web
counter
 

"Then came the day MTV blew us away...."

By Seth Freilich | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (13)



skins-sid-and-cassie.jpg

Fucking remakes, man. Over on Sky TV, the Brits get to watch this lovely little teen dramedy called “Skins” (we get it here in the States, well after the fact, on BBC America). As I previously wrote in my review of Season Three of “Skins” about the first two seasons:

While not a perfect show by any means, the first two seasons were really quite good…. The cast was quite excellent, from the two actors you probably know (a pre-Slumdog Millionaire Dev Patel, in a drastically different role, and a quite post-About a Boy Nicholas Hoult), to a lot of names you’ve probably never heard of (the particular standouts being Mike Bailey, Hannah Murray and Joseph Dempsie — you’ll know at least one of these actors five years from now, is my bet). Thanks to both the actors and the writing, most of the characters walked a fine line between being both caricatures and entirely believable high school kids. The show had a lot of drama, without often falling into melodrama, and the comedy was wicked funny.

While my review of Season Three was a bit more tepid, it’s actually grown on me of late, and I’m looking forward to catching Season Four (which has already aired across the pond) as soon as May sweeps is done. While the show works because of its acting, writing, and music, above all else, it works because there is just something quintessentially British about it. And much like “Coupling” before it, I suspect that it defies the Americanized remake. But MTV is going to give it a go anyway, as it is finally moving forward with its plans to remake the show (it’s had the rights since last August). Not much is known about the planned 10 episode run beyond this: “Similar to the original series, “Skins” will feature a mostly unknown cast. There’s been no official start day of production, but the series is set to take place in Baltimore.”

Well, we also know the show won’t be nearly as fun as the original. For starters, the original cast is just too spot-on. For seconders, stupid standards mean MTV will not be able to give us colorful dialogue like “I’ll kill you, you fucking flat-chested cocksucking spastic horsefucker!” And for thirders, no way in hell does MTV have the balls to include perhaps the most offensive musical of all time, one that still gets stuck in my head at least once a month (YouTube has disabled embedding, so you’ll have to dig it directly).

In other words, suck a nut MTV.

(Source: Variety. Yes, Variety, you may not source when you steal from bloggers, but we’ll still source you anyways.)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Oh Boy! vs. Great Scott! | Last Night on "Chuck" | Book Review: New Moon, Eclipse, & Breaking Dawn by Stephenie Meyer









Comments

I really missed Hannah Murray's Cassie. Anyway, Kaya Scodelario is a lovely pumpkin, albeit a very thin pumpkin.

Posted by: arrrghzi at May 11, 2010 9:46 AM

My guess is it will be like "Undressed" for a new, slightly more retarded generation.

Posted by: schrome at May 11, 2010 9:49 AM

I had no idea Skins was showing in the US. Excellent!

And I must report with sadness s4 is not as good as s3, albeit it falls short of the mark only marginally. S4 is to s3 what s3 was to s2, and s2 to s1. You get the idea. Just out of interest ... ah, please don’t be upset with me, but I am curious ... do Americans get the social context and such of this show? E.g. the fact that the characters live in Bristol?

Brit TV shows are hard to sell across the pond. Hell, whom am I kidding – they’re hard to sell everywhere. Even Australians don’t want to buy them. Can’t say I blame them.

Posted by: SB at May 11, 2010 10:15 AM

I'm almost done watching series 4 of Skins. Agreed, 1 and 2 were excellent, 3 less so, 4 even less than that. I find that I can't stand Effy. 3 and 4 are more melodramatic (yes, I'm aware that's saying a lot seeing as how Tony got hit by a bus and all) but at least in 1 and 2 there was some fun, and some actual joy. The new cast is just problem after problem. I know you mentioned this in your previous review, Seth, but nothing compares to the gut punch of Sid and Tony in the club after he finds his father. It still breaks my heart.

And yet, it's light years better than what MTV or any US network could ever do.

SB, what is the deal with Bristol? I fully admit that the significance of that detail is right over my head.

Posted by: MyySharona at May 11, 2010 11:25 AM

Stupid idea. The first two series only worked because of the casting and the sharp writing, the premise itself is really average. The English version couldn't even pull it off again with a different cast so this has no chance. It will just be the same as a million other American dramas.

Posted by: Steph at May 11, 2010 11:58 AM

Seasons 1&2 were fantastic! But yeah, 3 left me cold, and I will probably not bother to watch 4. MTV would fuck up an American version, but it would probably be a HUGE hit.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at May 11, 2010 12:20 PM

Banksy and Massive Attack are from there. I always got the feeling that it was supposed to be a little badass, but from seeing enough English talk that way about their towns, I just figured I'd take that for boasting, e.g. Liverpool, Manchester.

One thing that does impress me about the show is that nearly every episode has the same writer and same director. I have seen all four series so far*. While I thought 1 the superior for making comic-superheroic quests out of teenage life, I also remember reading message boards that completely missed that irony. I think there were articles that suggested Skins was in part responsible for increased social deviancy in the youth. It was a massively popular show for teens who thought Bryan Eisley was glorifying the verve and pop of life that allows teens to make more mistakes. It was humorous when troves of youth began to question their motives for liking the show and dismiss it as immature or embarrassing. That whole trashiness for promiscuity for sophistication syllogism. If we're trying to sublimate Skins, then I think we're on the wrong track.

#Realistic it is not.

It is a comedy, foremost. If you were ever one of the "bad ones," be prepared to make fun of yourself. If kids are watching this show and pointing to how proud they can be that a sophisticated representation of teens is on tv, they are deluded. This may seem contradictory if what you've seen is from series 1. That was very different in tone and content. The teens, who may as like be mannequins, dress up in only one costume for the length of the season. One of the strengths of the show is that they can essentially change all the characters from one season to the next.

(Too bad Effy was never as cool as she was in the first series. She was the impossible character, the vardøger in green spandex- that let me know this show is not meant to be taken truthfully. Though her walk in the cold night air while her nose is runny and she's reciting her poetry on the extras disc for series 1 is quite fantastic; the special effects for the whole show are the improbability of events.)

Anyway, I really like every season of Skins. It's outlandish. It's exploitive. It's cocky. It's emotional. Its music is fabulous. Series 1 and 2 are more memorable, but while those were running, the ruse was still working on most viewers. Now that the conceit is fleshed out, the writing changes Skins on the main characters more than once per series. This sometimes feels jarring, but still works as a novel solution for essentially 'sketching' a drama show.

I hold little hope for the American remake. How self-aware do you think this show could be? Part of the allure of Skins is that it is not a bloody ass-bag of reality tv famewhores doing this stuff. Stick with the Hills, MTV. There's your poison. It's at least literal and genuine in it's lack of judgment and responsibility. You got you're 'least influential' pop star bullshit for mentioning award. Rest on those laurels.

"Someone's gonna make that Degenerate Dollar."


spoiler*

It looks like a fifth would follow F-man's petite soeur.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at May 11, 2010 12:48 PM

MyySharona: Bristol’s generally rough (they don’t admit to it there, but it is); unemployment’s rather high (for a city in the South of England) ... and the characters act like they’re in London. I’ll take a leap and guess that nowadays in all likelihood Bristol teens do what Skins characters do – after they saw it on telly. I'd wager they use less drugs though.

Posted by: SB at May 11, 2010 1:01 PM

I'm really really hoping this goes as well as the plan that was canceled recently to do an American remake of Spaced.

And I will always love Cassie for when she finally has enough of Sid: "HEY! WOW! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU SID! FUCK YOU!"

Posted by: Annie_Reckson at May 11, 2010 4:14 PM

I love the first two seasons of Skins, and I tried to watch the third but I honestly couldn't even get past the opening scene. I probably should've given it a fair chance, but I knew there was no way I'd be into it after the splendor that was the cast of 1 and 2. Anyways, an MTV version sounds rather stupid.

Posted by: Penelope at May 11, 2010 5:11 PM

Channel 4 produces and broadcasts Skins, not Sky TV. I know i'm being picky but a show like this will never be shown on a network owned by Rupert Murdoch.

Posted by: James at May 11, 2010 8:10 PM

!!Spoilers!!

Though I don't like the second set of characters near as much as the first, I did think that Kaya Scodelario, the actress who played Effy, did an amazing job of transitioning from a silent, mysterious background character to a victim of psychotic depression. schitosofrenia
I thought the show redeemed itself with the final two episodes of series 4. I was also completely blind sided with the death of Freddie.

Posted by: Morgan LaFai at May 12, 2010 4:55 AM

**spoilers**

I'm sorry, but the death of Freddie made me laugh out loud. I thought it was a brilliant way to end such a soap opera of a season, but seriously, it was so off the wall.
But I guess that's what I like about where Skins is heading. It's similar to Shameless (another brilliant British soap opera) in that it's getting so ridiculous and fun.

I miss Cassie and Chris though.

Posted by: ruby at May 13, 2010 1:45 AM