free counter with statistics Indiana Jones and the Holy Pajiba! | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

indianajones.jpg


Indiana Jones and the Holy Pajiba!

The Weekly Trade Round-Up / The Pajiba Staff

Trade News | January 3, 2007 | Comments (36)


Item #1: The huge news over the holiday break was that the principals (Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, and Harrison Ford) finally agreed on a script for the fourth installment in the Indiana Jones franchise and — after years in development hell — they’re actually going to start filming this June, with an eye toward a May 2008 release. The film is going into production under the working title: Geriatric Jones and the Search for Depends (with the Occasional Nap). The good news is that the script was written by David Koepp, who has written more good films (Jurassic Park, Spider-Man, Carlito’s Way) than bad (Secret Window, The Shadow, Zathura). The bad news, of course, is that Koepp is going to have to write in a walker for the title character, who is bound to break a hip sometime during filming. Rumors have it that Sean Connery will return as Indy’s Pa (never mind the fact that he looks 10 years younger than Harrison Ford now), that Natalie Portman may get a role (Indy’s daughter?), and Karen Allen may even return, which should be quite a boon to her almost nonexistent career. Honestly, I’m not that worried about Indy’s age (if Stallone can take a punch at 60, Ford can crack a whip at 64); I’m a lot more terrified that they’ll somehow ruin the positively magical associations I have with the franchise. You’d hate to see them do to Indy what they did to Star Wars; maybe it’s best to just leave well enough alone. — Dustin Rowles

Item #2: If I haven’t made it obvious in the past, I’m a huge fan of Nick Hornby, recognizing of course that the quality of his novels has diminished a bit since his best two efforts, High Fidelity and Fever Pitch (I’m actually half terrified that he’s heading into John Irving territory). Fortunately, his writing also lends itself incredibly well to film; High Fidelity and About a Boy were two of my favorite modern screen adaptations; the latter may have actually been slightly better than the book. With his latest, A Long Way Down, it almost felt like Hornby was writing it with an eye toward the film rights; I even pictured most of the characters as Hollywood actors (Hugh Grant as Martin; Julianne Moore as Maureen; Mark Ruffalo as JJ; Natalie Portman as Jess), which is not to say that A Long Way Down wasn’t an easy, pleasant way to waste several hours, though in his old age Hornby is starting to sound like an English version of Tom Perrotta. Anyway, A Long Way Down has, expectedly, been optioned; Warner Brothers did the bidding, and Johnny Depp, of all people, will produce (where’s Cusack?). They were also smart enough to hire D.V. DeVincentis ( Grosse Point Blank, as well as Fidelity) to adapt the story of four desperate people who meet on New Year’s Eve on top of a building famous for suicide jumpers and form a little surrogate family. As long as the director is competent and DeVincentis doesn’t try to get cute with the source material, there’s little doubt that the novel will make an excellent flick. — DR

Item #3: And speaking of Johnny Depp, there has been a lot of speculation, fueled by Queen’s Brian May, that Depp will play Freddie Mercury in an upcoming biopic. The film itself is being produced by Robert DeNiro’s production company, Tribeca. The casting isn’t yet official, and there are no details available, but — since Tim Curry is clearly too old now — you probably couldn’t find a better guy to play Mercury. And, seriously, who doesn’t want to see Depp strutting around Wembley belting out “Fat Bottomed Girls”? I don’t know who the hell they’ll get to play Brian May, though; I’m guessing the lead singer of Stryper is either unavailable or 101 years old, otherwise he’s a dead ringer (at least in the version of him I still have floating around in my mind). — DR

Item #4: Movie voiceover king Morgan Freeman must have been unavailable, as the producers of Stardust were forced to resort to Sir Ian McKellen to narrate their little fantasy flick. The movie, based on the short illustrated novel by Neil Gaiman, is an elegant fairy tale about a young man who enters the land of Faerie to retrieve a fallen star for his lady love. The flick’s being helmed by Matthew Vaughn, the producer of Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch and the director/producer of Layer Cake, and has a healthy cast featuring Claire Danes, Robert De Niro, Michelle Pfeiffer, and Sienna Miller (plus a bit spot by Ricky Gervais). I’m an almost unhealthy fan of Gaiman, and every sign is that this film is going to do his original work justice. The addition of McKellen as the narrator seems perfect to me, as I suspect his distinct cadence and delivery will blend perfectly with the flow and narrative of the movie. Seriously, I’m actually a little weak in the knees just thinking about this. — Seth Freilich

Item #5: Television pilot season is in full swing. Between now and May, those high-paid network executives will be scrambling to figure out which pieces of shit to put on their new fall schedules so that they can present these schedules during the big to-do upfronts, glossing over all of this year’s failures and trying to convince advertisers that next season is the one when they’re really going to put out nothing but hits. So for the next couple of months, we’ll be hearing tons of news about new pilots, and the greens are already being lit. Over at ABC, a pilot for “Mr. and Mrs. Smith” has finally gotten the go-ahead, after sitting on the backburner for about a year. The movie’s original writer (Simon Kinberg) and director (Doug Liman) will be performing the same roles for the pilot and will also be exec-producing the series. Pitt and Jolie will not be involved, however, allegedly because craft services could not provide enough un-adopted foreign babies. Kinberg describes the show as “‘Married … with Children’ with guns,” which isn’t exactly wetting my panties. Nor are NBC’s latest greenlit pilots. There’s “Chuck,” a dark-humored spy drama to be co-written by Josh Schwartz (of “The O.C.,” which officially bit the dust yesterday, with the announcement that the February 22 season finale is now a series finale), which is allegedly akin to Grosse Point Blank. And there’s also a remake of “The Bionic Woman,” being made, I guess, because NBC has the technology to rebuild her. … It’s going to be a long spring. — SF

Item #6: The long New Year’s weekend gave excuses to millions of moviegoers to get one last shitty movie in for 2006 before resolving never to watch a Ben Stiller movie again, as Night of the Museum somehow racked up $36 million to bring its 10-day total to $115 million. The Pursuit of Happyness continued to provoke tears amongst weak-willed men and grammarians frustrated with an inexcusable typo, grossing $19 million. Dreamgirls performed strongly in its first wave of release, clearing $14 million, though at least a few attendees were disappointed that Eddie Murphy never went into his “Hot in the Hot Tub” spiel. Finally, in at number five, The Good Shepherd accumulated another $11 million to bring its total to $35 million; DeNiro was nonplussed.

Most of the last two weeks’ other releases were very limited, many of which will be expanding in the coming weeks, including this weekend. Children of Men, for instance, goes wide, as does the already-reviewed The Painted Veil. Two other movies — Miss Potter and Perfume: The Story of a Murderer — will be getting a few more screens added, as well as the usual Pajiba treatment. Otherwise, it looks like we’re back to pre-holiday shit, as the first weekend in January prepares us for another year of godawful films. And what better way to get started than with Cedric the Entertainer and Lucy Liu in Code Name: The Cleaner. Cedric plays a janitor with amnesia — I think that ought to be enough to steer you clear of it. Also in theaters, Hilary Swank stars in the 475th variation of Stand and Deliver, bringing us Freedom Writers. Of course, this one, too, is inspired by a true story — in fact, I’m beginning to think that they are all inspired by the same true story. Happily N’Ever After also goes wide, but we’re not touching it — we’ve got another long year of bad children’s films ahead of us, so we need to save our strength for those that don’t rely on the voice talents of Freddie Prinze Jr. and Sarah Michelle Gellar.

Otherwise, because we haven’t mentioned it yet: Happy New Year from the Pajiba staff. I’d say something gratuitously effusive about your continued readership and the contributions many of you make to our comments section, but someone — no doubt — would mock my thoughtfulness, so I’ll just keep it at: Thanks. And if we haven’t offended you yet, please stick around for another year. We promise to do our best. — DR


Pajiba Love 01/03/07 | Freedom Writers



Comments

"The Pursuit of Happyness continued to provoke tears amongst weak-willed men and grammarians frustrated with an inexcusable typo, grossing $19 million."

Thank you. My morning has started off right with this.

Hey, now if Prinze and Gellar are good anough for Robot Chicken, they can't be half ba...oh, who am I kidding.

Posted by: Vermillion at January 4, 2007 10:25 AM

Re #2: You have the casting for A Long Way Down about how I imagined when i read the book, with the exception of Julianne Moore. Not her - oh please, NOT her.

Author's Note: Alternatively, I occasionally pictured Ellen Burstyn, if that helps.

Posted by: Mediocre79 at January 4, 2007 10:54 AM

speaking of tv shows what about The Sarah Connor Chronicles....

Posted by: goldend at January 4, 2007 11:01 AM

Great, Indiana Jones and The Search for Someone Who Still Gives a Rat's Ass.


I'll watch it but only 'cause Ford is Han Solo.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 4, 2007 11:02 AM

Re #6 and harking back to Vermillion--it hurts me just to SEE happiness spelled 'happyness' so I couldn't possibly get past it to see the movie!

Posted by: birdgal at January 4, 2007 11:04 AM

I have been following the development of Stardust on Gaiman's blog (yes, I'm that nerdy) and I have to say, it sounds phenomenal. Or at least the potential is there. But I also enjoyed Mirrormask, if mainly for the visuals.
And although I agree with "fairy tale", I might have to quibble on "elegant", as I just reread it and it is as gory and brutal as I recall. "Old-fashioned" would be more of my description, as it was as Grimm as they get nowadays.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at January 4, 2007 11:08 AM

Ahh, Indy 4...
Say what you will, "Raiders" is great. Cool hero, good sidekick, agreeable plot and Nazis - what more could you want in an adventure movie?
"Temple of Doom" sucks: annoying characters, dumb villains, a story I just can't suspend my disbelief for, and teenage horror instead of action comedy.
Luckily, in "Last Crusade" they got it right again: hero, sidekick and bad guys from "Raiders", Connery as a weird professor and a nice and round plot (althought the Nazi Rally in Berlin is a bit much) - it referred to/copied from the previous flicks, but added something fresh.
The Fourth now could become an amazing "last one" with a story about growing old and one's legacy (including Natalie Portman w/ fedora and bullwhip), or it could be the unneccesary revival of a franchise, complete with too many series in-jokes, lack of originality and a 60 year old guy in the role of a 40 y.o. hero. I sure hope they have some good baddies...

Posted by: zuuk at January 4, 2007 11:19 AM

If I were Portman I'd stay as far away from anyhting Lucas related as possible, he brings out the WORST of her acting.

On #4, I'm guessing this is Pfeiffer in another one of her "I'm not a hot chick/whore roles" what a pity.

And that Bionic Woman remake is sucking already. There's only one Jamie Sommers and that's Lindsay Wagner. I can picture the douchebag producer already casting some reality show reject for this thing. nuff said

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 4, 2007 11:34 AM

When I saw the trailer for Freedom Writers I laughed out loud at two things:

1. The fact that it took place at Wilson High School. They're portraying it as a ghetto-fabulous school a la S&D, but let me tell you: I went to Poly High and Wilson was our cross-town rival and we are WAY more ghetto than they are. That movie only represents about 25% of the school because everyone I knew who went there was WHITE. And RICH. They don't even have razor wire on their fences; they use plain old barbed.
2. The ridiculous title. Freedom Writers? What, they write "Freedom" all over their Trapper Keepers? Please.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 4, 2007 1:11 PM

I'd be really scared about the new Indy installment if Spielberg wasn't attached to it, but with his involvement, I find it hard to imagine the 4th Indy being half as bad as the Star Wars prequels.

Posted by: karina at January 4, 2007 3:28 PM

BarbadoSlim, about Michelle Pfeiffer in #4, if it's anything like the book she's an evil murderous witch trying to kill Claire Danes to regain her youth and power. I'm not sure how that fits with the "I'm not a hot chick/whore" role.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at January 4, 2007 3:37 PM

When I first saw the commercials for Freedom Writers, I couldn't help but think, "Didn't I already see the version with Edward James Olmos (Stand and Deliver), or that other one with Morgan Freeman (Lean On Me)?"

This current version seems to be the standard "gentile samaritan offers saves MTV-style 'ghetto' kids from themselves." At least in The Substitute, they had the occasional gunfight to keep things interesting.

And as for Indiana Jones 4, I can't help but wonder if it'll turn out like that South Park episode when Lucas and Spielberg try to remake Raiders of the Lost Ark. These guys just cannot leave "well enough" alone, can they?

Posted by: MrSparkle at January 4, 2007 4:05 PM

@Anne, well here's hoping.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 4, 2007 4:10 PM

I reread Item #6, and caught the "Hot in the Hot Tub" joke. Once again, warmth in my heart.

When has Michelle Pfieffer ever had a "hot chick/whore" role? I admit, I have only saw her in "superteacher/romantic lead/abused wife" roles so far.

As long as Lucy Liu doesn't wear anything skimpy and/or revealing, I can resist Codename: The Cleaner. She got me with CA: Full Throttle, but she won't get me again!

I agree that Freedom Writers and its ilk must have come from the same story, because if there is really that many superteachers in the ghetto, why do the schools still suck so much to need them?

Posted by: Vermillion at January 4, 2007 4:39 PM

While I'm sure Depp would do his usual good job in portraying Freddie Mercury, I think all Sacha Baron Cohen would need to do is take Borat out of the grey suit, and slip into the striped spandex and...Viola! Freddie lives!

Posted by: Mohaski at January 4, 2007 5:54 PM

Stardust!? No way! Now I have to read the book before seeing the film. Hopefully the cast won't screw it up...it's doubtful though...

Posted by: Gina at January 4, 2007 6:16 PM

There ya go:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000201/

I'd say she went all serious somewhere in... 1990?

Her work on Grease2 is a perverse pleasure of mine.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 4, 2007 6:24 PM

What do Pajiba's movie reviewers think about the upcoming Hannibal Rising? I have to admit I am a huge fan of the books (and the movies), and I am shaking with excitement already.

Posted by: SV at January 4, 2007 7:38 PM

I discovered Neil Gaiman only last year, and I immediately had to find everything he's written. I'm excited to hear about the "Stardust" movie, but...Claire Danes?? Please, no.

Posted by: Ann at January 4, 2007 8:54 PM

Seriously? I thought Claire Danes was great casting. The star is kind of bitchy and whiny anyways.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at January 4, 2007 9:26 PM

Glad to know I'm not the only one who thinks that Harrison Ford looks older than Sean Connery now. The man is probably 10 times healthier than I am, but it's still gonna be weird to see those two onscreen as father and son. Make-up can only do so much, but thank goodness for airbrushing, I suppose. Despite all that, Han Solo is still the hotness, so HF has my gratitude for that. BTW, Harrison isn't still sporting the earring, is he? I hope not.

Posted by: Daphne at January 4, 2007 9:38 PM

I have been iffy about seeing Indy 4 since it was announced that they might be considering possibly thinking about maybe looking at scripts. Then Zuuk introduced the image of Natalie Portman with a fedora and whip and my mind exploded. If there is even the slightest possibility of this happening I will be there opening night to watch this movie. There's just something about the thought of her dressed that way that I find incredibly sexy. Same thing with Keira Knightingly. I never was very much impressed with her until I saw (was forced to see) Pirates of the Carribbean 2 and she wore that pirate hat and a poofy shirt and I fell in love. Does that mean there's something wrong with me?

Anyways, as long as they keep Indy 4 strictly within the realm of Nazis and biblical artifacts, I don't see how they can go wrong. Sure George Lucas is involved, but let's not forget that he was invovled with the first 3, and they turned out all right... for the most part. George Lucas only ever seems to commit cinematic date rape when there's no one else around to reign in his hackish tendencies. And since Steven Spielberg appears to be the hackish ying to Lucas' yang, if you will, there is an excellent chance this movie won't totally suck.

And while it is true that Harrison Ford is practically a senior citizen, it is clear from several other comments here that, deep down, HF is still Han Solo for many of us, myself included. That fact, coupled with Hollywood's amazing makeup artists, and perhaps some of the digital effects that Lucas and Spielberg are so fond of, means that we will probably be able to suspend our disbelief long enough to believe that the person we're seeing on the screen swinging across a temple cavern to fight hordes of Nazis with only a pistol and two fists really is HF, and not a stunt double who's possibly 30 to 40 years younger.

Posted by: Carpe Pancakes! at January 4, 2007 11:33 PM

"When I first saw the commercials for Freedom Writers, I couldn't help but think, 'Didn't I already see the version with Edward James Olmos (Stand and Deliver), or that other one with Morgan Freeman (Lean On Me)?'"

this review has Phillip Stephens ALL OVER IT...one love...

Posted by: idiot dentist at January 4, 2007 11:56 PM

dustin,

glad to see you're cautiously optimistic about "Indy 4". i am too. i think it has potential, but Ford's oft-observed geriatric status has failure written all over it. but let's wait and see what tomorrow brings.

perhaps your guarded optimism about this flick will make up for your "Hellboy" shits in the "Pan's Labyrinth" review. oh well...perhaps we can see "Indy 4" in the same theater...seeing "Last Crusade" together was awesome, though i truly do believe that "4" will be a Lucas-influenced exercise in mediocrity.

we can only hope...

Posted by: idiot dentist at January 5, 2007 12:01 AM

I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but if you go to the IMDB entry for Indiana Jones 4, the title they have up for it is "Indiana Jones and the Ravages of Time". It made my day.

Posted by: Rob at January 5, 2007 12:12 AM

So apparently Johnny Depp sings now? Or lipsyncs...He's also supposed to be the title character of Tim Burton's rendition of Sweeney Todd (which I have mixed feelings about simply because of my love of the musical, but it looks to have a pretty good cast lined up).

I think the real question is: Will they finally let him wear a prosthetic nose for Freddie (which they denied him for Ichabod Crane)? I mean come on, the guy was Indian. He should not look like Johnny Depp.

Posted by: Diana at January 5, 2007 12:36 AM

From what I heard about HF during the filming of Firewall, I don't think he is gonna let some young buck take his fedora. I swear, I think he is trying to kill himself in one of his movies. Possibly because Han Solo would never go quietly, but maybe because he realized he boned Ally McBeal and pierced his damn ear.

Posted by: Vermillion at January 5, 2007 2:08 AM

Vermillion: A man (or more accurately, a dork) can dream...

Posted by: zuuk at January 5, 2007 9:28 AM

MrSparkle, I was pretty sure I'd already seen "Freedom Writers" when it was called "Dangerous Minds."

Posted by: Cheryl at January 5, 2007 12:18 PM

Speaking of Keira Knightly, she was always the one I pictured as Jess in Long Way Down. Natalie Portman is too pretty to be that hateful.

Posted by: karina at January 5, 2007 12:34 PM

I heard a couple years ago that the type of script Spielberg and Ford wanted for Indy 4 was one that took place during the Cold War. They didn't want an Indy picture that followed the same formula and basically didn't want to insult the audience by trying to recreate the earlier films and passing Harrison off as younger than he really is. I'm guessing that's why it took so long to find a good script, and I have high hopes for it. I think it would be interesting to see an older Indy during that time in history. Indy behind the Iron Curtain seems like an interesting prospect. I guess we won't really know until they release plot details.

Posted by: nathan at January 5, 2007 2:00 PM

I can't believe that Stardust and Coraline are in production but Neverwhere is not.

Posted by: adela at January 5, 2007 5:46 PM

Neverwhere was originally a TV production (for BBC?). You can get it from Netflix.

Posted by: Ann at January 5, 2007 7:15 PM

I cannot wait until Stardust comes out! I discovered last year after being introduced to Neil Gaiman by a friend through "Mirrormask" that one of my very good friends, Holly, is actually Neil's daughter. So Stardust is kind of a big deal to me, since she spent her summer in England working as a production assistant on the set. Sadly I have not met Papa Neil yet, but I'm hoping one day I will have the honor of doing so.

Posted by: Ada at January 7, 2007 1:37 PM

Neil Gaiman?

Alright, I'll see it.

I loved Sandman.

Posted by: Moi at January 8, 2007 4:42 PM

Nice to see lots of Neil Gaiman fans. I just finished re-reading Stardust and it was better than I remember from my first reading, so am quite excited about a movie adaptation. But when, oh when, will they make American Gods into a movie? All hail, Mr. Wednesday!

Posted by: The Tick at January 9, 2007 12:03 PM