web
counter
 

Nightmares Really Do Come True!

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (38)



kate-gosselin-sarah-palin (1).jpg

After that unfortunate week in which there were something like 4,329 Sarah Palin posts on the site, the edges of the Internet began to blur, and relationships fell apart, we’ve taken a break — or rather, the pop culture news world had taken a break from her — giving us no excuse to torture you (you knew that something would have to replace the vacancy left by the Human Centipede). But hey! If we ignored Sarah Palin, how would she ever become the huge reality star we all want her to be?

And how to best raise the profile of Palin’s reality show, Alaska? Stunt-casting the only mother in America reviled by more people than Sarah Palin: Kate Gosselin. It’s a savvy political move, actually. It’s more difficult to concentrate all your hate on Palin with Gosselin around, and from the looks of the preview, Gosselin gets the worst of it.

(That episode aired last night, and it didn’t go well for Gosselin).

And just to drag the torture out, don’t look now, but Bristol Palin (or at least, someone writing on behalf of Bristol Palin) is a hell of a lot more likable than her Mom, notwithstanding her inability to dance. A couple of weeks ago, Keith Olbermann named Bristol Palin one of the “worst people in the world” (I thought he’d retired that segment?) for that safe sex commercial, and Palin shot back eloquently (on Facebook), writing:

What Mr. Olbermann lacks in originality he makes up for with insincere incredulity. Mr. Olbermann fails to understand that in order to have credibility as a spokesperson, it sometimes takes a person who has made mistakes. I have never claimed to be perfect. If that makes me the ‘worst person in the world’ to Mr. Olbermann, then I must apologize for not being absolutely faultless like he undoubtedly must be.”

Uh … burn?

Now, this week, after Bristol’s friend (?), Margaret Cho, claimed that Sarah Palin forced Bristol to be on “Dancing with Stars” to make up for costing Palin the election, Bristol once again took to FB, writing in part:

It saddens me that people would think that my mom would “blame” me for anything that occurred in the 2008 election—much less “harshly” and “openly.” I think that canard (there, I said it again), has been floating around since then also … The point is, I seriously doubt anyone who considers herself a student of American politics truly believes I impacted even one vote in that election. Why do I want to set the record straight? For 20 years my mom had my back—and for the rest of my life I will have hers.

To my friend Margaret Cho, if you ever have a question, call me girlfriend. Don’t ever rely on “sources” who claim to know me or my family. You will be taken every time. And we need to talk. You say you “don’t agree with the family’s politics at all” but I say, if you understood that commonsense conservative values supports the right of individuals like you, like all of us, to live our lives with less government interference and more independence, you would embrace us faster than KD Lang at an Indigo Girls concert.

P.S. If you want to baby-sit Tripp, I could use a night off.

2-0. Bristol. Maybe that’s why Bristol is becoming such a popular baby name.

(Source: Vulture)










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



First 2 Minutes of Space Battleship Yamato | In Space No One Can Write You Subtitles | Mega Shark vs. Crocosaurus Trailer | The Greatest Thing In The History Of The Universe









Comments

Having seen Bristol and her sister's facebook grammar, I'm pretty sure that she didn't write one word of that.
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/7/2010/11/340x_willow-palin-facebook-homophobic-5.jpg

Posted by: Paultera at December 6, 2010 10:40 AM

Man...not the "commonsense" thing again (and in it's "that's not a word" form as well).

Well, she's a straight talker that talks about facts that she shoots from the hip.

Posted by: Jay at December 6, 2010 10:54 AM

Exhibiting incredulity at canards has always been Bristol Palin's bailiwick.

Posted by: sansho1 at December 6, 2010 10:54 AM

Wow, I'm impressed. I am not one to visit the sins (or stupidity) of the parents upon their children, so this is refreshing. Bristol seems intelligent and rational, and I respect her for trying to teach young women about the harsh consequences of wonderful, condom-free sex.

Besides, Olbermann is a first-rate bully whose rants are so far beyond ridiculous that they take hyperbole, pump it full of roofies, throw it into a 19th century French prison colony, and offer an immediate pardon to whomever can humiliate and desecrate it the worst.

Margaret Cho is shitty at the one thing she does (stand-up comedy) so she can fuck off. And remember, she no rickey Payrin's pahrritics! You hanky-panky coss Repubricans dah erection!

Posted by: Kballs at December 6, 2010 10:58 AM

Politics aside (if that's possible), doesn't Olberman have better targets for his venom than 20-year-old single moms who, like many white people, can't dance very well?

Maybe he needs another timeout.

Posted by: , at December 6, 2010 10:59 AM

If Bristol actually wrote those FB posts, then I lost my virginity to Princess Leia while visiting Atlantis.

Posted by: Perfect Tommy at December 6, 2010 11:01 AM

sansho1,it's only Monday. You want to build up to that level of fabulosity.

Posted by: Wednesday at December 6, 2010 11:02 AM

If Bristol actually wrote those FB posts, then I lost my virginity to Princess Leia while visiting Atlantis.

Posted by: Perfect Tommy at December 6, 2010 11:01 AM

Luckyyyyy...

Posted by: coryo at December 6, 2010 11:11 AM

I'm a pretty well-read 20-something and even I had a moment over "canard".

Although, "insincere incredulity" does perfectly describe Keith Olbermann.

Posted by: Hayden Tompkins at December 6, 2010 11:18 AM

Dear Democrats, Liberals, Progressives, and The Professional Left


You sons of bitches shit on President Obama on a daily basis simply because he’s pragmatic and he always looks at the bigger picture. And now you fuckers want to primary his ass? Do you fuckers really think you can put another Democrat in the White house without the African American vote? African Americans have always supported the Democratic party without fail and now you fuckers want to show him the ultimate disrespect. Let me explain something to you fuckers, the Republicans have already figured out how to put a Republican in the White house without the African American vote. You fucking Democrats haven’t, so unless you fuckers figure out that trick I suggest you get on board with President Obama.

P.S. I think the founder of wikileaks should be put in prison, but since he’s not an American citizen there is pretty much nothing we can do to that fucker. All of you tree huggers probably want to make him man of the year, forgetting that he’s put people lives in danger, people that have put their lives on the line trying to serve their country.

P.P.S. If I had it my way I would just extend the middle class tax cuts, but it looks like all classes will have the Bush tax cuts extended. The Republicans will not vote on DADT, or the Dream Act if they don’t get their tax cuts. I think President Obama will probably extend them for all and you know what, the DADT people and the Dream Act people are still going to shit on President Obama.

P.P.P.S. I’m thinking seriously about getting the Chevy Volt, it’s a good car from the things I’ve read about it.

Posted by: Pookie at December 6, 2010 11:21 AM

"If Bristol actually wrote those FB posts, then I lost my virginity to Princess Leia while visiting Atlantis."

If you're gonna advertise yourself as Perfect Tommy, we wouldn't put it past you.

In fact, I'd believe that before I believe Bristol Palin wrote that shit. We're talking about a teen mom who didn't graduate high school. I've seen coffee pots with higher IQs than StayPuft McShittyDancerTeaPartyIconCoastByOnMama'sBookDeals here.

Posted by: D-Day at December 6, 2010 11:24 AM

*Update*

Breaking News:

*Scotland Yard has just issued an arrest warrant for the wikileaks guy*

P.S. I hope they get that motherfucker.

Posted by: Pookie at December 6, 2010 11:27 AM

re: Nightmares Really Do Come True!

Well, that explains why I am naked at work.

I thought it was the meds.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 6, 2010 11:29 AM

D-Day,

I’m glad that her mother is making millions and Bristol will surely benefit from it. But I look at it from a different point of view. A person can be poor and stupid and remain anonymous. But if you are rich and stupid there’s no way in hell you can remain anonymous, and that my friend is the beauty of the Palins having money.

Posted by: Pookie at December 6, 2010 11:33 AM

I like how Bristol's publicist manages to reconcile the idea that putting in a constitutional ban on gay marriage jives with the idea of a limited government that does not interfere with the private lives of its citizens.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at December 6, 2010 11:37 AM

Touchee Pookie,

But at the same time, while those of us grounded in reality see "rich and stupid", too many people are seeing this coven of colossal dolts as "charismatic and influential".

Posted by: D-Day at December 6, 2010 11:40 AM

Alphawhiskey,


You assume that the Palins have fully developed Egos and Super-egos, I assure you they don’t, they are permanently stuck in the Id stage. And that is why they are so petulant.

Posted by: Pookie at December 6, 2010 11:49 AM

Pookie, sadly I think we'll catch the Wikileaks guy after we've caught Osama.

As for Palin-Gosselin: I am just glad I don't watch reality TV.

Oh and Bristol may be doing some growing up. Good for her.

Posted by: Fredo at December 6, 2010 11:49 AM

Dear Pookie,

I love you.

Posted by: chad at December 6, 2010 11:55 AM

Actually, I believe she could have written those two posts. She felt attacked by people far more sophisticated than herself, so she might have pulled out a thesaurus and did her best to respond. She's clearly the sympathetic character in these exchanges, especially with that prick Olbermann.

Posted by: sansho1 at December 6, 2010 11:56 AM

P.S. I think the founder of wikileaks should be put in prison, but since he’s not an American citizen there is pretty much nothing we can do to that fucker. All of you tree huggers probably want to make him man of the year, forgetting that he’s put people lives in danger, people that have put their lives on the line trying to serve their country.

Gee, how fortunate that Dick Cheney IS an American, so we can presumably prosecute him for outing Valery Plame.

Right?

Let's get that case going while Assange is still AWOL.

Posted by: clocker at December 6, 2010 12:01 PM

On the Wikileaks guy: had we a truly free and open fourth estate that wasn't so afraid of losing access or wasn't just an arm of some corporation, perhaps Wikileaks wouldn't exist.

Posted by: Fredo at December 6, 2010 12:06 PM

I'd vote for Bristol Palin before I ever voted for her mother. Even if she's not really writting those posts herself, at least the child has enough sense to want to sound intelligent; she at least had the foresight to hire someone to use English words that actually exist.

Posted by: superasente at December 6, 2010 12:24 PM

1) As a "tree hugging liberal elitist peace-love-harmony anti-gun apologist commie pinko", I take offense to assuming that I'm going to automatically defending Assange. There's a difference between transparency and shit that actually needs to stay confidential.

What I do find hilarious about this, is that the people he's "outing", aka the CIA, would poison this asshole, prop him up in the driver seat, and drive his car off a cliff in wintry conditions back in the day.

2) Keith Olbermann is a self-serving prick who I readily distance myself from. All points gained from unleashing that wonderful volley of AREYOUFUCKINGSERIOUS quotes from Tea Party candidates is cancelled out by his general ass-hattery on an everyday basis. He's the kind of dude that makes "us" (a loose concept not worth defining/clarifying) look bad; despite his positions, he'd rather die a martyr in order to elevate himself than do something like, I dunno, make an apology.

Posted by: D-Day at December 6, 2010 12:28 PM

Breaking News:

*Scotland Yard has just issued an arrest warrant for the wikileaks guy*

P.S. I hope they get that motherfucker.

"Getting" him isn't going to stop the leaks. Also, I take it that you enjoy having a government that can know anything and everything about, but doesn't want you to have the same ability.

Posted by: strife at December 6, 2010 12:37 PM

Pookie 2012!

Seriously though, you make the bumper stickers. I'll put them on peoples' cars without their approval.

Posted by: Blank at December 6, 2010 12:39 PM

It will be a cold day in Hell before I believe Bristol Palin is smart enough to have even looked up any of those words, let alone used them correctly. I'll let D-Day sodomize me on the 50-yard line at the Super Bowl before I believe that (he's a surprisingly tender lover, btw). I'll stay awake while Pookie explains how the Tripartite Commission is out to get him. I will give Dick Cheney a tongue bath if you can prove to me that she knows "credibility" has nothing to do with one's ability to get credit. No, no, A THOUSAND FUCKING TIMES NO.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at December 6, 2010 12:43 PM

I'll let D-Day sodomize me on the 50-yard line at the Super Bowl before I believe that

That would be the best half time show they've had in quite a while.

/Marks calendar.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at December 6, 2010 1:13 PM

What I do find hilarious about this, is that the people he's "outing", aka the CIA, would poison this asshole, prop him up in the driver seat, and drive his car off a cliff in wintry conditions back in the day.

Theyre being much more insidious and subtle than that. Heard about his "rape" charges? Or that he's wanted for "sex crimes"?

Yea. See, he had sex with a couple of groupies who are both on record as saying it was consensual. What they're going after him for is for not using a rubber. Apparently there is some archaic Swiss(?) law that says if either party wants a rubber used, one must be used. One of the groupies decided after the fact that she was upset that one wasnt used and pressed charges. I guess the law is written to allow you to change your mind?

Either way, our government and people "in the know" are floating his "sex crimes" record and either implying, or in some cases outright explicitly stating, that he's a rapist.

As for "putting peoples lives in danger" as Pookie points out in his own post... their lives are already in danger. I'm fairly certain no amount of wikileaks information is going to increase that danger in any significant manner. I don't foresee some potential terrorist on the fence about whether or not to blow himself up making that decision based on whether or not we made under handed trade deals with China to keep North Korea on a tighter leash.

With the exception of some details, there is nothing in those wikileaks documents that surprises anyone who possesses even the slightest sense of cynicism about their government or international politics. A good deal of those documents merely confirm things that were stated and substantiated by second and third party sources. We just lacked the primary source.

Label me a tree hugging pinko commie all you want but I'll readily stand by the assertion that Wikileaks in the best thing to happen to this country in my lifetime.

Posted by: Lennon at December 6, 2010 1:30 PM

D-Day:

There are some secrets that the government should be able to keep to themselves for obvious reasons. Like first strike capabilities and shit like that.


Clocker:

You are right, Cheney should have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for treason. But the current administration chose a different path, I don’t agree with not charging Cheney but I can understand the administrations decision.


Fredo:

It won’t be too hard to catch the wikileaks guy, just stake out all of the gay bars in Australia so when he stops by to refuel we can nab him.


P.S. I’m not comfortable talking about ass plundering without chicks around.

Posted by: Pookie at December 6, 2010 1:46 PM

Lennon:


Are you saying that in the 250 thousand documents that were leaked, there was nothing in them that could have caused someone to lose their life? You do know that Secretary of State Clinton wanted our diplomats to spy on foreign diplomats don’t you? Don’t tell me people’s lives were not at stake, because whenever the word “Spy” is thrown in, you just know that some motherfucker is going to catch a serious beat down or mysteriously catch a heart attack if they are in fact caught spying.


P.S. as far as the tree hugger comment goes, I’m one, so it wasn’t used as some sort of put down.

Posted by: Pookie at December 6, 2010 1:59 PM

The "Bristol Palin" responsible for authoring those online posts full of big ol' SAT-caliber words is not THE "Bristol Palin": it's clearly someone employed by her mother's people to be "Bristol" when making public statements. The real Bristol is a gum-snapping, imbecilic spoiled brat incapable of stringing together six words with a ball of twine and two rolls of duct tape. There's a whole marketing & PR team telling the Palins what to say, where to stand, how to dress and everything else required to present a certain image to the ever-gullible American public. Having some washed-up, 3rd rate lesbian comedian taking shots at Bristol is like gold to Sarah, she'll take that ball and run like hell with it while her followers salivate and pontificate on cue. Why this country is making it so easy on this woman is a total mystery to me, why don't we just throw the Constitution into the nearest shredder and just put a big golden crown on her head right now?

Posted by: TonsOFun at December 6, 2010 2:14 PM

Permanently Petulant Palins Proven Posers! (per Pookie and Pajiba)

Posted by: mswas at December 6, 2010 2:19 PM

It won’t be too hard to catch the wikileaks guy, just stake out all of the gay bars in Australia so when he stops by to refuel we can nab him.

I don't think we have that kind of man power. (*giggle* Man Power)

Posted by: L4NkYb at December 6, 2010 2:19 PM

P.S. as far as the tree hugger comment goes, I’m one, so it wasn’t used as some sort of put down.

If approached properly, a tree will hug you back, and it's yummy. True fact.

Treebeard / Whomping Willow '12
"Everybody gets some wood!"

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at December 6, 2010 2:28 PM

Apparently there is some archaic Swiss(?) law...

Posted by: Lennon at December 6, 2010 1:30 PM

Archaic or not, I doubt that is what the Swedish government is using for their faux-charges.

Semantics aside, it occurs to me that certain parts of the US government have been exposed as bullies and they are retaliating by...bulliying some more.

As for putting lives as risk, I'm pretty sure they did that when they bombed the crap out of countries who (having no WMDs) were no threat to them at all, but it didn't concern them much back then.

Posted by: Simon at December 6, 2010 4:48 PM

I agree entirely with you, Lennon and also Simon as well. I remember when the Drudge Report somehow found out exactly where Prince Harry was stationed in Afghanistan, and posted it online. I think that the reasoning was that nobody deserves special treatment. Despite putting not only the prince but his entire platoon in (extra) danger, and forcing Harry to be removed from combat, I don't remember Matt Drudge having his website forced from it's domain.

In addition, while a lot of this information has obviously been extremely sensitive, this batch of cables seems mostly to have highlighted how incompetent and corrupt everyone is, and how hard it is to work together, and also how disorganized and petty we all are. What I've read has been more embarrassing and grim than anything else. At the same time... none of that is terribly surprising.

Posted by: Jenne Frisby at December 6, 2010 10:36 PM

Of course she's dumb, look at the thing old puddingface made a baby with.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at December 7, 2010 12:58 AM