web
counter
 

How Do You Mess This Up? Oh, I See

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (54)



the_tempest02.jpg

I know we have several Julie Taymor fans out in the audience today, and I’m not going to dis on you. Frida was great, though I thought Across the Universe was an inspired and ambitious mess of a movie. She has a knack for visuals, even if those visuals aren’t entirely apt for the particular movie she’s directing.

The next one she’s directing is Tempest, based on the Shakespeare play. She’s faithful to the Shakespearean language, too, which I’m sure pleases as many of you as it completely turns some of you off from the film. And when you see the cast list, you’ll no doubt feel some tinglies in your funny regions: Helen Mirren, Chris Cooper, Alfred Molina, Russell Brand, Alan Cumming, Djimon Hounsou, David Staithern, and relative newcomer, Felicity Jones, who I’ve only seen a couple of times (a “Doctor Who” episode and Cemetery Junction), but it was enough to make me want to revise my hottest redheads list.

And you think: This cast, Shakespeare, and Julie Taymor, how can you go wrong?

The trailer pretty much says it all.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Emma Stone To Play Gwen Stacy In Spider-Man | Wait, What? | Noomi Meet Poots. Poots Meet Noomi | The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest Trailer









Comments

Y'know, I'm not opposed to this. I also don't care that much for Tempest, so it doesn't offend my Shakespeare love. (And oh, is that love deep. I wore my Alphabet of Shakespeare shirt to rehearsal the other day...Ophelia with a full fishbowl stuck on her head for "O" is my favorite!) At least it promises the pretty. And some people using Shakespearean English and understanding what they are saying.

What I'm saying is, I'll probably see it.

Posted by: KatSings at October 6, 2010 11:10 AM

I'm still down for this. Like KatSings said, Tempest doesn't rank as one of the Shakespeare's untouchable works for me and, in fact, I can see it giving a lot of leeway for a totally balls-to-wall crazy re-visioning like what Taymor seems to have done.

I'll see it. If nothing else, the visuals will be unbelievable.

Posted by: Sassafrass Green at October 6, 2010 11:14 AM

A bit over the top, but this is Julie Taymor, so that shouldn't be a surprise.

There are moments of sheer beauty and magic, and then there are moments with Russell Brand.

Posted by: jthomas666 at October 6, 2010 11:16 AM

One of my favorite plays in College. I'll see it, but I could certainly do without Russell Brand's existence in...well, just his existence in general, I guess.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at October 6, 2010 11:17 AM

I think it looks lovely, actually (and was that a Sigur Ros song at the end?). And I haven't read The Tempest since 1986, so my recollection of it isn't all that sharp. So, yeah, count me in, 'cause I love many of the folks in the cast.

Posted by: tamatha at October 6, 2010 11:17 AM

...besides, have you seen Prospero's Books? Taymor's got a looooooong way to go to reach that level of batshit crazy interpretation.

Posted by: jthomas666 at October 6, 2010 11:18 AM

When I saw the trailer, I was very curious to see the Pajiban reaction. I will see it - pretty much no matter what. It will be beautiful, and I actually like The Tempest.

That being said, I can see the forced nature of the trippy effects, and I disagree with some of the directorial decisions regarding sound design. I don't much care for Ariel yet, either.

I will still get a style-boner. And Sandy Powell can do no wrong.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at October 6, 2010 11:18 AM

I don't remember so many explosions in The Tempest.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 6, 2010 11:18 AM

...besides, have you seen Prospero's Books?

*shudder* shit, back to the drinking that drowns out those memories.

Posted by: twig at October 6, 2010 11:21 AM

I don't get it. It's Hollywood + Shakespeare. Expectations are low to begin with. You don't even really need to qualify it much beyond that. They'll get some things right, the rest will be slightly ridiculous ... enh. Yeah, I'll see it. As several people have mentioned, though, The Tempest is a weaker work anyway. It does look rather pretty, though, doesn't it?

Posted by: Samantha at October 6, 2010 11:23 AM

There was a lot of pointing with pointy implements and an abundance of over-acting. Though, it being Shakepearian, it seems to fit.

Posted by: admin at October 6, 2010 11:23 AM

The best way to save this would be to cut 75% of Russel Brand's scenes, and 85% of the stupid lovers plot.

But they won't do that, because he's a big name and the other two have pretty faces.

Posted by: That Girl at October 6, 2010 11:25 AM

Ummm...Felicity Jones. She was born on January 19, 1984, I was born on January 19, 1984. She's a red head, I'm a red head. She's incredibly attractive, me not so much. Like the philosopher Meatloaf once said "Two Out of Three Ain't Bad."

Posted by: pastor of muppets at October 6, 2010 11:25 AM

Hee. "Style boner" Exactly.

Posted by: Jami at October 6, 2010 11:28 AM

Did I just see Chris Cooper?
[Rubs eyes, waits for cast listing to pop up]
It is Chris Cooper!
Damn, now with him, Alfred Molina, AND Helen Mirren, I feel like I have to watch this shit.

Posted by: penelope at October 6, 2010 11:30 AM

Oh crap. I really wanted to like this anyway, but the trailer is so disappointing. Sure, the visuals might be interesting, but that overload of strange computer manipulation strikes me as cheap after a while. It also messes with my suspension of disbelief.
On the other hand, I might be able to overlook the weird Julie Taymor visuals if the tone of the film is less frenetic and stupid than it seemed in the trailer. Can we all agree that this trailer is an unholy mess? We've got all sorts of unrelated clips stirred into each other, no transition between what's supposed to be dramatic and what's supposed to be funny, and (for those who don't remember / don't know The Tempest) there is absolutely NO hint at the story.
Ugh.

Posted by: katyv at October 6, 2010 11:32 AM

Why, why, why was that picked as the soundtrack?

How To Ruin A Shakespeare Film In One Easy Step.

Posted by: heddy at October 6, 2010 11:33 AM

I actually think this has a chance to be good. I'm a fan of the The Tempest, of course tis always hard translating the Bard to screen but it has been done successfully before. Of course this movie will make no money. The lovers look a bit boring in this version. But Djimon Hounsou as Caliban....I like.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at October 6, 2010 11:35 AM

As much as it troubles me that Brand may completely cock this thing up, I had a strange attraction to the trailer. I got a masters degree in English literature with an emphasis in Renaissance drama. Casting Russell Brand in Shakespeare is EXACTLY the same kind of shit they used to pull on the stage during Shakespeare's lifetime. You would have some high drama interspersed with absolute stupidity, clowns, slapstick etc. Hell, there was bear-baiting down the street from the Globe and you could get your knob polished DURING a play if you paid and stood among the groundlings. We have decided that Shakespeare is such high art and that low artists should not be allowed to speak his honeyed words. I think that we forget that Shakespeare was, originally, the popular culture of his day and was considered low art. I mean, in 12th Night there's a comedy bit where two guys mistake a dog for a bear. Just sayin.

-- You have been enjoying, "Just Sayin" with professor_love.

Posted by: professor_love at October 6, 2010 11:37 AM

Well, I figured it was a bad sign that Prospero became Prospera. You know, in a play where the daughter of the sorcerer has never interacted with other women beyond infancy? That might, you know, undermine a major aspect of the play.

I've heard terrible things about this film. Horrible, ugly things that I do not wish to believe could happen in neither Helen Mirren nor William Shakespeare pictures. Yet the complaints are consistent and I'm getting scared.

Julie Taymor struck gold once with a Broadway show and she has a free pass to do whatever crazy things she wants to and they just aren't working. I liked Titus as much as the next Shakespeare fan, but this looks like crap. Pure crap. Crap in its most distilled form. And now I fear for the Spider-Man musical I want ever so much to be good. Is it a matter of reigning in Taymor's artistic vision or making sure she has the right material to begin with? I don't know.

Posted by: Robert at October 6, 2010 11:38 AM

I don't get it. It's Hollywood + Shakespeare. Expectations are low to begin with. You don't even really need to qualify it much beyond that.

Expectations were justifiably high after Titus.

Posted by: twig at October 6, 2010 11:40 AM

Have you seen Taymor's Titus? I AM THERE BASED ON THAT ALONE.

It's already shejuled in my datebook. IN INK.

P.S. HELEN MIRREN.

Posted by: Anna von Beav at October 6, 2010 11:47 AM

The music supervisor should be flayed.

Hot mess.

Posted by: Cindy at October 6, 2010 11:53 AM

I've always felt that "The Tempest" was written after Shakespeare went on one of his drunken week-long binges and woke up with a hangover and a quill in his hand, wondering what the hell he had actually put on paper.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 6, 2010 11:54 AM

Titus. That is reason enough to give this one a looksey. But definitely getting a bit worried now. As if casting Russel Brand wasn't worrisome enough.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 6, 2010 12:01 PM

I will admit that, for some obviously stupid reason (because I love the play) I have not yet seen Titus. But it wouldn't make my expectations for a Shax adaptation to film any higher. Just because.

PS: professor_love, I heart you. Or maybe just your degree. Someday, it shall be mine. Oh yes...

Posted by: Samantha at October 6, 2010 12:14 PM

I'm sorry... WHAT'S wrong with this?

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at October 6, 2010 12:21 PM

it looks like 2 different movies.

one is a crappy special effects wizard movie. cheap looking computer generated effects and bad music.

then there's this other movie with actors that i love, shot in a beautiful, crisp, detailed fashion. natural and stunning.

combined it's a confusing hot mess.

Posted by: glittergirl at October 6, 2010 12:24 PM

I guess what I'm saying is, as someone who's performed more Shakespeare than most people have ever seen, I am so NOT offended by this, I don't even know where to begin.

See... the point of ANY modern performance of Shakespeare -- on film, radio, TV, stage -- is to make it accessible and understood and entertaining. And not necessarily in that order. Shakespeare himself was really only concerned with the latter.

Methinks he would approve.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at October 6, 2010 12:24 PM

After watching this I can't quite tell if the film sucks or if the person responsible for designing the trailer needs to be shot. As long as the music and cheesier of the cgi scenes (the ones that superimpose a character over a different scene) are "not appearing in this film," it might not be terrible.

Although there's no real excuse for the overacting. Yeah, it's Shakespearean, but that's because back in the Bard's time you had to yell at the audience so they could hear you. No reason to do that in a movie.

Posted by: Royalewithcheese at October 6, 2010 12:27 PM

Maryscott hits the nail on the head. Shakespeare wrote plays aimed at the common people. Adapting his works to make them accessible to the "commoners" of today is right in line with his intent.

I think casting Brand in the clown role is a god choice. We're not supposed to take that kind of character seriously, he's a break from the weighty matters of the play. I can totally see him pissing in the courtyard during Macbeth.

Posted by: FyreHaar at October 6, 2010 12:42 PM

Y'know. I'm probably going to see this. It's purdy and has Helen Mirren in it. That's really all it takes to get me in a seat.

Posted by: Kiddo at October 6, 2010 12:43 PM

You people keep mentioning Titus like it's some perfect artifact. It's so, so not. I'm not saying it's awful, I'm just saying it's not the homerun everyone here seems to think it is.

I'm just glad Taymor keeps not doing my favorite Shakespeare plays. And it's a wonder she hasn't tried her hand at A Midsummer Night's Dream, as that's more up her stylistic alley. But maybe I shouldn't give her any ideas...

@Robert, have you not heard U2's BIG DAMN SPIDER-MAN SONG for the Broadway play, yet? Don't bother with hopes, high or low, on that one, sir.

Posted by: RobP at October 6, 2010 12:47 PM

Yeah, yeah, yeah, Shakespeare played to the groundlings. We all know this. Methinks today's groundling analog would be utterly confused by this abstract, arthouse trailer. That argument is just silly.

Posted by: RobP at October 6, 2010 12:49 PM

I'm just saying it's not the homerun everyone here seems to think it is.

Yes, yes it is.

So there.

Posted by: twig at October 6, 2010 1:20 PM

Oh, the trailer itself is cocked up eleven ways to Sunday. It's aimed either at ardent Bard-heads who will go to anything penned by or based on Shakespeare or at LSD addicts. Or possibly the intersection of the two groups.

Still, there are enough compelling images (these images involve neither CGI hellhounds nor Russell Brand (though I'd totally be on board with CGI hellhounds devouring Russell Brand)) to give me hope. It can't be as messed up as Propero's Books (he says, whispering a silent prayer to Melpomene).

Besides, , as has already been noted, Helen Mirren as Prospera is total win.

Posted by: jthomas666 at October 6, 2010 1:34 PM

But hey, I liked Prospero's Books...

Also, HELEN MOTHERFUCKING MIRREN.

Posted by: Jerry at October 6, 2010 1:53 PM

Rob P, I love the premiered Spider-Man song and fully intend on auditioning with that sucker in a few years when the hooplah dies down.

Then again, I also audition with "Heaven" from Carrie: The Musical and do the occasional 8-bar audition with a random section of Starmites, so my taste level is questionable.

Posted by: Robert at October 6, 2010 2:03 PM

Fuck all of you.

The Tempest is not a weaker work. It is a damned masterful work.

Posted by: coryo at October 6, 2010 2:16 PM

Yet another Shakespeare aficionado chiming in to say that I will be watching this. The Tempest is not my favorite of his works, but I have to think the movie is far better than the trailer.

Posted by: Melody at October 6, 2010 2:54 PM

I didn't understand a word from that.

Posted by: grace b at October 6, 2010 3:41 PM

"The Top" just called, he said this fucker was flying over so gorram high you'd need a winch to pull it down.

And I loved Titus.

Posted by: D-Day at October 6, 2010 3:52 PM

I mostly just got the impression that the badness from the trailer was the product of terrible trailer editing, rather than any reflection on the film itself, so I'm still hopeful. Each of the scenes, not the whole, seemed like they had a lot of interesting potential.

Plus I'm a sucker for visuals, and the entire cast is awesome, so...yeah, I'm there.

Posted by: Kalexal at October 6, 2010 4:22 PM

Dustin, get your hands on Titus, directed by Taymor. Do it right now. Holy batshit crazy movie and it's AMAZING. Based on that, and the cast she put together (yes, even Brand) I cannot wait for this movie.

And I'm with twig. Yes, yes it fucking is.

Posted by: figgy at October 6, 2010 4:59 PM

I have SUCH a soft spot for The Tempest. We named our first cat Ariel (NOT for the little mermaid dammit, even though it came out that year!) and I quoted lines from Miranda and Caliban at LEAST twice yesterday in various chats. 'Peopling the world with Calibans' is a fave of mine. The folks I am mocking with that NEVER understand it.
I think Mirren will rock it, I actually am amused by Russel Brand, and aside from some over the top-ness, I think it will be a fun take on the play. I think if Shakespeare were alive today, he would SOOO be giving James Cameron a run for his money in the popular appeal-to-the-masses story telling. It isn't always the BEST literature of an age that survives, it is the most popular.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 6, 2010 6:04 PM

Don't tell Cromwell the Widow Dido's dead.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at October 6, 2010 7:11 PM

That trailer is the advertising definition of a Hot Mess... seriously...

worst. trailer. ever.

Posted by: Claire Allison at October 6, 2010 8:22 PM

Eh, it could be way worse. Even if the visuals are bat-shit insane, I still want to see that cast in action. Especially Felicity Jones - eeeeek she is so adorable!

Posted by: Empress of All the Russias at October 6, 2010 10:04 PM

I'm sorry, how is this not going to be a big ol' bucket of fun?

Helen Mirren. Does no one remember the awesomeness of Excalibur?

Posted by: Salieri2 at October 7, 2010 12:13 AM

@Tamata: yes, I'm pretty sure that it's Sigur Ros that's playing at the end, which is quite an appropriate choice I would say. As for the movie, sure it's over the top, but that Taymor for you. Still, seeing Helen Mirren as a sorceress is just like an early Christmas present. So I'm not going to miss out on that.

Posted by: Ioana Liliana at October 7, 2010 7:09 AM

Julie Taymor + Witchcraft + HELEN "I'M THE QUEEN TWICE BITCH" MIRREN + Shakespeare = FTW

Posted by: Yankee Sodomite at October 7, 2010 10:18 AM

okay, just: did this remind anyone else of, like, the result of a makeout session between The Sorcerer's Apprentice and Where The Wild Things Are?

Posted by: ashby at October 7, 2010 6:02 PM

Finally someone has found a way to put Djimon Hounsou into a loincloth and make him ashy as fuck. FINALLY. FIRST TIME FOR EVERYTHING.

Posted by: Hey at October 7, 2010 10:26 PM

me doi a conocer como soi y que el cliete se sienta satisfecho

Posted by: sensualcarissa at December 24, 2010 1:04 AM