web
counter
 

Exclusive: Warner Brothers Developing Starman Film

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (9)



New_starman.jpg

*Update*: A spokesperson from Warner Brothers has denied this story.

Starman is one of those DC properties that’s gone through several iterations in its 70-year history. He’s been a helmeted dude with a “gravity rod,” a blue-skinned alien with flying shoes (sort of), an alien mutant prince (also notable for being one of the few — possibly only — bisexual superheroes), a being of pure energy, and I believe a couple of others. The current incarnation of Starman is as a member of the Justice League from the future. Or something. DC Comics can be pretty goddamn confusing sometimes.

In any event, according to an inside source, Warner Brother, in partnership with Lin Productions and DC Comics, is bringing Starman to the big screen. Which version is sort of unknown — he’ll wield a gravity rod, have energy powers, and likely be able to fly. One of the more recent Starman characters could also manipulate mass, but not word on whether that power will be present. It’s being produced by Dan Lin (Sherlock Holmes — yay!, Terminator Salvation — hmm…) and Gregory Noveck (Jonah Hex — jury’s still out). No writer or director is attached yet, as the film is in very early development.

Depending on which route they go, it could be a pretty interesting character — the idea of a true intergalactic superhero hasn’t been explored (although next year’s Green Lantern will likely be the first), and it will likely need to be a special effects-heavy production to make it viable. Whether or not this would pave the way to an eventual Justice League movie is unknown, but I’d guess unlikely, unless they scrapped the involvement of the Big Three — Superman (practically dead in the water), Batman (too grounded in Nolan’s gritty real-world universe), and Wonder Woman (trapped in development hell). That isn’t to say that there aren’t plenty of other good characters to use, and given the current work on Green Lantern, who knows.

As long as there’s no Aquaman. That guy’s a douche.









News: 3D 3D the 3D, 3Ding to the 3D | Just Assume All Trade News Posts Are About 3D | Pajiba Love 04/28/10













Comments

There are so few homo-friendly heroes in the world. And they'll cut that bit out completely, of course. Just like you'll never see even a bit-part by Northstar or Colossus' gay side in a Marvel production.
I bitch.

Posted by: Kevin at April 28, 2010 12:06 PM

Oh, he'd just stare at the other superheroes' asses all day like a big homo.

Just kidding. It would be VERY interesting to introduce an "out" superhero and take more balls than the studios have right now in developing these kinds of movies. Making it even more unlikely is the need for all that CGI, which increases the production's price tag, which increases the need to bring in as many paying customers as possible, which means being as non-controversial as possible. Or maybe they'll go the other way and push the controversy hoping to get butts in the seats that way. I will stay tuned . . .

Posted by: Kballs at April 28, 2010 12:46 PM

Starman's really a Justice Society kind of guy...

It'd have to be Jack Knight. I mean, Ted would probably be part of it, and they could bring in Mikaal and Will Payton and whoever else, but Jack's the one with the most potential.

Posted by: Todd at April 28, 2010 1:12 PM

Before I clicked the link I thought: That's a lovely evening dress he's sporting there.

Posted by: Stella at April 28, 2010 2:29 PM

Marvel Comics can be pretty goddamn confusing as well.

Posted by: bignick at April 28, 2010 5:02 PM

Something in my mind immediately made me think they were remaking Starman...the one that starred Jeff Bridges and Karen Allen.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 28, 2010 5:10 PM

Todd has it spot on.

James Robinson's version of Starman would be possibly, repeat possibly great for a franchise as Jack Knight could be used as the center aropund which the entire history of the character and the various people who have been Starman could be told.

But some Hollywood exec will manage to fuck it up.

Posted by: FappyMcFapper at April 28, 2010 5:12 PM

at least they are leaving jeff bridges glorious buttcheeks alone

Posted by: rio at April 28, 2010 6:29 PM

Oh my god! This is awesome! I hope they do the Jack Knight iteration of the character. And also, Fuck you! Aquaman is awesome!!! Have you assholes never read JUSTICE/KINGDOM COME/ watched Brave and The Bold? COME ON! Making fun of Aquaman is best left to African american stand up comedians in the 90's.

Posted by: Kap-el at April 29, 2010 11:18 PM

















mindholeblowers.gif viral_hits.gif
>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time