Pajiba

Amen, TK. And if I may add, animals and babies should never speak in ads either. Look, dogs are inherently cute and adorable. They speak a thousand words with their expressions and body language. They don't need any help from special effects.

And the Chihuahua will be voiced by George Lopez.

WHAT?! What about the dog in men in black? And the one in that Adam Sandler film?

I hereby submit that everyone who is in any way involved in the movie industry (producers, actors, critics, etc) should be implanted with small explosive devices at the base of their cranium. Upon the vocalization, typing or writing of: "hilarious and outrageously entertaining" or, "adventure that’s fun for all the family" or any permutation thereof - said device shall explode in a Scanners-esque fashion thereby saving the world from having to endure the inane prattle of an obvious moron.

Pffft, that's stupid. Everyone knows that the police dog should be the one named Donut. Stupid Hollywood, effing everything up.

Shouldn't the former police dog be named Donut?

I think they are lying when they say that it's fun for the whole family.

"Pajiba: Read This Website or the Dog Dies"

Alright, sidebar here-

This is arguably the third time out where Hollywood is attempting to jam 3-D down our collective gullet. The first two being the 50's and 80's. And I think it's a safe bet that it's going to end much like the previous two attempts for several reasons; first off it's a gimmick that doesn't add anything to the overall quality (or lack thereof) of the product, second it adds to the cost of an already over inflated ticket price, and thirdly, shitful movies like this that often were not even intended to be 3-D to begin with and making garbage fly into the audience's faces will not distract them from that fact.

If you're going to present crappy movie in 3-D, it's going to wear out the welcome. Theaters are not going to spend ungodly amounts of money to buy equipment capable of showing 3-D movies if the majority of what's out there sucks donkey quim. And Hollywood- if the movies you make are that bad, making them in 3-D doesn't make them any better. If the majority of movies in 3-D are wretched, people are going to associate 3-D format with bad movies yet again; "If the movie' in 3-D, maybe that's all it's got going for it." Seriously, how many older 3-D movie are really considered anything other than gimmicky schlock? Are there any 3-D movies that a really considered classics? And if you can think of any, was it the 3-D that made them good, or were they good regardless?

Folks if you're pissed off after leaving a shit movie because you feel swindled, imagine how pissed you'll be after spending even more money to be subjected to it. It's like Golgafrincham survivors are calling the shots in Hollywood.

"Hey we made all these lousy movies, how do we make them better?"
"I know, we can make them in 3-D so people will be memorized."
"Will that work?"
"It worked when we sat in on a research group."
"Weren't those the junkies we picked up around LAX?"
"Yes, but we found they have the same mentality as the average teenage moviegoer."

If Hollywood doesn't start bringing in a higher quality of movie for 3-D presentation, 2-D movie will have little worry of endangerment.

I loved Milo and Otis when I was a kid, and they talked. Although I haven't seen it in about 15 years, so it might be a giant crapfest to my adult self.

Babe, for the win!

The only talking animal movie worth it's weight in gold, I tell ya, GOLD!

East Coast Ugly:

Milo and Otis was narrated if I remember. That's not the same as making their mouths move and putting words in them.

Paddy Dog...

That was my point. The animals didn't talk.

I liked that.