web
counter
 

It's Flashdance All Over Again: Does Natalie Portman Deserve Her Oscar?

By Cindy Davis | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (47)



Black-Swan.jpg

Now that Natalie Portman actually has her Academy Award in hand, it’s time for the vultures to circle her graceful carcass, and so they have.

Way back in the olden days (1983), actress Jennifer Beals was first celebrated for her performance in the film, Flashdance, then later, derided because she hadn’t really been dancing. Just about every dance shot had been performed by someone other than Beals. But Flashdance was no Black Swan and Beals was no Portman. Both Portman and director Darren Aronofsky have been fairly open about Portman’s (and co-star Mila Kunis’) extensive dance training to prepare for the movie and I don’t think anyone ever came away with the impression that the actress performed all the dance scenes. Apparently, behind the curtain, a storm has been brewing.

A few days ago, Portman’s co-star (and fiance), Benjamin Millepied, spoke to the Los Angeles Times about the film and he mentioned that there were articles emerging about Portman’s dance-double, Sarah Lane. According to Millepied, Lane “…just did the footwork, and the fouettes, and one diagonal [phrase] in the studio. Honestly, 85% of that movie is Natalie.” He also explained that simple and fluid choreography, along with CGI and close-up shots, allowed for Portman’s seemingly long dance scenes. But Millepied’s comments were just a prelude to bitterness and the aftermath may say as much about the kill-or-be-killed ballet environment than did Black Swan itself.

American Ballet Theatre soloist, Sarah Lane, now claims to EW that there has been a “cover-up” by some of the people involved with Black Swan and its publicists. She says that she was specifically asked by a producer not to speak to the press about her work in the film, and that part of the Oscar campaign was to create an image of Natalie Portman that included her being “transformed” into a ballerina. Lane also claims (and there may or may not be video to confirm) that Portman’s head was digitally grafted onto her (Lane’s) body. Though she claims not to be jealous, Lane’s comments about Portman certainly sound so: “I mean, from a professional dancer’s standpoint, she doesn’t look like a professional ballet dancer at all and she can’t dance in pointe shoes. And she can’t move her body; she’s very stiff…” Lane validly complains that it’s ludicrous for anyone to become a ballerina in a year and a half, and Portman had admitted as much: “It was not anything I ever could have done in a year, nothing I could’ve caught up with. But I think it was just better for all of us if I did as much as possible.”

The dance world is, of course, standing behind its own. Though I agree that it should be known that Portman and Kunis had dance doubles who made their performances more believable, that fact doesn’t make their acting less valid. Because while Flashdance may have revolved around the dancing, Black Swan revolved around the acting and directing. This film wasn’t about the dance so much as it was about the characters and the effect their professional lives had upon them. People didn’t revel in Portman’s ballet moves—they raved over her emotions, her facial expressions, her onscreen, complete and utter mental breakdown.

For a dancer to participate in a film like Black Swan (with the stars that were headlining,) and then to speak out after the fact crying about her contribution not being celebrated enough, is simply ludicrous. Sarah Lane knew what she was doing, she was a “dance-double.” Her role’s definition is its name. Anyone who saw Black Swan, with the close-ups and the camera angles and the separate shots of upper and lower body halves, knew exactly what he was watching. Not a one of us exclaimed, “Oh what a great ballet talent Natalie Portman is! She could be a professional.” Rather, we knew that a film was being made in a way that would be believable, and in a way that would showcase the actors’ talents. The things I remember most after having seen Black Swan are Natalie Portman’s terrified expressions, her trembling lips and her quivering chin. I remember her cowering and defeated posture and the baby voice she put on whenever she spoke with her mother (Barbara Hershey). I felt the pain of her bloody digits, the scratches on her back and the feather she pulled; the feeling of inadequacy that emanated from every pore I could see in the close-ups of her flawless skin. I remember sitting in the theater, mesmerized. I realized that I had never thought much of Natalie Portman before, but that now, up on that movie screen was an Academy Award-worthy actress.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Weekly Murdertank: Slut-Shaming, Lady Mutants, "Fringe," and the Zombie Apocalypse | Pajiba After Dark 3/27/11









Comments

At the time it seems to me that the real scandal in flashdance was that Jennifer Beal's double was a man.

Someone should tell this Sarah Lane chica that if you are going to try and besmirch an Academy Award winner in the afterglow of her award, its more interesting if you are a creepy looking tattoo covered freak show.

Natalie Portman was going to win at some point in here career, but its seems incredibly mean spirited to come after a pregnant woman. I doubt this will help lane in anyway, and frankly I am surprised she hasn't breached a confidentiality agreement of some sort by speaking out. Studio lawyers are slipping!

Posted by: Juiceinla at March 27, 2011 3:20 PM

While their egos may be as inflated, you seldom hear athletes complaining that their work went "under appreciated" as they threw 40 yard frozen ropes that made Keanu Reeves look like Joe Montana.
It's a shame that the dance community can't appreciate the fact that ballet was the subject of a celebrated film and let it go.

Posted by: Spender at March 27, 2011 3:25 PM

I didn't care who was behind the dancing either way,but I wasn't impressed at all by Portman's actressing in this film?

Also, is her fiancé's name pronounced "Millipede"?

Posted by: csb at March 27, 2011 3:28 PM

csb, it's pronounced "Mill-pee-ay."

Posted by: Internet Magpie at March 27, 2011 3:50 PM

I really can't care, I'm just enjoying the bitchiness.

Posted by: Jay at March 27, 2011 3:56 PM

I've always felt that Flashdance revolved around the bra removal.

I may be alone in this.

Posted by: Groundloop at March 27, 2011 4:00 PM

She's a glorified stunt double. Someone needs to tell her to fuck off.

Posted by: Lennon at March 27, 2011 4:09 PM

Mind you, I meant the bitchiness that had been coming out of this story this week, but now that it's here...

Posted by: Jay at March 27, 2011 4:22 PM

I think you give the viewing public way too much credit for being intelligent. They really did present this movie as Portman doing the majority of the dancing and I can understand why the actual dancer would be angry. If they had presented it honestly and given her a share of the credit, then this might not have gotten so nasty.

Posted by: snapnhiss at March 27, 2011 4:29 PM

Re: Natalie's face being digitally transposed over the double's face during the dance sequence: around awards time, there was a video where the special effects director took someone through how they did that last sequence, including a fake audience, the swan wings, the weird bumps on her skin, and Portman's face over the double's face. It's not like they were hiding it, I saw it on a big-time movie website. Prima ballerina needs to take a Xanax.

Posted by: Dorothy Snarker at March 27, 2011 4:33 PM

and the Oscar for best body double in ballet goes to...

yeah, I don't remember that

Posted by: kirbyjay at March 27, 2011 4:41 PM

So the dance people back the dancer and the movie people back the actress.

Nothing to see here, move along.

Posted by: maka at March 27, 2011 4:55 PM

dancers are horrible actors.

but they might actually be a bit more self-absorbed than actors.. you know it's all those mirrors.

i just think they are protective of their work in general as people tend to think 'ballerina-ing' is mere tutus and music. stunt double indeed.

Posted by: jubilat at March 27, 2011 5:05 PM

Ho-de-hum.

...I suppose it's too late in the day to continue to expect a Sucker Punch review...? I had been sorta looking forward to an evisceration by one of the Pajiba wits.

Posted by: Jerce at March 27, 2011 5:39 PM

The award was for acting, not dancing. I wouldn't have expected her to do all the dancing. No more than I would expect an action star to do all his own stunts.

While I may disagree with the Portman winning, it wasn't due to the dancing part of the movie. My problems were with the acting. And the writing. Especially the writing.

Posted by: Sean at March 27, 2011 5:41 PM

Did anyone actually think Natalie Portman was doing her own dance routines? Or Mila Kunis?

No one believes that Christian Bale basejumped off that highrise in Hong Kong. There isn't anyone who thinks that Matt Damon is a Krav Maga master based on six weeks of prep ahead of a Bourne movie. No one goes "Oh wow, The Statham is such a great driver! And he can shoot while driving!"

This is all make-believe. We accept that as we go on about our movie watching.

The only way this is a controversy is if anyone sold Portman as being a great ballerina. I'm trying to remember if anyone did though.

Posted by: Fredo at March 27, 2011 5:47 PM

The only thing that seems odd is how the dancer wasn't credited as "dance double", but as a background character. That has a whiff of subterfuge about it. I've seen the face replacement video - the two scenes it showed were, as far as I can recall, the only ones in the film that had complicated en point work. That is to be expected, since learning point takes years. Natalie worked her ass off to achieve a physique and a form that looked authentic to the general viewing public, which enhanced her acting performance - I think that's all that matters.

Posted by: Lauren at March 27, 2011 5:47 PM

Dancing isn't acting. Who cares.

Portman was mediocre, as was the film.

Posted by: zeke the pig at March 27, 2011 5:51 PM

Isn't it a fact that Portman got her Academy golden man BECAUSE people considered she had to learn the difficult ballet moves and act according to a hard-ass script at the same time? And that, allegedly, she managed to combine those two almost perfectly and earned her award for that?

If you consider this to be true, and if the lady dancer is also telling the truth, and Portman was acting in a still, completely controlled environment so as to have her digital face later recolocated, I guess Portman's Academy golden man would have to be returned, pure and simple. She got it on false grounds. That's a Milli Vanilli case all over again.

That's a lot of "if", mind you...

Posted by: godzilla_foil at March 27, 2011 6:16 PM

The real scandal here is that a glorified Lifetime movie can win awards.

Posted by: Schadenfraulein at March 27, 2011 6:22 PM

I have to side with the dancer on this one. She's not asking for glory, and her comments about Natalie's form don't strike me as bitter. She's been dancing for 22 years, of course she can tell if Natalie's form is stiff or inauthentic. Anyway, she's not upset about not getting enough attention, she's upset that Natalie's main man claimed that Natalie did more of the dancing than she actually did, which in itself wouldn't be such a problem if there hadn't been so much publicity exalting Natalie's "amazing transformation" and "intensive study." I don't doubt that Natalie put her all into her work, but Lane is right in that it DOES diminish the art if Natalie's people are claiming that Natalie learned enough ballet to dance like a professional for 85% of the dancing shots. That is just absurd.

And, are you kidding? All of Natalie's dramatic training or whatever had a lot to do with her win, because that was built up before the movie even came out. Natalie's acting, to me, has always seemed one-dimensional and vanilla-frantic anyway, and I doubt she would have won if her actual training hadn't been played up so much. Granted, I do think she's a very devoted, serious actress and isn't really to blame here (let's blame her boyfriend, in this instance) but she was glorified as some kind of prodigy to a lot of people. Trust me, the audiences are not as smart as you give them credit for.

That's just my two cents.

Posted by: Alwyn at March 27, 2011 7:26 PM

Let's be realistic, this movie and its star were given a ton of attention based on how much work she had to do to prep for the role. It was a huge part of why she won the Oscar. Of course the man who was "obsessed" with her during filming woul lie for her.

I think she wouldn't have won had her "transformation" not been so widely publicized. She had 3 facial expressions in that movie.

Posted by: stump at March 27, 2011 7:31 PM

I just finished watching Ben Hur, for the first time in its entirety.

Charlton Heston won the Academy Award for Best Actor.

Did the fact that they used a stunt man to ride in the chariots during most of the famous chariot race mean he didn't deserve his Oscar?

Did Portman's Oscar hinge on her ability to dance or to act like she was dancing?

Posted by: John W at March 27, 2011 7:51 PM

Jesus Christ, who cares?

Posted by: Daventhal at March 27, 2011 7:53 PM

Jesus Christ, who cares?

Whoever gets into a cinema blog to read about cinema because they like cinema and care about what's going on with cinema. That's who.

Posted by: godzilla_foil at March 27, 2011 8:12 PM

She gave the best acting performance of anyone in 2010, male or female, dancer or otherwise. That's all that matters to me.

Posted by: ChristianH at March 27, 2011 9:52 PM

Whoever gets into a cinema blog to read about cinema because they like cinema and care about what's going on with cinema. That's who.

Main Entry: cinema
Part of Speech: noun

Synonyms: big screen, bijou, cine, drive-in, film, flicks, motion pictures, movie house, movie theater, moving pictures, nabes, photoplay, picture show, pictures, playhouse, show, silver screen, cine, cinema , cinematics, cinematograph, feature film, film, flick, flick, flicker, movie, moving picture, photodrama, photoplay, picture, picture show, silver screen, talkie, talkie, talking picture, videotape

Posted by: Douchebag McGee at March 27, 2011 10:02 PM

Eh, I can see the dancer's point of view. They seriously downplayed her contribution and exaggerated Portman's. And the CGI stuff is pretty underhanded.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at March 27, 2011 10:14 PM

Douchebag, try a new entry: "sarcasm". Maybe you'll find something under "writing style" too. And you could try "Repetition as a rhetorical device" on Wikipedia.

Posted by: godzilla_foil at March 27, 2011 10:18 PM

Thanks for the tip chief, but I think I already read the sarcasm entry. I will research the others tonight and report back to you with my findings post-haste.

Posted by: Douchebag McGee at March 27, 2011 10:43 PM

As someone who has been following this story from the beginning, Sarah Lane was actually very gracious up until a point. She was quoted several times as saying she never expected credit or recognition, and she seemed very cognizant of her role on the movie food chain.

What actually happened was that an op-ed was written in Dance Magazine that Lane had no part of, in which the author shot the first arrow at the studio. This piece was the first to accuse the studio and Portman of not giving due recognition to Lane, and it even pointed out that in the published film credits on IMDB, Sarah Lane is not credited as a dance double, but rather as "Lady in the Lane" - a split second non-dancing role.

After the accusatory op-ed, Lane was again interviewed by Dance Magazine, in which she re-iterated that she expected no credit and that Portman had done a great job, but that she was dismayed that so many people were under the impression that being a professional ballerina was something that could be accomplished in a year. She said this after reports within the profession that people are actually calling up the ABT and asking if there are any plans to have a production of Swan Lake with Portman in the lead role. So yeah, there are a lot of really clueless people out there that honestly believe Portman did all of her own dancing.

Lane's most recent remarks do swing a bit over to the side of catty, but if you read the fiance's comment again that Lane "just did the footwork, and the fouettés, and one diagonal [phrase] in the studio," again, to non-dance people that makes it seem like that's not much, but dance people will recognize footwork as being among the more technically taxing aspects of ballet that require the most practice, and fouettés as being infamously diabolical (and that's why the black swan coda famously has 32 of then in a row, to demonstrate that this black swan creature is truly quite amazing and CRAZY.) I feel bad for Lane, who didn't exactly start this argument but is now defending herself against Mr. Portman basically implying that her work wasn't that important. Sure, she is a glorified stunt double, but I don't hear a lot of people saying that what stunt doubles do isn't that big of a deal. That's basically what a lot of people are trying to argue against Lane here, and it's B.S.

Posted by: Amanda6 at March 28, 2011 12:43 AM

> Lane also claims (and there may or may
> not be video to confirm) that Portman’s head
> was digitally grafted onto her (Lane’s) body.

Oh come on now, that video exists, it's just being pulled by Fox very conveniently each time it re-surfaces. I saw it 4 days ago here, and of course it's gone now. It was scary to see how far face replacement has gone, even in very complex camera motions. It's really not a question of "separate shots of upper and lower body halves" here.

Posted by: -S at March 28, 2011 1:37 AM

Anyone who saw Black Swan, with the close-ups and the camera angles and the separate shots of upper and lower body halves, knew exactly what he was watching. Not a one of us exclaimed, “Oh what a great ballet talent Natalie Portman is! She could be a professional.”

Actually, I've heard a lot of people say that. My sister thought that Portman did all her own dancing. When I told her about the double, she was amazed because the press had talked up all the training Portman had done.

When I saw the film I was surprised by how few "separate shots of upper and lower body halves" there were. That's normally how you can tell where a double was used but in this film they used face replacement and were thus able to get in a lot of full-length shots with the dancer's body and Portman's face.

Re: Natalie's face being digitally transposed over the double's face during the dance sequence: around awards time, there was a video where the special effects director took someone through how they did that last sequence, including a fake audience, the swan wings, the weird bumps on her skin, and Portman's face over the double's face. It's not like they were hiding it, I saw it on a big-time movie website. Prima ballerina needs to take a Xanax.

Posted by: Dorothy Snarker

That video was briefly on YouTube before it got pulled by the studio and replaced with a version that did not contain any face replacement VFX. The original version is still floating around, but the one that was heavily promoted on various blogs was the one that made it look like Natalie Portman was doing all her own dancing.

Posted by: Brittany at March 28, 2011 1:43 AM

I disagree, I watched a lot of ballet and took some classes when I was younger, my mother still takes classes and I know some professional ballet dancers. I was amazed when I heard she did most of the work. That was, to me, one of the things that made her performance so good and deserving of an Oscar. The producers/studio/publicists shouldn't have lied about it...

That being said, I thought Black Swan was a piece of shit.

Posted by: Sarah J-town at March 28, 2011 5:06 AM

I think she didn't deserve the oscar on the basis of her acting, which was twee and precious. I never thought for a minute that she did all her own dancing. Of course she couldn't have. That said, the film isn't about the dancing, it's about Nina's breakdown, so this whole question strikes me as neither here nor there, really.

Posted by: June Velcro at March 28, 2011 6:33 AM

Tsss, I couldn't care less about who danced what. Fact is, her acting was shite and the nomination alone was nonsensical (though utterly predictable).

Posted by: Trevor at March 28, 2011 8:13 AM

"The only way this is a controversy is if anyone sold Portman as being a great ballerina. I'm trying to remember if anyone did though."

Sorry can't remember who said that, but in response: actually, that's exactly what her fiance, the studios and Aronofsky (sp?) have been doing. During his BAFTA acceptance speech on behalf of Portman, Aronofsky specifically referred to the fact that she had become a prima ballerina in a year as one of the reasons she deserved to win. I can see why statements like that would piss off professional dancers because it completely downplays the sacrifices they make over a lifetime. Hell, it pissed me off and I'm not even a dancer.

Posted by: Big Moo at March 28, 2011 8:47 AM

I haven't seen it yet, but I agree with you completely. This is just common sense, people.

Posted by: Candee at March 28, 2011 9:45 AM

Isn't the choreographer, who worked with the director on figuring out how to make Portman look the most like a ballerina, also one of the dance world's own? These sound like the same whiny people who called Black Swan laughable because of the horror elements and actively campaigned against the film for mocking the ballet industry (which it didn't).

If you listen to the choreographer's side, it's pretty damn clear Portman did most of her own dancing. For goodness sake, the stiffness and rigidity of her movements was written in as a plot point and her dancerly transition into the Black Swan was accomplished through some looser arm movements and a whole lot of CGI. Sorry that an actress who hasn't danced regularly since she was a child didn't magically gain the faculty to do fouettes and dance en pointe.

Whiny dance double needs to quit whining. Chances are, she did all of Portman's dances so that Portman could study them and work through them better with the choreographer. Of course, that would require knowing how movies are made. You know, basic things like multiple takes and the use of stand-ins? Just because the cameras pointed at you doesn't mean it's the final take or even rolling.

Posted by: Robert at March 28, 2011 9:49 AM

The choreographer may be one of the dance world's own, but he's also Portman's baby daddy. Obviously he's going to take her side. I agree that it really doesn't matter either way (as far as her Oscar is concerned), but it does denigrate the art form to imply that you can dance like that in a year. Yeah right. I never believed it.

Posted by: Mel C. at March 28, 2011 11:13 AM

Alwyn - thank you. There's a lot more to this story than "Sarah Lane needs to stop whiiiiining." She said nothing until Portman's paramour came out and said Portman had done most of the dancing. Dancers work for frigging decades to perform as Lane does and it's disrespectful to their profession to think somebody can achieve it in just over a year's time. She is doing it out of respect for her profession, not to be some drama queen.

" Though she claims not to be jealous, Lane’s comments about Portman certainly sound so: “I mean, from a professional dancer’s standpoint, she doesn’t look like a professional ballet dancer at all and she can’t dance in pointe shoes. And she can’t move her body; she’s very stiff…” Lane validly complains that it’s ludicrous for anyone to become a ballerina in a year and a half, and Portman had admitted as much: “It was not anything I ever could have done in a year, nothing I could’ve caught up with. But I think it was just better for all of us if I did as much as possible.”

Why would Sarah Lane be jealous? She is at the top of one of the most competitive fields around. She has no reason to be envious of a hacky actress. And Natalie may have done "as much as possible", but there is no way she did 85% of the dancing (per her baby daddy).

Posted by: samantha t at March 28, 2011 11:33 AM

I think the art form is doing a good enough job denigrating itself. A movie comes along and gives ballet some much needed mainstream attention and they can only stand in the shadows, screeching that their part wasn't big enough; that they deserved more and are going to drag the whole thing down with their bloodied, broken fingernails.

Posted by: Salad Is Murder at March 28, 2011 11:44 AM

What do you know, big deal with the big dealers causes everyone to become disingenuous and all sanctimonious. Both sides need to be glad ballet is still relevant. Or is it?

Gonna file this under "in-house disagreement", because both camps need each other. Thankfully, I don't need either one.

Posted by: Recondite at March 28, 2011 12:53 PM

Now, Darren Aronofsky has spoken out:

“Here is the reality. I had my editor count shots. There are 139 dance shots in the film. 111 are Natalie Portman untouched. 28 are her dance double Sarah Lane. If you do the math that’s 80% Natalie Portman. What about duration? The shots that feature the double are wide shots and rarely play for longer than one second. There are two complicated longer dance sequences that we used face replacement. Even so, if we were judging by time over 90% would be Natalie Portman.

And to be clear Natalie did dance on pointe in pointe shoes. If you look at the final shot of the opening prologue, which lasts 85 seconds, and was danced completely by Natalie, she exits the scene on pointe. That is completely her without any digital magic. I am responding to this to put this to rest and to defend my actor. Natalie sweated long and hard to deliver a great physical and emotional performance. And I don’t want anyone to think that’s not her they are watching. It is.”

Posted by: Cindy at March 28, 2011 4:11 PM

Everyone continuing to whinge "It is Natalie! We swear!" continues to miss the point that the sequences that were not Natalie are easily identified as the most difficult sequences. Whoop-de-fucking-do if girl can stand en pointe with sickled feet and maybe bourre across the floor for 90% of the movie, leaving the actual difficult work for the dance double in the remaining 10%. Sorry, maybe I'm a bit biased because I didn't think the rest of her acting was that great and I don't like her in general.

Posted by: Amanda6 at March 28, 2011 4:30 PM

Well as both a former ballet dancer and someone whose done serious acting, I do think it's more that Millepied is being a douche as usual. And something that doesn't seem to be mentioned much is that he had a long time girlfriend when he met and knocked up Portman. Sarah Lane happens to be very good friends with the ex and talked about how awkward it was to have to work in that environment.

As has been said by others, it was clear to me what she did and didn't do, and it wasn't 85%. Millepied is a great choreographer but an unmitigated ass. It's incredibly insulting to dancers to not give them the credit they are due. And given that she pulled a Jolie with her friend, I'm surprised Sarah was as restrained as she was.

Posted by: rhombus at March 28, 2011 5:36 PM

Well then maybe next time someone comes to her with a 'dance double' part and a check she'll think twice about signing on the dotted line.

Posted by: Salad Is Murder at March 29, 2011 12:43 AM