web
counter
 

It Still Smarts a Little

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (16)



Alanis-Morissette-and-Ryan-Reynolds-6054790.jpg

Last night on “Idol:” The really nice, marginally talented white dude won over the more talented but somewhat distant unwed mother with dreads. It’s OK, though. The nice white dude has a nice smile, and he sings with a nervous quiver. Isn’t that adorable? For those of you thinking that the unwed mother is better off because she won’t have to work with the “Idol” recording label: Forget that. “Idol” owns the soul of the entire top ten. For life, or until the world forgets about them.

Also, lots of people who many of you listened to growing up came out to sing with this season’s “Idol” contestants in an effort to make you feel really fucking old. The common thread: You probably won’t see any of them again until next year’s “Idol” finale. Except for Joe Cocker. He’ll probably be dead. But for a guy about to die, he can still belt it.

Note, too, that Janet Jackson (the thinner version) appeared, as well as Hall & Oates. The fun thing about Hall & Oates’ appearance is that, in the last 20 years, Oates has inexplicably become the good-looking one. Bret Michaels also appeared to sing “Every Rose Has Its Thorn,” and I don’t know how the hell it happened, but that man has somehow won over America’s respect and adoration, either through simple longevity, his ability not to die, winning “Celebrity Apprentice,” or hosting a VH1 show that allowed him to get laid multiple times. The man who sang “Unskinny Bop.” How did that happen? Your guess is as good as mine.

That’s Bret Michaels and Jon Bon Jovi now who have inexplicably become Gen X icons in their old age. Now, we need only wait for the resurrection of Def Leppard’s Joe Elliot. All of Kurt Cobain’s efforts were in vain, people.

Also, Alanis Morissette showed up to show the world that, while she’s finally over her break-up with Ryan Reynolds, I’m still not. It should’ve been you, Alanis! Also, lady looked good.

Finally, Simon Cowell signed off after nine years. There were a number of segments devoted to him, all of which I fast-forwarded through (except for the Ricky Gervais bit). Paula Abdul also showed up, and though I didn’t hear her speak, she looked like her customarily wobbly self in FF motion.

I think that’s probably all you need to know. That, and the key to winning “American Idol” is similar to the strategy for winning “Survivor:” In the end, the weaker player who alienates the fewer number of people always wins. The difference is that on “Survivor” you alienate by pissing people off; on “American Idol,” you alienate in this order: being gay, not being an outspoken Christian, being an unwed mother, and being too aware of your own talent.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Book Review: "The Deep Blue Good-by" by John D. MacDonald | I CAN ONLY AWNSER WHAT WOULD SHOCKOZULU DO | Shanghai Trailer









Comments

The best part of the Alanis Morissette appearance was when the girl sang "would she go down with you to a theater". american idol knows how to keep it classy.

Posted by: brian at May 27, 2010 9:19 AM

Is all pop music by definition manufactured?

Discuss.

Posted by: , at May 27, 2010 9:39 AM

Is all pop music by definition manufactured?

I argue in the affirmative, but that's because I define "pop" as manufactured popular music. There's lots of music that sounds like pop, but isn't; perhaps it was borne of pure artistic expression, not primarily of commercial interest, or of parody. Likewise, there's lots of music that is widely popular, but that wasn't created for such an end. Hence, you have pop, indie pop, synthpop, dance pop, & every other "pop" portmanteau imaginable.

Posted by: the new transported man at May 27, 2010 9:54 AM

Hmm, look like the jacket fit the white guy this time.

Posted by: Uncle JR at May 27, 2010 10:20 AM

Girliepop etc.

I guess what I'm wondering is, is the AI process the way music and performers of this type get manufactured and packaged and sold (and have always been), only AI lets us see (and imagine we participate in) the process? Is it letting us see the sausage being made? Is it an exaggerated example of the process? Is it entirely different somehow?

I ask this knowing that the public ALWAYS participates in the process eventually, by buying (and thereby passing judgment on) the product. This just moves the public one step up in the process: The public gets to decide whose "music" will even get made so it can be sold (or not sold).

Geez, just thinking of music as "process" and "product" makes me ill.

Posted by: , at May 27, 2010 10:27 AM

Really? hard to believe.
I heard this news times from many friends playing on a ta ll da ting site ___Tallconnect.com___,i did not believe, i think that they are know nothing but da ting and love.
i am wrong.

Posted by: gordenss at May 27, 2010 10:51 AM

Never seen a minute of AI, but as I understand it, it's a unique, crossover model for the music business, although what happens when those finalists start making records is largely status quo. One big variable is how a pop artist gets to that pop manufacturing facility, i.e. via AI, YouTube, crossover appeal, pure machination (e.g. boy bands), or good ol' fashioned hard work.

Posted by: the new transported man at May 27, 2010 10:56 AM

Stokin' the star-maker machinery
Behind the popular song

Posted by: , at May 27, 2010 11:06 AM

It was pretty clear that DeWyze was going to be the winner. On top 3 performance night, hippy chick and pretty boy have simply produced numbers, no frills. Lee DeWyze gets an 8-piece gospel choir in frigging robes, and highly produced lighting and camera work. Idol playing favorites. ahem...Good thing I don't watch it, though....

Posted by: logar at May 27, 2010 12:06 PM

One of the many things that bother me (too much, obviously) about AI: I watched a show a few years ago called "The Next Best Thing," which was a contest for celebrity impersonators. Many of them were remarkably good, which should have been a huge clue, but I'm kinda dense so it took me quite a while to catch on to the fact that these weren't just people who'd been cracking up their friends and families in their living rooms with their impersonations of Madonna or Sinatra, they were almost all people who worked gigs as celebrity impersonators. They were the real (heh) deal. They were pros.

AI presents these contestants to us as people who just kind of wandered in off the street, just like WE could, and happened to be able to sing fairly well, just like WE could, and WOW suddenly they're in the spotlight, just like WE could be, with a little luck. And I'm pretty sure that's what the terrible ones you see in the early shows are. But I can't help shake the feeling that the people who make it on the big show are mostly or all pros at this and it's not at all Ted Mack's Original Amateur Hour. It's more like a home run hitting contest among minor league baseball players. They're pros and they're pretty good at what they do, you just haven't heard of them.

Now I should really be happy that people who've paid their dues playing dingy clubs for 10 of their friends for years get this big break and turn into arena acts, but that's negated by what I figure is the subterfuge involved, that these people are being presented as JUST LIKE US! Just ordinary people who sing in the shower. Hey, that means ANY of us could be stars too!

And I don't think it works that way.

Posted by: , at May 27, 2010 12:51 PM

I didn't watch a single second of the show this year, but I knew as soon as I had seen the two final contestants that the guy would win.

Posted by: figgy at May 27, 2010 1:00 PM

And the chick is probably better off. Isn't it pretty standard by now that the person in second place is infinitely more successful (and talented) that the winner? But I don't even listen to new music so what the hell do I care.

Posted by: figgy at May 27, 2010 1:01 PM

Does anybody else think that Christina Aguilera was absolutely amazing? I completely forgot she can sing like that, and she made all those other pathetic "singers" look like diaper-wetters. Except for Hall and Oates, whom I love unreasonably.

Posted by: AM at May 27, 2010 1:17 PM

I'm not a Christina Aguilera fan at all, and she blew me away.

Posted by: humperdinck at May 27, 2010 2:03 PM

Que paso anoche en uno de los homenajes para Simon, que un tipo se puso a hablar mal de el y los sacaron del aire en medio del musical?? Alguien tiene informacion de eso?

Posted by: x at May 27, 2010 5:43 PM

Did anyone see in one musical for Simon, the singer speaks badly about him and the transmission was cutted? Has anyone realized about that?

Posted by: x at May 27, 2010 5:46 PM