Third.

What's with all the trashing of Casino Royale? Watch one of the last few Pierce Bronsan clunkers like The World is Not Enough and get back to me on the "stupid love story" in Casino Royale.

Posted by: Alabamapink at May 22, 2007 10:31 AM

As long as Anthony Michael Hall is not Robin I think we'll be alright.

Posted by: The Stew at May 22, 2007 10:35 AM

Sorry for the "perspicacity" of my Shrek the Third comments

Que? "Perspicacity: possessing acute mental vision or discernment."

All good!

Posted by: Ranylt at May 22, 2007 10:47 AM

The only good that can come from something iike that is if they get Travolta to be part of a remake of 'pink flamingos,' and get him to eat a big chunk of dog shit.

I would pay full price to see that movie. My first laugh of the day--thank you!

I enjoyed the hell out of Casino Royale and so did everyone I know who saw it. I never got the negativity about Craig; as soon as I heard he'd been cast I knew he'd knock it out of the fucking park. The movie was thrilling.

socalledonlypajibapajamas: Stop fretting; nobody's mad at you. We've all been that drunk at some point. Also, thanks for promising to shorten your name.

I never got into USA's "The Dead Zone" but I do think Anthony Michael Hall is a better actor than he usually gets credit for. And, as someone said above, Nolan can do no wrong (at least so far) and I am psyched to see whatever he tosses up on the screen this time.

Posted by: Jerce at May 22, 2007 10:51 AM

I'm also a little confused about why there is some Casino Royale hating going on. It was a great movie, the poker scenes were a joy to watch. The only problem I had with the movie was the opening sequence on the crane which I thought was a bit much and the way Bond could run through a stream of bullets and not get hit.

I'd like to see my hero win in a game of wits rather than pot luck.

Posted by: Caillan at May 22, 2007 11:10 AM

The Fanboys trailer looked ok. I didn't see that sexy hunk of throbbing manhood Seth Rogen in it anywhere, though, which is the whole reason I went and looked in the first place.

Posted by: AdaHaze at May 22, 2007 11:11 AM

Ok, one of you Pajiba bloggers mentioned John Travolta in the Hairspray role before, and I wanted to say something but didn't, but I thought I would toss in my two cents here.
What the hell?? I had heard about him taking this role before, but just recently saw photos of him in drag (and what a drag, really). Seriously, what a way to leach out any style, irreverence, and pure tackiness that Devine might have brought to the character. It's like the Wal-Martization of John Waters and somehow that doesn't make it a good thing.

Posted by: Lizzy at May 22, 2007 11:15 AM

So it would seem to be only a matter of time before they annouce that Jessica Simpson will star in a heart-warming biopic about Jane Goodall.
Didn't read the rest of the round-up. I'm stuck on the Julia Roberts news (are you sure this isn't April 1st?). Wouldn't you like to be a fly on the wall during those dialogue coaching sessions? If DiCaprio couldn't pull off that strange mix of influences that contribute to Anglo-Boer-African style English, just think of how Roberts will fuck it up.
Sorry planet, I'm starting to wish that caring about the environment never became trendy and turned into a career accessory for Hollywood morons.

Posted by: PaddyDog at May 22, 2007 11:27 AM

Chris Atkins resembles Joan Root more than Julia Roberts.

Posted by: conchi at May 22, 2007 11:30 AM

AdaHaze:

Seth Rogen is barely recognizable! He plays a total nerd dressed (I think - I can't access the trailer here at work and I saw it a couple of weeks ago) as Darth Vader or a Storm Trooper, and he's in the scene where the main character(s) are talking to people in costume. He insults them, or is insulted by them, and he's wearing a wig or false teeth or something like that..... damn, my students are sucking away my memory.

At any rate, I had no idea it was him until my eagle-eyed husband was like, "That's the guy from 40-Year-Old Virgin!" Lo and behold, it was.

Posted by: Ariel at May 22, 2007 11:43 AM

Meh, I've got nothing against Anthony Michael Hall, kid had great comedic chops, Gary, was great.

Julia was America's "sweetheart" (whatever the fuck that means, that's straight out of the Walmart set playbook) now she's just an old horse.

There's some weird shit going down on that next Bond flick, read the Olsen twins are being courted by producers. That would mean they are deliberately sabotaging the film for insurance purposes.

Finally, the definitive way of watching the Phantom Menace is by placing the disc on your microwave, setting it to high and watching it melt.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 22, 2007 11:51 AM

Y'know, I was actually wondering why the Shrek board had almost 200 posts but was too lazy to read the comments to figure it out since there were, well, 200 posts. I had attributed it to the recent comment explosion that seems to have taken place across this whole site recently (seriously, where did all these people come from?) but now I know the real story. Catfighting. Glorious glorious catfighting. And now I'm sad that I missed out on the entire thing. Next time though, yeah? Just warn me ahead of time what ridiculous part of a review it's going to be about so I can get my A game ready.


Yo Mamma so Pajiba...

Posted by: McGeek at May 22, 2007 11:53 AM

just wait until we're somebody gets the bright idea to remake Harold and Maude with Topher Grace and Catherine Zeta-Jones

It would make sense for her to be in the remake - her life is the saem, with the roles reversed

Posted by: Brian at May 22, 2007 11:54 AM

--It's only a matter of time before they remake all the cult classics as mainstream films -- just wait until we're somebody gets the bright idea to remake Harold and Maude with Topher Grace and Catherine Zeta-Jones. It'll happen, too. Sons of bitches -- all of them. --
That I'd pay to see.

Hairspray: not so much. Travolta's got the part all wrong, the stageplay has been adapted to increase racial humor, that kid who can't sing Tenor roles from High School Musical is playing a Tenor Role, and Amanda Bynes' character that has 15-20 lines and one singing moment is listed as a lead. What has the world come to?

PS: The stage musical of Hairspray is awesome, and that is the source of this film, not the even more awesome Waters' film. So it's technically an adaptation of an adaptation, and not a remake of the film, which spells certain doom based on Rent, Dreamgirls, and The Producers (though that was at least enjoyable for all the Mel Brooks humor).

Posted by: Robert at May 22, 2007 11:58 AM

Kiki Dunst as Debbie Harry

WHAT?!!!
WHERE?!!!
WHY?!!!

Posted by: Brian at May 22, 2007 12:02 PM

Thing with Hairspray is that, I just can't picture it without Divine in it. While I'm not a Travolta hater I will become once I see this, you just KNOW it's going to play as TRAVOLTA disguised as a woman doing a funny "woman" voice (think Dunkin' Donuts guy trying to spy on the competition commercial.) With Divine it didn't come off like that.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 22, 2007 12:05 PM

I'm optimistic about Forster taking over as director. I loved his work in his other movies, just as I loved Cuaron's work in The Prisoner of Azkaban . Good comparison.

As I watched the Fanboys trailer, I couldn't even spot Seth Rogen. Which one is he? And what the heck is up with Kristen Bell's black wig?

Posted by: bonnie at May 22, 2007 12:06 PM

Re: Harold and Maude
Shhh, you're giving them ideas...

Posted by: mutterhals at May 22, 2007 12:06 PM

Raising hand somewhat meekly

I too thought Casino Royale was a great film, in its genre.

Not to quote Pajiba, but Daniel Carlson reviewed it for us, and was overall laudatory...

Posted by: Paris at May 22, 2007 12:15 PM

What. THE HELL.
Elijah Wood?
He has...no edge! OR...HEIGHT. Or..ABS!
JESUS!

I really think they should make the biopics after the person is dead. It saves them the shame and embarrassment of having to come face to face with the person they are portraying.
Somehow I don't think Iggy handpicked Elijah Wood a la Hunter & Depp.

Posted by: Leanne at May 22, 2007 12:16 PM

I am about as excited for Hairspray as I am for rectal hemorrhaging. Cuz ya kow...who DOESN'T love them a good spot o' rectal hemorrhaging.

Posted by: PissBoy at May 22, 2007 12:28 PM

Ohh, my father was a good friend of Joan Root, and I am sick - sick! - at the thought of that talentless hack playing her. Ugh. She, while perhaps not the ideal of beauty Hollywood demands, was an amazing woman, and one of my role models growing up.

Obviously, I'm not talking Julia Roberts, here. Gah.

Posted by: elsworthy at May 22, 2007 12:46 PM

People were probably skeptical when they heard Christopher Nolan would be directing "Batman Begins". He had never done any action films before and look how well that turned out (except for Katie Holmes). I think Marc Forster will do a fine job if he gets the James Bond gig. Just keep Paul Haggis away from the script.

Posted by: RAT at May 22, 2007 12:52 PM

Also on DVD today...Criterion's reissue of "The Third Man." Good stuff.

Posted by: Cody at May 22, 2007 12:57 PM

Well, if it were John Travolta rectally hemorrhaging, I could like it a little.


"I'd be pissed if I learned that the fuckin' hobbit from Flipper was playing me."


TK, you made me scare the baby.


One of the reasons that I can't hate George Clooney despite the Ocean's series is that he's on record lamenting Hollywood thus: "If they remade Harold and Maude today, it would star, well, me. And Julia Roberts in age makeup." And in related snarkage, since Horsey ruined Michael Collins with her execrable Irish "accent," I agree that she'll never pull off Boer.

Posted by: Erin MJ at May 22, 2007 12:59 PM

I'm a total sucker for musicals of any kind, so I will be watching Hairspray and I most likely will enjoy it.

Posted by: Brianne at May 22, 2007 1:30 PM

Don't y'all think Joan Allen would make a good Joan Root? She has a physical resemblance and God knows she can out-act Julia Roberts (not that that's much of an accomplishment).

Posted by: Jerce at May 22, 2007 1:37 PM

Step back, everyone--stardust savant is going to lay a massive egg of rage when she gets here (to go along with the one I just popped out on reading that ort of absurdity). Oh Ranylt, how right you are. I actually heard that Frodo Wood was being considered to play Iggy about a couple years ago. As you can imagine the words "WHAT THE FUCK?! WHOSE BRILLIANT IDEA WAS THIS? GAWD, I HATE HOLLYWOOD!!" echoed through my house causing dogs and cats to scatter to the corners of the house, cowering in fear. Then I said, in a slightly calmer voice, "I hope the casting directors come to their senses." Apparently, they have not. I also seem to remember reading an interview with Iggy in a very obscure skating magazine in which he expressed his puzzlement as to why on God's Green Earth someone would think that Frodo would make a great faux-Iggy.

Someone has obviously lost their ever-lovin' mind. Elijah Wood was born to play the part of Frodo Baggins and Yellow Bastard. He is not Iggy - he simply lacks the Awesome Gene that Iggy clearly has. Can't see it happening. Obviously, the casting director has no friends or loved ones. If they did, then said friends or loved ones would have promptly wrapped the casting director up in a straitjacket the moment the words "You know who would make an awesome Iggy Pop? Elijah Wood!!" came out of their mouth. Because that's what friends and loved ones do - they make sure that teh stoopid is not spread to the general public.

And furthermore, WTF is up with making a biopic about someone who is not even dead? Yeah Iggy is a legend in his own time, but damn - at least let the guy be gone a couple decades or so before making a movie about his life that is probably going to get at least a few of the facts wrong. Or have the courtesy to blatantly fictionalize it a la Velvet Goldmine.

All this righteous indignation has given me a headache. I'm going to go have a lie down.

Posted by: stardust savant at May 22, 2007 1:44 PM

As I watched the Fanboys trailer, I couldn't even spot Seth Rogen. Which one is he?

He's the one in fromt of the Picard statue, who said Solo was a dirtbag

Posted by: Brian at May 22, 2007 1:54 PM

heh-heh, heh - d'oh learn new word

d'oh learn perspicacity no bad

d'oh stop sucking thumb, pull head out of ass

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 22, 2007 1:57 PM

Brian: that Solo was a dirtbag spurred my um...perspicacity so I clicked on that trailer, that shit was hilarious, Shatner!, Star Wars v. Star Trek geeks, stripping to Menudo, by force (there's a nod to Police Academy somewhere in there). This could be the new Harold and Kumar.

I disagree with our geek hating reviewer and hope they don't fuck it up with the re-shoots.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 22, 2007 2:14 PM

@stardust savant

Thank you for mentioning Velvet Goldmine, despite the overall aggrandizement and fabrication going on, I thought the casting was OK.
I mean : Ewan McGregor vs. Elijah Wood

Does even Elijah Wood himself think that he's awesome enough to play Iggy Pop? I've never seen an inkling of rock star in any of his performances.

Posted by: missmle at May 22, 2007 3:09 PM

Paddydog, you ruined my whole damn day with that Jessica-Simpson-as-Jane-Goodall comment. Thanks for that, buddy. Though it does seem to be following the same casting pattern that Hollywood is on lately.

And damnit, I loved Casino Royale! I though Daniel Craig was great, and completely rejuvinated the James Bond franchise. Also, I'm a sucker for those blue eyes, which might have something to do with it.

Posted by: Claire at May 22, 2007 3:30 PM

JOHN RAMBO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I can't believe you haven't made mention of that trailer yet. Insane...holy sh** insane!

Posted by: CoolWhip11 at May 22, 2007 3:55 PM

I'm now listening to "I Wanna Be Your Dog" and trying to picture Elijah as Iggy, and - oh, and now I'm sobbing. Thanks, Pajiba!

Seriously, I have nothing against Elijah Wood, but I'm pretty sure that I could be a more convincing Iggy Pop.

Posted by: Mimi at May 22, 2007 3:56 PM

Elijah Wood as Iggy Pop???


....WHAT?!?

Posted by: Ambiepony at May 22, 2007 4:02 PM

You know what, man? I don't care if Julia Roberts is or isn't America's sweetheart, or if she looks like Joan Root. However, I am getting seriously fed up with the fact that nearly every Hollywood movie about Africa and/or Africans somehow manages to star a lilly-white (super)star with maybe one or two African(-American) co-stars, ie:
Tha Last King of Scotland,
The Constant Gardner,
Blood Diamonds,
The Interpreter,
Cath a Fire,
Beyond Borders,
Black Hawk Down,
Amistad,
To Walk With Lions,
I Dreamed of Africa,
Danger Zone,
The Ghost and the Darkness,
Outbreak,
A Good Man in Africa,
Heart of Darkness,
Congo,
Mountains of the Moon,
Gorillas in the Mist,
Cry Freedom,
Out of Africa,
Ashanti,
The African Queen,
and so many others it's not even funny.
Hotel Rwanda and The Color Purple are the only big Hollywood productions about Africa I can think of that star an all-Black or mostly Black cast.
I'm white, but I did grow up in sub-Saharan Africa, where... the overwhelming majority of people are dark-skinned, except for South Africa.
Is it too much to ask that Hollywood produce movies about Africa and Africans with the lead role(s) not being a) the White American/European explorer/ missionnary/ humanitarian/ hunter, or b) the White African mercenary/ hunter/ journalist/ interpreter? Can we not have more movies about Africa and Africans starring people who, oh, I don't know, actually represent most Africans in physiology and profession/ lifestyle? Does Hollywood really have to give us a White lead character to "usher" us into Africa every single time? Can Black African characters not introduce us to their countries themselves? But most importantly, Hollywood keeps saying that, what? All the explorers, humanitarians, preservationists, and activists in the history of Africa worth making a movie about were... White. Europeans or their descendants. That's incredibly dismissive. Even the Steve Biko movie starring Denzel Washington gives almost as much screen time to Kevin Kline.
Look, I'm just saying. Nicole Kidman as an African was already pretty hard to swallow, but Julia Roberts? Really?

Posted by: Gabrielle at May 22, 2007 5:15 PM

Claire: I'm so sorry. It just struck me as the natural progression of the madness. I've just finished the second half of Goodall's authbiography and when I read today's Round-Up, I had a vision of Simpson in Daisy Mae shorts in the chimp preserve in Kenya. I felt the need to vent because if I kept it to myself, I might harm someone.

Posted by: PaddyDog at May 22, 2007 5:20 PM

Gabrielle: You forgot every Tarzan movie ever made in which even the wild animals are more noble and get more screen time than the "natives".

Posted by: PaddyDog at May 22, 2007 5:42 PM

That was an excellent post Gabrielle, I can't wait for the Harriet Tubman biographical starring Rachel MacAdams, in black face, set against the background of a strugling plantation family led by a strong willed matriarch played by Meryl Streep.

Lindsay Lohan, will play the slutty daughter and also, Halle Berry as the treacherous house-negro who sleeps with the the plantation owner.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 22, 2007 6:03 PM

Gabrielle - I feel you. I recall mentioning something similar when The Last King of Scotland came out. Tsotsi was a great movie, IMO (to add to the TCP and HR list). Anyway, I don't know if things will ever really change in that regard, but I'm hopeful. Also, to be fair, the white character leading or driving the story about a non-Western European culture isn't exclusive to Africa. Thinking of some other examples - the Middle East and American Indians don't get much love, either, I think.

Posted by: Daphne at May 22, 2007 6:30 PM

Dang, Gabrielle, that was a long list, and I've seen about half of those movies.

I remember thinking that about Last King of Scotland, which I watched recently--if the character had just been based on a real person, it wouldn't have been so insulting; but still.

I suppose studios are still nervous about financing movies with casts that are "too ethnic."

...which leads me to think that maybe Tyler Perry is doing something worthwhile, in a kind of left-handed way. His movies make money. Since money means everything to studio execs, maybe they'll open up a little.

Posted by: Jerce at May 22, 2007 7:32 PM

Bite your tongue, Jerce!

To his credit, Tyler has tapped into a certain demographic with his films and plays. He's done what any other savvy writer/director/producer has done. But, there has never been any complexity to his stories or the characters in them. Which is what I'd like to see more of.

Posted by: Daphne at May 22, 2007 9:23 PM

The trick to the Hairspray movie is to not think of it as a remake of the John Waters movie but instead think of it as what it actually is: A poorly cast film version of a Broadway show. Yes, the show was based on the original film, but they're too far apart to call this a remake. The singing, for one thing, puts a damper on that.

That said, I can already see Travolta is horribly miscast. Harvey Fierstein was great in the role. Travolta is too tame.

Posted by: Kevin at May 22, 2007 9:25 PM

I just had a horrible thought. Perhaps one of the most horrible movie-related thoughts I have ever had. If Frodo Wood is (mis)cast to play the part of Iggy Pop then who, I ask you who in the name of all that is good and holy and musically awesome, is going to be cast to play the part of Bowie?! You know they're going to do it. The two of them worked together so closely in the 70s that I can't see how they could possibly make the biopic without casting someone for Bowie. If the casting director makes another poor casting decision and miscasts the part of Bowie, I may have to express a little indignation on my own site. And of course link to the eventual scathing review that the good folks here at Pajiba will write.

Posted by: stardust savant at May 22, 2007 10:03 PM

Hold on to your spleen Stardust Savant because I have the perfect answer from hell for you. They'll cast Sean Astin as Bowie and market the movie as "see these two great friends united again in the buddy movie of the year".

Posted by: PaddyDog at May 22, 2007 10:26 PM

Hey, Dustin.

There's a "Great Expecation" that's crept into the second paragraph. Anal-retentive tendencies away!

Posted by: Brett at May 22, 2007 10:53 PM

"just wait until we're somebody gets the bright idea to remake Harold and Maude with Topher Grace and Catherine Zeta-Jones."

So is Topher Grace now the token overrated "it-boy" actor? I guess I can see that.

For the record, I loved the Shrek III review. And the Seinfeld reference.

Posted by: Diana at May 22, 2007 11:09 PM

"everyone I know always seems to have a big but "
-socalledonlypajibapajamas

Is that a...reference to Pee-Wee's Big Adventure? Man, this is the only place I can feel cool recognizing that.

Well, almost cool.

Posted by: Diana at May 22, 2007 11:16 PM

I'm pretty sure I'm in love with the term 'bumblefucked'.

Elijah Wood will play Iggy Pop in an Iggy biopic.
And hey, conveniently I -finally- possess a word that can adequately express the level of confusion I'm experiencing now.
Really? ..WHY? How?
In what alternate dimension is this anything but a nearly blasphemically horrendous idea? X.x

Posted by: the hel at May 23, 2007 7:20 AM

INT. BOARDROOM -- DAY

A massive table is populated by MEN AND WOMEN, early 40's, botoxed enough to be holding out for an ID check at Bungalow 8. They titter blandly.

A HUGE DOUCHE sits at the head. His tongue slithers. He stands.

HUGE DOUCHE
So, the question is, what would
Jane Root look like...
(Pause)
...Hot?

There is a pregnant pause.

MAN #1
...Lindsay Lohan?

HUGE DOUCHE
Yes, I know, we all want
Lindsay Lohan, but she's going
to be tied up with Scorsese and
that Wes Tommy Anderson guy for
the next decade, so we're just
going to have to figure out what
Monkey Bitch would look like if
we were all shitfaced.

FADE OUT

Posted by: Kristin at May 23, 2007 7:36 AM

Yes indeedy Kiki Dunst as Debbie Harry. Although I heard she was actually hand picked for the role which is just.... weird. Sorry to ruin your day Brian

And I can't help it but I have to make a correction from waaaaaay up there (because I won't be able to sleep tonight if I don't) Frodo Wood played Kevin not the Yellow Bastard.

OK, I'm done.

Except for the fact that I called a friend yesterday to inform her of the casting choice for Iggy... I think I still hear her weeping.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at May 23, 2007 10:03 AM

Paddydog, I appreciate the apology, but then you went and did it all again with the Sean Astin thing! I don't want to see Sean Astin ever again. Ever.

Posted by: Claire at May 23, 2007 1:11 PM

the overwhelming majority of people are dark-skinned, except for South Africa.

Um... South Africa is about 80% black and about 10% coloured. I'd call that combo the overwhelming majority. Whites are only about 9% of the population.

Sorry, as South African part of that majority(the coloured part), and a child of the Apartheid years, it's a bit of a sore subject...

But your intent is absolutely spot-on, Gabrielle, something I've railed against here in the past. Hollywood is near-incapable of making a movie that takes place in a foreign country without giving it a white protagonist. Daphne adds to the rightness (which is why Daphne rocks) - it's not just Africa. It's almost as if they're convinced that Americans won't see a movie unless there's a white person starring. Pathetic, really.

Posted by: TK at May 23, 2007 3:35 PM

I'M A CHECKERBOARD CHICK!!!!!!!

Posted by: SCG at May 23, 2007 5:41 PM

Alex you are totally right! And I just read that novel too. You'd think I would have gotten that right...but no. My vast wealth of useless knowledge that I am so proud of is obviously becoming a sieve. Must rectify that.

Posted by: stardust savant at May 23, 2007 10:19 PM

Diana -- if you're still trawling around these comments: Yes! I love that quote.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 23, 2007 10:32 PM

Nice! It's weird, because I literally just watched that movie a few days ago. And yes, still trawling. This isn't something I can just let go without any confirmation, you know? So thank you.

Posted by: Diana at May 25, 2007 12:35 AM

Casino Royale was boring? BORING? What the hell is happening that someone found that film boring? Jesus.

Posted by: Madz at May 27, 2007 4:13 AM