web
counter
 

News, First Image From Silent Hill: Revelation

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (9)



silent-hill-3-bunny.jpg

I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t interested in another Silent Hill film. The Christopher Gans-directed first entry had an outstanding cast (Radha Mitchell, Laurie Holden, Sean Bean, Kim Coates, Alice Krige), and was something of a gorgeous disaster. It was thisclose to being a very good movie, until it got swallowed up by its own bullshit. But it has some genuinely scary moments, a good bit of solid acting, and visually, it’s absolutely stunning. So I’d like to see someone build off of that.

The problem, of course, is how to do that. The games have been plagued by a nasty inconsistency, ranging from stunning efforts that are exercises in terror, storytelling and gameplay… to just plain crap. So I’d also like to see the next movie avoid that. Casting is still underway, but per Bloody Disgusting, two actors have been cast: Adelaide Clemens will play Heather, who in the games has a pretty fascinating — if not confusing as hell — history, involving incubuses and reincarnation. Additionally, Kit Harrington has been cast in a yet-unknown role. I’ve never seen Clemens in anything, and a quick glance at her IMDB page explains that — she hasn’t starred in much. Same goes for Harington, but you’ll get a chance to see him as he’s playing Jon Snow in HBO’s upcoming “Game Of Thrones.”

And Sean Bean is in talks to return, which we can only hope for, because… well, you know, it’s Sean Bean.

There’s also a first image available:

hiressilenthill030711.jpg

OK, not a whole lot to get excited about. Oh, and there’s a plot summary floating around:

Heather Mason and her father have been on the run, always one step ahead of dangerous forces that she doesn’t fully understand, Now on the eve of her 18th birthday, plagued by horrific nightmares and the disappearance of her father, Heather discovers she’s not who she thinks she is. The revelation leads her deeper into a demonic world that threatens to trap her forever.

So there’s that. Here’s the rub (because you knew there’d be one). The film will be in 3D (of course), and will be directed by Michael J. Bassett, who directed Deathwatch (uh oh) and Soloman Kane (oh, balls).

So maybe I’m not quite as excited as I was before.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Hasta La Pasta, Terry Gilliam Films New Short | Cars 2 Trailer: Eh, It's Pixar. You'll See It Eventually. What Choice Do You Have?









Comments

The 3D, and any connection to Resident Evil Afterlife (same producers, I think?) is worrisome. Adelaide certainly is a good visual fit for Heather, but 3 is the only game in the series (besides Origins) that I never played through, so I have no idea if there's a decent story in there for them to adapt. 2 was Incredible, 4 was dogshit, and I thought 5 was the best game since 2. So plotwise, it's a crapshoot, especially since the first film wasn't limited to material from the first game.

I'm still holding out hope. Pattern recognition tells me not to, but I'm an unapologetic Silent Hill fanboy. If this goes south at least I have the next game coming out this fall to look forward to.

Posted by: Markus at March 8, 2011 11:01 AM

In the "Breaking Web Trends" box, I had the trifecta of "Mila Kunis Licks Her Lips," "Meagan Fox Moaning" and "Lindsey Lohan Poses Nude."

Wow, that really is a Breaking web trend. Does "girl be so hot and be naked and be sex" actually work? I wonder what the numbers are on that. It made me wonder if Pajiba's numbers go up whenever a naked or nearly naked girl appears as the header pic. Are we all just a bunch of masturbating monkeys?

Posted by: John G. at March 8, 2011 12:13 PM

I LOVE the first movie. Can't stress that enough. LOVE. Like I love Jennifer Connelly, Superman and Skittles; I love this movie.

Here's why: Okay, we're led to believe that the cultists within Hell are the true villains, yes? They do this horrible thing to this woman and her daughter, and throw the whole town into Hell, where they are constandly made to suffer for their collective sin. The little girl is eventually dragged back into this Hell (she's just an echo of her former self, who exists now only due to demonic intervention) and her adoptive Mother, the protagonist of the story, follows her into hell to save her.

But lets look at the story a little closer, shall we.

Okay, the town's people burned her because they believed that she was (or would become) devil's spawn. And they were right. She did. She made a pact with the devil. They were right to try and kill her because she DID eventually become evil and destroy everything they knew and loved. While watching the movie we're led to believe that their faith is false, that they're radicals and hypocrites. But they're not. They're only safe in the church; it's the only place the evil can't get them. Basically, their faith is the only thing that gives them protection and keeps them from eternal damnation. If we're to accept that there is a devil, we must necessarily accept that there is a God, and that he has favored the town's people with his protection.

And what happens in the end? The town's people, as they are just about to destroy the evil for good, are betrayed and tricked by this foolish woman who lets the evil into their house, ensuring their destruction and damnation.

Evil wins. Big. Hooray.

I'm telling you; watch the movie again from the perspective that the town's people are doing right and good, and it takes on a whole new tone.

Posted by: superasente at March 8, 2011 12:24 PM

Markus, 3 was awesome. It's the only one I've played through about 4 times...much more atmospherically creepy than 2, IMO. Having said that, I am really looking forward to seeing this.

Posted by: jesstastic! at March 8, 2011 3:33 PM

Wait, though.

IIRC, the first movie ended with SPOILER ALERT! The mother and the daughter implied to be stuck in another Silent Hill reality, separated from the father.

Also, the first game ended with Cheryl's soul (renamed Sharon for the movie) being 'rejoined' with the original Alessa, and said Alessa having to give Harry yet another roadside baby, that being Heather from this new movie.

So if they're sticking with the storyline from the games, then how did Harry find Heather if Sharon is still (presumably) alive with Rose?!

Posted by: Aislinn at March 8, 2011 3:34 PM

@superasente, absolutely!

Posted by: idleprimate at March 8, 2011 8:05 PM

Thank you @suprasente for that wonderful summation!!!

Posted by: Lala11_7 at March 8, 2011 9:09 PM

Silent Hill 3 is probably my favourite in the entire series of games. One of my favourite games ever.

If they stick very close to that storyline I'll be happy.

And here's hoping the DVD extras include a runthrough with the Heather character in a heart princess costume, taking out monsters with her "Sexy Beam".

Posted by: DarthBrookes at March 8, 2011 9:26 PM

Are we all just a bunch of masturbating monkeys?

Posted by: John G. at March 8, 2011 12:13 PM

It's Pajiba... Do you even need to ask?

Posted by: Uriah Creep at March 8, 2011 9:27 PM