web
counter
 

Yup. Again.

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (50)



Picture-138.jpg

Really?

No, really?

(Sigh)

Kate Beckinsale, who was once the indie darling of the world before she decided to convert herself to a full-blown sexpot, is apparently contractually obligated to once again portray the character of Selene in the fourth entry in the increasingly shitty Underworld franchise. For those who haven’t seen the movies, they suck. All of them. The first one was mildly entertaining in parts, the second one was painfully stupid, and the third went straight to video, and it didn’t even deserve that. Beckinsale is completely wooden, Scott Speedman, her dreamboat co-star makes her look like fucking Meryl Streep, and the third featured Rhona Mitra, an actress who’s most well-known for getting ogled while topless in the horrendous Hollow Man. The only even remotely redeeming factors in any of them have been the recurring role of Bill Nighy, and the presence of Michael Sheen (even though he wasn’t particularly good in them).

I guess what I’m saying is, I didn’t particularly care for the movies. What has always befuddled me is how director Len Wiseman (who is responsible for the first two) managed to fuck up such a killer concept. An underground war between vampires and werewolves? Kate Beckinsale in black vinyl? Bill Nighy? I mean, it’s a fucking slam dunk. Except that, oh right, Wiseman also couldn’t direct his thumb to find his own ass. Asshole. Way to fuck it up for everyone.

ANYWAY. The coming of Underworld 4: The Suckening isn’t news. But the news is that apparently Beckinsale is obligated to do the fourth, though she doesn’t want to (possibly due to the aforementioned sucking). According to the boys at Bloody Disgusting, she’s “trying to find a way out of the film — or at least have a smaller role in order to “pass the torch” to one of her kindred.” Screenwriter John Hlavin is quoted as saying, “It will satisfy old fans and excite new audiences, meaning that we don’t want to redo the first three movies, so steps are being taken to honor what fans have loved but at the same time introduce fresh elements.”

Motherfucker, it’s not James Bond. Don’t delude yourself into thinking that there’s a ravenous audience tapping their feet and hoping oh-so-much that there’ll be another Underworld movie. Most people are just hoping to see Beckinsale’s ass in leather again, and maybe see a big fucking wolf tear someone’s head off. Expectations aren’t exactly high.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Jon Stewart Appears on Bill O'Relly's Show | American Psycho: The Musical









Comments

I doubt Beckinsale wants out because of the suck seeing as how Wiseman is her husband. That could be an awkward conversation.

Beckinsale: I don't have time for a 4th. I'm just SUPER busy right now.

Wiseman: Um. We live in the same place. I see you in the house. You don't have shit going on.

Beckinsale: Ok to be honest, I'm not busy. You're directing sucks.

Wiseman: Whaaaaaaaaaaaa?

Beckinsale: Uh...hey! Look! Found my Seline costume. Check out my boobs.

Wiseman: What were we talking about?

Yeah. Maybe it would be less awkward than I thought.

Posted by: NameTBD at February 4, 2010 10:14 AM

I think one of the (many) issues with the third one was that, hadn't we seen the entire plot in flashback anyway in the first one? Or at least I felt I had. It didn't add anything new. I think the first one did have promise, but it rapidly became a big mess. Bit of a shame.

Posted by: Carrie (aka Teabelly) at February 4, 2010 10:16 AM

I'm totally cool with another movie. The first three were like high production b-movies. They were poorly written, poorly directed, poorly acted -- but they were SHINEY!

Like porn. With more werewolves.

Posted by: superasente at February 4, 2010 10:23 AM

I only saw the first one. It had some flashes of cool, but overall it sucked. It was pretty stupid.

As for this comment...

Kate Beckinsale, who was once the indie darling of the world before she decided to convert herself to a full-blown sexpot

I, for one, applaud Ms. Beckinsale's career choice. We have an ample supply of "indie darlings" who can, you know, actually act. Since she really can't, I'd much rather have her head down the "full-blown sexpot" road. It's really the best for everyone.

Kudos to you, Ms. Beckinsale.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at February 4, 2010 10:25 AM

Rise of the Lycans didn't go straight to video...

Posted by: Snath at February 4, 2010 10:32 AM

When in god's name was Kate Beckinsale an indie darling? What did *I* miss?

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at February 4, 2010 10:45 AM

I was thinking that too Snath, but wasn't sure if the US had a different release. I think I might even have seen Lycans at the cinema...god I'll watch anything.

Posted by: Carrie (aka Teabelly) at February 4, 2010 10:46 AM

When in god's name was Kate Beckinsale an indie darling? What did *I* miss?

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at February 4, 2010 10:45 AM

Back in those early "Cold Comfort Farm"/"Last Days of Disco" days.

I remember catching some of "Cold Comfort Farm" on cable and being all, "Woah... Who is that hot, little indie darling?"

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at February 4, 2010 10:47 AM

When in god's name was Kate Beckinsale an indie darling? What did *I* miss?

Cold Comfort Farm, Shooting Fish, Last Days of Disco are the only ones I can think of. I guess anything she did before Pearl Harbor.

Posted by: Carrie (aka Teabelly) at February 4, 2010 10:48 AM

Damn it. Beaten to it.

Posted by: Carrie (aka Teabelly) at February 4, 2010 10:50 AM

Underworld 4: The Suckening

The franchise might actually gain a few more fans if this were actually the title of the fourth movie.

Posted by: stardust at February 4, 2010 10:55 AM

Forbiddendonut has expressed my own feelings perfectly. Vive le sexpot!

Posted by: admin at February 4, 2010 10:58 AM

Hey, I'm glad I'm not the only one who reads Bloody Disgusting. They have a good news feed.

Posted by: TWoP_Fan at February 4, 2010 10:59 AM

I enjoyed her in Alice: Through The Looking Glass (probably more as eye candy, her acting wasn't exactly superb) and Much Ado About Nothing (her part was small and playing in a movie with Keanu can make anyone look good... BTW, Keanu in Shakespeare REALLY? WTF?).

I tried to like her in Serendipity... but... jeez, what a tiresome flick. Her performance might have been brilliant, but I couldn't tell simply because the movie was dull and I hated both characters. And hating any Cusack character takes a lot.

I was dragged to see Underworld by a vampire infatuated girlfriend. It taught me a valuable lesson, one I'm glad I learned LONG before the Twilight phenomenon.

The lesson being:

There are gems in the vampire genre, no doubt, but they are now few and far between. And unless you like bad vampire flicks as much as romantic comedies, don't date vampire infatuated women. Because they'll drag you to BOTH types of flicks.

Posted by: Lubeg at February 4, 2010 11:02 AM

Rise of the Lycans didn't go straight to video...

Yeah well, it should have. Shut it.

Posted by: TK at February 4, 2010 11:11 AM

Thank you, Snath, for pointing that out. I was pretty sure I (shamefully) remembered seeing it in a theater. No, I'm sure I did, because we were all laughing at the REE.DICK.ULOUS violence.

BTW, Keanu in Shakespeare REALLY? WTF?
True story: I was in theatre with a kid in high school who could barely get words out of his mush mouth. He was attractive and likeable, but on stage, he tended to speak so fast it came out as a wet mess. One time he literally jumbled a sentence, raspberried and said, "Let me try that again." I almost fell of the poorly-constructed-swing I was perched on!
After I graduated, I found out he got multiple scholarships because of his Shakespearean performances. What. The. Hell. Apparently when he took his time, he figured it out. Which, I guess we all do after puberty... there's a dirty joke in there...

Posted by: Patty O'Green at February 4, 2010 11:33 AM

I'm confused as to how she's contractually obligated to do the fourth movie when she apparently wasn't obligated to do the third one.

I shamefully submit that I enjoyed the Underworld movies. All your criticisms are valid. But I like shiny things. I will, however, take umbrage with the notion that Michael Sheen wasn't good in them. He was pretty dang awesome.

Posted by: MM at February 4, 2010 11:46 AM

Yeah, starting a career in Kenneth Brannaghs 'Much Ado' wasn't exactly indie, especially with Keanu sucking the life out of Don John. Still, Richard Briers, Imelda Staunton, Brian Blessed (best voice ever) and Emma Thompson are all pretty awesome, and I guess britishly indie.
Shooting Fish was typically English Indie, and a fucking great film.
Then if you ignore Serendipidy, I actually really liked 'Laurel Canyon' with Alessandro Nivlova, Frances McDorman, Christian Bale (not over acting too much) and the beautiful Natasha McElhone. Mmmmm I have lost any point i had, oh, she was in Van Helsing, to which someone wrote
"Kate Beckinsale plays the role of Anna in Van Helsing. She is one of the most sexiest characters in the cinema... " classy. It was a shit film. Fucking wolverine

Posted by: Keif at February 4, 2010 12:05 PM

Wouldn't it be better for Underworld 4 to just be slow-motion shots of Beckinsale's ass in latex? Might as well just forego the foreplay and give the audience what it wants.

Posted by: Fredo at February 4, 2010 12:42 PM

I love that version of Much Ado! My girl Emma Thompson rocked it out. And I refuse to believe that that Kate Beckinsale is the same boring-ass stick insect running around these days. It can't possibly be her.

Posted by: figgy at February 4, 2010 12:46 PM

Yeah, at least I'll always have "Shooting Fish"......*sigh*

Posted by: Jay at February 4, 2010 12:48 PM

The only even remotely redeeming factors in any of them have been the recurring role of Bill Nighy, and the presence of Michael Sheen (even though he wasn’t particularly good in them).

Wasn't Michael Sheen shirtless in all of them? How is that not good?

Posted by: jM at February 4, 2010 1:00 PM

Kate Beckinsale in black vinyl is all you need. Not to mention in the second film you "basically" see her naked. Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

That being said. I remember in the extras on the first film there is a shot of her all vamped out, singing, rubbing her breasts, and then flicking off the camera. I about DIED. No really. Fucking geekgasm bigger then shit.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at February 4, 2010 1:53 PM

... and the third featured Rhona Mitra, an actress who’s most well-known for getting ogled while topless in the horrendous Hollow Man.

Rhone Mitra is *not* "most well-known for getting ogled ... in Hollow Man." She's better known for getting ogled on-screen by James Spader in Boston Legal *and* by pretty much everybody as Lara Kroft.

She's also exceptionally well known for getting ogled while topless in multiple other movies, which I'll leave as a research project for you.

I know my oglege.

Now if they cold get Rhona Mitra and Kate B in the same movie - "Underwire Four" - that would be something.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at February 4, 2010 2:12 PM

Have you ever seen La Beckinsale's feet?

It's like this whole thing -- she's famous or infamous or
Well you know, she's already famous, but she's like the number one foot phreak whack target.

The fourth toe on each foot (the one next to the pinky piggy) dangles off of her shoe whenever she wears sandals and basically scrapes along the pavement wherever she goes. And apparently -- that's awesome. The idea of a long tubular toe dangling off the end of a shoe bobbling around in the street like a tiny hairless testicle is almost the most disgusting thing I can imagine, but for the foot morlocks, it's beyond sublime. It's like they want to pretend that the toes are tiny prehensile cocks wiggling around and -- I mean they like to suck em right? so Beckinsale is the world's number one toe-tranny and

wait, what was I talking about . . . ?

Posted by: Kosmic Koyote at February 4, 2010 3:42 PM

Dustin, you failed to answer the most important question about this latest entry in the franchise: Will Michael Sheen be in it, and will he be shirtless??

Posted by: ariadne at February 4, 2010 4:23 PM

The second Underworld movie is one of my secret shames. The action is just so brutal. And awesome.

When that dude comes out of the ground, and kills everyone in a first person perspective? That floored me.

And his death at the end, being pushed into moving chopper blades? Hilarious, I watched that scene over and over.

To sum up, very bad movie. However, I enjoy movies with great concepts and cool action, despite glaringly obvious faults.

P.S. I could not find the death scene on youtube. Drat. Meh.

Posted by: Thurgod at February 4, 2010 6:35 PM

I like Underworld. I think it's some good fun. It stars Kate Beckinsale's ass! C'mon?!

Bill Nighy? So much fun to watch. And he had a great time, said so in the extras on the DVD. The only movie he'd been in where he got fight scenes (until POTC, I suppose).

Micheal Sheen? He'll always be Lucian to me. The scene where he wills Selene's AG-rounds out of his body? (That glare!) When Lucian chases Selene's car down after that? Did that stunt himself!

And of course, the hidden star of the franchise, Kevin Grevioux. Developed the concept, wrote the script of the the first movie, played the lycan Raze, (and that is his his actual voice), he's a microbiologist and (almost) genetic engineer. Hands-down the most terrifying nerd on the planet. How can you not love that?

I think it sucks Raze won't be back 'cause, although lycans all look the same when they're wolfed, I'm fairly sure Raze was the one Viktor killed when he showed up at their lair.

Okay, so I haven't seen Rise of the Lycans yet, but I understand that the storyline in that film predates Selene's involvement in the war, explaining her abscence. And Viktor's daughter Sonya's story is something I'd like more details on. Plus, more Nighy and Sheen! (Sheen's in it, right?)

So some answers I'd like from Underworld: The Suckening: Did Lucian really die? Was Raze the lycan Viktor killed? But most importantly, why are there no female lycans? Or are they like dwarves and also grow beards and muttonchops?

Ew...

Posted by: Baldo at February 5, 2010 7:25 AM

Ok, *small voice* I liked Rise of the Lycans. Of course, I got to go to the premiere and ogle the sublime Michael Sheen in person.

I'm hoping against hope that Underworld 4 takes place between the third and first installment, when the lycans and vampires have an all-out war, culminating in Kraven and Lucian striking a bargain and Lucian faking his own death. Now THAT is a slam-dunk concept. At any rate, it's the most interesting part of the story and we still haven't gotten to see it.

Posted by: Ginger at February 5, 2010 3:23 PM

Yeh, I was hoping you had an interesting opinion till you said all of the Underworld movies sucked. As a fan of the series I can say the last one sucked balls. You how ever, suck ginormous ones.

Posted by: Robert at February 5, 2010 10:48 PM

Plus, more Nighy and Sheen! (Sheen's in it, right?)

Yes, he's in it, and he gets all hot and heavy w/his great love, and it's filmed sort of pretty, so I always pause the remote when that scene is coming up, because I'm sort of a perv, and then I get sucked in with Nighy's totally camp send up of the entire vampire legend while totally selling it, and by the time I realize that the entire thing is seven shades of stupid, I'm watching the [very important scene *snrt*] and getting a kick out of how very angsty it all is and how that big guy's voice is so deep it makes the speakers hum a little, and then the credits roll, and I come back to reality about ten minutes after whatever I was making for dinner has burned.

Posted by: Reba at February 5, 2010 11:16 PM

Okay, just last night, I got the Rise of the Lycans DVD. I've come to this conclusion: I could never be a movie critic, not because I have no taste in cinema, but because I just like moster movies a lot, and, apparently, I can let some stuff slide.

I'm sure if I was paying full price for tickets to actual theaters, I may be more discriminating (I am actually... I think the last film I saw in a theater was Return of the King), but for a few ten-euro DVDs, Underworld is worth every cent.

Like the scene where three wolves are chasing Sonja back to the castle. Lucian takes out two of them with the first two bolts in the triple-crossbow just as they leap at her back, making the shots so tight, the bolts strike sparks off each side of the helmet she's wearing. Gamers (like me) have arousing dreams about making shots like that.

That was just a neat trick, though. I think the best part of the film is how clearly it shows Lucian's suffering... how different it all could have been if Viktor had just removed that damn collar - not the sliver-spiked one Lucian was forced to wear, but the entitlement with paranoia spikes Viktor himself wore.

So, yeah, I still like the Underworld series, warts and all. I'm not a critic, though, just a guy that likes monster movies.

Posted by: Baldo at February 6, 2010 5:57 AM

Interested in a discrete and mutually beneficial relationship? http://AgelessOnly.com gives you a chance to make your life better.

Posted by: Patty at February 6, 2010 11:38 AM

Just a question for this website owner. Why are you so blatantly harsh toward Kate Beckinsale and this movie chain? It's one thing to not like a movie or movie concept. It's another to not like an actress. But, good grief, man! You sound like you hate these people with a passion. The foul language is really unnecessary and doesn't really do anything to endear your point to others. You refer to Kate Beckinsale as if she somehow let you down somehow and ruined your image of her; as if this is personal. It's acting, my friend. She's merely playing a role, yet judging by your comments, you seem to take it awfully personally. Relax, buddy. Actors have the right to play any character they want, and if Kate Beckinsale wants to be sexy, who the hell are you to tell her she shouldn't be?
As for calling her "wooden", what the hell is a female vampire supposed to be like? Vampires are dead; soulless creatures. What kind of personalities are female vampires hundreds of years old supposed to have?
You're quick to trash the whole concept, and make it a point to say these movies suck, but you fail to mention what your actual problem with the movies or Kate Beckinsale is. How would you do the movies differently? Where did Wiseman go wrong exactly? Sorry, pal, but aside from assuming a lot of people agree with you, cursing a lot, and screaming that the movies suck, you don't really offer a lot of insight.

Posted by: Charlie at February 11, 2010 11:51 AM

First off we wouldn't be talking about this if the 3 movies sucked.... The first was great, the second was somewhat boring, the third was a blockbuster, NONE of them went straight to DVD they were all blowouts in the theater, and if there was no demand for a 4th there wouldn't be one.... there is demand.

What a jaded and negative opinion piece here... at least there is a minority representation on the internet.

Posted by: MMAKansas at February 12, 2010 12:34 AM

I totally agree with the last comment. if all 3 of these movies sucked so hard then why are there demands for sequals and yes there have been demands. none of these movies, especially Rise of the Lycans, went straight to DVD. if you're going to blast something (simply because you dont like it), than thats you're right but atleast, know what the f*** you're talking about!

Posted by: Ebony at April 9, 2010 6:04 PM

Agreed. I definetly saw the 3rd one in theatres. Loved them all

Posted by: ayauger at April 11, 2010 2:25 AM

The first Underworld was phenomenal. Unfortunately the second one was confusing and the third one told us what we already knew.

If they stopped at the first Underworld, made us wait five years for version four, then I am sure we would all fill the theatres with respect and anticipation for the fourth story (WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE SECOND) AND have a greater respect for the franchise.

The problem is they have us by the (you know what) because we all have a desire to HOPE.

Instead we watched the studio execs, just like Obama and his Chicago six, ram down our throats what we don't want to see or EVER IMAGINE.

Their goal is to lure us in with part 4, and make us forget parts two and three.

Let us hope they succeed,

Best,
Mark

Posted by: Mark at April 13, 2010 1:01 AM

I would have to agree with the other comments all of the movies were in the theaters before you make comments know what you are talking about and I for one really loved the movies good or bad try doing some real research before you make comments like the ones you have made.

Posted by: billT at April 13, 2010 1:42 PM

Who cares about a fucking plotline. These movies arent trying to win a damn academy award. It has action. Hot chicks in skin tight leather, and werewolves.

Her ass alone is worth the price of admission. There has never been a sexier vampire, ever.

Posted by: Dennis at April 14, 2010 11:29 PM

They're making another Underworld? Excellent news! I love them all, they are great fun.

Posted by: Mega Jet Jaguar at April 20, 2010 12:37 AM

I saw Rise of the Lycans in the theater too. It was there just as long as all the other movies. I will admit, I really didn't like the second one, but I really enjoyed both the first and third. I'm looking forward to the forth. Every person I've talked to said they like the movies, so I have no idea what's going on with you people. I bet a lot of you did like them, but didn't want the rest to whine at you, "I shamefully submit that I enjoyed the Underworld movies"? Bullshit. Nobody is forcing any of you to watch the movies... but talking shit is just going to make other people not see the movies when they would probably enjoy them. So please, stop bitching...

Posted by: Emily at April 22, 2010 1:26 PM

Wow you people are crazy. The Underworld movies are the best vamp and werewolf movies ever made. Meaning both vamp and werewolves together. Of course there are better vamp movies and better werewolf movies but nobody has put both in one movie that was this good. I thought the prequel was a good way to help you understand the complete story and how lucian got away. I kind of wish they hadnt killed lucian off, other than that the movies were awesome. The funny thing is every comment on here were the only bad comments i've heard about the movies. Everyone i know thinks they are awesome too. Even IGN people are excited about the sequel.

Posted by: chaz at April 28, 2010 3:13 PM

I had the misfortune to stumble on this site. I guess I am one of the dumbasses that love the Underworld movies. So all I have to say to you is eat a big pile of shit you fucking cock jockey. I am sure you can find some there is a ton of it streamming out of your mouth.
P.S. FUCK YOU.

As for Kate. I am a true fan and not of just your ass. You have been great in everything I have ever seen you in. It is just to bad that people like this aftermath of a rabid dog cluster fuck does't have anything better to do than wine about other people and what they can do.
P.S.P.S. Man you are a DICK!!!!!!!

Posted by: Adam D at May 11, 2010 4:28 PM

ok this comment is for the guy at the very top's comment...your a greasy douch!!!! the underworld's rocked!!! WHAT A LOSER!!!! HAHAHA LOOOOOSER!!!!!!!!

Posted by: NIC at June 16, 2010 9:08 PM

Just keeping the facts straight for the poster: Rise of the Lycans did NOT go straight to video.
But of course that would get in the way of a good blog, right?

Posted by: Rod Steel at June 21, 2010 1:01 PM

Since u know so much about the Underworld Franchise you should know that the 3rd movie Rise Of The Lycans was released in theatres on January 23, 2009 at midnight and was released on DVD May 12, 2009. Also we don't release movies on video anymore...we have DVD and Bluray. I love Michael Sheen, Kate Beckinsale, and ofcourse Bill Nighy and I'm not saying this is gonna be a huge movie but I respect the hardwork these people put into these movies. In the end they are the one's with the millions and you are the one writing this shitty little blog for next to nothing probably!

Posted by: Madison at July 8, 2010 1:57 PM

you saying that the underworld series suck is just an inside comment on how crappy your thaughts on movies really are. The series has been better then what most people have thaught and for your information, underworld three rise of the lycans did not go straight to video. It was in theaters and did ok. I saw it in the movie theaters and althaough i thaught the movie was rushed through and not enough developement it was over all good. Chritics suck when it comes to movies cause they are so narrow minded on how the movie should be. If the movie was good for you then it must suck for everyone else. Not everyone will like the same movies. Critiques are about as worthless as a snowball in hell.

Posted by: shadowfang at August 14, 2010 8:06 PM

Pajiba is not only a crappy critic but a critic with a filthy mouth and atrocious spelling.
I think your punishment should be having all the male lead actors of the underworld movies hold you down while Kate Beckinsale and Rhona Metra kick you in the head repeatedly until you agree to close this site forever. Pukes like you give all the other usually bad critics, an even worse reputation.
Now go to put on your dress and whine like the little bitch you are.

Posted by: Dracula at September 22, 2010 6:41 AM

i just love first two underword and love the character micheal and selene i,m not gonna watch this upcoming underworld if there,s no kate and scott!

Posted by: liza at March 4, 2011 6:51 AM