web
counter
 

Joss Whedon's Involvement With Marvel Films Even Bigger Than Expected

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (53)



whedondccomics.jpg

Well, now that we know who’s directing The Avengers (Joss Whedon, for those who have been living in a cave since yesterday), expect news to start moving along.

Several months ago, Zak Penn was charged with writing the script for The Avengers. We still don’t know what the gist of that story will be, other than it will involve Nick Fury, director of S.H.I.E.L.D. bringing together the newfound superheroes who have been developing in a series of movies from Marvel Entertainment — namely, Iron Man, Captain America, Thor and possibly The Incredible Hulk. We don’t know much else about it, nor do we know who the big bad will be.

Apparently, Whedon is not only in final negotiations to direct, but also to rewrite Penn’s script. I’m sure some will be up in arms about this, but it’s got great potential. Whedon’s writing has always been strong (if you’re going to bring up Alien Resurrection, remember Whedon’s quote on it: “They did everything wrong that they could possibly do”), both in terms of dialogue and plotting. Most important to fans is likely going to be the fact that he’s got serious experience writing in this specific genre — I’ve raved about The Astonishing X-Men before, and I’ll continue to do so. I’m not expecting this to be The Scooby Gang with costumes — Whedon hopefully knows the genre better than that.

As for the exclusive news, Pajiba is fortunate enough to have a source close to the project who has some interesting info on The First Avenger: Captain America. Apparently Whedon’s role in the Marvel film universe may expand even further, as he’s also likely to be tasked with doing a polish on the Captain America script. At this point, we know the general news about Captain America — Steve Rogers (played by Chris Evans) undergoes a secret super soldier experiment during WWII and becomes Captain America. During a battle with The Red Skull (played by Hugo Weaving), he ends up frozen in ice, only to re-emerge during the modern era (where, presumably, he’ll eventually meet up with Tony Stark, Nick Fury, Thor, and the rest of the gang). The nature of Whedon’s script polish (on a screenplay originally written by Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely) is unknown, but it makes me rest a little easier, since this project has seemed like more of an x-factor than the others.

Sebastian Stan will play his sidekick Bucky Barnes, and just yesterday it was announced that British actress Hayley Atwell (most recently featured as Lucy in “The Prisoner”) will play Peggy Carter, his WWII-era girlfriend who is also a resistance fighter.

This is Ms. Atwell, by the way:
HayleyAtwell5.jpg

So there you have it. Joss Whedon is taking the Marvel universe by storm.

(header pic courtesy of Slashfilm)









News: Coming to a Beach Near You -- Heidi Montag's Shark-Killing Boobs | World's Smallest Penis Throws Jimmy Hat In Reality O-Ring | It's Just Like Survivor Only...It's Just Like Survivor













Comments

...And let the hatred commence!

Posted by: D-Day at April 15, 2010 7:29 AM

I just hope after the millions of blog posts, debates and advertising/promotion for these movies that I'm at least entertained by the drama on screen.

Posted by: kooling123 at April 15, 2010 7:39 AM

Don't hate, please don't hate this movie. This will be perfect not only for the film, but for Whedon. His script re-write will work out perfectly and he won't go on twittet whining like a little bitch about the critic's review and why he's so damn fat in his saet, because the script re-write will be so effin' awsome.

Posted by: Corey Weaver at April 15, 2010 7:39 AM

Hey, nice rack there on Peggy Carter. That shit is real!

Posted by: the new transported man at April 15, 2010 8:16 AM

I'm a 100% on board with this. I love his writing, "Serenity" had beautiful direction, and he gets the comic medium. Based on the "Here comes Serenity and holy shit that's a ton of Reaver ships!" scene in "Serenity" we know the man can do thrilling action scenes with the best of them. I say bring it on.

Give Whedon X-Men 4 while you're at it. Few things were as cool to read as when the Danger Room went sentient and tried to kill the X-Men in The Astonishing X-Men.

Posted by: TylerDFC at April 15, 2010 8:30 AM

Joss Whedon started out as a 'script doctor' and worked on movies like Speed, Toy Story (credit), and X-Men. His main strength is writing IMO, so it's good he'll get final say over the script.

I also think Captain America is similar to Cyclops, which Joss did a great job writing for in Astonishing X-Men. He'll hopefully do a good job of writing him as an all American hero feeling the weight of responsibility on his shoulders.

It seems like Marvel are putting real faith in his writing abilities which can only be a good thing. Whedon is always best when writing ensemble pieces (which all his shows have been). The more I think about, the more I think Marvel have got it right hiring him for their flagship movie.

My only reason for caution is the way he got shafted with Wonder Women. However, I think this movie is almost a guaranteed financial success. It doesn't take much to make a movie about 5+ established superheroes exciting...

Posted by: Mark Davidson at April 15, 2010 8:32 AM

I really hope Whedon "fixes" the ending for Captain America (I'm assuming it's gonna be bad). I don't know how but I can see it in my head. Cap and Bucky gripping a giant V2-esque rocket as it takes off, hearing nothing but the roar of fuel burning off. Cap tries to hold Bucky, Bucky hands him a grenade belt, falls first. Cap blows the damn thing to kingdom come and falls into the Arctic circle. AND SCENE!

I still can't get over the fact that Bucky is being played by a guy named Sebastian Stan--he just sounds like a Stan Lee supervillain--double S initials (SS!-The Nazis!!). In the Marvel Universe, Sebastian Stan sounds like he would be an odious European corporation head, bent on world domination through the silent brokering of deals with nefarious villains and criminals. A sort of clandestine polar-opposite to Stark Industries, with a touch of Lex Luthor even.

Posted by: D-Day at April 15, 2010 8:41 AM

This is going to be so good! He's absolutely perfect for this project. And I say that not because he's perfect for everything (which he is...duh) but because his dialogue is always stellar and he'll take out any hidden religious implications in the movie and you're right, The Astonishing X-Men was awesome. Anyway, SO. EXCITED.

Posted by: esme at April 15, 2010 9:21 AM

So there will be a Captain America film BEFORE Avengers?
Am I understanding this correctly?

It wouldn't hurt if they also did a Thor too, that would give Avengers some major backstory.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 15, 2010 9:31 AM

Sickening. Now Captain America gets turned into a whiny, camp unable to do anything without a woman to give direction and we get a film with 'look at me, I'm Joss Whedon' cornball quips.

Great.

Learn from DC's bravery, dump this commerical flop before he brings down the Marvel franchise.

Posted by: Patriot at April 15, 2010 9:36 AM

Can't wait until Whedon has the Red Skull acting like a vaudeville character. Every one in his junk has to have their reasons for their evil, be funny and charming (see the Mayor, Spike, Adele, Lindsey etc, etc).

Skull's just flat-out evil. But a liberal douche like Whedon as well as being crappy at characterisation has to try and 'understand everyone'.

Ugh.

Posted by: John at April 15, 2010 9:39 AM

I find it sad that a character with as much rich history as America, with such fine writers workign at Marvel as Faction, Brubaker, Mayberry, and Hickman, the best they can do for a writer is a man with massive mommy issues whose prone to temper tantrums.

Typical boneheaded Joe Q move.

Posted by: MarvelFan at April 15, 2010 9:49 AM

BSlim: Thor is in development too. I think it is coming out before "Captain America". So we will have Iron Man 2, Thor, Captain America, possibly Hulk 2, and THEN The Avengers.

Posted by: TylerDFC at April 15, 2010 9:52 AM

I am honestly ecstatic that a creator who not only does good material in genre work, but also LOVES genre work, is the one being given the handles on this project. And this is one HELL of a project. Like it was said before, this is the first time several franchises are being made with the purpose of culminating them in crossover, it's a titanic feat.

One thing I'm looking forward to is that Whedon's rewrite of Cap will result in more screentime for his WWII adventures, something that should NEVER be glossed over. Cap is who he is because of WWII: his appreciation for human life and desire to protect and lead are a result of his first-hand experience of the brutality of WWII.

I'm still kinda iffy about Evans as Cap, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt: he's a decent actor and he WAS by far the best part about the Fantastic Four movies, he friggin' NAILED The Human Torch. Hell, his respect for the material might actually make us see a much deeper and human performance from him than ever before.

Posted by: Danny from Puerto Rico at April 15, 2010 9:57 AM

Yeah! Whedon is probably going to replace Captain America's shield with a big piece of arugula with some commie symbol on it! He's going to sully the long line of quality Marvel comics movies that have come before this like Howard the Duck, the 1994 direct-to-video live action Captain America, Daredevil, Elektra, Fantastic Four, X-Men: The Last Stand, Man-Thing, Ghost Rider, Spider-Man 3, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, and X-Men Origins: Wolverine.

How can you sleep at night, Joss?!

Posted by: branded at April 15, 2010 10:04 AM

This sounds fantastic! I'm excited about that Captain America bit because I feel like there should be an even more tighter bond between both CA and The Avengers movies... well, this makes sense in my mind but yeah, I have faith in him and I'm sure he'll bring it.

Posted by: m. at April 15, 2010 10:10 AM

Dear MarvelFan/Patriot/John:

One commenter handle will suffice; no need to separate all your very lucid, very charming, oh so brilliant musings into three posts with three different names. (We can check those things, you know?) But thanks for playing. That Joe Q line? Inspired!

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at April 15, 2010 10:12 AM

This bears the unfamiliar stink of Hollywood doing something right.

Make Iron Man believable? Wealthy arms dealer develops extremely tiny and powerful energy source...and makes a flying armored suit.
Ok, they pulled that off. Only downside was a cliche final banter battle.

Make the Hulk believable? Dude irradiates himself into suffering uncontrollable mutation into giant green wrestler.
Second time around, this felt fairly serviceable.

Make Captain America believable? Yeah, it's possible. Enhanced WWII super soldier gets frozen and then thaws out today. They'll probably get that figured out.

That just leaves them one Norse god (or about...um...97% of their suspension of disbelief effort) remaining.

Posted by: laredo at April 15, 2010 10:50 AM

I recently watched "Firefly" and I'm happy to eat my words of negativity about Whedon. It was great. A real shame that it didn't go on longer.

Anyway, I take back what I said about the man. He can definitely handle this. His sense of character, story and action is excellent (the scene in the last episode when the bounty hunter threatens to rape the engineer was terrifying -- that actress deserves a pat on the back).

Although, like MarvelFan/Patriot/John said earlier (thrice over), I worry about, "...Whedon' cornball quips." A little bit of it goes a long way and in a feature film a long way is too far.

Posted by: superasente at April 15, 2010 10:58 AM

*headbadger*

Posted by: figgy at April 15, 2010 11:19 AM

Let me be the first to say that “Captain America” will be a complete failure. Captain America in my opinion just doesn’t bring the sexy like “Iron Man” and the “Dark Knight” also in this political climate do you really want your super hero dressed up like a “Tea bagger?”

Posted by: Pookie at April 15, 2010 11:20 AM

Skull's just flat-out evil. But a liberal douche like Whedon as well as being crappy at characterisation has to try and 'understand everyone'.
Ugh.
Posted by: John at April 15, 2010 9:39 AM

I know this is just some dude trolling to get people mad, and, as Dustin pointed out, it's three dudes as one, but seriously, I've heard this argument before about Whedon and other directors, and it never ceases to piss me off.

Posted by: ChristianH at April 15, 2010 11:23 AM

I still dream that someday soon Whedon will do a series for HBO or Showtime. Or even USA or A&E (Breaking Bad is the tits; if you haven't seen it go queue up the DVDs). Maybe, if these projects go over well, I'll get to see that happen.

Oh, and I can't wait to see Cabin in the Woods even if it is being shittified with 3D.

Posted by: Jerce at April 15, 2010 11:31 AM

Sigh. And here I was, all excited that he'd JUST be directing, so his sitcom dialogue wouldn't get in the way of my ability to enjoy the movie. Oh well.

Thankfully, I was never a huge Marvel fan to begin with, so I won't be all that bummed about missing out.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at April 15, 2010 11:42 AM

The official title is now Captain America: The First Avenger.

I'm excited that Whedon is attached, I think he has a decent track record so far.

My biggest concern is can Marvel afford to do this movie? What happens if Captain America and Thor become huge hits, won't those actors demand bigger salaries? I'm assuming that Downey, Cheadles, et al aren't cheap. And it's already been pointed out that bringing the Hulk to the big screen is expensive.

Posted by: John W at April 15, 2010 12:16 PM

Let me be the first to say that “Captain America” will be a complete failure.

Yes. You are the first to say it.

Posted by: superasente at April 15, 2010 12:18 PM

"The Red Skull is flat out evil." Yup. So were the Nazis in general. But they were also quirky hypocritical psychopaths with fairly outsized personalities. so, perhaps Whedon will make them interesting while still making them evil. The Mayor for example was quirky but always evil.

Posted by: mrcreosote at April 15, 2010 12:18 PM

"Tea bagger?"

What, the script has leaked already? Now we know that The Cap will be tea bagging Iron Man? Interesting character choice. Will Whedon's "scrubbing" add Rachel Weisz appreciating the view and herself, or is that too much to hope for?

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at April 15, 2010 12:40 PM

mrcreosote, nazis were "quirky?"

Zooey Deschenel is "quirky." Peep dioramas are "quirky." The Moldy Peaches are "quirky." Lindsey with an 'E' is "quirky" (and sexy - daaaamn).

Whatever; just remind me to avoid you on April 1st next year.

Posted by: superasente at April 15, 2010 12:41 PM

'sente you left out "hypocritical psychopaths" in my description. Vegan antismoking health obsessed mass murderers are both quirky and terrifying. One of Whedon's writing talents is to make you think the big bad is engaging and entertaining just before they do something horrific.

Posted by: mrcreosote at April 15, 2010 2:57 PM

@John W

Anytime a guy signs on with Marvel, they're in a multi-film contract. Sam Jackson, for example, is signed on for something like 9 movies. Now, rough guess, those 9 movies are probably Marvel counting on 2 Avengers movies and a bunch of sequels and what else, so these deals aren't important in terms of how many movies the stars are set to star in; the fact that they're locked in to a salary is what is.

@Supes

Supes, ma boy, I sympathize. I never will be a Buffy fan, and much as I tried, Dollhouse was Dushku'd from the beginning.

But I was completely overwhelmed by Firefly to the extent that it's easily my favorite TV series of all-time. The dialogue is crisp, witty, and not over-bearing; the world he constructs is believable and not steeped in sci-fi babble. It's a great show, and a well-recognized very good movie. Whedon can write, and if you step back and realize he made Serenity on 38 million with no studio support, you can start to have faith in an Avengers movie.

The guy knows his comics, the guy knows what the fans want and what fits in the universe Marvel creates.

There are a ton of directors who are completely wrong for this; but if you take someone talented who works within their limits, you get a good/great movie. Was anyone seriously pumped up for John Favreau directing Iron Man?. I don't think so.

Posted by: D-Day at April 15, 2010 3:33 PM

Not surprised by this. He did really good work in Astonishing X-Men and the Runaway's, so makes sense that they choose him to rewrite these movies. Good decision Marvel.

Posted by: Person at April 15, 2010 3:54 PM

One of Whedon's writing talents is to make you think the big bad is engaging and entertaining just before they do something horrific.

I agree entirely. He has a knack for making his villains (really, ALL of his characters) very believable and human. Even inhuman monsters are still people, somehow. It's one of his strengths.

D-Day, I'm just about to start Buffy (once I finish Quantum Leap). I'm actually very eager. If the cast on that show has half the dynamic as on Firefly, it should be quite the run. Actually, yours is the first desenting (sp?) voice I've heard. Everyone else I know (like EVERYONE -- even my sober, unimaginative sister) loves it. I'm trying not to go in with too high of expectations, though, so I actually appreciate your input. Frankly, I don't know how he could out-do his effort on "Firefly." The show was short-lived, but wonderful. I agree with your entire summary.

Posted by: superasente at April 15, 2010 4:05 PM

I maintain that Adam Baldwin would be awesome as Captain America. If they need to have a younger man for the early Steve, I recommend the actor who recently played the younger Colonel John Casey in 'Chuck', with Adam as the post transformation maturer Cappy.

Posted by: Philippa at April 15, 2010 4:08 PM

I'll hold off until I see your opinion on Buffy, Supes. I watched a bit and it's just not my thing.

(Ladies don't kill me) I have a hard time empathizing with female action leads, and I'm not a big SMG fan. The show just seemed a bit too high-schooly to me, I dunno. The setting of the whole thing just didn't hit me as my kind of cool.

I was dating this chick who caught me cracking up at one of the Firefly episodes and wondered what was wrong with me.

Fast forward two weeks and we finished the entire series. She was pretty disappointed when I showed her the movie and told her it was no more. Even my extremely cynical/critical/asshole best friend who never watches anything on TV caught on to this. The show is just great, and I don't have enough time to go further into that fact.

Posted by: D-Day at April 15, 2010 4:13 PM

first: I hope that Joss does great for Marvel. have been a fan of his for a long time and think that he can pull it off. Serenity is an amazing film and he did that from the ground up...so piss off to those that thinks that he cant.

Also, the chick in that picture......huge boobs. I'm just sayin

Posted by: supes at April 15, 2010 5:56 PM

This is awesome news! Whedon is amazingly tallented and in covering both Captain America and Avengers means a more streamlined universe. Can't wait for this!

Posted by: JMadrox at April 15, 2010 8:45 PM

D-Day, I'm just about to start Buffy (once I finish Quantum Leap). I'm actually very eager. If the cast on that show has half the dynamic as on Firefly, it should be quite the run. Actually, yours is the first desenting (sp?) voice I've heard. Everyone else I know (like EVERYONE -- even my sober, unimaginative sister) loves it. I'm trying not to go in with too high of expectations, though, so I actually appreciate your input. Frankly, I don't know how he could out-do his effort on "Firefly." The show was short-lived, but wonderful. I agree with your entire summary.
Posted by: superasente at April 15, 2010 4:05 PM

Superasente, just be aware, the first season is pretty bad. I mean, downright BAAAAD. It picks up gradually as it goes along.

Posted by: ChristianH at April 15, 2010 10:07 PM

all I can think of from this post is damm, that chick has a nice rack.

Posted by: ben at April 15, 2010 11:19 PM

I don't know if you guys follow the rest of the interweb, but you've gained infamous reputation and pissed a whole lot of geeks off with this information.

"Anyway, I think this "Pajiba" site is BS
by Tall_Boy66 Apr 15th, 2010
10:11:12 PM
Just cause I never heard of it and it has a silly name. seems like wishfull thinking to me, but a Whedon pass on Avengers wouldn't surprise me. Captain America would, just because it has to start shooting damn soon."

"Now, Pajiba is reporting that Marvel is talking to Whedon about re-working the "Captain America" script as well, in order to have the film transition better to "The Avengers."

"We reported a few days ago that Joss Whedon
is in final talks to direct the long-awaited superhero ensemble film The Avengers and now it seems he might be scripting another upcoming Marvel film. Pajiba is reporting that Whedon will also be doing a script polish on Captain America: The First Avenger."

"This item comes from Pajiba, which funnily enough just took a swipe at yours truly the other day for running that Logan Lerman-as-Spidey rumor/story. That's O.K., Pajiba, I won't hold it against you! Anyway, here's the exact quote from their Whedon rumor/story:"

"It's also not a surprise that Whedon is taking a pass at the existing AVENGERS draft -- he's a writer first and foremost, after all. But Pajiba hears that he'll also probably be tapping at the script for CAPTAIN AMERICA (THE FIRST AVENGER!)."

Everywhere. You guys are now everywhere. You're blog trends from the bunk should've been a meta concentration on yourselves.

Posted by: Brian at April 15, 2010 11:59 PM

As usual, with the news of Joss Whedon doing anything, I have to say, please, don't kill off any characters just for drama.

Posted by: Radlum at April 16, 2010 1:53 AM

For those of you who are too busy slobbering over everything Whedon, I point out the following:

1) Every show he's ever done has been cancelled.
2) His writing on Astonishing X-Men was abhorrent.
3) X-Men 3
4) Alien: Resurrection.

This Avengers movie will make Alien look like Citizen Kane in comparison.

Posted by: M&M at April 16, 2010 8:17 PM

1) All his series have been critically lauded (Dollhouse got interesting once Eliza went bye-bye)
2) His Astonishing X-Men is both a critical and commercial success.
3) He didn't write X-Men 3. They lifted multiple ideas and I think Zak Penn was head writer.
4) There's no Ripley in Whedon's version. The director did not speak English. Any involvement in Toy Story cancels this out.

Deal with Whedon.

Posted by: D-Day at April 16, 2010 9:46 PM

This movie will suck. Whedon has his skills, but putting him on this is like having Tarantino on a chick flick. You could do it, but it would be stupid.

Serenity is Exhibit A on why Whedon can only write for chicks and gay men: the love interest is a literal whore. Who cares about McCabe and Mrs. Miller in Space? There's a reason revisionist Westerns are forgotten: they suck.

Captain America requires no irony, no pop culture quips, no quirkiness, and a sense of tremendous fear, danger, and stupendous sacrifice. Think Band of Brothers, brutal because the enemy was indeed, far more brutal than could be imagined.

Add in the guaranteed feminist idiocy (lemme see now, who was it that stormed the Normandy beaches, feminists or average Joes) and both the Whedon script for Captain America and the Avengers Movie will suck donkey balls.

Whedon's never had a commercial hit, nor shown any interest or ability to write for a male audience, or indeed any understanding of the CLASSIC comic book characters (his run on X-Men confirms that). All of his stuff is about Hollywood minor nobility that seeks to be way cooler than "suits" and run things himself. With a heaping dose of PC dogma, and so on.

Whedon on a small budget, niche movie like Nick and Nora's Infinite Playlist, about self-absorbed yuppies in hip urban areas? That's his wheelhouse.

A story of WWII duty and sacrifice, for the sake of America? Please, not only does Whedon like all Hollywood-ites not have much of a patriotic bent, he wouldn't understand it. It would be like the glitterati not understanding why anyone would have a problem with Roman Polanski.

I could well believe something this stupid -- it sounds like Citi and Washington Mutual doubling down on CDOs, or ESPN betting heavy on World Cup Soccer (but without Spanish language broadcast rights).

Captain America is bottom line a guy who sees evil (don't forget Timely Comics had Cap punching out Hitler a year before America entered the War, to the hatred of the German-American Bund), and has great sacrifice to fight it, not entirely on his own, but as a leader of men. Not a hip, nihilistic Alpha Male. Heck he's an Iowa farm-boy. He's Captain Ed Winters, with minor superpowers. Whedon's the kind of guy who would think Captain Sobel not Winters was the hero.

I'm sure there will be (Dollhouse, Serenity) a prostitute in this movie, and one (Serenity, Buffy) "romantic" rape scene.

Posted by: whiskey at April 16, 2010 10:42 PM

Jon Favreau's Directing Credits before Iron Man:

# "In Case of Emergency" (1 episode, 2007)
- Pilot (2007) TV episode
# Zathura: A Space Adventure (2005)
... aka "Zathura" - International (English title) (short title), USA (promotional title)
# Elf (2003)
# Life on Parole (2003) (TV)
# "Undeclared" (1 episode, 2002)
- Eric's POV (2002) TV episode
# Made (2001)
# Smog (1999) (TV)
# Bad Cop, Bad Cop (1998) (TV)

Did you pre-judge the fuck out of Favreau?

It'd be too easy to pick apart your post Whiskey, so I'm wondering if you're just not going to bother to see Captain America?

Posted by: D-Day at April 17, 2010 9:51 AM

"For those of you who are too busy slobbering over everything Whedon, I point out the following:

1) Every show he's ever done has been cancelled.
2) His writing on Astonishing X-Men was abhorrent.
3) X-Men 3
4) Alien: Resurrection.

This Avengers movie will make Alien look like Citizen Kane in comparison. "

Posted by: M&M at April 16, 2010 8:17 PM

Get your facts right - D-Day good on you for clearing this up!!! Don't post if you don't get your facts right!!

Posted by: Serenity Rocks at April 17, 2010 8:26 PM

Buffy TVS creator making a Marvel all-stars flick. I think I've died and gone to Whedon.

Wait, this doesn't mean Eliza Dushku will be in the movie does it?

Gulp.

Posted by: Jiggles at April 18, 2010 4:50 PM

Goddamn there's always some haters. Just can't satisfy some people. It could have been worse than Joss Whedon, assholes. A whole lot fucking worse. It could have been that Ratner fuck. Even Micheal Bay would be better than him. It's like Kenneth Branaugh directing Thor. That should be ME but I'm not gonna get too worked up about that because Kenneth Branaugh is better than, again, that Ratner fuck. He was in Braveheart right?

Whoever is in charge of The Pacific should be directing Captain America. That shit is fucking tense. One question, how is Chris Evans gonna play a skinny little geek before the serum?

Ooohh...I can do that too.

Posted by: HappyGobo at April 25, 2010 2:11 AM

I realize despite enthusiasts support there are a lot of naysayers out there. Most these anti-Whedon commentators have very weak arguments on why Whedon would suck for Marvel. First, criticizing Whedon before you even seen The Avengers or Captain America is even in production is not only premature but illogical as well. Also, I don't understand why some criticize Whedon for creating villains with depth and complexity. Whedon has proven that villains can be unambiguously evil yet have reasons for their evil actions. These are just one the many weak arguments against Joss Whedon and down below are the weakest of them all.

1) Every show he's ever done has been cancelled.

Firefly and Dollhouse was cancelled, while Angel lasted five successful seasons before it was cancelled. Furthermore, the fact that his shows were cancelled doesn't mean they were not first rate quality television. Wonderfalls, My So Called Life, Veronica Mars, Twin Peaks, Pushing Daisies all great shows and they all were cancelled.

2) His writing on Astonishing X-Men was abhorrent.

Okay? Whedon's run on Astonishing X-men was critical acclaimed, and Eisner award winning series. That statement is obviously based on your own biased opinions.

3) X-Men 3

Joss had nothing to do with X-Men 3. How can you blame Joss for the writers borrowing elements from his story arc in Astonishing X-Men.

4) Alien: Resurrection

Whedon I said himself that he didn't like the movie. Furthermore, he was the director and when you can't direct a film you written you lose a large amount of creative control. It doesn't matter what Whedon thoughts on how the film should be executed; its the director that has the final say.

I hope that who ever wrote realize how flawed and inaccurate there points really was. Hopefully, those that are against Joss will come up with a better argument.

Posted by: Resigned Sidekick at May 23, 2010 8:02 PM

I realize despite enthusiasts support there are a lot of naysayers out there. Most these anti-Whedon commentators have very weak arguments on why Whedon would suck for Marvel. First, criticizing Whedon before you even seen The Avengers or Captain America is even in production is not only premature but illogical as well. Also, I don't understand why some criticize Whedon for creating villains with depth and complexity. Whedon has proven that villains can be unambiguously evil yet have reasons for their evil actions. These are just one the many weak arguments against Joss Whedon and down below are the weakest of them all.

1) Every show he's ever done has been cancelled.

Firefly and Dollhouse was cancelled, while Angel lasted five successful seasons before it was cancelled. Furthermore, the fact that his shows were cancelled doesn't mean they were not first rate quality television. Wonderfalls, My So Called Life, Veronica Mars, Twin Peaks, Pushing Daisies all great shows and they all were cancelled.

2) His writing on Astonishing X-Men was abhorrent.

Okay? Whedon's run on Astonishing X-men was critical acclaimed, and Eisner award winning series. That statement is obviously based on your own biased opinions.

3) X-Men 3

Joss had nothing to do with X-Men 3. How can you blame Joss for the writers borrowing elements from his story arc in Astonishing X-Men?

4) Alien: Resurrection

Whedon I said himself that he didn't like the movie. Furthermore, he was the director and when you can't direct a film you written you lose a large amount of creative control. It doesn't matter what Whedon thoughts on how the film should be executed; its the director that has the final say.

I hope that who ever wrote realize how flawed and inaccurate there points really was. Hopefully, those that are against Joss will come up with a better argument.

Posted by: Resigned Sidekick at May 23, 2010 8:04 PM

I would to ask what do people have against Eliza Dushku? She help make one the most memorable characters in TV history.

Posted by: Resigned Sidekick at May 23, 2010 8:17 PM

I realize despite enthusiasts support there are a lot of naysayers out there. Most these anti-Whedon commentators have very weak arguments on why Whedon would suck for Marvel. First, criticizing Whedon before you even seen The Avengers or Captain America is even in production is not only premature but illogical as well. Also, I don't understand why some criticize Whedon for creating villains with depth and complexity. Whedon has proven that villains can be unambiguously evil yet have reasons for their evil actions. These are just one the many weak arguments against Joss Whedon and down below are the weakest of them all.

1) Every show he's ever done has been cancelled.

Firefly and Dollhouse was cancelled, while Angel lasted five successful seasons before it was cancelled. Furthermore, the fact that his shows were cancelled doesn't mean they were not first rate quality television. Wonderfalls, My So Called Life, Veronica Mars, Twin Peaks, Pushing Daisies all great shows and they all were cancelled.

2) His writing on Astonishing X-Men was abhorrent.

Okay? Whedon's run on Astonishing X-men was critical acclaimed, and Eisner award winning series. That statement is obviously based on your own biased opinions.

3) X-Men 3

Joss had nothing to do with X-Men 3. How can you blame Joss for the writers borrowing elements from his story arc in Astonishing X-Men?

4) Alien: Resurrection

Whedon I said himself that he didn't like the movie. Furthermore, he was NOT the director and when you can't direct a film you written you lose a large amount of creative control. It doesn't matter what Whedon thoughts on how the film should be executed; its the director that has the final say.

I hope that who ever wrote realize how flawed and inaccurate there points really was. Hopefully, those that are against Joss will come up with a better argument.

Posted by: Resigned Sidekick at May 24, 2010 2:43 PM

I like Whedon's projects, but I'm not glad he's directing The Avengers. He does well on the small screen, but I have yet to see him be involved in a film I liked. He also tends to 1) write dialogue that is full of pop culture references and weird syntax, 2) employ all of the same actors, and 3) screw up characters and plots if he handles them for too long. Personally, I think the series Firefly is so excellent because it ended before he could mess things up. Then he made the movie Serenity and suddenly half of the cast dies for no reason.

However, he had nothing to do with X-Men 3, only wrote the script for Alien: Resurrection, and created Buffy and Angel, which ran for 7 and 5 seasons, respectively. That's hardly a poor run for a TV series. Dollhouse was given 2 seasons and Firefly was given a feature-length follow-up. That spells success to me.

Posted by: chibiev at September 5, 2010 5:07 AM

















mindholeblowers.gif viral_hits.gif
>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time