web
counter
 

Eliza%20Dushkudafd.jpg
When Did Eliza Dushku Gain Indie Cred?


Why Don’t She Bring It On No More? / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | February 27, 2009 | Comments (14)


OK. Honestly, I’m not trying to harsh on the Dushku mellow this week. She seems like a very nice person (she’s a Boston girl, after all — oh, well. Nevermind), I just don’t find her to be a particularly compelling actress. She was infinitely serviceable in her role on “Buffy,” but pardon my assholery: She’s kind of out of her depth when she’s not taking off most of her clothes and playing the pin-up object of the Popoholic sex fantasy. When you’re taking off your clothes that often, you’re bound to be hiding something. Here, it’s Dushku’s acting talent, which cannot be found beneath her mid-riff. And I’m sorry, folks, but it’s hard to respect a woman who starred in a Nickelback video.

Anyway, the “Dollhouse” star, who was somehow able to finagle a production deal out of FOX that ultimately landed her back into the hesitantly outstretched arms of Joss Whedon (“You want to make another show with me. Really? Umm … I guess”), is now producing a film. Apparently, they’ll let anyone do it if you have the money to pony up for the rights.

In this case, Dushku secured exclusive rights to the life story of Robert Mapplethorpe, which she’s gonna translate into a movie. Surely, you remember who Mapplethorpe wa? He was a controversial artist back in the 80s who painted a self-portrait with a bullwhip in his ass, as well as a photograph of one dude pissing in another dude’s mouth. And while he stretched the obscenity boundaries, he also became the conservatives’ whipping boy every time they wanted to cut funding for the National Endowment of Arts (which had funded an exhibition of his). Mapplethorpe was most famous, otherwise, for portraits of rock stars. He died, in Boston, in 1989 from AIDS.

The film, working under the title The Perfect Moment (an allusion to that controversial NEA-funded exhibition), will be directed by Ondi Timoner (DIG!), a Sundance darling, of sorts. And fortunately, since Mapplethorpe was gay, there shouldn’t be any love interest parts lying around for Dushku.

Here’s your former glory, Dushku?









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Cannonball 5K Winner | Sunshine Cleaning Trailer









Comments

I guess friendship with Whedon has its perks.

The subject matter sounds interesting, so let's hope she's a better producer than she is an actress.

Posted by: CIndy at February 27, 2009 10:08 AM

"she's a Boston girl, after all -- oh, well. Nevermind"

Ha. Funny.

Someone's sleeping in the fucking garage next time they come to visit.

Posted by: TK at February 27, 2009 10:31 AM

Well Rowles the good thing is that you don't have a picture of a man laying down in a compromising position like you usually do, baby steps.

Posted by: Pookie at February 27, 2009 10:41 AM

And I'm sorry, folks, but it's hard to respect a woman who starred in a Nickelback video.

So that's what that smell was. She's dead to me.

Posted by: jM at February 27, 2009 10:49 AM

I just don't find her to be a particularly compelling actress.

Thaaaank you. I was so freaking confused by all the hoopla surrounding her in Dollhouse-I get that it's Whedon and people go apeshit over him, but Dushku? Ehhh.

Posted by: Sabrina at February 27, 2009 11:06 AM

Surely, you remember who Mapplethorpe wa? He was a controversial artist back in the 80s who painted a self-portrait with a bullwhip in his ass

Nope. Mapplethrope was a photographer through and through-- he photographed the bullwhip in the asshole self-portrait, not painted it. Did you know he photographer Arnold Schwarzenegger nakedly and homoerotically back in the day? Ahh, Mapplethorpe, you left us with so many precious gifts.

How on earth they're going to make a movie about Mapplethorpe even remotely passible for an R rating is beyond me.

Posted by: Tatiana at February 27, 2009 12:00 PM

Let me think how would an amazingly attractive talent challenged woman get multiple parts and staring roles on shows that never go anywhere ?

O yeah by being filled out like a job application.

Posted by: gilp at February 27, 2009 12:03 PM

Is he the guy who's hooking up with hot models on ___Tallloving Co m___ ? actually there're lots sexy people there, Online chat, blogs, forums, flirtation and messages! Start an May-December romance just a click away! Whether for heat or passion, you are gonna be surprised what you might be end with!!LOL

Posted by: Erica at February 27, 2009 12:24 PM

The irony of the conservative response to Mapplethorpe was, of course, that most of us never would have heard of him otherwise. And I think the one photo that really drove them mad had no human subject at all. It depicted a crucifix in a glass of urine. I have to admit that I don't "get it." But it's a good thing for the world that art isn't dictated by my limited understanding. Or anyone else's.

Posted by: dma at February 27, 2009 12:28 PM

Just like the incorrect statement in the article above-- the one saying Mapplethorpe painted rather than photographed-- I just can't let this go:

dma: The crucifix in a glass of urine photograph was by the artist Andres Serrano, entitled "Piss Christ."

Serrano is from a very different generation of artists than Mapplethorpe, but he was also the recipient of an NEA grant, and his piece "Piss Christ" was used in the conservative argument to abolish the NEA's individual-based grants, leaving us in our current state where there is practically zero government-based art funding.

Posted by: Tatiana at February 27, 2009 12:35 PM

Mapplethorpe may only be famous for his "obscene" works but he produced exquisite floral, still life and nude photographs too.

Posted by: Mrs. Adams at February 27, 2009 1:52 PM

"Here, it's Dushku's acting talent, which cannot be found beneath her mid-riff."

I'm confused, are you saying Eliza Dushku's vagina can't act?

Posted by: ali at February 27, 2009 9:18 PM

Bring It On = One of the best films of all time

Posted by: returnofthesmith at February 28, 2009 1:04 AM

I read Whedon wrote the part with her in mind. She he WANTED someone who can't act to play the role of someone who can't act.

Brilliant.

Posted by: bucdaddy at February 28, 2009 11:20 PM