Hellraiser Remake … Ayup.
Why Not / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | September 5, 2008 | Comments (36)


Hellraiser_09.jpgWhen I was 13, while other Dads and sons were out throwing the ball around and playing grab-ass with the coeds at the mall, my dead gay father took me and a friend to see Hellraiser, because Hellraiser was Rated R for rock-your-face-off blood and guts. Because back in the day, there was no such thing as a PG-13 horror film, which is what God intended, and which also allowed me an occasional moment of junior-high popularity, being the only guy in my age bracket able to see Rated R horror films. It’s called a competitive advantage. Chicks dig a guy who can relate the story of a zombie being chased by demons escaped from a sado-masochistic hell.

God, that movie was awesome.

Anyway, it’s being remade, that much we know. Patrick Melton and Marcus Dunstan (The Feast trilogy — yeah, there were 3!) have been tapped to write the script. Who will direct and who will ultimately play Pinhead is still an open question, but the remake does have the blessing of Clive Barker, who discussed it (along with the Candyman remake) with MTV, admitting that later installments of the previous Hellraiser franchise were shitty, profit-motivated sequels. He also had a word about the current state of horror films:


Not only does a memorable horror movie need a good script, but it needs heart-stopping scares, argues the filmmaker. You can’t hold anything back and that’s why Barker is opposed to PG-13 horror. He said if he has his way, the new “Hellraiser” and “Candyman” flicks won’t follow the same trend as PG-13 remakes such as “The Eye” and “Prom Night.”

“It’s one of the most disgusting developments in the last few years,” Barker said of toned-down horror. “The whole notion of a PG-13 horror movie to me is a contradiction in terms. It’s like having a XXX Disney picture. It doesn’t work.”


Well, clearly Barker hasn’t seen Fisterbell or my favorite, Fucking Goofy, but the point remains: Give us blood, or give us death. Or both. And lots of it.


Tyler Perry's The Family that Preys Trailer | Zack and Miri Movie Poster





Comments

I wouldn't object to this except that movie executives wouldn't know a good horror movie if it brought them out, got them shitfaced and then took them home and gave them the banging of a lifetime.

No matter what Clive says this will suck. As will the Candyman remake.

Posted by: Catag at September 5, 2008 9:11 AM

I really liked "Hellraiser II". The rest were horrible, but I thought the second one was pretty decent.

Posted by: ajax19 at September 5, 2008 9:14 AM

Hellraiser: Inferno was better than expected for a direct-to-video Craig Scheffer starring sequel. I think I've seen all of the movies in the series but they kind of run together into one big sado-masochistic conglomeration of hooked chains, dank, and drearily intoned vaguely gothic phrases like "You're suffering will be legendary, even in Hell!" which is awesome to use in everyday conversation.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 5, 2008 9:38 AM

My fellow Fangoria-reading/editing-bemoaning friend and I snuck into "Hellraiser II" (can't remember what we bought tickets for, I know we paid for "Mac and Me" when we saw Nightmare IV). It was the middle of the day and the only other people in the theater were a senior couple, who got up and left about halfway through.

Hey, maybe they got there early and were just killing time!

Sure, stuff like, well, the picture above gives me the heebiest of jeebies, I'm extremely squeamish on skin-breakin stuff, real or movie or even just descriptive words, but that "What is your pleasure, Sir?" ending was easily the scariest thing I saw in both movies. Jesus!

Posted by: Jay at September 5, 2008 9:39 AM

What you neglected to mention is that Clive Barker WANTED Hellraiser remade. In earlier interviews on this, he mentioned how he did the best he could with a limited budget and stilted technology, but now thinks it can be much better when made with money and computers capable of running more than Pong or text based adventure games.

The more you know.

Though he also was supposed to be writing the new script himself, so who knows what's actually happening here.

Posted by: Robert at September 5, 2008 9:40 AM

"It's one of the most disgusting developments in the last few years," Barker said of toned-down horror.

I love that man.

But really? Hellraiser remake? Is that necessary? I mean honestly. Who would play Julia? They'll get somebody far too young, and not nearly bitchy enough. *sigh*

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 5, 2008 9:45 AM

Just three days ago, I was thinking about how disturbing that scene is ... "Jesus wept."

I can't wait to see this.

Posted by: Jason at September 5, 2008 11:15 AM

I thought Hellraiser II was one of the best sequels I've ever seen. And no, obviously I don't mean it was as good a movie as Aliens or The Godfather, Part II. But it was a rare sequel that managed to capture the original's style and themes while continuing the story and expanding its scope.

And Inferno was pretty good for a stand-alone story, too. I like that it gave us a different view of Pinhead and the necessity of his existence. 'Cause sometimes, the damned reeeeally have it coming.

Posted by: Todd at September 5, 2008 11:36 AM

Clive Barker is fucking awesome.

BUT WHERE IS MY IMAJICA MOVIE?

Posted by: Bucko at September 5, 2008 11:39 AM

Fuck that, I take it back.

Imajica needs to be a series on HBO.

Posted by: Bucko at September 5, 2008 11:43 AM

Hellraiser scares the shit out of me to this day. I don't think I need to see a remake.
Clive Barker needs to work on getting Abarat made into a movie.

Posted by: Courtie at September 5, 2008 12:12 PM

lol Rawhead Rex

Posted by: Asta at September 5, 2008 12:13 PM

oh my gawd, Rawhead Rex!!! I hadn't thought about that in years. In my teenage years, I went through only a brief phase of boy posters on my walls (oh, Duran Duran), which was quickly replaced by a much longer phase of horror movie posters. Stuff ripped out of Fangoria, stuff from Cinefex, full size posters purchased at Spencer Gifts, whatever I could get my hands on. Jason Voorhees, Michael Myers, Freddie Kruger, the Tall Man, Duane and Belial Bradley... I could go on all day. Rawhead Rex was up there. I kind of wanted to keep him as a pet, to eat the stupid bunch of assholes I went to high school with.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 5, 2008 12:24 PM

Barker actually had a deal with Disney to make a movie and THEME PARK RIDES out of Abarat before he started writing it, based just on his paintings... but it fell through recently due to those ever-vague and ubiquitous creative differences.

There's a Thief of Always movie coming out someday, though.

Posted by: Bucko at September 5, 2008 12:24 PM

You mention Fisterbell But no The Little Spermaid? Shame on you sir. I grew up on that classic.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at September 5, 2008 12:31 PM

I really love Clive. Love him to bits. But he has put his name to some, shall we say, underwhelming productions, over the last decade.

Remaking Hellraiser is a bit like remaking Casablanca. Sure, you can do it, it'll probably make money and you'll be able to do things now that the original never could. But do we need it?

The original is more than just a movie to me, it's an experience, a mile stone in my life and a text that I refer to like a book of the Bible. Maybe that's my problem. Maybe I'm being too precious about it. But if you ask me, it's damn near pefect as is and if some exec from the 21st century gets involved with it, they'll probably want to "retool" it, "reimagine" and "make it relevant to a modern cinema going audience". In short, bend it over and fuck it.

I hope Clive maintains an iron fist of control over this. This is his baby, after all. For all his dark fantastic desires, the world first really got to know him as "the creator of Hellraiser". His fate and the fate of his creation are forever entwined. And if as long as he does maintain a tight control over his work, I also hope that his instincts steer him true and he comes up with a final product worthy of his (and his hellish original vision's) legend.

As for an HBO series of Imajica, there's always the Great and Secret Show HBO series... I mean, Carnivale. (Which reminds me, I have to get season two on DVD soon!)

Posted by: Godsbane at September 5, 2008 12:33 PM

@Anna: I bought a crappy, albeit cheap VHS copy of Rawhead Rex on ebay a few months ago, and even though half of the movie is muddled by static, I consider it to be my finest acquisition to date. I love that Rawhead Rex wastes no time with exposition at all. I love that Howard's daughter's name is Minty. I love that Rawhead baptizes Declan with what one can only assume is urine. Rawhead Rex is pure evil, pure power, pure terror and the movie is made of pure awesome and win.

Posted by: Asta at September 5, 2008 12:53 PM

You know, I may still have this on VHS; I seem to recall taping it when it played on cable, way back when... Probably around the same time that MTV actually played music videos! Yes, I'm really, really old.

Ooh! Project for the weekend: look through box of old VHS tapes taped off cable!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 5, 2008 1:02 PM

If you read the short story, Asta, it is quite explicit that it is, in fact, demonic urine.

Posted by: Bucko at September 5, 2008 1:44 PM

The problem with an adaptation of The Great and Secret Show and Everville is that no one, NO ONE, wants to see a Lix or the process to create one on any size screen. It's bad enough in words on a page.

Posted by: Bucko at September 5, 2008 1:46 PM

Well, clearly Barker hasn't seen Fisterbell or my favorite, Fucking Goofy, but the point remains: Give us blood, or give us death. Or both. And lots of it.

Those were classics, all right - the ride based on Snow White's 7 Holes for 7 Dwarves feels just like a Skittimus fantasy. Blood, death, and turkey claws.

Posted by: lordhelmet at September 5, 2008 1:50 PM

Ha ha ha... I have a pencil drawing I did of a Lix somewhere, Bucko. One of the best horror creatures of all time.

Posted by: Godsbane at September 5, 2008 1:58 PM

Beauty and the Breast and the Loin King were classics, too,

Posted by: Bucko at September 5, 2008 2:02 PM

List of things to never show your psychiatrist:

1.)Pencil drawing I made of a Lix.

Posted by: Bucko at September 5, 2008 2:05 PM

They need to leave well enough alone and mine the other epic horror stories Barker has penned.

My offering: Weaveworld w/special effects done by Weta.

Epic horror.

Posted by: Recondite at September 5, 2008 2:48 PM

So which freaked you out more: the movie or the fact that your dead father was the one who took you there?

Posted by: Geetch at September 5, 2008 4:22 PM

"Hellraiser" without Doug Bradley as Pinhead is just wrong.

Leave "Hellraiser" alone and remake "Nightbreed" (or at least re-issue it to DVD)!

Posted by: brownribbon at September 5, 2008 4:34 PM

No one is Pinhead except Doug Bradley. Anyone else deserves to be eaten by the Engineer or hammered in the head by Julia (Clare Higgins is the only Julia I will ever accept). I loved this franchise, although yes, I admit, several of them were pure detritus. Although I was pleasantly surprised by the Hellseeker installment where Kirsty came back with some tricks up her sleeve.
Anyway, I sort wanna see it if they remake it, but I won't pay unless Doug is Pinhead. It's the principle of the matter.

Posted by: osmate77 at September 5, 2008 6:39 PM

@bucko "BUT WHERE IS MY IMAJICA MOVIE?"

Believe me, you don't want an Imajica movie.

Posted by: Arthur Dent at September 6, 2008 12:15 AM

Please tell me that Fucking Goofy is not a real porno. The horrifying images I just saw in my head will keep me up all night.

Posted by: Mike at September 6, 2008 3:26 AM

First Candyman and now Hellraiser?I simply don't get it. Why remake a movie that doesn't need improvement? Fucking greedy Hollywood, pisses me off I tell ya!

Posted by: piedlourde at September 6, 2008 7:48 AM

I have to admit, I absolutely loved the direct-to-DVD Inferno (V) and Hellseeker (VI), especially after the hilarity of Cenobites! In! Spaaaaaaace! My Hellraiser DVD's consist of I, II, V, and VI.

The rest of the movies were just crap to me. I mean, really, a Cenobite that wields CD's as weapons? A Cenobite that attacks with cigarettes, inflicting pain and annoyance until her victim -- I am to guess -- drops from embarrassment?

Posted by: Craig at September 10, 2008 8:44 PM

Hellraiser should stay as is ,besides why ruin a good thing? Who among you could stand to watch this without Doug Bradly? It is a crime agaisnt nature to remake this movie!

Posted by: Brittany at September 18, 2008 5:43 PM

totaly agree , hellraiser without doug bradly is just a sin . would be interesting to see what they come up with but naaaa it dont work .

Posted by: dave beard at September 19, 2008 6:11 PM

totaly agree , hellraiser without doug bradly is just a sin . would be interesting to see what they come up with but naaaa it dont work .

Posted by: dave beard at September 19, 2008 6:12 PM

As a huge fan of the book, the original film and the s&m/ life affirming metaphors that run throughout it, I'm looking forward to it.

4 things that had better be in the new film:

1. Doug Bradley. I know he's not anyway but that's just plain shit.
2. An ending without the cenobobites going after Kirsty complete with flashing disco lights. Why would they go after her? there's no fucking need, man... They're honourable sadists not fucking bounty hunters.
3. Total necro gore.
4. A damn fine (looks and acting ability) actress playing Julia.

Posted by: Lord Iron Sid at October 25, 2008 8:01 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.