web
counter
 

J.D. Salinger: 1919 - 2010

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (50)



Salinger-Catcher.JPG

J.D. Salinger passed away yesterday, in his home in Cornish, N.H. He died at the age of 91, of natural causes. He was 91.

Salinger is best known for his novel, Catcher in the Rye, which is essentially responsible for half of modern fiction. He also wrote Nine Stories, Franny and Zooey and Raise High the Roofbeams before his self-imposed isolation out in the middle of bumfuck New Hampshire (I had no idea, but I must have driven fairly near his house five times a year — it’s not to far from poet laureate Donald Hall’s home. I wonder … ).

Salinger and, particularly, Catcher has inspired a lot of heated and mixed reaction on this site, between those that cherish Catcher and those that didn’t get the significance. I’m of the former — Catcher is the only book I re-read once a year. You can see the significance of Catcher’s anti-hero not just in novels (every three months, a book is annointed the next Catcher in the Rye), but in some of the greatest coming-of-age movies of the last half century — The Graduate and half of John Hughes’ oeuvre, to name just a few. Catcher also, sadly, inspired Mark David Chapman to shoot and kill John Lennon. I never really understood that.

It’s hard to say that Salinger will be missed — he hasn’t been around for 50 years, and the only time we ever hear of him is when his lawyers file lawsuits seeking to protect the copyrights of his work (most recently to enjoin a sequel to Catcher). Word is that he’s been writing books, and has a pile of unpublished works, which — I’d like to hope — may finally be released. I’m sure many of you, like me, had Hapworth 16, 1928 on pre-order from Amazon for years before it was finally abandoned.

So long, Mr. Salinger. May all the “phonies” let you rest in eternal peace.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Give 'Em Hell Malone Review | "Big Love" Recap: S4, E3 "Strange Bedfellows"









Comments

For a while in my teens, the entire Glass family were my fantasy surrogate family. Salinger introduced me to the Tom Collins. For that alone, I owe him a huge debt of gratitude. CITR is a great book. Full. Stop.
Franny and Zooey is my Salinger book. It's the one I carried with me for years and quoted from as nauseum. And yes, I went through the snotty phase where a guy who didn't get the quote was simply not datable.

Oh snail, climb Mount Fuji. But slowly, slowly.

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 28, 2010 2:04 PM

Awwwww, the author of the only book Mr. Snuggie ever read cover to cover died! I'll have to tell him, then he will read it again.

Wait, I lie. He also read Billy Budd.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at January 28, 2010 2:11 PM

Just wanted to point out your header is wrong, he was born in 1919.

Posted by: emzmcgee at January 28, 2010 2:13 PM

And I just read that Howard Zinn died...

Posted by: TSF at January 28, 2010 2:16 PM

He was part of my bookworm childhood. It leaves a mark.

Posted by: Ranylt at January 28, 2010 2:20 PM

Salinger woke me up, made me think. I owe him for enlightenment.

You'll learn from them - if you want to. Just as someday, if you have something to offer, someone will learn something from you. It's a beautiful reciprocal arrangement. And it isn't education. It's history. It's poetry. -Catcher In The Rye

I shall, sir. Thank you and goodbye.

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at January 28, 2010 2:22 PM

I'm very, very sad, as he was one of my favorite authors.

But...yeah...after that initial feeling of sadness I must admit that my mind very selfishly leaped to the potential of those writings that he has been sticking in a vault for all these years finally seeing the light of day. I hope he left instructions that would allow us to see them and that his public reticence was just a result of his not wanting to deal with the inevitable pestering that new releases would inevitably bring while he was alive.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 28, 2010 2:25 PM

I love Catcher in the Rye. I guess I can appreciate and respect the right of others to hate it, but I wish they would reconsider.

Posted by: MM at January 28, 2010 2:25 PM

Rest in peace, Mr. Salinger.

Posted by: Oracle at January 28, 2010 2:29 PM

Wait, he was still alive? I thought he was already dead! Jesus....

Posted by: Aislinn at January 28, 2010 2:33 PM

"Boy, when you're dead, they really fix you up. I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody."

Holden Caulfield

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 28, 2010 2:36 PM

After not understanding Catcher in high school I re-read it a couple years ago and was astounded. I actually hope they don't give us his unreleased stuff. Vonnegut in his later years paled in comparison to his Slaughterhouse 5 and Cat's Cradle years. Let's let Salinger rest in peace like he wanted. Leave the legacy the way it is. I'm sure Hunter S. Thompson had stuff laying around after he died but there was a reason it was never published in the first place.

Posted by: Roorda at January 28, 2010 2:40 PM

I never got Catcher in the Rye, but loved Franny and Zooey and Raise High the Roofbeams, Carpenter. I think I read CITR too late; I just thought Holden complained a lot. Might have to give it another try, based on Roorda's post and a girlfriend that loooooooovvveees it.

Posted by: Brenton at January 28, 2010 2:56 PM

Wait, was he 91 or 101? It's been a long day at the office, but the math is throwing me off here.

Posted by: Colin at January 28, 2010 2:57 PM

Google tells me it was 1919. Crisis averted. I'm going home.

Posted by: Colin at January 28, 2010 2:58 PM

Jesus Christ People!! It's JD Salinger. When Brittany Murphy raw-carrot-a-dayed herself to death, there were tons of "oh how sad" comments. But one of the seminal writers of American fiction dies and we get 12 comments????

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 28, 2010 2:58 PM

It's sad. I was already in mourning for Howard Zinn.

Posted by: Nimue at January 28, 2010 3:02 PM

I'm one of those who didn't get Catcher in the Rye. I wanted to. It's my best friend's favourite book and she made me read it as a teen, gushing about how amazing it was. I love books that make you feel like that. Sadly, nothing. Nothing but anger and boredom and a severe hatred for Holden Caulfield. I don't know if I read it now if I would feel any different. I can't quite bring myself to pick it up again and see.

Posted by: Carrie at January 28, 2010 3:15 PM

What's depressing me most is the number of headlines distinguishing him as 'Catcher In The Rye author J.D. Salinger.' I can't believe there are folks do who don't know why he's famous.
I said as much on my twitter and got into trouble when someone I (thought I) respected stated she didn't know who he was.
Our country is really doomed, y'know?

Posted by: geekchicoho at January 28, 2010 3:15 PM

For me, Salinger and Vonnegutt were the bridge between childhood reading and literature.

Although Dustin has a point, it's not a terribly affecting loss since he never had an active public presence in my lifetime. Vonnegutt's death was a lot more significant. And is it ghoulish to wonder if there will be any posthumous publications forthcoming?

Posted by: Yossarian at January 28, 2010 3:16 PM

I read CITR a long time ago when I was a stupid kid and didn't get the appeal.

Maybe I should read it again, now that I've reached an adult level of stupidity.

How about we read it for the next Pajiba Book Club after Lolita?

Posted by: mswas at January 28, 2010 3:17 PM

I wrote an 11 page paper on Salinger in high school for my junior year symposium. I had great respect for him and for his family, especially the Glass family. His writing made me curious, impatient and laugh out loud (ok maybe not all the time). He lived a long ass time and I will miss his rumoured life and intrigue. Salinger truly understood youth (as I saw it) and grappled with interesting spiritual questions in his writings and I look forward to rereading his books with fervor.

Posted by: grace b at January 28, 2010 3:18 PM

Wow, sadness.

Guess I'll be pulling Catcher off the shelf tonight.

Paddy, I think it's probable that A) people's hateration of CITR is partly responsible for the dearth of comments and B) the fact that he lived to be a 91-year-old-man while Murphy died an untimely death at 32 probably has a lot to do with it. (Also, she was a lot prettier than he was.)

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at January 28, 2010 3:18 PM

Reading CiTR my senior year changed my view of literature. I give Salinger mad respect for his work and the way it changed the literary landscape of America.

*pours out a forty for my homey JD*

Posted by: Jelinas at January 28, 2010 3:21 PM

His short stories are just wonderful. My dad started reading them to me when I was 8, and I pretty much am constantly re-reading them. Thanks for this post -- it's nice to be reminded that we as a collective whole care about the serious as well as the fluff.

Posted by: esme at January 28, 2010 3:25 PM

Franny and Zooey always made me cry, in a good way.

Posted by: bat at January 28, 2010 3:33 PM

That's a goddam shame, for chrissake.

Posted by: Eep at January 28, 2010 3:37 PM

i vote for the no-release-of-unpublished-work measure.

he set that writing out which he wanted read. it's a corpus of great beauty. let's let all the rest of it, and he, rest.

Posted by: jimmy at January 28, 2010 4:06 PM

I take the opposite view from Jimmy. In life he should have complete creative control over the release and publication of his work but his vested interest in keeping that work private stops when he does. Forgive me the crude metaphor but it is analogous to the idea that a person's garbage is public domain once it hits the curb. Appoint an executor of his literary estate and, if there is anything worth publishing, let it be shared with the world.

Posted by: Yossarian at January 28, 2010 4:16 PM

Paddydog: welcome to the alternative universe where the likes of Murphy are hailed as brilliant and Salinger is deemed "overrated."

Posted by: samantha t at January 28, 2010 4:27 PM

I love the part in CITR when Holden goes to see his history teacher who repeats that Holden knew "absolutely nothing".

Posted by: samantha t at January 28, 2010 4:28 PM

I'm a longtime lurker but I needed to come out of the woodwork for this. J.D. Salinger changed my life. He inspired me to get into writing and English again after years of asshole high school teachers destroyed my love of the word. He is the driving force behind my English major, and Catcher in the Rye is easily my all-time favorite book (with 9 Stories being the best collection I've ever read). I cried when I heard of his death. He will be greatly missed.

Posted by: sonk at January 28, 2010 4:30 PM

I don't see much point in debating whether or not unpublished writings be released until we hear the official position of his estate and/or his will. It's very possible that he left allowances for it but simply didn't want to deal with the attention active publication would have given him in life. If it turns out we learn he didn't want us to see anything even after his death, "so be it" would be my very disappointed position.

And to the person above who said that the quality of his writing probably fell off - let's take a look at how long it's been since we actually received a published work from J.D. Salinger. Uh, yeah...it's been over 40 years. I guarantee deterioration wouldn't be an issue for at least half that time. It's very possible that there are some absolute gems that we have yet to see. Think about all that has happened in this country over the last 40 years. You don't think Salinger with the wisdom of his 50s and 60s wouldn't have some sort of relevant, insightful response to life, society, and the world during that time?

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 28, 2010 4:36 PM

To make this even more pajiban, I fervently hope there's NEVER a movie of CITR. One of those books where it's better that we each see it in our mind's eye the way we want.

As for unpublished stuff, I defintely imagine that someone's going to find a locked box full of ashes with a note saying that these *were* even better than CITR. He seems like that kinda guy.

Posted by: Jacktrade at January 28, 2010 5:13 PM

Hear, hear, Jacktrade.

Boy did I ever know a good many Holden aspirants! Even though I may not deeply feel the impact of his work in this latest phase of my life, I can easily recognize that a true icon of the human family has gone forth.

Posted by: replica at January 28, 2010 5:26 PM

I'm just saying that even if it might be "wise" it might not necessarily be good writing. Think Timequake by Vonnegut. Very wise, awesome insights into his writing process, and generally interesting. Yet when compared to his early work it's not as good as the earlier work of his.

I get that he may have wanted some of it published, in which case I'll be first in line. But all posthumous novels I've read (e.g. Tolkien in particular,) are disorganized, jumbled messes that just tarnish the otherwise sterling body of work that they had in life.

Posted by: Roorda at January 28, 2010 5:38 PM

We were talking about CITR at UNI just today, without knowing Salinger deceased... the last five minutes whether or not there should be a movie adaption. I don't think it will be too long now... you can always bribe lawyers.
Wig up Cate Blanchet and let her do Holden like she did Dylan, that'd be wicked.

Posted by: CaptainSavvy at January 28, 2010 5:40 PM

Roorda >> I see what you're saying, but I'm imagining manuscripts Salinger deemed finished (granted, without an editorial pass) that he simply didn't want published. I don't know what Salinger's process was, but it seems it's possible such items exist that are on the order of 20 or 30 years old (as opposed to something that had its regular creative process essentially interrupted because of his death). Given that we've had over 40 years without his writing - and assuming that he has been actively writing all that time - calling his stories from the 50s and 60s earlier works might be accurate, but we're potentially missing out on much of his evolution as a writer, i.e., his middle and late works.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 28, 2010 6:00 PM

I hope he left instructions that would allow us to see them and that his public reticence was just a result of his not wanting to deal with the inevitable pestering that new releases would inevitably bring while he was alive.

Fuck that shit(the not releasing, not you). If he didn't want people reading it, he shouldn't have wrote it. When you're dead, you're dead; end of story.

Forgive me the crude metaphor but it is analogous to the idea that a person's garbage is public domain once it hits the curb. Appoint an executor of his literary estate and, if there is anything worth publishing, let it be shared with the world.

Word.

Posted by: pissant at January 28, 2010 7:22 PM

In a way, I hope there is a movie adaption of CitR. In my opinion, I think it would expose just how atrocious the novel actually was.

Still, rest in peace J.D.

Posted by: muchsarcasm at January 28, 2010 7:27 PM

I'm a big fan of Catcher in the Rye. I'm sad about Salinger's passing, but I'm glad he didn't have a big public persona. Otherwise, I'd be bawling by now. I don't really know much about him and I haven't even read his other works.

But anyway, rest in peace. And thank you for Holden Caulfield.

Posted by: kayla at January 28, 2010 8:53 PM

Wow, yesterday was not a good day to be an author of books sitting on my and my roommate's bookcase It's hard for me to be sad about this-as Dustin noted, he did get a lot of years out of life. Maybe one of his potentially unpublished masterpieces will impress me even more than 9 Stories. What I'm trying to say is that I hope I never have to do a eulogy for anyone, because I would not do well. So long, Sally.

Posted by: SaBrina at January 28, 2010 8:54 PM

At different times I stumbled across and read Joyce Maynard's memoir and Margaret Salinger's memoir. Joyce was J.D.'s teen lover. Margaret was J.D.'s daughter. The two lady's lives intertwined for a while there, awkwardly. Prior to reading either of these books I didn't have much feeling one way or the other about Salinger. I read CITR, blah, blah, blah, not an earth shattering event for me. However, after reading the experiences of two women who were close to him I was left with the feeling that he was a selfish, misogynist bag of shit.

Posted by: Lizardqueen at January 28, 2010 10:04 PM

i don't care what anyone says, but i have been in love with holden caulfield since the 10th grade and i think i married him.

and i hope it never gets made into a movie. ever.

Posted by: k at January 29, 2010 12:20 AM

Overrated.

Posted by: , at January 29, 2010 1:07 AM

I liked franny and zooey and raise high the roof beam. not that i really remember them, i gulped them down during an early adulthood voracious binge of literature consumption.

my experience with CITR, was reading it in random chunks out of order whenever i slept at my gf's house as a teen, because i had insomnia and it was either the salinger book, or sydney sheldon and i wasnt ever going there. i never understood the appeal or relevance of caulden holfield. perhaps i had already experienced enuff that his whining seemed just that, whining. but i always fondly remember the beat up paperback as part of lying next to my first love during quiet nights in an otherwise fairly insane life.

I also felt more strongly about zinn dying today. the world lost a hero.

Posted by: idleprimate at January 29, 2010 1:53 AM

on the subject of obituaries, Pernell Roberts died this week. he was of course, brooding dark haired son, Adam in the Cartwright saga, Bonanza. one of my faves growing up, and probably, other than little house on the prairie and littlest hobo, the biggest set of morality lessons i got thru tv.

Posted by: idleprimate at January 29, 2010 2:06 AM

Put me down as one of those who never got CiiR, probably due to my own shallowness. More interesting to me is the issue of his unpublished work. My analogy is if Will-I-Am Shakespeare only released Hamlet (for example) and burned the remainder under the personal-artistic-freedom defense, and what a tragedy (pun intended) it would have been.

Either Maynard or his daughter (don’t remember which) has said that the unpublished works are marked to distinguish those that can be published as is, and those in need of editing. The now sleeping Jerry Salinger can still answer his critics.

Posted by: Mickey at January 29, 2010 9:54 AM

Related slightly to the conversation, can we PLEASE have the iconic maroon-and-gold paperback design for CITR back? I miss it.

I lost my high school copy years ago, so have been stuck with the kinda dull new white version. Ugh.

Posted by: Jacktrade at January 29, 2010 2:43 PM

For those who are saying that they did not (or do not) get Catcher In the Rye ( by the way - the abbreviation CITR makes me remember that line from Joyce Maynard's 'An 18-Year-Old Looks Back On Life' -- "The whole program was called SRA and there were a dozen other abbreviations, TTUM, FSU, PDQ--all having to do with formulas that had reduced reading to a science.") - let me tell you, be happy that you do not get it. Be relieved. Getting it means you identify with it at some levels, and trust me - that in turn means you ARE in trouble. Not getting it means you will do all the right things in life, you will strive towards success, you will have the proper ambitions, you will be model citizens, you will know WHO are the ones that matter, and WHO don’t. Life will be simple, uncomplicated, and hopefully – happy.

Posted by: Marshy Hobbit at January 31, 2010 6:41 PM