free counter with statistics Katherine Heigl Turns Down Valentine's Day | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

katherine_heigl_emmy.jpg
Katherine Heigl is an A**hole, Part a Million


Casting News / Stacey Nosek

Trade News | May 27, 2009 | Comments (44)


Katherine Heigl has reportedly turned down a part in the upcoming Valentine’s Day — an ensemble cast directed by Garry Marshall featuring the likes of Julia Roberts, Jennifer Garner, Anne Hathaway, Ashton Kutcher, Shirley MacLaine and Bradley Cooper — because they weren’t willing to shell out the big bucks for her. God. Don’t these people know a star when they see one?

An insider told Page Six, “Producers at New Line originally had Katherine on their casting list. They wanted her for the project, but during the talks, she came back demanding $3 million for the role.”

Our source calls that number “ridiculous” because the movie has “an ensemble cast where there is really no one lead role. Actors are only filming between three and 14 days, and no other actors asked for nearly that amount.”

A rep for Heigl told Page Six, “The story is ludicrous. Early negotiations are a daily occurrence in this business, and just for clarification, Katherine walked away from this project for multiple reasons.” A spokeswoman for New Line had “no comment.” (Source)

Now before Katherine Heigl’s personal fan club goes jumping up my ass like always, notice her rep didn’t exactly deny the story — just called it ludicrous. You know what I think is ludicrous? That Katherine Heigl turned down this film even if the offer consisted of her getting paid purely in smelling the farts of Shirley MacLaine and Julia Roberts. And that, my friends, is why Heigl will always be the poor man’s My Best Friend’s Wedding Julia Roberts and never the poor man’s Erin Brockovich Julia Roberts.

(Cross-posted on WIMB)


Kasdan to Direct Bad Teacher | Songs You Hate But Secretely Love



Comments

You know, I used to really like her. She's attractive. She's got big boobies.

This website has single handedly made me hate her. I hope you're happy.

Posted by: superasente at May 27, 2009 7:37 PM

Posted by: superasente at May 27, 2009 7:37 PM

The website didn't make you hate her, she made you hate her. The website just made you aware of it.

Posted by: Chugga at May 27, 2009 7:39 PM

I would like to take this opportunity to take a nice and steamy virtual poop on SKANKCANCER and all her fans.

You people are the reason why the terrorists are winning and communism is still around.

Fuck you very much.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 27, 2009 7:48 PM

It's like - I want to like her? Then I come here and you people make it impossible. Now I have to remove 27 Dresses from my Netflix queue.

Thanks Pajiba!

Posted by: greer at May 27, 2009 8:30 PM

Don't take too much stock in what you read on "Page 6". It's just barely a notch above "The National Enquirer".

Posted by: Dano at May 27, 2009 8:34 PM

I like her. I'll always like her. Nyah.

No, I don't watch Grey's Anatomy -- I don't really care for soap operas -- but I suspect most people are confusing the character with the actress. Hollywood is a target-rich environment for ego-bashing, so there must be an alternate reason why it's chic to pick on Heigl.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at May 27, 2009 8:37 PM

greer,

Don't feel bad about removing that trash from your queue. I watched it on a sick day and felt worse.

Posted by: Kate at May 27, 2009 8:38 PM

"...but I suspect most people are confusing the character with the actress..."


Eh, no.

Her uber-cunt rep has been legendary since waaaaaay back when she bitched and moaned while working on Roswell.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 27, 2009 8:44 PM

Oh, Roswell. Oh, WB.

Posted by: Kate at May 27, 2009 8:45 PM

Oh for fuck's sake barbadoslim, the point wasn't about liking or disliking Heigl. The point was that it's wrong to reduce a person to her sexuality, especially in a negative way. The whole goddamn argument revolved around the inappropriateness of 'skankcancer' as a nickname, considering she's simply a horrendous jerk and not in any way "skanky." Not to mention it's fucked up in general to slut-shame women.

The nickname is demeaning, it's wrong, and it's just fucking lazy. I- like the rest of the "fan club" to which you so disingenuously refer- expected better from pajiba, and we said as much.
So give it a fucking rest, would you? You aren't funny, you aren't clever, and the type of 'humor' you offer certainly isn't original.

Posted by: serena at May 27, 2009 8:53 PM

We are just going to have to agree to disagree on this one, friend.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 27, 2009 8:59 PM

I'm not your friend, buddy.

Posted by: serena at May 27, 2009 9:04 PM

Serena-1
Dark Lord Of Hate And Misogyny-0

Go,Serena!

Posted by: Spender at May 27, 2009 9:06 PM

I'm not your buddy, guy.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 27, 2009 9:06 PM

This sounds bogus, because her salary for both 27 Dresses and The Ugly Truth is listed at $6 million. If that's accurate, I don't see where asking for $3 mill as an opening negotiation is ridiculous. Sounds like someone's got their panties in a bundle and from what's written here I wouldn't say it's Heigl.

Oh, wait, I'd better jump on the Heigl-Hate bandwagon before someone calls me a troll again.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at May 27, 2009 9:10 PM

And it doesn't matter what you say to me, at the end of the day Heigl will still be a raging cunt who will most probably succumb to lung cancer on account her 5-pack a day habit, and a HORRIBLE actress.

Stick THAT up your full bush.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at May 27, 2009 9:11 PM

Nosek you’re absolutely right, who does Heigl think she is that she can negotiate a contract? She should keep her mouth closed and take what the men are offering her, how dare a woman act tough during contract negotiations?

P.S. I though the word “Skank Cancer” was banned because when I used it sometime ago I was roundly denounced by virtually everyone here as being insensitive to cancer survivors?

Posted by: Guess Who! at May 27, 2009 9:21 PM

The consistent Heigl-bashing 'round these parts just makes me want to defend her more. Not that I think she's the greatest thing to happen to movies or television ever, but I think she's harmless and the fact that Pajiba goes out of its way to shit on her reputation whenever they can is the one predominantly sour note over the whole website.

Posted by: whatBENwatches at May 27, 2009 9:22 PM

Go Serena. Your manner of speech makes me horny... That's all I have to say. I'm not getting into this argument. I don't really care for Heigl or how much she gets paid. And I don't see why you should either. I'm pretty sure you WOULD act in a film for much less money if you could but you're stuck in an office only dreaming of how it would be like to make a million, let alonse several millions. Why get your panties in a twist about it? Rich actors can take their fat pay packets and stuff them.

Posted by: barf at May 27, 2009 9:29 PM

……In this corner the Dark Lord of Hate, ladies and gentlemen, I give you, from parts unknown, Barbadooooooooooooooo Slimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, Slimmmmmmmmmmmmmm!

…….And in this corner the young upstart, the future of pajiba, the pimp with a limp, ladies and gentlemen, I give you, The Biggggggggg Spenderrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!


Ok guys you know the rules, no hitting below the belt unless it is absolutely necessary, and protect yourself at all times, now when the bell rings come out swinging, and good luck to the both of you.

Posted by: Guess Who! at May 27, 2009 9:32 PM

Heigl is a self-absorbed hypocrite with bitch-points to spare. Words like skankcancer cannot begin to describe the horrible cunt that she is.

I heard she blows cigarette smoke in kittens' faces, too.

Posted by: Venture82 at May 27, 2009 9:35 PM

Wait, didn't the 'Jiban community already roundly condemn Valentine's Day based on the premise and casting news alone? And now we're shitting on Heigl for not bending over backwards to be in that same movie?

Someone explain this to me in small words, because I'm having trouble understanding exactly why Katherine Heigl is a bitch in this specific instance. Not any other instance, just this one.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at May 27, 2009 9:37 PM

Serena wrote, "...it's wrong to reduce a person to her sexuality..."

Now I feel bad for commenting on her magnificent, heaving breasts. Not THAT bad, but still bad.

Posted by: superasente at May 27, 2009 9:40 PM

Genny, that is a good point.

We are so schizo.

Posted by: Kate at May 27, 2009 9:44 PM

She does have big boobies

Posted by: Ari at May 27, 2009 10:11 PM

We are so schizo.

No, we are not. We are a site visited by tons of people with differing opinions, run by a group of people with differing opinions. There is nothing contradictory or schizo about that.

I for one would appreciate it if folks didn't automatically lump us all together like that. It tends to breed so-called rebels that feel like they are bucking some sort of system where there is none.

Someone explain this to me in small words, because I'm having trouble understanding exactly why Katherine Heigl is a bitch in this specific instance.

From my powers of deduction, it seems the problem is that Ms. Heigl has hardly shown herself to be worth such a substantial pay, especially considering that 1) she doesn't have a role that demands that much commitment and 2) the other stars (namely the ones who have proven themselves in the box office: Roberts, Hathaway, and MacLaine) didn't ask for as much. She also hasn't done herself any favors with the....for lack of a better term, ill-considered statements she has made on past projects.

Simply put, she seems to be too much risk for that much reward. Yeah, the movie may be lousy, but even lousy movies don't have to shoot themselves in the foot like that.

That should answer your query, Genny. It is either that, or they just don't want her working anymore.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 27, 2009 10:18 PM

Whew, calm down. Tiny phrase. Little comment. Internet board. No big deal.

Posted by: Kate at May 27, 2009 10:28 PM

V, I can kinda see that, but per my imdb research Heigl was already down to 50% what she's been making with that offer. I'm betting they approached her before they secured a couple of the other stars, but with the names they had when she came back with the $3 mill number they were like "you know what, thanks but no thanks".

Or I could be wrong and she could be a totally horrible person. Whatever.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at May 27, 2009 10:39 PM

I will say, not to defend Heigl, that Page Six is often Rupert Murdoch-controlled bullshit.

Posted by: ChristianH at May 27, 2009 10:56 PM

I still don't hate her. I just don't care. Donald Trump is still much more deserving of contempt than pretty much anyone in Hollywood.

Katherine Heigl would have to demand $3 million for footage of herself taking a big, steaming dump to be anywhere near the most assholish person in America. She may get there one day, she's still young, but she's not there yet.

Everyone on any "reality" show is more of an affront to our sensibilities than Heigl has ever been so far. Hell, Oprah is more guilty of it than Heigl is.

Posted by: Slash at May 27, 2009 11:07 PM

Fun little tangents aside, Heigl turned down a role that would require her to work for 3-14 days alongside Roberts, MacLaine and Hathaway (that's right, I'm including Hathaway, she's fucking great).

Let's assume the worst possible situation for Heigl - imagine it's a tiny role, the paycheck is $0 and the script sucks. Regardless of that, it's a job that is done in 14 days, and she would get to work with great people.

She's still retarded for turning it down, even if you give her all the benefit of the doubt in the world.

Oh, and as the original Pajiba article points out, He's Just Not That Into You made almost $100mil. If Heigl's representation could have just gotten her a nice percentage, she would have gotten a lovely paycheck anyway. If her agent can't get her 1% of a movie's profits, she needs a new agent. And if she can't find 14 days to work with that cast and get a million dollars for the fucking priveledge, I'm back to calling her a retard.

Posted by: Steve at May 27, 2009 11:09 PM

Children, children, play nice. Just remember Pajiba's motto: Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People.

Me, I kind of like Heigl in the things I've seen her in. I quit watching Gray's because of the stupid thing with Dead Denny, but she didn't write that. Smoking? I smoked 3 packs a day for 20 yeats before I quit. None of you smoke? Really?

I have been on the fringes of showbizness for 40 years now, (community theatre, opera choruses), and I can't even begin to imagine life with the paps clicking away every time I left the house.

I'm willing to give her a break. However if any of you feel particularly bitchy, knock yourselves out.

-Ralphie

Posted by: ralphie at May 27, 2009 11:30 PM

Now, why'd you have to go ragging on My Best Friend's Wedding when Julia Roberts made several much cheesier and more Heigl-esque romcoms? Runaway Bride, America's Sweethearts!, c'mon!!! (Sorry, I guess I just have a more special place in my heart for MBFW than I thought..)

Posted by: Caro at May 27, 2009 11:46 PM

Whew, calm down. Tiny phrase. Little comment. Internet board. No big deal.

I am sorry for that, but it just irritates me when folks start referring to the entire site as one entity, as if we can't contradict and conflict with each other. I really didn't mean to direct that at you.

Posted by: Vermillion at May 28, 2009 12:09 AM

You know what, after reading that casting list, I wouldn't want to work on that movie either.

Did I just defend the killer of rainbows!? How many hail godtopuses is that?

Posted by: admin at May 28, 2009 1:06 AM

What admin said.

Posted by: figgy at May 28, 2009 2:31 AM

Oh god, not this debate again. She's an averagely talented actor who isn't taking part in a film that sounds absolutely fuck-awful. Why so much hate?

Posted by: Caspar at May 28, 2009 7:17 AM

She's just another pretty, marginally talented, thinks too highly of herself Hollywood spoiled hag.

Posted by: Zeiss at May 28, 2009 9:09 AM

Heigl will never be on my it list. Unless it's an it list of people I will be putting in my crosshairs. She's a terrible actress who makes terrible movies and stars in a terrible TV show for American houses full of clucking office hens and their pussy-whipped husbands/boyfriends.

Someone said she has "big boobies." Yes fine...her body is pretty good, but her face looks like a Mogwai fucked an old set of my grandfather's dentures after they'd been dipped in dogshit.

Posted by: PissBoy at May 28, 2009 10:02 AM

Why is Heigl the breakout star of Grey's Anatomy anyway? Can't we write a letter and make that brunette actress who played the semi-lesbi doctor lady be more famouser? I think her character's name is Callie?

Yeah. She's dead sexy. Why not her instead? It'd save us a lot of argumentation.

Posted by: Why do mommy & daddy yell? at May 28, 2009 10:49 AM

Heigl is a boring and mediocre actress, but I can think of far more fame-whorish people to hate on: Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Hulk Hogan and family, Heidi Montag and Spencer Pratt...

I dunno, at least Rainbow Killer keeps her panties on and doesn't make out with her husband in front of cameras at a 99 cent shop or a pizza joint.

Posted by: Bonnie at May 28, 2009 1:21 PM

While Heigl is allowed to negotiate her contract, I don't think she deserves it simply because she's not a great actress. She's mediocre at best.

I can live with the Isaiah Washington comments she made and her lousy films, but she lost any respect from me with that crack about the writing being lousy on Grey's; which is why she turned down the Emmy nod. It was tacky, and a cheap shot to make. And as as we have seen from the ridiculous plots they've given her, never screw with the people who write your lines.

Posted by: Brie at May 28, 2009 1:47 PM

i never really hated her. i heard shit about her and every story i hear about her is bad. with that said, i've always disliked her. she's hot and has nice tits but she's not that good an actress. i think the thing i disliked about her the most was when she got married she all of a sudden started giving advice on how a marriage works. she was married for all of like 15 minutes and she's an expert? the reason i don't hate her for it is because all the E!, ok mag, people, (insert gossip rag/website here) assholes started talking to her about it what advice she could give to couples. all of them including her are douche bags. it doesn't surprise me that she would be a bitch, she sounds like a bitch. i don't think much of the other chicks in the movie except for anne hathaway but considering the company she was going to be in she should have taken what they were offering. every single one of those women in that movie make way more than she does, julia roberts alone is like hollywood royalty. she's not even the poor mans julia roberts. she's the homeless mans julia roberts

Posted by: DoormanDoormanDoorman at May 28, 2009 5:11 PM

Why Do Mommy and Daddy, THANK YOU for acknowledging the awesomeness that is Sara Ramirez. Her character is much more interesting than Heigel's. Plus she won a Tony for her role as the Lady of the Lake in Spamalot

Posted by: Empress of All the Russias at May 31, 2009 2:28 AM