the-fourth-kind-1.jpg
Is The Fourth Kind a Hoax?


Yeah. But It's a Smart One / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | October 30, 2009 | Comments (23)


Over the last month or so, you may have seen the somewhat effective trailers for The Fourth Kind (I know that ads for the movie has appeared frequently on this site). It’s a marginally compelling trailer, put together in what looks like a very misleading way. Milla Jovovich, who stars in the movie as a shrink, appears as herself, claiming that she stars as a psychiatrist in the “dramatization of events that occurred October 2000.” Moreover, she claims, “Every scene in this movie is supported by archive footage.” After that, the trailer alternates between the “dramatization” of events using actors, and what we are led to believe is actual archive footage of the actual thing, essentially suggesting that these people in Nome, Alaska, have been abducted by aliens.

But while the marketing suggests the movie is based on actual cases, no such cases are ever specified, and so far as we know, that “archival footage” is also the work of the filmmakers. It’s smart. But by most accounts, it’s complete bullshit.

Do a little research, and it turns out the the psychiatrist, Dr. Abigal Taylor, didn’t actually exist, nor has there been much in the way of alien abduction reports in Nome, Alaska. (A search for the shrink turns up a website that is clearly fake, registered to a proxy, and only recently created). Although, there is the possibility that the names and the setting were changed, but who are we kidding? It’s an alien abduction movie. It’s also filmed in Bulgaria, and not Nome.

There were claims to suggest that a serial killer was involved in the more-than-average numbers of disappearances in Nome (24 missing persons and/or suspicious deaths), but a little more research suggests that that possibility has been ruled out by the FBI. So, it must have been aliens, right? Or maybe it was the fact that these people lived in freakin’ Nome, Alaska, where the alcoholism rate is high and the climate is harsh. Moreover, some of those cases have been solved, and alcohol seems to be a contributing factor.

In addition, if the archive footage is real, there’s nothing really to suggest a link to Nome, and the people in the footage may simply be straight-up nutters (and are we really going to believe a man levitated, and that there was a camera there to capture it?). The biggest problem, however, in attempting to get to the bottom of the hoax is that so many people have now seen the trailer, so many of them are so willing to believe, and of course, it’s those people that dominate Internet forums, so the actual truth is obscured by hundreds of UFO enthusiasts (and, likely, studio plants) contributing white noise to the issue. It doesn’t make it impossible to get to the bottom of it through simple Internet research, but it does make it burdensome and very likely way too much trouble for the average moviegoer, who is likely to be swayed by the bullshit suggestion in the trailer.

In either respect, it’s a smart marketing campaign. Outside of the trailer, no one from the studio is really trying to convince an audience that the events are true; they simply remain hush about it, and allow the wackjobs to do all their legwork. And when the state newspaper in Anchorage attempted to disprove the suggested facts in the movie, the studio smartly had “no comment,” and inexplicably, that newspaper was unable to definitively rule out the events of the movie, as there still remains a mystery surrounding the disappearances of some Nome citizens. All of which leaves a very, very tiny possibility that the events of the film are true, and it is that infinitesimal possibility that the filmmakers are exploiting.


An Update on The Jetsons | Lingerie Football League



Comments

The bigger hoax is that I'm supposed to take MILLAMILLAMILLAMILLA seriously as an actor.

My buddy said he got a better reaction out of the crowd by holding up his ID and bellowing "LEELOO DALLAS MULTI-PASS!" at her during the end of that serial-killer honeymoon whatever thing than any other scene in the movie.

Posted by: D-Day at October 30, 2009 11:25 AM

THIS IS A TRUE STORY. The events depicted in this film took place in Minnesota in 1987 Alaska in 2000. At the request of the survivors, the names have been changed. Out of respect for the dead, the rest has been told exactly as it occurred.

Posted by: Yossarian at October 30, 2009 11:25 AM

LEELOO DALLAS MULTI-PASS!

Awesome! I wish I could have been there. I think all of Milla's movies should end with someone in the crowd jumping up to say that. It would make for a better moviegoing experience. I'm going to try it next time I see one of her movies in San Diego.

Posted by: James at October 30, 2009 12:45 PM

You can see Bulgaria from your front porch in Nome.

Or so I've heard.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at October 30, 2009 1:03 PM

It'll work. Just don't forget to hold up your ID at the screen for max effect.

It should work pretty well at a movie like this, where the crowd should get the reference. I'm sure there will be a moment near the end where there's some barely audible music and her face is slightly off-profile, mouth agape. This will be your chance to strike, grasshoppa.

Also good for drive through fast food lines.

Posted by: D-Day at October 30, 2009 1:13 PM

I'm all for making fiction appear real. Its hard to do and it shows creative skill. Let the wackjobs spread the lies

Posted by: Malon at October 30, 2009 1:36 PM

Do you remember when Milla had a music career in the mid 90s? Well, she was performing at a music festival (Zephyrfest RULED!!) and she was kind of whiny and annoying and complaining about the smell and the entire audience starting making fun of her.
I laughed my ass off.

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at October 30, 2009 2:15 PM

LEELOO DALLAS MULTI-PASS!!

This wins Pajiba this week.

Posted by: Fredo at October 30, 2009 3:48 PM

My brother turned to me after seeing this trailer and asked "Have you read about this?" He knows I research crazy stuff like this all the time with a particular interest in UFO encounters and possessions (oh the weeks I spent going through actual writings on Emily Rose, nee Annalise Michaels, in anticipation of that film). I racked my brain for three days straight trying to remember anything from Nome, Alaska. I had nothing.

I went through all my usual starting points for research. Nothing.

I went beyond those into gigantic library databases (like Lexis-Nexis and GaleGroup). Nothing.

I went beyond the stuff mentioned in the film and found the same info on the murders in Nome, Alaska. Nothing on aliens/possessions/sexy psychiatrists.

I don't want to scream hoax, but I won't be surprised if it's revealed to all be fake. I'll let my brother be the judge of that. I don't question shit when he suggests going to a horror film and agrees to pay.

Posted by: Robert at October 30, 2009 4:12 PM

If the fourth kind of alien encounter is abduction, what the hell are the other three?

Posted by: Jeni at October 30, 2009 4:29 PM

Jeni, the other three kinds of encounters are:

Close Encounter of the First Kind: Seeing a UFO in the sky
Second Kind: Seeing evidence of a UFO, like crop circles
Third Kind: Seeing an alien
Fourth: Being abducted

There's also a Fifth, but I don't really understand the definition. I think it's when you have an alien love child, like Suri Cruise.

Posted by: Lindsay at October 30, 2009 4:54 PM

"I don't want to scream hoax, but I won't be surprised if it's revealed to all be fake"

The topic at hand is alien abductions. Alien. Abductions. ALIEN AB-FUCKING-DUC-FUCKING-TIONS! I think you're allowed to go out on a limb (trust me, it's thick and welcoming.... ahem) and denounce it as fake.

Posted by: bendiagram at October 30, 2009 9:38 PM

If these gall-brickers are gonna tell me this is based on a true story, then what's to prevent me from suing them for libel when I cite their "case studies" for my peer review journals?

Motherfuckers!

Also I will admit I thought this was real. Not the alien abduction crap I haven't gone full retard, but maybe some weird shit did happen up there. I mean c'mon, it is Sarah Palin country after all.

Posted by: D-Day at October 31, 2009 12:28 PM

I had a grand ole time when I saw a screening of this with a wimp friend of mine. Convinced her it was real (it didn't take much convincing, really: "Is this real footage?!" "Um, yeah?" "OMIGOD") until the bit with the guy in the bed almost made her cry.

I felt bad, but not enough to stop myself from giggling for a few minutes.

Posted by: Mimi at October 31, 2009 10:58 PM

I'm confused. Are you reviewing the movie or just bitching about the marketing scheme?

Posted by: fitzwilly at October 31, 2009 11:12 PM

yeah, i was wondering that too. i hadnt heard anything about it before getting a chance to see a preview screening (though my buddy is convinced we saw the trailer) and i found it really scary. i'm not a believer but it did make me think about the what-if. and its a scary question, and the movie shows how scary it is to be helpless. the "real" footage was cool and i bought it but have been reading about it after and i guess some of it has been questioned but is it different than any other based-on-a-true-story? ddnt change my experience.

Posted by: BenGrimm at November 1, 2009 4:02 PM

Clearly fake though the "based on true accounts" stuff is, that is one seriously well-done trailer. *shivers*

Posted by: Shay at November 1, 2009 5:09 PM

Of course its a hoax; everything involving ufos and aliens is, unfortunately, a hoax. I don't find that particularly annoying though. What does annoy me is that they've decided to advertise it in such a way as to drive all the nutters out there deeper into their nutter.

When you consider the justification for insanity that stuff like this puts out there, all to sell a movie, you really start to long for the days when ad-men just wanted us to believe cigarettes turned us into cowboys.

Posted by: Julian at November 1, 2009 5:45 PM

Of course it's a hoax, but who cares? If we have to deal with movie marketing, might as well make it fun.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at November 1, 2009 8:12 PM

Oh and I'd like to add (because the internet is the place where un-asked-for opinions go to die) that aliens aren't scary and that trailer made me laugh.

Posted by: bendiagram at November 1, 2009 9:15 PM

I find it weird that you're even discussing whether this is a hoax or not.

Hey...you guys know Blair Witch wasn't real either, right?

Posted by: ameagari at November 3, 2009 5:50 AM

Real or not, this movie is scary as F***. I saw a preview in Houston a couple days ago and we were all scared out of my minds. I didn't ask who was a believer and who wasn't but all the screams - that sounded pretty real to me. And I guess I hate being able to sleep because I am going again on Saturday.

Posted by: salamander at November 5, 2009 6:40 PM

these people spend the time and money to make a movie to entertain you so shut the fuck up ad enjoy it. why do you care if it's real or not?

I dont really believe it but I still thought it was a good movie.
and something must be real about it, i watched the credits like a hawk and they didnt say a damn thing or credit any other actors. so maybe theyre just dirty liars but its about time someone made a movie like that and didnt blow it for you in the credits.
You skeptics should be ashamed of yourselves for bashing people who made this movie.

Posted by: RIDGE at November 20, 2009 12:08 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment: