web
counter
 

Ivan Reitman Will Be Back to Direct Ghostbusters 3!

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (16)



ghostbusters-32.jpg

In an interview with Ivan Reitman, MTV confirmed what has been assumed all along: That Reitman — who produced and directed the first two Ghostbusters movie — will return to direct the third.

Awesome, right? A huge sigh of relief. Whew! Team Reitman! That’s what I’m talking about!

woah … wait a second, back up. Let’s first consider the evidence before we get too excited.

First of all, as great as the original Ghostbusters was (and to a lesser extent — a much lesser extent, the sequel), Ivan Reitman hasn’t actually made a particularly good movie since Ghostbusters, save for the fairly entertaining Dave, with Kevin Kline. In fact, Reitman has made some spectacularly bad movies since that time, including Father’s Day, My Super Ex-Girlfriend, Six Days, Seven Nights and Evolution. There’s a reason, as we reported two years ago, that the script for Ghostbusters 3 was originally written behind Reitman’s back — I don’t think anyone really wanted Reitman’s involvement or his input.

Second, the script is written by Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky, lead writers on “The Office.” When it was announced that they’d written Ghostbusters 3, it was cause for celebration. But that was before we saw their Year One, one of the worst movies of 2009. And it wasn’t the director’s fault, or even the middling efforts of the cast. It was a bad script — a terrible script, from start to finish (for any of you who actually managed to stay through the entire movie).

Third, this is a reboot, of sorts, of the franchise. Never mind the fact that it likely won’t involve much of the original cast — who are expecting to make cameos, at best — Reitman really isn’t the guy you want directing a new generation of talent, which may or may not include the likes of Seth Rogen, Paul Rudd, or actors of that ilk, who may not be comedically aligned with an old school Reitman. There really aren’t any comedic successors to Bill Murry and Dan Aykroyd; there may never be.

Shooting is expected to start early next year, but besides the fact that a slow and steady stream of Ghostbusters casting news is likely to keep this site in business for the next nine months, I can’t say I’m particularly behind the idea of a Ghostbusters 3. I don’t know which is worse: A Ghostbusters 3 with Reitman, or one without.

(You can bet your ass this will be in 3D, too)









Wonderful World Review | Five Unorthodox Versions of the Spider-Man Reboot We'll Never See













Comments

This. Will. Suuuuuuuck.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at January 13, 2010 2:58 PM

This has FAIL written all over it. Are they going to battle a giant M&M monster now?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 13, 2010 3:08 PM

I miss the days when I could get as excited about a movie as I was about Ghostbusters.

I feel like someone should make a movie about all the directors who used to be funny and have just completely lost their touch. Reitman, Landis, Ramis, it could be a hard-hitting but melancholy documentary or it could be a Wild Hogs-style buddy movie where they find redemption in the end by teaming up to produce a fresh comedy that actually connects with modern audiences. Someone help me name that movie. I feel like there's a great gag in there but I'm just not finding it.

Back to the point though, maybe someone could convince Reitman to turn G3 over to Jason?

Posted by: Eep at January 13, 2010 3:10 PM

This is sounding more and more like an epic fail!

Posted by: QuickDime at January 13, 2010 3:11 PM

Luckily the trailer for Year One, much like the trailer for Love Guru, was like a wreath of garlic to me and kept me away from that movie.

Posted by: John W at January 13, 2010 3:12 PM

Dude, what are you doing talking about "Love Guru" like that? You're giving everyone a head-ache.

Posted by: superasente at January 13, 2010 3:24 PM

No Bill Murray? Not interested. Also, 'Stupnitsky' haha.

Posted by: Steph at January 13, 2010 3:32 PM

Kindergarten Cop rules!

No quibbles beyond that.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 13, 2010 4:07 PM

Did you just badmouth Evolution?

I might be high, but you sir, may have gone over the line once again...

Posted by: D-Day at January 13, 2010 4:17 PM

I like Evolution.

Posted by: FabMax at January 13, 2010 4:21 PM

I cannot tell a lie. I loved Evolution.

Posted by: eurotrashwonton at January 13, 2010 5:14 PM

Evolution, "spectacularly bad"? I beg to disagree.

Posted by: Dill The Devil at January 13, 2010 5:51 PM

I gotta see the original "Ghostbusters" again some day to see if it's still as "meh" as I remember. Never saw the sequel (there was a sequel?) so color me uninspired.

Posted by: , at January 13, 2010 8:18 PM

Interested in a discrete and mutually beneficial relationship? http://agelessonly.com gives you a chance to make your life better.

Posted by: Celia at January 14, 2010 1:25 AM

There really aren’t any comedic successors to Bill Murry and Dan Aykroyd; there may never be.

Isn't THAT a true statement! Fame isn't so great on comedians - the well only goes so deep, and the fire of youth and fear (and apparently drugs) is required to make them excel, but I have to say those two guys will never have an 'echo' performer chase their heels.

Posted by: replica at January 14, 2010 2:14 AM

Fucking 3D. Fucking fuck.

Posted by: Sapphiar at January 15, 2010 11:34 AM

















mindholeblowers.gif viral_hits.gif
>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time