web
counter
 

Will Billy Elliot Be the Next Spider-Man? Plus, More Captain America News

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (29)



jamie-bell-berlin-film-festival.jpg

In the further adventures of Marvel Comics movie casting, we’ve got two items for you — one minor, one alleged but possibly major.

First, the minor. Stanley Tucci, who is an excellent actor when he’s not paying back Vegas legbreakers by taking roles in Space Chimps (seriously, what other reason could there be?), has been cast in Captain America: The First Avenger .

[grits teeth at having to keep typing that clunky-assed and wholly inaccurate title]

Tucci will portray Dr. Abraham Erskine, the brilliant German scientist who actually invents the super soldier serum that leads to ordinary enlistee Steve Rogers becoming the hero the world will come to know as Captain America. It’s a relatively small role (depending on how much exposition they choose to do — hopefully not too much), especially because, well, shortly afterwards Erskine is assassinated, which was Marvel’s kind of weak way of explaining why no one was ever able to replicate the serum. Really? Despite the fact that there are fucking geniuses like Bruce Banner and Reed Richards who can invent all kinds of shit — no one could come up with the serum?

Anyway. I deviate once more. Shut it. It’s a solid addition that makes me anticipate Joe Johnston’s flick a little more, even though I’m still on the fence about Chris Evans. But with veteran actors like Tucci and Hugo Weaving as the Red Skull, I’m a bit more optimistic.

(Source: Cinematical)

Next, the rumor, that’s possibly a big deal. According to website Bleeding Cool, British actor Jamie Bell has been offered the role of Spider-Man in Sony’s reboot/remake/reborquel. They claim to have received multiple reports of this, although I dug around and couldn’t find any other confirmation. Doesn’t mean it’s not true — Lord knows not everyone buys it when the Cog gets a scoop (though they should, since he is pretty much batting 1.000) — but don’t get your hopes up (or down) just yet, although he was on the studio’s short list.

Bell, as some may know, has been kicking around for a little while in Hollywood. He’s likely best known for the role of Billy Elliot back when he was a wee lad, and recently co-starred in the uninspired Jumper. To his credit, after the batshit, wig-crazy performance of Samuel Jackson, he was the best part of that lackluster film.

As for the story, if it’s true, it’s interesting. At 24, he’s young enough to play the part — the new version, based on a script by James Vanderbilt, takes Peter Parker back to his high school days and focuses more on his early development. He’s obviously a solid actor. The biggest obstacle would likely be the fact that Bell has also been cast in Stephen Spielberg’s adaptation of The Adventures of Tintin.

Oh, and he clearly has the build for it:
eagle_of_the_ninth_movie_image_jamie_bell_01.jpg

As far as the whole idea of rebooting a franchise that’s less than 10 years old — I think it’s pretty stupid. While I do think that Raimi kind of rushed Peter Parker’s development in the first film, it’s not like anyone doesn’t know the origin story at this point. And unless he’s going to surround him with new villains, re-using villains like Venom, Doc Ock, and The Green Goblin is just going to fuck up the established continuity. It’s going to be confusing as hell. On the other hand… Spider-Man 3 was so dismally awful, so horribly, wretchedly idiotic… that maybe it’s a chance to wash its stench off. Goddamnit, I adore Sam Raimi, but that was just a terrible movie.

Anyway true believers, we’ll keep you posted on the whole story as it develops.

(Source: Collider)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"My Super Sweet 16" Just Got Replaced in the Human Centipede of Spoiled Princess Defecation | "You're Cut Off" Trailer | "Exam" Review | Do You Like Riddles?









Comments

Yes, but IS HE FUNNY? I was always at odds with Tobey MacGuire as Spider-Man. He nailed the meek Peter Parker role, but failed miserably in the wise-cracking superhero role. Dude couldn't joke his way out of a wet paper sack. Tobey MacGuire is NOT FUNNY, and Spider-Man needs to be funny.

Also: to do whatever a spider can.

Posted by: Paul Southworth at June 8, 2010 11:09 AM

I love, love, LOVE Jamie Bell and will watch anything he's in.

If they cast him, my money's as good as theirs.

Posted by: Jelinas at June 8, 2010 11:15 AM

I think Jamie Bell has a bit of comedy in him from what I remember of Billy Elliot and other random stuff he's done since then. And oh, man, I do kind of love the idea of him doing the Spidey thing.

I'm pretty sure they've already done or are currently filming the majority of the TinTin movie anyway. (I've seen pictures, so it must be true.) They'll be super-imposing a cartoon head onto Bell's, so I assume it'll be in post-production for a while.

Posted by: AnnieKar at June 8, 2010 11:22 AM

Ohmygawd. Here's how I know I woke up too early and shouldn't do ANYTHING before I have my coffee:

I opened up Pajiba, saw that header pic and just went "ROWWWWWWWWWWWWR" really loudly.

Then I kinda looked around to make sure there's no one else in the house.

Posted by: figgy at June 8, 2010 11:25 AM

Blame the heat, figgy.

Posted by: Drake at June 8, 2010 11:37 AM

As for the news? I love Jamie Bell. He'd make a great superhero--but can he do a decent American accent?

Also, he's Tin Tin?? Really! I lost all hope when I heard it would be motion capture, but they really have a solid cast...but then again, so did Beowulf and look how that turned out. Anyway, the first Tin Tin movie's done filming, and unless they start doing the sequels right away (and the movie doesn't come out til next year) I think he can work around it. And won't be overexposed because of the motion-capture thing, I think.

Plus damn that boy turned out hot.

Posted by: figgy at June 8, 2010 11:37 AM

Despite the fact that there are fucking geniuses like Bruce Banner and Reed Richards who can invent all kinds of shit — no one could come up with the serum?

Well, apparently the latest asspull from Marvel was that the serum was explicable, but unstable. They needed the Vita-Ray, a special bombardment of energy, to keep it from driving the soldier insane. That was the unrepeatable angle.

But according to Avengers: The Initiative, Erskine managed to replicate the effects of the serum with specially designed vitamin supplements and a carefully regulated diet, turning his grandson into Super-Soldier. And STILL nobody has been able to replicate it.

So hells if I know.

Tobey MacGuire is NOT FUNNY, and Spider-Man needs to be funny

THANK YOU. I never understood how that happened. Spider-Man has his wisecracks. It is as essential to the character as the damn web shooters. Know what happens every time some writer gets it into their heads to make Spider-Man gritty or morose and self-loathing? The fans go apoplectic.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 8, 2010 11:46 AM

Man, Donald Glover really would be awesome in the role.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at June 8, 2010 11:51 AM

I second Donald Glover, he'd be an amazing spider-man (heheheh)!

I reckon Jamie Bell may not be a bad choice, though. If he can be a bit cheeky.

Posted by: Hazel at June 8, 2010 12:21 PM

Yeah, after hearing about Twitter campaign to get Donald Glover an audition (at least), I've been in love with the idea of him as Peter Parker/Spider-Man. Based on what I've seen from Community and interviews, he's a good enough actor to pull off the unassuming Peter, and we know he's damn funny enough to make Spidey funny, again.

Also, never disagree with Paul Southworth.

Posted by: RobP at June 8, 2010 12:21 PM

It bears mentioning that while he is perhaps past his prime now, Stanley Tucci once had one of the best bodies in Hollywood. But then, I can remember watching Magnum PI on its original airdates (which comes to mind in a tangential "bodies that were once glorious" way), so my memory might be a bit foggy.

Now all I can think about is Sam Elliott. Another day bettered by the good people at Pajiba.

Have I mentioned the sleep deprivation?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 8, 2010 12:23 PM

Optimus Rhyme, you read my soul. Donald Glover would be fantastic and everyone on the godforsaken earth knows it.

Posted by: good ol' smokey at June 8, 2010 12:34 PM

Who is Donald Glover? I keep thinking of Danny Glover, but that can't be right.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 8, 2010 12:37 PM

Dearest figgy:
-Tintin is one word.
-Don't feel bad about your...outburst. I saw the header pic and went "DAMMMNNNN."
-The heat isn't as bad today, don't you think? At least here, where it's overcast. I don't actually know where you are, and it could very well be sweltering there, because there's a map of Texas on the wall next to me and this state has like a kajillion counties!
-Sorry for that correction. I'm a bit anal (shut it, all of you, not like that) and have read every Tintin book ever. Not a perfect combination.
-WORLD CUP! WOOOOOOOO!

Posted by: esme at June 8, 2010 12:40 PM

Wait, hold on... are they really replacing this guy's head with a cartoon head for the TinTin movie?

I honestly can't tell if you're fucking with me or not.

Posted by: Paul Southworth at June 8, 2010 12:49 PM

Man, Donald Glover really would be awesome in the role.

I am still all about this meme. He would be fan-fucking-tastic.

Posted by: RedRightAnkle at June 8, 2010 12:56 PM

Paul Southworth, I thought it was just the head for the movie (I don't remember how I got that impression), but it's probably the whole body motion capture thingie.

Posted by: AnnieKar at June 8, 2010 1:38 PM

Man, Donald Glover really would be awesome in the role.

Originally read that as Danny Glover and immediately started making a list as to why he wouldn't make a good Spider-Man.

1. Peter Parker isn't black (yet)
2. He's way out of shape
3. He's gettin' too old for this shit.

Posted by: PissBoy at June 8, 2010 1:59 PM

Pissboy FTW

Posted by: The Other Agent Johnson at June 8, 2010 2:02 PM

I always get Tintin wrong, even though I have read every single one of the books like 1500 times. Eesh. I really want to see a trailer or something soon and either have my hopes dashed that this will be a good movie or be happy about it. Do you remember the cartoon that came out in like the mid 90s? that shit was AWESOME.

I'm in Dallas, and it's 96 outside, but I only know that because of the thermometer. I am NOT going outside anytime soon.

Posted by: figgy at June 8, 2010 2:22 PM

Murtaugh!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at June 8, 2010 2:42 PM

I agree it's too soon for a new Spiderman movie franchise, but I don't think continuity is an issue, personally. I could probably write a whole essay on how comic book characters - the big ones at least - are just modern day folk heroes, and the beautiful thing about folk heroes is that they're stock characters that anybody can make up stories about. Continuity isn't that important when it comes to that sort of communal story telling.

Posted by: dr. pisaster at June 8, 2010 3:08 PM

Give me some Kingpin. I know they did that in Daredevil, but only like ten people saw it, and most of them forgot the movie immediately afterward. Kingpin was the best villain of the Ultimate Spider-Man series, and it'd give the new movie a decidedly different vibe from the other three to use a more realistic, less action-oriented bad guy. There'd still be plenty for Peter to fight, given the army of mercenaries and assassins and mad scientists employed by the Kingpin.

Posted by: Lucas at June 8, 2010 3:46 PM

Lucas, as much as I agree that Kingpin would make for a great a Spidey-Movie villain, the fact that Fox made Daredevil probably means he won't (i.e., legally can't) appear in the Sony owned Spider-Man franchise. Marvel selling the rights to many of their characters to get out of bankruptcy in the 1990s really haunts us still, doesn't it?

Posted by: RobP at June 8, 2010 4:00 PM

Yeah, the reboot's stupid, but if this is true it's fantastic news. Despite the picture of him with massive abs, he has that kind of scruffy/scrawny feel that Parker needs, and he can bring the funny. In fact, itll be like Maguire never went away.

Posted by: scarecrowprophet at June 8, 2010 4:06 PM

Ah, Jamie Bell. Bless him.

Posted by: sheshakes at June 8, 2010 5:56 PM

My experience has been that if you watch Spider-Man 3 as it if were in the spirit of an opera: big, overwrought, melodramatic, crowded, romantic, demonstrative. I enjoyed it more, thinking of it like that.

Posted by: Brian at June 8, 2010 6:58 PM

If he has to choose between Spiderman and Tintin (I typed it as two words the first time, then glanced at esme's comment), I vote to go for Tintin. He actually kinda looks the part. I can picture him wearing that weird navy blue corduroy jacket and running around with Snowy.

Also, I really want them to call him "TONTON"over and over again when he travels to France.

Posted by: dene at June 9, 2010 12:55 PM

Called it here 4 months ago! Yeah go ahead and search the comments....somehow that didn't inflate my ego...

Posted by: Blank at June 9, 2010 1:23 PM