web
counter
 

Your Suffering Will Be Legendary, Even In Hell

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (14)



hellraiser-pinhead.jpg

I don’t think Clive Barker had any idea what it would come to. When he directed the original Hellraiser in 1987 (based on his short story “The Hellbound Heart”), Barker certainly couldn’t have imagined that it would spawn nine sequels, all getting worse and worse as time goes on. I know for a fact that they get worse, because believe it or not, I’ve seen seven of them. What can I say — I’m a Pinhead fan.

And they’re awful. The first Hellraiser is bloody brilliant. It’s an intelligent, bizarre, and creepy as fuck horror flick that is still fantastic to watch. The second is almost a satire of the first, but has it’s enjoyable parts. That, however, is the end of the road for Hellraiser. After that, it’s a steep drop off.

Over the past couple of years, Dimension Films has been bandying about the idea of a remake, an idea that I was initially very, very opposed to. Not because I view the film as a sacred cow, but simply because I’ve seen how remakes are getting butchered into pathetic simulacra of their former selves. Given to the right director and writing team, it could actually be quite promising. Given to, say, Jerry Bruckheimer’s army of soulless idea-rapers, and it would be a epic fuckup to end all epic fuckups.

However, Dimension doesn’t appear to know what the hell they want. They’ve flirted with several film makers regarding the remake, including Julien Maury and Alexandre Bustillo (Inside), Pascal Laugier (Martyrs), and Marcus Dunstan and Patrick Melton, of the Feast movies and the latter, poorer Saw films. Of those groups, I’d love to see what Laugier could do, even though Martyrs is a brutal film that I almost didn’t survive. Dunstan and Melton can go shit in their hats, though.

Regardless, because Dimension doesn’t want to lose the rights to the title, and since they couldn’t get their remaking asses together, they’re just going to throw together another sequel, which will be titled Hellraiser: Revelations. It’s pretty much the worst of all worlds — it’ll be written by Gary Tunnicliffe, the second unit director for the seventh film, directed by Victor Garcia, who directed the DTV film Return To The House On Haunted Hill, and will star Peta Wilson, whose star has apparently fallen quite far since the “La Femme Nikita” TV series.

In other words, it’ll be another sack of shit smeared onto a strip of celluloid. Fabulous. Well, two out of ten ain’t bad. Oh no, wait — that’s actually horrendous. Never mind.









Robocop Has Feelings | Finally a Musical I Don't Want to C**ck Punch | Exclusive: ScarJo and JGL Attached to Diablo Cody's "Breathers: A Zombie Lament | Trade News that Will Razz Your Berries













Comments

Awwwww, crap!

Posted by: Uncle JR at September 1, 2010 9:28 AM

Hellraiser 2 was hilarious: "and to think...I hesitated!"

great stuff.

Posted by: Keith at September 1, 2010 9:42 AM

Not surprised.

I too am a bit of a fan of Barker's original. It's weird because the monsters aren't the Cenobites, but the humans who keep searching for pleasure to the point they are willing to sacrifice others. Naturally with such iconic creatures, sequels would mine them to death, but I always thought that a remake could work if you brought that original element back into the fold.

Posted by: Fredo at September 1, 2010 9:47 AM

No love for Inferno with Craig Sheffer, TK? I thought it was pretty good. A bit more thoughtful take on the premise. Almost felt like a reboot with Pinhead pushed far into the background like the first movie. Inferno was the last one I saw. I don't think I'm missing that much by not continuing.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 1, 2010 9:52 AM

I'm with TylerDFC, I thought Inferno was OK. It was sort of an off-beat, eerie, psychological take on the franchise. It wasn't great, but I was still unnerved at the end of the movie. Thats gotta be worth something.

Posted by: JR at September 1, 2010 10:17 AM

I really enjoyed the sequel. I don't think it was better than the original, but it took the series in a slightly different and enjoyable direction. As far as sequels go in general, it's one of the better ones.

I still say "I reccomend... amputation!" whenever anyone complains about that one of their extremities hurts.

I think I saw the third one, which sucked. And I think I saw the one that was in space. That also sucked. I sort of lost interest after that.

I used to have this plastic replica of the Box. I wonder where that is...

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at September 1, 2010 10:19 AM

I actually liked Inferno and Hellseeker. Putting Pinhead front and center was a huge mistake. The Cenobites were always supposed to be mysterious Outsiders with an agenda all their own, not quipping Freddy Krueger wannabes. Inferno kept the Cenobites in the background as it followed a crooked cop's investigation of a crime scene linked to the puzzle box. Hellseeker followed a lot of the same ground, but also provided closure for Kirsty Cotton's story.

Everything else was shit, though.

Posted by: Craig at September 1, 2010 10:30 AM

I have to say, though I'm hesitant to admit it, I really enjoyed Hellraiser:Deader, the sixth installment. I know, I know, Kari Wurher sucks, but still, it had some nice imagery and the storyline was such that it kind of brought you back to the feel of the first one. I don't know, maybe I shouldn't have said anything. I feel like you're all going to judge me now.

Posted by: Smokin at September 1, 2010 10:34 AM

I could see del Toro making a decent remake of Hellraiser, but the dude is already booked into somewhere around the next century, isn't he?

Posted by: Rykker at September 1, 2010 10:59 AM

Inferno and Hellseeker were ass on a stick. Christ, Bloodine was better than those two piles of mung! The only decent (and I use that term very loosely) one of the straight-to-video Hellraiser shit-fests was Deader, because it actually felt like a Clive Barker story...and the Cenobites actually all show up at the end and tear shit up. Sure, it's just a bland repeat of the original, but...it's easily the "best" (again, loose, very loose) of a putrid lot.

Posted by: Case at September 1, 2010 1:38 PM

I went over to Wikipedia to check out the plot for Martyrs and found this little tidbit at the bottom:

"Pascal Laugier has confirmed in an interview that he is currently in the middle of negotiating the rights for Martyrs to be remade in America.[9] The film will be produced by Wyck Godfrey who produced the Twilight series. Godfrey is hoping Kristen Stewart will star."


A movie almost too brutal for TK given the Twilight treatment. That will probably work out well.

Posted by: Even Stevens at September 1, 2010 1:54 PM

Ugh! I had actually, successfully, repressed the memories of having watched "Hellseeker" until Craig reminded me...

Hellseeker followed a lot of the same ground, but also provided closure for Kirsty Cotton's story.

No. Just. Just, no! They took Kirsty Cotton and completely fucked up her whole arc. She wasn't like that in the original story, she was the good one, the only one who really deserved to survive and she really did! Sure the whole experience of the first and second movies might mess a person up, but to turn her into that? That's just disrespectful to the character.

It's like in Critters 4 where they took Ug the Bounty Hunter and made him into an evil, psychotic prick, instead of the lovable, bumbling comic relief... Actually, probably best if you forget I said anything about that particular series of movies.

While I thought Inferno was okay in some parts - the almost Lynchian way the story progresses and ends, and the focus being brought back to the human sinners, rather than the scary boogymen Cenobites - I had a hard time with the whole "engineer" leather daddy cowboy thing. I mean, in the novella, the Engineer was my favourite Cenobite, a kind of Dominatrix whose safe word was probably something like, "kill me harder!" In the films, the thing that hangs from the walls and chases Kirsty down the corridor and tries to grab the Lament Configuration at the end, that was the engineer. When did Pinhead get that promotion... and that outfit!

I have to say I didn't mind Hellraiser 3. I saw it on the big screen with my dad and despite the whole "new cenobites" crap, I thought it was a good update for the mythos for a new generation. I really didn't like Hellraiser 4 at first, but it sort of grew on me. Plus they do use a lot of the history that was actually developed by Barker that wasn't known to a lot of people at that time. Although these two films took creative control completely away from Barker, which I think is just rude, not to mention the reason we have all the shite sequels we have now.

Posted by: DarthBrookes at September 1, 2010 7:05 PM

i'm a horror movie idiot. i watched all of them and i didnt love thie first. i remember the response in the theatre, it was movie geek love, i just wasnt in the zone. why oh why have i watched them all.

the answer lies in hundreds of terrible horror films i have waded through in my undying addiction

Posted by: idleprimate at September 2, 2010 8:36 PM

Nine sequels? Really? Like TK, I've seen the original and seven sequels - I watched them all in the space of a week and live-tweeted my responses - by the end of the week, I was praying for the Cenobites to take me.

Posted by: Dill The Devil at September 6, 2010 8:23 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time