web
counter
 

Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman

By Admin | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (32)



neverwhere800x600.jpg

I’m having a bit of a conundrum. I like Neil Gaiman. I think his writing is great, his descriptions of people, places, and items of note are fantastic, and his imagination is brilliant. I’ve read three of his books now; Good Omens, American Gods and now Neverwhere. I really enjoyed American Gods but, upon the completion of the other two, I found myself with a feeling of “well that was…all right.” It seems that I just don’t connect with some of his writing like I do with other authors. Is it him? Is it me? I just don’t know. Nevertheless, Neverwhere is a perfectly fine read for those that are fans of Gaiman’s other works and I’m sure that I may be in the minority with my less than stellar impressions of the book.

Neverwhere is the story of Richard Mayhew who, on the eve of leaving for London to begin a career in securities, receives a warning from an old woman as he’s lying on the sidewalk outside the pub about to be sick. “I’d watch out for doors if I were you,” she states. Typical of young men preparing to venture to the big city and with a liver full of liquor, Richard promptly disregards her warning and even more expediently, forgets it. After living in London for a while, Richard finds himself engaged to a woman who is out of his league, in a job that seems to be plodding along but not really taking him anywhere and just kind existing day to day. One evening, as Richard and his fiancee are about to have supper with her boss, they come across a girl laying on the sidewalk who is obviously hurt badly. His finacee admonishes Richard to leave the woman where she is as this supper is extremely important to her career. Richard, being a person with a soul, stops to help the woman and takes her back to his apartment to care for her. Eventually she recovers enough to tell Richard what happened and her name, Door. Soon thereafter, two men appear at Richards door asking about the woman he had rescued. These men obviously have bad intentions towards the girl so Richard tries to provide cover as best he can but when he goes back into his apartment, the girl is gone.

The next day, things start to get very strange. People he’s known for years have trouble remembering him, his bank account seems to be missing and some people come to look at his apartment while he is still there but don’t even notice him. Richard sets out to find out what the hell has happened to him and what happened to the girl which leads him to the underground of London with the help of a street bum. He meets the rat people and is taken to the Rat King who aids him in finding Door again. Door tells him of her family’s murder and her talent for opening, well, doors. What follows is a harrowing adventure through the underground to bring the killers to justice and to remove an ancient evil from the underground of London.

That’s not a very good description so let me just say this: Neverwhere is yet another re-telling of Alice in Wonderland. It’s far more sinister than the versions that I’m familliar with and certainly isn’t out of place amongst Gaiman’s other works. All the characters you’re familiar with are here in some form or another. The Cheshire cat, Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, The Mad Hatter, and of course The Queen of Hearts. Gaiman is in fine form as he weaves his imagination in and out of the classic tale. There’s blood, there’s horror, there’s the supernatural and it’s definitely an excellent book. So what’s the issue I had with it? Well, I’ve read it before. That is, the story of Alice has been told, told and re-told many many times. While it’s interesting to read Gaiman’s take on the adventure, you always know what’s coming next. I just didn’t connect with this book like I do with most others. As I said, it’s a perfectly fine tale, but it’s a tale that you’ve all read before. If you’re a fan of Gaiman’s, you’re sure to love it. If you’re a fan of Alice in Wonderland you’ll probably enjoy it. For me, well, I’ve been down that rabbit hole before and I don’t feel the need to go back.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Admin’s reviews, check out his blog, Welcome to Stabbymart.









Cameron Crowe Circling We Bought a Zoo | HBO Picks Up Game of Thrones













Comments

Guess I'll be in the Gaiman fan group, so I'll be reading this.

It's a shame you don't like Good Omens, that was some good fun! Ah well, differring tastes! Thanks for the review.

Posted by: Four Eyes at March 3, 2010 8:22 AM

OK, I usually try to avoid hijacking Cannonball Read reviews with Book Club updates because I don't want to take distract from the book & reviewer at hand, but:

The Pajiba Book Club March selection will be The Graveyard Book by Mr. Neil Gaiman. And I'm glad that Admin pointed out the parallels between Neverwhere and Alice in Wonderland because The Graveyard Book is a retelling of Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book. There will be a full post dedicated to previewing the Book Club selection later, but, you know, since we are already talkin' Gaiman I figured I'd put it out there.

Posted by: Yossarian at March 3, 2010 8:38 AM

For me, Gaiman is always associated with comic books first, and the proper novels are more of an afterthought. I *loved* The Sandman series, so rich with mythology and allusions. I never really took to American Gods and thought Good Omens was a little tedious for all the hype (I reviewed it for this year's Cannonball read at my blog).

Posted by: Yossarian at March 3, 2010 8:45 AM

I haven't read Neverwhere but enjoyed other Gaiman books so will probably pick it up. I'm not overly familiar with Alice (other than the basic gist, I've never read the book or been that bothered by it) so I think I'll be ok there.

And I'll try and get a copy of The Graveyard book for the next book club.

Posted by: Carrie at March 3, 2010 8:49 AM

I tend to not like authors other people rave about, so I know where you're coming from, Admin. And I mostly only find Gaiman to be an ok storyteller, but Neverwhere is one of his I really like. Still, an insightful review. I'd never really thought about the parallels between it and Alice.

Yossarian, I liked Good Omens a lot, but you're right about its tediousness. I blame it on Pratchett, whose other books I find extremely tedious (he's another hyped up author I won't read). Which is sad, because I like his sense of humor quite a bit.

Posted by: nutmeag at March 3, 2010 9:00 AM

I’ve read three of his books now; Good Omens, American Gods and now Neverwhere. I really enjoyed American Gods but, upon the completion of the other two, I found myself with a feeling of “well that was…alright.”

Since I know many of the Pajibans might zero in on that, I just wanted to say I can totally feel you on that. I like Gaiman, but of the ones I've read, they have either brought out a "oh my God, I love it" or "okay, that was good and all, but what's the big deal?" reaction. For me, Stardust and Good Omens were the first I read, and while I thought they were funny, I wasn't exactly convinced. On the other hand, I loved Neverwhere and Anansi Boys, and while I liked American Gods, I don't think I liked it quite as much as many other people on this site. It was still very good.

As I said, I actually really liked Neverwhere but I love London (I've only been twice and would love to go back) so that was definitely a major selling point, and I also liked all the underground stops and references - I have a shot glass that says "Mind the Gap" which I actually bought on my second visit after I'd read this novel.

Posted by: Jen K at March 3, 2010 9:00 AM

YAAAAAY, I am excited about reading more Gaiman!! And I'm excited about actually participating in the book club this time around.

Thanks for the review, admin. Hopefully, The Graveyard Book will live up to my expectations and change your mind about Gaiman. :)

Posted by: Jelinas at March 3, 2010 9:02 AM

There was a British TV mini-series of Neverwhere.
It starred that guy who looks like Paul McCartney who played Paul McCartney in "Back Beat".
It might have been good except the budget appeared to be about $500.

Posted by: rajah rabbit at March 3, 2010 9:21 AM

I'm right there with you... I always want to like Gaiman's books more than I actually do, and I have a hard time putting my finger on it.

At first I thought it was just that I'm less captivated by the backdrop of blending the Real, Modern World with fantasy that tends to be his signature, but there are some works of that sort that I quite like, so I'm left thinking it's a stylistic disjoint between him and me.

At the end of the day (or book), I always feel like his ideas are awesome, but something about the execution left me a bit disappointed.

Posted by: k at March 3, 2010 9:31 AM

If I remember correctly, the book came after the series, and it suffers for it. I would love to see the series remade with a Real Budget, but I'm very meh about the book itself. Door is a blank character in the book, and she's not all that lively in the series, either, but at least she's less of an empty canvas.

Posted by: Wednesday at March 3, 2010 9:39 AM

Admin, I'll say up front that I love this book but also I'm not trying to talk you into liking it better.

The reason I look back on this book with such major fondness is that it reminds me of the Joss Whedon world of peril: Richard is a ridiculous man, totally ill-prepared for everything, let alone this spontaneous dangerous adventure.

It has the surreality of Alice with the laugh-out-loud absurd humor of a great Firefly moment.

Posted by: caroline at March 3, 2010 10:03 AM

That's an excellent point, Wednesday. It's almost like she's a Macguffin.

When is the book club date again Yossarian? I've actually got The Graveyard Book as my daughter won it at a Halloween party at the bookstore. Yes, I raise nerds and I'm proud of it.

Also, since there has been mention of Good Omens: I left my copy on the kitchen table one day when my Mother-in-law was babysitting so she decided to begin reading it. My Mother-in-law is a pretty hardcore Catholic. Her reaction: "I don't think that's exactly how it goes." I laughed. Hard.

Posted by: admin at March 3, 2010 10:07 AM

I had the same reaction after reading Neverwhere, helped no less by the fact that some people who saw me reading it started creaming their panties and exclaiming in no uncertain terms that I would do the same. It was okay, but I didn't connect with it as much as they said (despite my love for Alice in Wonderland type narrative arcs). I do enjoy other Gaiman works, though I'm more fond of his short stories: I feel he's got a stronger handle on the pacing and cohesiveness of a short story. Still, I haven't really broke through half of his canon yet, so I'm still reserving judgment on that.
Also, I always find the comic depiction of Door jarringly off. I vaguely recall her described as a girl child, not a gothy punk with dominatrix tendencies.

Posted by: keenerweiner at March 3, 2010 10:07 AM

Gaiman is a shitty adult novelist. His children's works are alright and some of his comic book work is sublime, but I cannot abide either American Gods or Neverwhere, so no, you're not alone, even from the geek contingent.

That said, Good Omens is a collaboration with Terry Pratchett, and if you're at all familiar with either author's style, you will easily recognize Pratchett as either the predominant influence or the connecting voice. If you don't like Discworld, you may not like Good Omens, but if you like American Gods, you probably don't like Good Omens.

Posted by: Kat at March 3, 2010 10:07 AM

Re: Pajiba Book Club

So far I don't have a date to give you. Dustin handles the scheduling. I can tell you that we are roughly organizing it by month and this is the March selection, so if you want to participate you should plan on finishing the book by late March. The Lolita discussion took place on February 25th. (that's why I wanted to work in a plug for it here, you've probably only got three weeks and change to find a copy and read it.)

Posted by: Yossarian at March 3, 2010 10:26 AM

I LOOOOOVE Neverwhere! Though I don't know if it's for the story or just the characters. I've never heard of The Graveyard Book, is it more recent? And as a fan of Gaiman's and Pajibans, when is everyone reading it? I'd like to play, too!

...Damn it, now I can't decide whether to watch the old BBC Neverwhere series or to just eat some really rare porcelain.

Posted by: Mikey Likes It at March 3, 2010 10:38 AM

Oh and right above me is the answer to my question. HURRRRR

Posted by: Mikey Likes It at March 3, 2010 10:39 AM

Great review admin. I haven't read Gaiman yet, but have American Gods on the shelf as it was recommended as a good start.

Posted by: Cindy at March 3, 2010 10:46 AM

I'm actually kind of the reverse of most Gaiman fans, although I see I have a few compatriots above. I LOVE Neverwhere and Stardust (and I can cope with the low-budget Neverwhere series because there's enough in there to keep me interested, but I hated the Stardust movie because they took out half of what I enjoyed about the book in favor of making it a cleaner and more formulaic romcom), I thought American Gods was largely bloated and trying way too hard, I thought Good Omens was hilarious (okay, I'm definitely not in the minority there) and had trouble not laughing out loud while furtively reading it in class, and thought Anansi Boys was decent, certainly not as bad as American Gods but not really as exciting as Neverwhere or Stardust for me.

Still haven't read Graveyard Book though. I'll get around to it eventually, once grad school stops kicking my ass and, um, I have a paying job that I can buy things with.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at March 3, 2010 11:56 AM

I was a big Sandman fan, then read Neverwhere when it first came out, and really loved it, but I recognize that it is not as fully fleshed out as it could be. I felt like he was writing the plot but maybe needed help with the drawings, so to speak. I've re-read it a few times since, and I still really like it.

Great review, Admin. I'm not a big Alice in Wonderland fan, so I didn't get the clear parallel at all.

Gaiman's other books: Stardust was a nice fairytale, American Gods was good but heavy-handed, and Anansi Boys was fun. I'm not going to automatically buy any new novels, though. Good Omens I don't really count as his, as it was a collabo with Pratchett clearly holding the reins.

Posted by: Brenton at March 3, 2010 12:23 PM

IMHO, American Gods is Neil Gaiman's best non-Sandman work. It's award-winning, and deservedly so. The others are good, but I'd agree with a lot of the people here that the ideas are a lot better than the execution for stuff like Neverwhere and Stardust. Other than American Gods, I'd definitely advise the short story collections - those are excellent.

Posted by: Royalewithcheese at March 3, 2010 12:51 PM

I really like Neverwhere, but like Jen K it's partly tied up in my affection for London. I read the novel again while I lived there and loved it even more. I would always think of Neverwhere when I heard "Mind the gap".

Posted by: lainiefig at March 3, 2010 12:53 PM

Here's the rankings, suckers.

1 Sandman
2 american gods
3 Stardust, with charles vess
4 neverwhere
5 good omens
6 Coraline
7 graveyard book
8 anansi boys

Number one is most best, number eight is least best.

Posted by: Johnny Von Awesome at March 3, 2010 12:55 PM

I'm going to go against the grain.

OK, one caveat: Sandman is on a league by itself so I won't count it.

1. Good Omens
2. Coraline
3. Stardust
4. Anansi Boys
5. American Gods
6. Neverwhere

Posted by: Fredo at March 3, 2010 2:24 PM

BTW, I'd love to see "Smoke and Mirrors" (Gaiman's first short story collection) added to the Cannonball Read.

Posted by: Fredo at March 3, 2010 2:26 PM

Good Omens is more than alright. And to be fair, he didnt write it alone so what you may have reacted against isn't necassarily one writer but Gilliam and Sir Pratchett. Oh Terry *sigh*

Posted by: Nadine at March 3, 2010 2:52 PM

Good to see the Sandman love. Not really possible to review it though. Maybe volume by volume?

Enjoyed Stardust and American Gods, and like others have mentioned, Good Omens seems much more Pratchett than Gaiman, fun to read but tedious at times.

Posted by: Mick J at March 3, 2010 3:03 PM

1. Sandman
2 Smoke and Mirrors (esp. "Troll Bridge" which breaks my heart--so I "teach it" in fiction workshop)
3. American gods
4. Stardust
5. Neverwhere
6. Good omens
7. Fragile Things
6 Coraline

Haven't read the Graveyard book yet.

Tried and couldn't start Anansi Boys

First thing I ever read of Gaiman's--even before Sandman, was Don't Panic, a fanboy book about HGTTG.

Posted by: Rezcat at March 3, 2010 7:58 PM

Oh, and I agreee with keenerwiener; Door from the novel looks nothing like comic character pictured above. If anything, I always imagined her to look somewhat more like Delight/Delirium from Sandman.

Posted by: Rezcat at March 3, 2010 8:02 PM

This is my absolute favorite book. Ever.
That is all.

Posted by: badkittyuno at March 3, 2010 9:14 PM

My brother recommended Neil Gaiman as an author similar to Douglas Adams and so I picked up "Good Omens" with every expectation of enjoying the hell out of myself.

I did not.

It was almost a chore to read and I had trouble concentrating on it or connecting with the story...or even any of the characters.

Usually we have pretty similar tastes. (For example, he demanded I read The Belgariad and I finally did and I was blown away by the awesome.) In this instance, however, I just didn't get it.

It was rather like reading "Knave of Dreams" by Andre Norton; a theoretically compelling story but just...flat. And rather cerebral which is odd because I really love Isaac Asimov.

Anyway, it is nice to know that I am not alone in my lack of Gaiman appreciation.

Posted by: Hayden Tompkins at March 4, 2010 12:24 AM

Oddly, I had just finished re-reading Neverwhere about twenty minutes before bumping into this review. Plot schmot, say I. Gaiman's aware of his habit of plot-cloning in his own works, even linked from his blog once to a site that pointed out, more wittily than I am, that all his plots boiled down to "average person discovers magical world next door to our own." However, he does such different things with that essential displacement that for me, the Alice comparison doesn't hold up more than superficially. There are a lot of rabbit holes in Gaiman's writing, but each world has rules and an internal logic that always makes for a sound story, unlike Lewis Carroll's shotgun approach to the crazy.

Stardust's tone & atmosphere are as distinctly different from Neverwhere as each is from American Gods, Coraline, The Graveyard Book, or Good Omens. Different rabbit holes, different journeys, different symbolism, context, different purpose, different storytelling. Richard Mayhew is nothing like Shadow, for instance, who's nothing like Coraline: their worlds are dangerous or mundane in believable, structured, specific ways that match only their own stories.

I see Neverwhere as primarily a paean to London itself: its architecture, lovely (St Paul's) or heinous (Centre Point!!), its history, from Romans to Victorians, its cosmopolitan jewels like the British Museum and its decidedly mundane sewer system. Putting the Floating Market in Harrod's, making real Black Friars out of Blackfriars Station, naming one character Old Bailey--he's enjoying playing with the language of the town, inverting or embellishing places that are really just street signs now, and adding weight and personality to London's ancient/modern culture soup: Gap monsters, killing fogs, cups of tea. I don't know if Gaiman loves London the way Mark Helprin loves New York (Winter's Tale), but I can't see the plot of this book as anything else but a canvas he paints London on.

Posted by: Salieri2 at March 4, 2010 1:05 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time