hulkmainpic.jpg

Mr. Pajiba, Don’t Make Me Angry. You Wouldn’t Like Me When I’m Angry

The Daily Trade Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | April 17, 2007 | Comments (43)


All right — do you have your cereal bowl out? Is it full? ‘Cause you’re going to want to weep in it a little this morning. Because this is what happens when the once next-great-actor of our generation hits a dry spell and coughs up a few indie duds: He signs on to play the goddamn Incredible Hulk. Yes — you heard right. Edward Norton, the Yale-trained thespian with two Oscar nominations for acting under his belt, has been cast as Bruce Banner in the sequel to the Marvel Comics film. I don’t know what most of you think of Norton, and if you’ve ever listened to the Fight Club DVD commentary you’d know that he’s surprisingly not as witty as Brad Pitt, but I once had a decent amount of respect for the guy. He’s got more flops than he does successes, but somehow playing a mild-mannered scientist capable of morphing into a CGI-monstrosity doesn’t seem to jibe with his roles in Primal Fear, American History X, The Illusionist, The People vs. Larry Flynt, and 25th Hour. And here’s what’s doubly disconcerting about this casting choice: They tried, with the original Hulk, to add a respected director (Ang Lee), give the movie some psychological heft, and ground it with a sheen of pretentiousness. And it didn’t work. Why? Because the people who might actually want to see a comic-book film about a goddamn scientist with anger-management issues want The Hulk to turn green and rip up some shit, and that’s about it. And, by casting Norton, Marvel has indicated that the second installment will be more of the same: A long, tedious action-light spectacle full of contemplation and humorlessness. I suppose it does make sense that it’s released in 2008 — a Presidential election year.

In casting news that you’ve probably all heard about already: Along with Cate Blanchett, Harrison Ford, and Ray Wintstone, Shia LaBeouf has now joined the cast of Indy 4. Honestly, I’m all right with that — I saw Disturbia over the weekend and totally agree with Phillip’s assessment: A welcoming slick, surprisingly intense Saturday afternoon diversion. And LaBeouf is a reasonably decent actor, though it’s a shame he’s set to appear in Transformers. You’d best watch yourself, Shia, or you’ll end up in an Incredible Hulk sequel.

In other casting news, Christina Ricci has signed onto Larry and Andy Wachowski’s live-action adaptation of Speed Racer, as Speed’s girlfriend, Trixie. Well, good for her: She already looks like an anime creation, so the casting here is appropriate.

Elsewhere, Akiva Goldsman is wrapping up the script for the prequel to The Da Vinci Code, Angels and Demons, and both Ron Howard and Tom Hanks are in negotiations to return. Go ahead now, just stick your entire head in that cereal bowl. Everything is better when your face is covered in Cap’n Crunch.

For what it’s worth, there is a lot of speculation this week, also, that Sam Raimi will not do a Spiderman 4 and will, instead, turn and direct The Hobbit. He is, apparently, circling the drain on that project. And I have no idea what to make of this, but Raimi is also writing a script for an Evil Dead remake and shopping for a director. If he actually pulls the trigger on a remake, it may be the biggest disservice to the horror genre of all time.

Also, there’s this: A Ben Stiller film entitled The Marc Pease Experience. The good news about the film is that Anna Kendrick (who was fantabulous in Rocket Science, in theaters August 12) has been attached to star, along with Jason Schwartzman and Stiller. It’s also written and directed by Todd Louiso, who most of you know as Dick from High Fidelity. Great, right? Well, listen to the plot summary: It’s about a high school student (Kendrick) who is romantically involved with both her older high school teacher (Schwartzman) and his mentor, Mr. Gribble (Ben Stiller), both of whom are set to open musical productions on the same night. Does that plot sketch ring any bells? Sound at all anything like a certain movie that Dan featured prominently in one of last year’s Guides? Hmm. Now, c’mon, Louiso. If you’re going to rip off Rushmore, at least have the decency not to cast the same actor in a similar role.

Also, the following films are set to be released on DVD today: Smokin’ Aces, Notes on a Scandal, The Last King of Scotland, The History Boys, and Freedom Writers. With the exception of the last one, the others are worth at least the rental fee.

In the trailer watch, a reader sent along this teaser trailer for Uwe Boll’s upcoming flick, Postal, which is apparently based on a completely inane video game (Uwe Boll? Video game? Get out of here!). I don’t know what it’s really about, but the plot summary on IMDb suggests that it’s about “Postal Dude,” his wife “Bitch,” and his “Uncle Dave” (Dave Foley), who hatch a plan to steal some valuables, only Osama Bin Laden (with “his friend George W. Bush as backup”) derail their plan. This clip features an incredibly tasteless scene with a window washer at the World Trade Center, seconds before the 9/11 attack. After you watch it, you may want to take that cereal bowl, attach a bone saw and some explosives to it, and shove it up Uwe Boll’s sphincter. (Thanks for the tip, Emily.)


Pajiba Love 04/16/07 | Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters



Comments

I'm still laughing over the fact that I actually had a cereal bowl in front of me when I clicked on this update.

Bowl/Boll--all good.

(Why, Dave Foley, why?)

Posted by: Ranylt at April 17, 2007 9:28 AM

Does that trailer mean that Uwe Boll can be sent to Guantanamo Bay for cinematic terrorism?

I DO know of the game it is based on, and it is a doozy. It was made with the grand intention of being the most offensive video game ever. It featured, at the time it was released, the then still-shocking concept of a postal worker grabbing an arsenal and killing people left and right. The game's sequel featured Gary Coleman. And this is also the movie that features the boxing match Boll had with movie critics that dissed him, which he totally rigged of course.

And as one of the few people who apparently liked the first Hulk film, I have to agree with you on your assessment on its failure and the sequel's imminent doom. It seems very few people actually cared about the more dramatic elements of the story, and only want ridiculous levels of CGI smashing without the inconvenience of real plot. I blame MySpace. Because I can.

Oh, and now I must punch out whoever had the grand idea about doing a movie based on a cartoon made up of 90% still pictures with speed lines.

Posted by: Vermillion at April 17, 2007 9:32 AM

Alas, I have no Cap'n Crunch, and somehow Corn Bran Squares just aren't going to cut it.

You. Can't. Remake. Evil Dead. Dammit!

Posted by: JH Maximumm at April 17, 2007 9:33 AM

I like Ed Norton.

The Ang Lee Hulk made me sleepy.

Don't want deep soul searching in Comic Book movie.

Hulk Smash!!

Posted by: greer at April 17, 2007 9:48 AM

Re: He's got more flops than he does successes...

C'mon now, I don't agree w/ this at all. I think it's the complete opposite. Norton has way more successes than he does flops. Most of the ones you listed in your review are successes in my book. Cut the guy a break!

You're probably right, Helcat. But, Death to Smoochy counts as several flops.

Posted by: Helcat at April 17, 2007 9:53 AM

Ouch! You just made my eyes bleed. Ok, I'll give you that one.

Posted by: Helcat at April 17, 2007 10:05 AM

Ed Norton = outstanding.

But "Yale-trained"? The man attended Yale College for undergraduate school, not the Yale School of Drama for graduate school. Yale College doesn't even offer a theater major. Though they're more than happy to take credit for anything.

Posted by: Boris at April 17, 2007 10:28 AM

'Postal' is my husband's current FAVORITE video game (any of you who aren't easily offended, check it out), and I do believe that a rental of Uwe Boll's movie treatment is lurking somewhere in my future.

Fuck the cereal bowl--I'm gonna go pour a tumbler of vodka to cry into.

Posted by: Jerce at April 17, 2007 10:38 AM

Oh come on, no one dislikes Death To Smoochy. Fuck Robin Williams, but Ed Norton was great.

Posted by: Eric at April 17, 2007 10:58 AM

Now, I'm not easily offended, but that Uwe Boll clip has got to be the most goddamned offensive 30 seconds of film I have EVER seen. And I sat through The Passion of the Christ twice!

Fuck Uwe Boll!

Posted by: Armando at April 17, 2007 11:04 AM

That was incredibly offensive.

and the illusionist was horrible. Norton reminded me of Sarah Michelle Gellar in "The Return" - both of their roles were to walk around looking quizically at things.

Posted by: soda at April 17, 2007 11:19 AM

Ed Norton in The Hulk. I just threw up a little in my mouth.

When I first watched Death to Smoochy a few years ago, I thought it was hilarious. It aired again a few weekends ago, and I sat down excitedly to relive the funny bits. Sadly, I was sorely disappointed. I now have to concur; it counts as several flops, but The Hulk will count as a bajillion flops. Sigh.

I guess I'll have to console myself with the memory of his other great performances.

Posted by: JKo at April 17, 2007 11:28 AM

I just watched the clip, and I threw up all over my computer.

Posted by: JKo at April 17, 2007 11:30 AM

DAVID SCOTT FOLEY YOU STOP THAT RIGHT NOW.

Posted by: nova at April 17, 2007 11:44 AM

I saw Death To Smoochy with a group of about 10 friends. By the end of it, I was the only one still in the theater. But then again, when we saw Dude, Where's My Car? I was the only one who walked out. Hmm...

Norton's presence in the new Hulk movie actually gives me hope for him. I genuinely like the guy.

Posted by: Rob at April 17, 2007 11:45 AM

I don't comment often, but good God I LOVE Norton and enjoyed the hell out of "Rounders" and "Fight Club". I think he needs to be a little more careful about his script choices.

Posted by: bebemiqui at April 17, 2007 11:57 AM

The people behind the hulk reboot have made it clear that it will not have the soul serching, daddy issues the former had, but will be all about the HULK SMASH. I look forward to seeing that. I know I am in the minoraty here but I love the lee HULK, I thought it was awsome. He made a 120 million dollar arthouse flick out of a superhero, Thats Ballsy. But I would still love me some HULK SMASH action movie to, and Norton signd, who I love, makes it seem like it has some merrit.

About Toilet Boll, he said he wanted to make the most offensive movie ever and that the movie would be dangerous. So he decided to fill it with all this easy to get offended stuff, So I beg dont get offended, that is what he wants, that would make him feel good and validate his work to him, just ignore it compleatly and hope that he dosen“t have any more "stupid German Money" to make another one. He is a cancer on the film world, The worst kind of filmmaker, he even thought that kicking the ass of some critics in the ring would make them like his movies or whatever the meaning of that was for him. " you see I Uwe Boll, kicked your ass, so you cant disslike my movies no more. hahaha" God I wish him Cancer of the ass.

Posted by: 13thDuke at April 17, 2007 12:22 PM

An Evil Dead remake? YOU..........BASTARDS!!

Posted by: michelle at April 17, 2007 12:35 PM

I'm a bit queasy about Norton's involvement in hulksmash but feel compelled to disagree sharply about Norton's current level of credibility capital. He is easily one of the finest actors and artists of his generation, based just on this sample (not in order of importance):

The Illusionist (critically well received)
25th Hour (excellent, nuanced performance in a complex film)
Fight Club (an icon -- what can be said?)
American History X (a difficult, complex tour-de-force)
Rounders (unsympathetic and thankless role that was very well executed)
The People vs. Larry Flynt (pure innocent idealism pulled off well)
Primal Fear (managed not to be upstaged by no less a ham than fucking Richard Gere in Norton's first major screen role).

Of the less successful efforts, they are generally either well-intentioned indies or concepts that sounded good but just didn't fully execute for reasons that seem beyond his control:

The Italian Job (he was great as the villain)
Red Dragon (Norton captured the novel's character very well)
Down in the Valley (which I liked a great deal)
Everyone Says I Love You (every Hollywood star has to make his or her Woody Allen mistake).

I haven't seen The Painted Veil yet but the reviews have been quite positive overall -- 74% on the Tomatometer.

The Score was a pretty formulaic exercise in the "heist thriller with a twist" genre, but it was entertaining and critically well-received, and again, Ed Norton was excellent.

Inexplicable/inexcusable:

Keeping the Faith (Jenna Elfman? Just stop it.)
Death to Smoochy (but a bizarro comedy with Robin Williams and Catherine Keener probably sounded pretty attractive in 2002)
Kingdom of Heaven (pretty small role -- maybe he lost a bet)

Norton takes interesting roles in a wide range of films -- the movies don't always match up with the talent, but his range is incredible, and he's usually very convincing, despite the high recognizability factor. So get off him already!

Posted by: fb at April 17, 2007 1:02 PM

You kinda made me want to drown in the cereal bowl (or maybe drown Boll?)



I think that Norton, Ricci and Foley can't read...



I think sequels/remakes are a bad idea. (raping classics for a buck... how unfortunate)



Why would you do a prequel (written by some screenwriter) based on a decent movie (that was based on a book) also, what the fuck could it be about? Is there something interesting that happened before that the first film didn't already reveal with its ton of exposition? I think no...



Loved Rushmore (don't love Stiller)



Harrison Ford is too old to be cracking whips... cracking hips is more like it.



And I liked Death to Smoochy.


"It's a rocket ship!"


I love that!

Posted by: Theresa at April 17, 2007 1:29 PM

I read both DaVinci Code and Angels and Demons. While I didn't care for the former, the latter was mildly entertaining. I still won't see the movie, though.

Posted by: superedna at April 17, 2007 1:44 PM

Theresa,
"Why would you do a prequel (written by some screenwriter) based on a decent movie (that was based on a book) also, what the fuck could it be about? Is there something interesting that happened before that the first film didn't already reveal with its ton of exposition? I think no..."

I'm not sure, but I think you're talking about The Da Vinci Code? If you are, just to let you know that Angels and Demons was actually the first novel writeen by Dan Brown with the Robert Langdon character....also, it's actually (in my opinion) a hell of a better read (minus the terrible, made-for-the-movies ending).

And if you weren't talking about The Da Vinci Code, well....carry on.

Posted by: kdm at April 17, 2007 1:48 PM

Oh, well, that is what I was talking about, and it seems that I stuck my foot in it. I shall go and look for angels and demons, because I kinda liked Da Vinci Code.

Sorry about my oversight

Posted by: Theresa at April 17, 2007 2:06 PM

Theresa needs to learn how to stay away from the enter key. Kinda like Michael Jackson needs to stay away from kids...

Except Theresa isn't fucking the enter key and then paying it off...but other than that...yeah stop it Theresa.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 17, 2007 3:08 PM

This all makes me very sad...

Posted by: MJ at April 17, 2007 3:21 PM

I never played Postal, but I played Postal 2. The "plot" was something like you got fired and you have some sort of objectives to complete around town. But the whole "point" of the game was the ludicrous things you could do. These include: grabbing a cat off the street, sticking it on your gun, and using it as your silencer, as well as lighting someone on fire, then putting it out by peeing on them.

It wasn't a good game, and generated less press in terms of offensive games, than grand theft auto 3 managed to. It's crappy nature, and no plot seem to make it the perfect fit for Uwe Boll.

Posted by: Eric at April 17, 2007 3:33 PM

I loved Death to Smoochy. It was so bad it was good. And Edward Norton I thought was awesome as a pseudo-hippy who was really an ass. He captured the role well. I still laugh out loud thinking about some scenes.

Posted by: Rachael at April 17, 2007 3:44 PM

Not surprised that Schwartzman is still living off the fumes of Rushmore.

Posted by: Samantha T at April 17, 2007 4:37 PM

*blushes* yeah, I know, I actually didn't do it on purpose. I had the paragraphs seperated by pressing the enter key, but then when I pressed preview, that didn't show up, so I thought that it only took html, so I added that on top of it. Of course, after I post, I can't edit. So yeah, I feel pretty stupid.

'Tis not a good day for me.

Posted by: Theresa at April 17, 2007 6:14 PM

Saw Lee's Hulk with a friend. At one point she sort of jerked as if she'd just woken up, turned to me, and said, "Wait. Are we still watching this movie?"

It felt like we'd been there for days.

Posted by: Lilly at April 17, 2007 6:36 PM

and the illusionist was horrible. Norton reminded me of Sarah Michelle Gellar in "The Return" - both of their roles were to walk around looking quizically at things.

Ha! Glad to know I'm not the only one who felt that Norton was totally phoning it in for The Illusionist. Look, I think Edward is indeed talented, but him being in a film doesn't make it worth critical acclaim. And yes, he was just there. Giamatti ran roughshod all over the movie, in a good way. Any halfway decent actor could have been Norton's character (don't recall the name).

Posted by: Daphne at April 17, 2007 7:29 PM

I was forced to sit through Ang Lee's Hulk during an English class, for reasons still unknown to me. I would have walked out or turned it off had I been watching it on my own accord, which I never would have been, but we all had to write papers on this banal and tedious atrocity. The only other time I was so bored during a movie was during the Da Vinci Code, but I left that halfway through. That teacher was a sadist.

Posted by: Brianne at April 17, 2007 7:45 PM

Wasn't Evil Dead 2 enough of an Evil Dead remake already?

Posted by: Tim at April 17, 2007 7:45 PM

Ok, it's so comforting to know that other people liked Death to Smoochy. Thanks, guys.

I used to love anything w/ Edward Norton, even the shitfest that was Keeping the Faith. He was good, and Stiller was ok, but Jenna Elfman? Why was she even there?!?

I have a feeling the Hulk will flat out suck. The first one was so depressing and talky...I don't see Norton as the HulkSmash type.

Posted by: Brie at April 17, 2007 9:01 PM

Edward? Ed?

What is this?


I thought we had something here. I know we had some harsh words after keeping the faith, but didn't we work that out? I forgave you for that. I even understood when you did Death to Smoochy. Damnit, I stayed with you through Red Fucking Dragon. And you do this to me? The goddamn HULK?

There are some things I just can't forgive, Edward. I'm sorry.

It's over.


(That out of my system, I'll probably see it. I've got a major talent crush on Edward Norton, ever since the opening scene of Fight Club.)

Posted by: Kallisti! at April 17, 2007 9:36 PM

What the fuck is up with Sam Raimi?

Don't get me wrong, I love the guy and most of his contributions to cinema. But his approach to horror seems to have gone down the shitter since Evil Dead 2.

When he announced the formation of Ghosthouse Pictures, it sounded like a horror fan's wet dream: a small company founded by a horror icon willing to give young up and comers a chance with low budget horror flicks. But then we get the likes of "Boogeyman" and "The Grudge" (as well as their inevitable sequels.

And what's with this bullshit "Evil Dead" remake? Another poster said it best...wasn't "Evil Dead 2" enough of a remake? And I say that with the utmost sense of flattery. But there's no need to turn the reigns over to some dipshit music video director who will sully the good name of Bruce Campbell and the "Evil Dead" franchise.

Oh, the horror of it all. Come on, Sam, you've got enough money to buy the Pope; don't piss away your credibility (you already tried once with "For the Love of the Game"). I'm going to go punch the wall.

Posted by: idiot dentist at April 17, 2007 9:40 PM

"...but Raimi is also writing a script for an Evil Dead remake and shopping for a director. If he actually pulls the trigger on a remake, it may be the biggest disservice to the horror genre of all time."

I am actually going to cry now. I've suffered a lot of remakes in relatively calm silence (well, I haven't become violent, anyway),
but that could be the final straw.

Btw, I met Bruce Campbell at a horror convention, and while I fell even more madly in love with him in that moment, I also thoroughly embarrassed myself by going bright red and voiceless. Top that, biatches! xD

Posted by: Loob at April 18, 2007 1:34 AM

Totally random but, has anyone seen Bubba Ho-Tep? Bruce Campbell as Elvis is the greatest thing I have ever seen.

Posted by: Rachael at April 18, 2007 1:55 AM

Theresa...c'mon. You're going to need to be stronger than this on the comments section. I'd be willing to be that you're relatively new to this site or at least the comments section. Don't explain yourself! Defend yourself! :P

This is all in good fun by the way...and yes. It's not a good day for you. But that's the beauty of Pajiba. You can lay a stinker one day and then come back tomorrow and blow us all away.

Posted by: PissBoy at April 18, 2007 9:04 AM

I'm ashamed to say, I liked the first Hulk movie. It was Ang Lee, which is always good, and it introduced me to Eric Bana...and a girl has to be grateful for such a thing.

Posted by: Fionna at April 18, 2007 10:16 AM

Bubba Ho-Tep rocked, Rachael! :D
This should excite you: Bubba Nosferatu and the Curse of the She-Vampires (2008) (pre-production)
Bruce as Elvis Presley/Sebastjin Haff.
"This prequel to Bubba Ho-Tep finds Elvis shooting a film in Louisiana when he runs afoul of a coven of she-vampires. "

I especially loved JFK in Bubba Ho-Tep, he was such a cuddly Grandpa type. I was so sad when Ossie Davis died. :(

Posted by: Loob at April 18, 2007 11:08 AM

Man, I'm actually a little sad. Kids in the Hall is one of my all time favorite shows and was only improved upon by Dave Foley's Quebecois hooker. First that awful improv show that just started and now an Uwe movie? Dave! For cripes sake! You did News Radio!

Posted by: Lizzy at April 18, 2007 11:43 AM

I see nothing wrong with Ed as Bruce. Nothing. I loved the original movie.

Posted by: Candy at April 19, 2007 4:47 PM