web
counter
 

Mary Jane Watson Will Likely Have Freckles and Dark Eyeliner

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (19)



Emma-Stone-mary-jane.jpg

So, it’s official, according to Deadline: Sony has offered the role of Mary Jane Watson in the Spider-man reboot to Emma Stone. The offer is “imminent,” according to Deadline, which is probably their way of giving the offer some newsworthy urgency.

But she still hasn’t accepted. Will she? Most likely. It’s a move that’s good for her career, and it’s good for the franchise. Unfortunately, it’s probably not that great for the rest of us, who like to see Emma Stone in more varied roles, those minor studio movies like Zombieland and Easy A that rely more on character than on gimmickry, and in that regard, Stone is one of the more dynamic young actresses working. I hate to see her sucked into a major franchise so early on, before she’s been properly defined as something more than simply Mary Jane Watson. She’s got another movie coming out, Help, which hopefully will help her to create an identity separate from this series. Fingers crossed.

Word is, however, that Mary Jane’s role in the first movie is more of a minor one. Peter Parker’s major love interest in the first film will be Gwen Stacey (played by Bryce Dallas Howard in the Raimi flick). The short list for that role has been narrowed to “Glee’s” Dianna Agron (thumbs down), Mia Wasikowska (thumbs up), Georgina Haig (who?) and Dominique McElligott (double who?).

I hate to say it, because I — like most of you — despise the idea of a Spider-man reboot so soon after the Raimi franchise, but, after seeing Garfield in The Social Network, and Emma Stone in Easy A and, Marc Webb’s (500) Days of Summer, I’m getting the distinct feeling that Sony may not actually screw this up.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Punishment Comes One Way Or Another | "True Grit" Teaser Post | Pajiba Love 04/10/10 | Still Less Embarrassing Than 30 Seconds To Mars









Comments

Realistically there's no way Emma Stone can turn down this role. Even if you think she's too good to be sucked up into a franchise (she is), she still isn't so big a name that she can turn down the paycheck and the guaranteed sequels work.

I do like the idea of starting of with Gwen Stacy. Question is are they bringing the Green Goblin back if that's the case? And if so, will they fix the damn suit this time?

Posted by: Fredo at October 4, 2010 11:50 AM

Yes, because Zombieland was the kind of quiet, well-written character study upon which Oscar-winning careers are built. Why, no less than Dame Judi Dench had her first starring role in Hell on Wheels, the intense, character-driven story of a nun who forms an all-girl biker gang to get revenge on the men who burned down her convent. The BAFTA-winning film also featured a then-unknown Helen Mirren as "Shotgun Sally."

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at October 4, 2010 11:50 AM

That was a very impressive display of sarcasm Tracer Bullet.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at October 4, 2010 11:53 AM

I hope she accepts. She's a good choice for the role and may rinse away the awful Dunst that's been coating my brain since Raimi's first Spiderman film.

Posted by: Spender at October 4, 2010 11:53 AM

I hope this movie sucks Green Goblin dick.

Posted by: logan at October 4, 2010 11:55 AM

And I see we have moved on to single servings of vitriol.

It must be Monday.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at October 4, 2010 11:57 AM

And if it must suck Green Goblin dick, I hope the dick has better CGI renderings than those in the 2002 movie.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at October 4, 2010 11:59 AM

Sorry but they have ruined the Spider man of my youth and I hate them for it.

Posted by: logan at October 4, 2010 12:03 PM

As long as there's plenty-o-emo I'm all for the reboot. I mean, really, who doesn't love whiny spidey?

Posted by: admin at October 4, 2010 12:09 PM

If you're going to be all sour grapes, logan, at least spell "Spider-Man" correctly.

/pedantic nerd

Posted by: Bates at October 4, 2010 12:11 PM

I miss the good old days when people just complained about the comics.

Posted by: superasente at October 4, 2010 12:30 PM

spider Man?

*drives fanboys to suicide*

Posted by: figgy at October 4, 2010 12:37 PM

"espayder man"

Posted by: Fredo at October 4, 2010 12:39 PM

Dustin, it's time to remove your brain container from out of your waste-relief valve.

You know when you hear Emma Stone utter the immortal words, "Face it, tiger, you've just hit the jackpot," you'll be needing a change of pants like the rest of us.

Posted by: RobP at October 4, 2010 12:43 PM

I need a change of pants right now.

Posted by: superasente at October 4, 2010 12:47 PM

I have no interest in this movie. There is no reason Spider-Man needs an origin story twice in one decade. Good for Emma, this is the kind of break actors and actresses dream of. If she's not an idiot she will be set for life and then some and still be able to make movies of her choosing. But unless the reviews call this the greatest movie of all time I'm still not going to bother.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 4, 2010 1:31 PM

It's one thing to remake a movie when some new technology comes around to make it better (silent to sound, BW to color, stereo to surround sound, Harryhausen to CGI, OK, scrap that last one), but to remake a movie that just came out last year (SHUT UP, that's what it feels like) is just lazy money grabbing.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 4, 2010 1:46 PM

She'll always be Jules to me.

Posted by: bobbyboxhead at October 4, 2010 6:12 PM

Dianna Agron is fucking hot, and a wet dream fantasy of mine. I'm voting for her.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at October 4, 2010 11:09 PM