web
counter
 

Get Ready for the Next Great Female Action Star

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (30)



danger-girl-wallpaper.jpg

Who is Todd Lincoln, you ask? Well, most of you probably know him as the production assistant for visual effects photography on From Dust Til Dawn.

Or not.

OK, he’s likely more known for his upcoming directorial debut, The Apparition, a movie we’ve never reported on here. What? We’re not fucking omnipresent, OK? Fine, I’ll report on it now:

When frightening events start to occur in their home, young couple Kelly (Ashley Greene) and Ben (Sebastian Stan) discover they are being haunted by a presence that was accidentally conjured during a university parapsychology experiment. The horrifying apparition feeds on their fear and torments them no matter where they try to run. Their last hope is an expert in the supernatural (Tom Felton), but even with his help they may already be too late to save themselves from this terrifying force.

There, happy? Also, hey! Ashley Greene! You’re pretty and the least annoying part of the Twilight movies. Good luck.

Anyway. Mr. Lincoln is also set to join the ranks of comic book movie directors, as his next project will be the Wildstorm comic Danger Girl. I’ve never read it, but it strikes me as the sort of thing that probably works better in comic book form. According to ze Vikipediaz:

The comic features a group of busty, scantily-clad secret agents led by a mentor named Deuce. The comic is a spoof of James Bond-style spy/action stories, with the Danger Girls being a send-up of the Bond girls. Unlike the Bond girls, however, the Danger Girls are the stars of the series.

Oh. So, basically Charlie’s Angels 2.0. Swell. OK, I know I’m a big defender of comics, but that sounds pretty lame. Not to mention painfully sophomoric and pretty sexist. If Lincoln has a brain in his head, he’d do something way cooler and original with the adaptation: completely remove all elements of sex appeal.

Well, according to the L.A. Times, that might be where it’s headed. Sort of. Producer Adrian Askarieh says that they’re looking to make it a combination of “Kill Bill meets Raiders of the Lost Ark with the “team” element of Mission: Impossible.” (side note: I love how Hollywood producers are incapable of describing a project in any original fashion, but always have to compare it to something else). He goes on to say that “we are taking these characters very seriously; a kind of Batman Begins (ed note: there he goes again) approach, if you will.” He also calls Lincoln’s approach “the anti-Charlie’s Angels,” which, well, OK. That’s exactly what I was hoping for. I’m not sure we;’re going to find the next feminist icon for the action movie in a comic book that specialized in cleavage and thongs, but…

Look, I like boobs and guns as much as the next dude. But you know what I’d like to see? I’d like to see a flick about a group of kick-ass tough women who get to just go all Jason Bourne on people. Deadly. Methodical. Skilled. Why do they have to be sex symbols? Why can’t we, just fucking once, have badass women who are just simply fucking badasses, and not have them have to flaunt their tits in order to achieve their objectives? It was sort of accomplished in Mr. and Mrs. Smith, but it’s very, very rare. Nikita and The Long Kiss Goodnight are two of the perfect examples. Hell, that’s what spawned this list. All I’m saying is, there should be a movie now and then where the character is female and an asskicker, but that the asskickery comes first. Note: this same principle applies to black action heroes, gay ones, etc., etc.

Sigh. I don’t know why I try to find reason in Hollywood. It’s like gazing into the abyss.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Stress of Her Regard by Tim Powers | Box Office Results 04/12/10









Comments

she is so beautiful. every time i signed in __diamondkissing.com__ and there were always
many men talking about her how sexy and pretty ... you know it is a site
where rich women can seek young cute men and men can
find extramarital affairs....they are picky, but they like her too.

Posted by: allision at April 12, 2010 10:16 AM

Spambot, always with the timing.

Posted by: Ian at April 12, 2010 10:35 AM

yeah, thats what I liked about Nikita (The french version). She was a beautiful woman ruined by drugs.

And stayed very odd in her behaviour.

Posted by: Magiel at April 12, 2010 10:44 AM

TK --

Can you name three female bad-asses in comics who do not have a bra size smaller than "baseball cap"?

You can't, right? Because they are all impossibly tittified for the sake of readers like you and me. They may be badass. They may be the Queen of badass. But they have tits like cataloupes because it sells.

Just sayin'.

Posted by: hater from siloam springs at April 12, 2010 10:48 AM

If Lincoln has a brain in his head, he’d do something way cooler and original with the adaptation: completely remove all elements of sex appeal.

Right. Because Jason Bourne = definitely not sexy.

Posted by: Todd at April 12, 2010 10:56 AM

From Dust Til Dawn

Really? Although I think that almost qualifies as a Freudian slip.


a mentor named Deuce

I laughed at that, because I'm 12.

One of the things that I like about Resident Evil is that Milla isn't all boob. Not that we should discriminate against the big-boobied, mind, but it's just nice that she can kick ass without needing a sports bra from hell.

Posted by: MM at April 12, 2010 11:03 AM

Love is in the air! People who's common bond is their taller than average height and a personal relationship is their goal. Finding love, dating and romance in real life is enough of a daunting task itself; now throw HEIGHT into the mix and you know what we mean! ____Tallmingle.com____ is the Internet's only true place dedicated 100% to helping TALL singles find their true someone special!
We cater solely to that small niche group of singles who would like to look their date square in the eyes and not the top of their heads OR those TALL people admirers! Many are not as fortunate to be able to stand heads above the rest and prefer to date people who do!

Posted by: garyll at April 12, 2010 11:12 AM

I'm all for Ship Equality, but wouldn't you say most male action-movie heroes are also sex symbols? The only time you get a schleppy or overweight male "hero" is in a comedy.

Posted by: Lindsay at April 12, 2010 11:12 AM

Give Mace her own movie! I'm not sure of her bra size, but you'd get kick ass woman plus she's black! Two under-served demographics in one movie!

Posted by: Stella at April 12, 2010 1:15 PM

why am I writing in exclamation points?!

Posted by: Stella at April 12, 2010 1:15 PM

"I'm all for Ship Equality, but wouldn't you say most male action-movie heroes are also sex symbols? The only time you get a schleppy or overweight male "hero" is in a comedy."

some of them are, but like TK says they manage to be sex symbols without objectifying themselves like most female action heroes are. and like TK says, male action movie heroes are heroes first and sex symbols second because of their charm and their abilities, female action heroes on the other hand are sex dolls first (running around in skimpy outfits which at times annoy me when their male counterparts are decked to the nines in combat armour and their running around in little more than lingerie i mean, thats no protection from heavy gunfire!)

its a blantent double standard, if the ladies are going to be running round like that equality in the movies would mean the male action heroes would be wearing little more than CK boxers and we'd be treated to numerous close up butt and ab shots.

Posted by: Jean at April 12, 2010 2:11 PM

Their last hope is an expert in the supernatural (Tom Felton)

Tom Felton? As in, Draco Malfoy? That should be interesting, I kind of thought he would fade off into obscurity after HP.

Posted by: Even Stevens at April 12, 2010 2:11 PM

I would recommend Angel of Death starring Zoe Bell. She plays a hit woman who suffers a terrible injury and undergoes a bit of a personality shift. It is the sort of role that is normally played by a man. It is not the most amazing movie ever, but the action is solid and Bell is one tough chick.

Posted by: androstarr at April 12, 2010 2:24 PM

But--and I mean, this is a totally sexist stance in and of itself--isn't it wit, charm and uber confidence that attracts women to men, whereas men tend to be more visual?

Hence, witty one-liners and an almost psychotic disregard for personal safety = sexy to women; boobs = sexy to men.

Posted by: Lindsay at April 12, 2010 2:28 PM

"But--and I mean, this is a totally sexist stance in and of itself--isn't it wit, charm and uber confidence that attracts women to men, whereas men tend to be more visual?

not unless you believe all the social propaganda. so your telling me all men, including homosexual ones, are more turned on by womens breasts then other sexy men? rather narrow minded don't cha think? also men can be attracted by wit and charm the same way women can be tempted by delicious half-naked men. me thinks you've been taken by the propaganda, resist Lindsay!!!!!!

Posted by: Jean at April 12, 2010 3:07 PM

Well, I'm a) speaking in generalities--there are people who are attracted to others because they're dressed up as furry animals or because they are missing limbs or have a unibrow or whatever and b) speaking only about heterosexuals.

I realize that plenty of men are genuinely attracted to women for who they are in addition to (or in spite of) their cup size and overall attractiveness, and that plenty of women are completely shallow. But we're talking about carnal attraction sex-symbol stuff here, and generally speaking, a woman's idea of what makes a man a "sex symbol" is more based on "charm" and a man's is more based on what he sees.

Posted by: Lindsay at April 12, 2010 3:17 PM

which is why i said social propaganda. where do you get your idea's of what "women" and "men" find attractive Lindsay? I'm not disputing whether you are right or wrong but there is a lot to be said about how the media and social structures tell us what we should and shouldn't like. carnal attraction and sex symbols are two different things. if your purely going from a scientific angle you analysis is wrong, as scientists would say women look for broad shoulders and masculine faces as opposed to interlect and personality for attractiveness.

the issue of objectification also arises when you think about how women are more valued in society for their appearence where as men are also more valued for their personalities which, at least from the sociological point of view, will factor into what we see as attractive.

and indeed i agreed partially with you until the fact you used the term "generally speaking". referring to any group of people who share the same race, religion or in this case sex as being homogeneous is problematic. your opinion is correct in regards to what society says men and women like. whether or not this is indeed a fact is still questionable.

and maybe perhaps you could tell me what films you've been watching? ;)

Posted by: Jean at April 12, 2010 3:38 PM

i also find it interesting that in your comments you insinuate that women who are attracted to mens appearence are completely shallow but do not afford men the same slur.

Posted by: Jean at April 12, 2010 3:44 PM

Slow clap for Jean

Posted by: Amanda6 at April 12, 2010 3:55 PM

I agree with Lindsay. I was walking past a storefront with my sister one time and we saw a little figurine of a buff guy wearing a speedo and a fireman's hat. My sister said something to the effect that it would be appealing to gay men. I asked her why that was, why it wouldn't be appealing to women, and she said that women usually aren't as visually oriented when it comes to sexual stimulation.

Like Lindsay says, it's just a generality. But if it weren't true to some extent, I'm betting James Bond would spend a whole lot more time shirtless.

Posted by: Todd at April 12, 2010 4:25 PM

she said that women usually aren't as visually oriented when it comes to sexual stimulation.
The photo collage of hot, sweaty, scantily clad men my college roommate and I assembled on one wall of our dorm room begs to differ. In my personal life I'll date a guy even if he doesn't fit my visual ideal*, but sometimes I am fond of admiring some good Man-Candy. I definitely appreciate it when male action figures run around without shirts on.

*that said, current guy has the broad shoulders and skinny waist, nice ass etc that I love and it's a definite huge plus. It's a struggle not to drool sometimes.

Posted by: dr. pisaster at April 12, 2010 5:14 PM

"if your purely going from a scientific angle you analysis is wrong, as scientists would say women look for broad shoulders and masculine faces as opposed to interlect and personality for attractiveness."

Right, and look at the men who star as action stars--most have broad shoulders and masculine faces (Gibson, Cruise, Damon, Worthington, Bale). It's just that they don't have to wear low-cut pleather to show that off.

Finding someone sexy based purely on physical appearance is shallow, whether you're a man or a woman. But there are other things to take into account when you're looking at the laws of attraction. Also, there's a difference between "Hey, I find him sexy" and "Hey I want an actual relationship with this person."

If you want to look at the laws of attraction from a more scientific perspective, look at our evolution as a species (if you believe in it, which, if you're on this site, I assume you do). There's a biological reason men produce 80 bajillion sperm* every time they have sex and women have 200-300 eggs for a lifetime, most of which will never leave their ovaries. And that plays into what attracts us. It's all related.

There's a reason that women generally seek out personality types over physical appearance. Back in the caveman days, females needed a male who could provide for and protect their young, who spend a statistically large amount of their lifespan (compared to other animals) immobile and helpless. Some physicality plays into that--again generally speaking, a man with more muscle mass is more attractive because he will be better able to bicycle-kick any attacking flying piranhas that threaten. But they also needed someone who could hunt and hopefully lead, which required a measure of intelligence and charm.

It also ties into why men are attracted to women with larger breasts and a wider hip-to-waist ratio: i.e. a female who stands a good chance of producing a healthy offspring and survive the birthing process.

Again...I am speaking purely of attraction, not long-term relationships, which is more what goes into play with "sex symbols." We don't want to date Jason Bourne--he would make an absolutely terrible boyfriend/husband/father. But we might be up for a roll in the sack.

Posted by: Lindsay at April 12, 2010 5:15 PM

action figures? I meant action heros. Same difference though, I don't care if they're plastic as long as they're pretty.

Posted by: dr. pisaster at April 12, 2010 5:15 PM

* not an accurate number.

Posted by: Lindsay at April 12, 2010 5:20 PM

Seriously, though. I don't actually think that women are less visually stimulated than men, I think we're just not supposed to openly admit it because that would be unlady-like.

Posted by: dr. pisaster at April 12, 2010 5:24 PM

I’d like to see a flick about a group of kick-ass tough women who get to just go all Jason Bourne on people. Deadly. Methodical. Skilled.

You mean Kill Bill?

Posted by: Fredo at April 12, 2010 5:25 PM

Bravo, TK. I'm glad to see it's not only women who feel like this.

Posted by: figgy at April 12, 2010 6:17 PM

I'm pretty sure Statham is contractually required to have his shirt RIPPED (not removed)off his body in at least 2 out of every 3 movies he's in. Also the Bourne Supremacy opens with the titular character running along the beach in a shot there merest breath removed from Baywatch.

On a not entirely random note, no one talks about Bond being reduced to his sex appeal when he sleeps, seduces, or otherwise implies romance to SCADS of women in order to get information/leverage/into the lair of the Evil Mastermind. Is he not, in these cases using his sexuality as a weapon every bit as much as the Badass Women of Cinema?

Anyway, if sexuality weren't a useful tactic, the KGB wouldn't have trained and had tradecraft codes for both men and women in the art of seduction. If you think Hollywood is going to stop using sex and violence with either gender as a method to spackle over the lack of an actual plot and nuance, well then, have I mentioned that I'm a recently deposed Nigerian Princess who just needs your bank account number in order to keep my money from being seized by a military junta. I'll give you half, promise!

Posted by: megaera at April 13, 2010 5:28 AM

Oh no. Anytime the "when we were cavemen" argument comes out I feel the need to pelt people with old bio anthro textbooks.
If you'll allow me to butt in for a moment, I'll add that the "science" behind these evolutionary theories is as steeped in cultural presuppositions about gender as a debutante ball. Meaning...*very* steeped. Yeah.

Posted by: allmyglasses at April 13, 2010 2:22 PM

edit: I realize it may read as if I'm arguing against evolution.
I'm not. Just the way gender plays into analysis of sexual selection.

Posted by: allmyglasses at April 13, 2010 2:28 PM