CANCER_0003.jpg
The Next James Bond is ... James McAvoy. Sort Of.


McAvoy Attached to Ian Fleming Pic / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | December 29, 2009 | Comments (28)


Update: According to an interview that Collider did with James McAvoy, he is not actually attached to the below Ian Fleming project. Apparently, he read the script, but that’s as far as it got. He never even spoke with the producers.

Palmstar Entertainment and Animus Films are developing a biopic based on the life of Ian Fleming, according to our source, The Hollywood Cog. Currently working under the title, Ian Fleming, the movie will be about the man behind James Bond, specifically focused on the years that gave him inspiration for the Bond character.

Years before creating Bond, Fleming struggled and floundered under the shadow of his family name (his father was a member of Parliament, and his siblings were also well-known, as well, including Peter — a travel writer). Likable but lost, Fleming was little but an aimless playboy, until his experiences in World War 2 changed his life, and it was those autobiographical experiences during war time that inspired James Bond, who was based — in part — on Fleming.

The movie itself will be based on the book, Ian Fleming: The Man Behind James Bond, by Andrew Lycett, who has also written books on Arthur Conan Doyle, Dylan Thomas, and Rudyard Kipling.

The big news here, however, is that the movie — which has been independently financed to the tune of around $40 million — has James McAvoy attached in the lead, which sadly probably takes him out of the running to replace Daniel Craig in the future. McAvoy actually seems well suited to the role — he can do playboy (Bright Young Things), he can do period and war movie (Atonement), and he can do action (Wanted). Plus, he’s an excellent actor with a dry sense of humor befitting not just Fleming, but Bond.

Ian Fleming is a high priority project, though I’m not sure where it will fall in with McAvoy’s schedule — he’s currently got I’m with Cancer and Wanted 2 in the works, and he’s already wrapped filming on The Conspirator. Given the movie’s limited budget, however, it would seem the sort of film McAvoy could squeeze in between a comedy and an action sequel which I don’t believe even has a finished script, yet.


The project is currently searching for a director, who will be working off a script from Matt Brown (Ropewalk).


Inception Teaser Trailer II | Young Victoria Review







Comments

interesting.

i love bond and i love fleming.

gonna have to check out that book.

(apparently roger moore has a autobiography too-'my word is my bond'-gotta get that one too.)

don't know much about mcavoy. thought he was meh in wanted. and never bothered to watch atonement. (i did see on tv though that he was one of hollywood's most bankable stars. will farell was the least bankable-that made me happy.)

Posted by: gem at December 29, 2009 11:19 AM

*enter coked-up Hollywood exec*

Does it HAVE to be set in the 40's? How about if we turn the guy into an X-treme hacker/motocrosser? Hey let's make him more "urban" by, say... 5%?

VIVIAN! get me Will Smith's agent on the horn, sweetcheeks. And get me JJ see what he can do with this, maybe we can set in space, call it Wrath of the Quantom Trek.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 29, 2009 11:21 AM

Sorry, I'm just not seeing McAvoy as Bond, so this news is fine with me. He's too...affable? He seems like such a twee little person, I just don't think he could fit the tux, so to speak.

Posted by: Snath at December 29, 2009 11:21 AM

Plus, I really can't picture Mr. Tumnus drinking a martini and breaking someone's neck. Well, I guess I could, but it turns out more like Woodland Critter Christmas than a Bond movie.

Posted by: Snath at December 29, 2009 11:29 AM

He seems like such a twee little person, I just don't think he could fit the tux, so to speak.

Posted by: Snath at December 29, 2009 11:21 AM
---------------------------------------------

What you said.

Yet ANOTHER problem with Abercrombiefitchifaction of Hollywood, all these poooseys trying to pass themselves off as men. I mean take a FUCKING look at a picture of Ian Fleming and compare it to this fancy boy here.

They should just go ahead and cast Zooey Deschanel as Fleming and call it a day.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 29, 2009 11:32 AM

*Abercrombiefication

THERE!

/dammit

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 29, 2009 11:45 AM

Aberzombiefication.

Fixed it.

Posted by: Snath at December 29, 2009 11:49 AM

“Plus, he’s an excellent actor with a dry sense of humor befitting not just Fleming, but Bond.”


Oh really? McAvoy has about as much of a chance of pulling of Bond as Pauley Shore does.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at December 29, 2009 12:11 PM

This sounds a lot like the evolution of McAvoy's character in the Last King of Scotland. Affable, playboy matured by the serious events around him. (Loathe as I am to argue with Dustin, he wasn't very playboy-like in Bright Young Things-he cried a lot and batted his gigantic blue eyes at the screen, but didn't do much playing). McAvoy is at that the to pof a short list of actors whom I would watch read the phone book, so I am thrilled by this news.

Posted by: coveredinbees at December 29, 2009 12:11 PM

Please don’t let THIS MOTHERFUCKER! Play Bond.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at December 29, 2009 12:21 PM

He'd make a decent Fleming.

Posted by: Adam C at December 29, 2009 12:24 PM

Well, you're never going to get a supreme court nomination with that kind of language. Or grammar, for that matter.

Posted by: Skewicide Blonde at December 29, 2009 12:39 PM

I love McAvoy but he's a bit . . . I don't know, short, and narrow-shouldered, and maybe not a tuxedo-filler after all.

But in Penelope he gave off a good stinky manly impression, so maybe it could work.

Posted by: caroline at December 29, 2009 12:41 PM

While, agreed, McAvoy is no Bond, he is definitely perfect in the role of a guy who imagines he is Bond.

In which case, I suppose he's perfect to play Fleming as, I guess, a WW2 spook who does lots of typical but real spook things (like reading reports and then writing reports on those reports) while dreaming of racing cars and shooting baddies and nailing endless quantities of high-class but treacherous poon that he feels a spook ought to be doing.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at December 29, 2009 1:11 PM

In other words, what is the plural of "analysis" -- and does the one you're thinking of also give Pajiba's spell-checker the red willies?

Posted by: Neodiogenes at December 29, 2009 1:13 PM

@BarbadoSlim: "I mean take a FUCKING look at a picture of Ian Fleming and compare it to this fancy boy here."

Just going by the look, Ian Fleming could have played Bond himself. James McAvoy is a good actor, but I don't see either how he fits the bill as Ian Fleming.

Posted by: Namhin at December 29, 2009 1:15 PM

Plus, I really can't picture Mr. Tumnus drinking a martini and breaking someone's neck. Well, I guess I could, but it turns out more like Woodland Critter Christmas than a Bond movie.

It's not too late to rewrite the script, Hollywood. Snath is onto something golden here.

Posted by: Robert at December 29, 2009 1:21 PM

I'm not the only one who's seen Spymaker: The Secret Life of Ian Fleming (with Jason Connery, son of Sean), am I?

Posted by: Todd at December 29, 2009 2:00 PM

I'm actually excited by this news. Granted, I've only seen five of his roles, but I've absolutely loved McAvoy in each of them. This sounds like good times to me.

Posted by: MB at December 29, 2009 3:56 PM

I think McAvoy is a great actor (and I would do UNSPEAKABLY dirty things to him), but yeah, I don't see him playing Bond at all. He's not...cool enough. I don't know. It just doesn't work for me.

I am excited about this project, though.

Posted by: Mimi at December 29, 2009 4:42 PM

Wanted... 2?!? After the clusterfuck that was Wanted? I think it's time to reboot this franchise closer to the source material... Fuck the loom of fate, I want my supervillains killing eachother.

Posted by: Chugga at December 29, 2009 5:18 PM

I'm looking forward to this. I agree about McAvoy not fitting the Bond role but I'd like to see him take on Fleming. And I'm apparently the only one who enjoyed him wearing a tux in Atonement.

Posted by: Heather at December 29, 2009 8:10 PM

i agree with a lot of what has been said about ol' macavoy, BUT if you saw LAST KING of fucking SCOTLAND, you know the dude can pull some shit off

Posted by: futherbeyond at December 29, 2009 8:40 PM

Why is everyone think he is playing James Bond? It's a biopic of Ian Fleming. Obviously he's NOT playing Bond.He is perfect as Ian Fleming.

Posted by: judi at December 30, 2009 3:29 AM

Why does Hollywood insist on casting boys in roles that are meant for men to play. James McAvoy's talent rests in doing "coming of age" type of roles. I can't see him as Ian Fleming, he doesn't have the stature to pull off the role. Big casting error.

Posted by: Shelley at December 30, 2009 11:12 AM

Why is everyone think he is playing James Bond? It's a biopic of Ian Fleming. Obviously he's NOT playing Bond.

We know that but Dustin says this: has James McAvoy attached in the lead, which sadly probably takes him out of the running to replace Daniel Craig in the future which makes everyone respond to the possibility of McAvoy playing Bond...

Posted by: Heather at December 30, 2009 12:00 PM

Ian Fleming was a real man. Jimmy Mac is a little boy. Not the best choice in my opinion. But little emo girls like him so he sells in Hollywood and that's all anyone really cares about.

Posted by: Ian Fleming at December 30, 2009 12:25 PM

Are you not liking Mcavoy for Bond or Fleming because he's short? Because he certainly proved he could put on shoulders in Wanted, and he's a great actor that can play anything. I guess the fact that he's short is the only thing that goes against him - but then just look at Tom Cruise - and he's not even half the actor (or the man) that James is.

I bet the people that complain about Mcavoy 'being a boy' have only seen him in Narnia - check out Atonement, where he certainly plays a 'real man', just to mention one movie. I think the children of Dune also shows what he can do, although it's an earlier piece, and for tv.

So, yes, he's short, but hey whatever, he could out-act any of the giants, believe me.

Posted by: Nea at January 11, 2010 7:36 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.



Related Posts with Thumbnails









twitter_badge-thumb-300x110-5250.jpg facebook-thumb-300x112-5252.jpg




recentreview.jpg