web
counter
 

New "Star Trek" Series? Because the Internet Was Built for Rumors

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (16)



618px-JeanLucPicardFacepalm.jpg

The latest rumor rumbling across the Internet (a phenomenon to which I am gleefully and knowingly contributing) is that there is a chance that “Star Trek” will be returning to television at some point in the near future. While the films of the series have never really broken the bank at the box office until JJ Abrams released Star Trek XI: The Undiscovered Lens Flare, the television series have always been the real heart of the series. Hundreds of episodes, telling hour long science fiction stories for the better part of half a century. There’s just more depth there, more introspection.

So when someone tells me that there might be a new series on its way, I get a tad excited. Then I read the actual details, as tossed at the fan by AICN:

Fuller tells AICN exclusively that the two Bryans, who have long (but separately) contemplated new Star Trek TV series, have discussed the possibility of pooling their resources to take a new corner of Gene Roddenberry’s multiverse to the small screen. Hopefully J.J. Abrams and Les Moonves will give them the keys to Starfleet HQ.

Yes, the entire rumor is based on a dude telling a website that he had a conversation with another dude about making a television series. Sure the two dudes in question are Bryan Fuller and Bryan Singer, so it might be a tad more likely than the conversations I’ve had with my cat about single handedly bringing back “Firefly,” but its only different by degree, not category.

Frankly, I think this is just an elaborate exercise in revenge by Bryan Singer. See, he wanted to do a “Battlestar Galactica” reboot, but it got put on hold and then Ron Moore made it his baby. But Moore made his bones on “Star Trek,” so now Singer is trying to dig up Moore’s roots and burn them in a cleansing fire.

And apropos of nothing, do you know what Singer’s first credit on IMDB is for? A film called Street Trash in 1987, with a credit as a grip. I don’t know what a grip is, but I assume it means that Singer is responsible for such memorable quotes as these:

“Lady, what’s the difference between you and a tape recorder except that I can’t shut you off?”

“Baby, I ain’t sure you don’t got a cock.”

“I’d like to know what you’re doing with all that chicken in your pants.”

“Hey, com’on, I read like old people fuck.”

Now re-read all of those quotes in Captain Picard’s voice.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Amazing Spider-Man Theatrical Trailer: The Same But Different. And Quite Possibly Better. | Ranking The New Dredd Images In Terms Of Their Adorkability









Comments

Steven, I'm fully prepared to devote all my extra time to installing your cat as a network executive to make that Firefly comeback happen. The only thing I ask is that we call him by his formal title: Mr. Whiskers, President and CEO of Litterbox Technology and Series Development.

As for a new series, why don't we just re-boot DS9? It's been off the air for over a decade. Kristen Stuart can play Gul Dukat to save on makeup.

Posted by: admin at February 7, 2012 10:16 AM

Sadly a grip on a movie set is not responsible for dialogue being spoken by the actors.

A grip, is a person responsible for the adjustment and maintenance of production equipment and rigging on the set. A key grip aka first company grip, for example would be leader of the grip crew and would handle such things as dollies, tracks and cranes. They can also handle such things as lighting, mics and even more grunt work and heavy lifting, although that sometimes gets a little delegated the bigger the budget of the production.

In other words, a grip is often an entry level crew-person and likely something Singer wouldn't be caught dead doing now.

Posted by: bleujayone at February 7, 2012 10:20 AM

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at February 7, 2012 10:25 AM

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD don't mess with DS9...I would be ok with going back to the delta quadrant, not a reboot, but a continuation.Or push it 3 or 4 centuries ahead, where are we now?

Posted by: karen at February 7, 2012 10:25 AM

The other day I was like, "God, I'm so sick of hearing about an Arrested Development movie. Do people still actually care about a middling-to-funny show that got cancelled like thirty years ago? Why do people care about these nonsense rumor of shit that is never going to actually happen? And even if it does, it will never live up to the expectations of what they think it will be."

And then you brought up the possibility of a new Trek series and I will be glued to the interenet for the next three years eagerly awaiting any news that might give me the slightest hope of a TV resurgence. I'm figuratively salivating all over my keyboard.

Posted by: superasente at February 7, 2012 10:53 AM

Only if The Shat plays a prominent part.

Posted by: , at February 7, 2012 11:18 AM

I'm obviously not suggesting this course of action, but the most direct approach would be to kill the cat and set it up to look like a suicide in protest of the cancellation of Firefly.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at February 7, 2012 12:11 PM

Socrates_Johnson,

Mr. Whiskers, President and CEO of Litterbox Technology and Series Development does not find your comment amusing.

Posted by: John G. at February 7, 2012 1:15 PM

Look, we all saw what happened when OUR generation tried to Trek. Enterprise happened. And I am like JUST NOW getting over it so don't even pretend or joke that it might happen again. Please.

please

Posted by: Nadine at February 7, 2012 1:30 PM

I can't do Captain Picard, but Sean Connery is close enough.

Posted by: Lucas at February 7, 2012 1:52 PM

Qu'vatlh!

The only way they could redo DS9 would be to fuck it, hard, right in the ass, then slash it with a mek'leth into complete unrecognizability.

Which means, of course, they'll probably do it.

Posted by: The Wanderer at February 7, 2012 2:10 PM

Nadine, that wasn't our generation. It was Brannon and Braga, who had already fucked up Star Trek in Voyager. After they were pushed out from Enterprise, the 4th season of that show was really good (and no, the last episode never happened).

Voyager is also the reason why Star Trek can never come back. Those two assholes destroyed the Trek universe completely.

Posted by: FabMax at February 7, 2012 3:07 PM

How about they just do fucking Star Trek? You know roll out the Enterprise with a new crew? Maybe we could make it an adult series this time though? No boy geniuses? Single adults on a ship for long periods of time that actually have sex with each other? Maybe we could even boldy go someplace, not stop and have meetings about it?

Posted by: logan at February 7, 2012 6:55 PM

This fills me with simultaneous glee and dread. I love me some trek, but most of the Roddenberry-free stuff has been pretty vile. (Voyager? Ugh. Can't speak to the Quantum Leap in Space one as I only saw 1 or 2 episodes) I quite liked the recent movie, but didn't understand why it was necessary to completely alter the timeline.

Posted by: koj at February 7, 2012 10:33 PM

Datebi* C O M The best c o m m u n I ty for seeking bi s e x u a l and b I –c u r Io u s In d I v I d u a ls   You’ll find hundreds of thousands of open-minded singles & couples looking to explore their bisexuality..Join it right now and have fun…tes it is so nice

Posted by: lily at February 8, 2012 1:55 AM

Fuck Paramount.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at February 8, 2012 8:33 AM