web
counter
 

Now It's Better Than Real, It's a Real Imitation

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (14)



frankenstein_profile.jpg

Will we get a good Frankenstein’s monster film in the modern era? Seriously, what’s the last good film based on Shelley’s classic character? Young Frankenstein? Monster Squad? Both phenomenal films, but neither particularly serious, and make no mistake, Frankenstein is serious stuff.

Well, the next round of adaptations is coming from 1019 Entertainment, who are pondering creating a franchise based on a series of novels by shlock-horror author extraordinaire, Dean Koontz. The series takes the original creature and puts him in modern-day New Orleans, and has a thoroughly bizarre storyline and cast of characters. I’ve read the first two, “The Prodigal Son” and “City of Night” and they were, much like most of Koontz’s work, long on ideas and short on execution (although I maintain that “Strangers” is a pretty good book).. Still, there are worse ways to spend a plane ride, I guess.

The first book’s synopsis should tell you all you need to know about how weird it is:

Dr. Frankenstein has survived into the 21st century, masquerading as biotech tycoon Victor Helios. Helios wants to replace flawed humanity with his New Race, people born and fermented in pods, their personalities programmed by him, their imperfections removed in the lab. But at least one of his creations has become a serial killer, trying to assemble the perfect woman from parts of many. Like expert plate-spinners, the authors set up a dizzying array of narrative viewpoints and cycle through them effortlessly. These include one of Victor’s creations who suffers from autism and is trying to understand it; a cloned priest who serves as a clandestine member of Helios’s army; Helios’s custom-made wife, unique among his creations in that she’s allowed to feel shame; and, tying it all together, a classic buddy-cop set of homicide detectives who slowly come to understand that the butcher they’re chasing isn’t quite human.

Yeah. I know. In the series, the Monster calls himself Deucalion and is something of an enigmatic hero. Oh, and he can teleport. No, seriously. He can fucking teleport.

In any event, the novels (or at least the two out of six that I read) are strange and overstuffed but I can see them being entertaining on the big screen if done right (that’ll happen, I’m sure). It was previously adapted into a 2004 TV movie for USA called Frankenstein, or Dean Koontz’s Frankenstein, or Diet Stephen King’s Frankenstein, or some shit. It was directed by Marcus Nispel (the new Conan - uh oh…) and had the kookiest cast ever — Parker Posey, Adam Goldberg and, of course, Michael Madsen. All I know is that I watched it, and it was fucking horrendous. I mean… think of the worst Sci-Fi Channel movie you’ve ever seen. Ever. Then punch yourself in the face and jump into a vat of enraged scorpions who only like to sting human genitals. It’s a billion times worse than all of things combined. It was seriously fucking terrible. You can find a trailer for it on IMDB, but I wouldn’t waste your time. It actually makes it look decent. It’s not.

Anyway, my guess is the first one will flop and the concept will disappear into obscurity. Besides, it can’t be worse than Van Helsing. NOTHING will ever be worse than Van Helsing.

(h/t: Slashfilm)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Tarantino Slavery Western | Happy Tears Trailer









Comments

What about Guillermo Del Toro's Frankenstein? He's the only one I trust with an adaptation of something so wholly beautiful. Also: This.Sounds.Ridiculous.

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at February 17, 2010 10:09 AM

I read part of a Dean Koontz book once. I've never picked up another.

The series takes the original creature and puts him in modern-day New Orleans,

Sounds familiar.

Posted by: admin at February 17, 2010 10:13 AM

I have but two words:

Frankenstein Unbound

Posted by: Anna von Murderpuppet at February 17, 2010 10:14 AM

she’s allowed to feel shame
---
I can't think of a single reason you'd do this unless, for some reason, you want her to feel bad about the anal.

Posted by: , at February 17, 2010 10:15 AM

Oh why can't they just leave that book alone? Hmm? If they can't do it right, I say just don't bother at all.

NOTHING will ever be worse than Van Helsing. Truer words, my friend... I have to admit I had a shitload of fun watching it. It was a free outdoor cinema with hundreds of uni students. Heckling, catcalls, hysterical laughter and just general monkeying around improved the experience.

Posted by: Joker at February 17, 2010 10:20 AM

Besides, it can’t be worse than Van Helsing. NOTHING will ever be worse than Van Helsing.

Thank you.

THANK YOU!

Posted by: ChristianH at February 17, 2010 10:24 AM

It’s a billion times worse than all of things combined.

All of things? That's hugely bad.

Posted by: coryo at February 17, 2010 10:30 AM

I actually looked forward to that USA movie (Parker Posey!) and wound up bailing after about fourteen minutes. It really was just that fucking horrible.

it can’t be worse than Van Helsing. NOTHING will ever be worse than Van Helsing.

Don't tempt the gods like that, TK. The gods are nothing if not sadistic.

Posted by: Jerce at February 17, 2010 10:34 AM

As a one-time Koontz fan (from the era of Strangers, Watchers, Midnight, and Lightning), I developed the following Koontz drinking game.
Take a shot for the following words:
macadam, keening, preternatural, Rockport.
and for the following:
anytime someone distributes the contents of a gym bag to his or her pockets
any reference to firearms purchased and held in readiness without ever being used in anger
mention of the protagonists being middle-aged, including a scarred but sensitive man and a fiery yet vulnerable woman.
If you must get into any of his more recent work, take a bottle of Jack with you to wash down the Neocon preachiness.

Posted by: laredo at February 17, 2010 11:35 AM

So the name sounded familiar and I had to look it up. This is taken from Wiki (the most wonderfully accurate site ever):

"Deucalion (Ancient Greek: Δευκαλίων) was a son of Prometheus and Pronoia. When the anger of Zeus was ignited against the hubris of the Pelasgians, Zeus decided to put an end to the Bronze Age with the Deluge. For Lycaon, the king of Arcadia had sacrificed a boy to Zeus. Zeus was appalled by this cannibal offering. So Zeus set upon loosing a deluge, where the rivers would run in torrents and the sea would encroach rapidly on the coastal plain, engulf the foothills with spray, and wash everything clean. Deucalion was then saved from this deluge, by the aid of his father Prometheus, like his Biblical equivalent Noah and the Mesopotamian counterpart Utnapishtim by building an ark."

So now I'm just confused. As for the story? The Koontz one. It sounds like there is just way too much shit going on. I like the idea of a Frankenstein like serial killer, but one that can teleport? Where the fuck did that come from?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at February 17, 2010 11:45 AM

Dude has a thing for teleportation. Did anyone read "The Bad Place" (might be "A Bad Place") about the incestuous, teleporting, animal-mind-inhabiting freaks; whose mother was a hermaphrodite that impregnated herself after imbibing copious amounts of acid? I did. It was a WILD ride.

Anyhow, dude has a thing for teleporting; that's all I'm sayin'.

Actually, I'm also saying that dude has issues and thank god he has found an outlet for his creativity, because otherwise I fear for the safety of the world. I believe Dean Koontz can teleport.

Posted by: superasente at February 17, 2010 3:05 PM

Heh. Diet Stephen King.

Posted by: Royalewithcheese at February 17, 2010 4:17 PM

I don't know why, but every time I hear or read a mention of Dean Koontz, one thing, and one thing only, pops into my mind:

"Affleck, you the bomb in Phantoms yo!"

Posted by: Groundloop at February 17, 2010 8:48 PM

Suit y'self, I'm easy.

Posted by: , at February 17, 2010 11:34 PM