web
counter
 

Thank God, No Purple

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (13)



jeremy_renner_03.jpg

Of all the things that I’m excited about when it comes to Joss Whedon’s upcoming The Avengers, Jeremy Renner playing Hawkeye is one of the top ones. Especially after seeing The Town — Renner was one of the best parts of an overall very good movie. Between that and his brilliant turn in The Hurt Locker, his casting is downright inspired.

It’s an interesting character — like Iron Man, Hawkeye aka Clint Barton relies more on tech and training than superpowers. He’s got a fairly colorful history, being raised by circus performers and earning his spot on the team by breaking into the Avengers Mansion. In any event, Renner recently spoke to about the role, the costume, and the Black Widow (Scarlett Johanssen). He had some interesting stuff to say:

“I think it’s going to be a little more reality-based,” said Renner. “You can kind of tell with Scarlett [Johansson]’s character [in ‘Iron Man 2’], it’s going to be more of a uniform … and not a big purple, comics sort of thing… That’s why I think it’s more palatable to audiences — there’s almost a sense of reality to these superheroes,” he explained. “That’s what makes it interesting to me, anyway.”

I like this idea and the thinking behind it. In general, film makers try to downplay the kooky spandex costume thing to make movies more accessible to non-fan viewers, and Hawkeye’s is pretty silly, particularly the big purple “H.” It sounds like they’re headed more towards the Ultimates version of Hawkeye, which is fine with me. About his relationship with Black Widow, he said:

“We will [have a relationship], I think, in this one as well… We’re kind of a team, and what that relationship is, is still to be discovered.”

Another indication that they’re using some of the Ultimates storyline — in the early issues, Widow and Hawkeye were a sort of black ops, wet work team for Nick Fury.

It’s shaping up nicely, I must say. Now we just have to see how Thor shakes out.

(source: The Playlist)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Internet Trolls: Sometimes, They Just Need a Hug | The Weekend Box-Office Report | This Comedy is Gay. Not Homosexual Gay. But Ron Howard Gay | "The Dilemma" Trailer









Comments

Someone in an earlier thread said they found Renner unattractive.

I defy them to look at that header picture and not cream their panties.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 20, 2010 9:06 AM

Ahem to that. Just his name makes me all purry...

Posted by: thordora at September 20, 2010 9:28 AM

Yes, he's attractive... in THAT picture. But that picture is a good angle for him. All he'd have to do would be tilt his head slightly, and the comments would be full of people wondering how many pairs of chromosomes he has.

Posted by: Craig at September 20, 2010 9:37 AM

Smart, talented, and hot as hell. He's the thinking woman's beefcake.

Posted by: Alice at September 20, 2010 9:55 AM

Well, not all of us have that angle. I'm still looking for the tilt of my head that get me there. At this point I've wrenched ALL the muscles and possibly cracked some spinal stuff.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at September 20, 2010 10:03 AM

He is definitely very sexy in a not-usually-my-type-way. Maybe it's the body. The voice helps.

What was this post about? Oh. Yay, supeheroes. Also, by "Wet Work Team"...do you mean...um...what DOES that mean? Sounds porny to me.

Posted by: figgy at September 20, 2010 10:14 AM

I am immune to the photo of Jeremy Renner.

Mr. Julien and I were discussing the movie star thing on the weekend (I know the Pajibans were on tenterhooks to learn the substance of our conversations) and I was mentioning that there was a Pajiba thread recently asking who would be the next movie stars. On the thread, someone mentioned that movie stars are too generic these days, but I think Renner is good example of why this is not true. I don't think Jeremy Renner is sexy, but he is a great actor and he has sand; I don’t think that Daniel Craig is empirically-attractive either, however he has the massive presence required of movie stars. Some of the old time movie stars were gorgeous (hence my small, but tasteful altar to Cary Grant), but certainly not all of them. It’s like when you fall for someone and they get better looking in your eyes. My secret husband William Powell? Not gorgeous, but I love him so. Katharine Hepburn? Striking, but not classically-beautiful. Jimmy Cagney? Small and average looking and the biggest star in the world. They own the screen because movie stars are about charisma. If you have massive charisma and/or likeability and the necessary drive, you can be a movie star such as Will Smith and Julia Roberts. I’m not a huge Roberts fan, but I get why she is a star. It seems to me that you get about three movies to make an impression and then if the charisma, work and the PR-machine can’t do it, you’re done and need to keep your day job. They tried to make Alec Baldwin a star and couldn’t do it. For Alec Baldwin, this turned out to be a blessing in disguise because he is a fantastic character actor and the same could end up being true for Renner. They tried with Nicole Kidman too, but got nowhere until her divorce from Tom Cruise, then she went supernova and now she is fizzling out because she doesn’t have that “star” thing. Jessicas Alba, Simpson and Biel are done. Josh Hartnett? Done. Emma Stone though? She’s going all the way. Daniel Craig is already there.

If you have great charisma, you can be a TV star, but not necessarily cross-over (David Caruso anyone?). If you are a Seventeen magazine version of a “good-looking person”, you can be a soap opera star. And if you look like an artist’s rendering of a business executive from the 1960’s, you can star in a TV show about an advertising agency.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at September 20, 2010 10:38 AM

What's wrong the the purple outfit and the "H"? Hawkeye's had that outfit for decades!

You move away from the Classics, sure, you might get the cool black ops Hawkeye, but unless you've got Mark Millar writing, you're more likely to get this:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__faI83aSYiQ/TD5qzVOR4hI/AAAAAAAAAx8/qtsfv1gsUDI/s1600/440px-Ult_Hawkeye.jpg

I'll take a purple "H" over that anyday.

Posted by: AmbroseKalifornia at September 20, 2010 10:49 AM

Ambrose, I was more thinking along the lines of either this or this.

I don't think you'll have to worry about the one you posted, because movies hate to obscure the characters' faces too much.

Posted by: TK at September 20, 2010 10:56 AM

Damn. I can see Renner rocking the hell out of either of those looks. PHWOAR.

Posted by: figgy at September 20, 2010 1:31 PM

Wetworks = assassinations, Figgy.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at September 20, 2010 3:09 PM

Julien -- may I say... EXCELLENT analysis.

I've made the same analysis myself on a few occasions, though not as artfully.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 20, 2010 5:27 PM

Wow, thanks!

Posted by: Mrs. Skipper at September 21, 2010 9:52 AM