web
counter
 

HBO Claims It Will Never Cut the Funiculus Umbilicalis

By Seth Freilich | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (11)



hbo-umbilical-cord.jpg

Funiculus umbilicalis. The umbilical cord, the birth cord, the little tube of arteries and veins that provides precious nourishment to a developing placental mammalian fetus. Once the youg baby is born, of course, that cord is removed, be it by cutting it, by eating it (yes, some mammal mothers separate the cord by eating it) or by letting it naturally dry up and break apart. At that point, the young mammal must nourish itself.

In the world of TV viewership, of course, the metaphorical umbilical cord takes several forms — over-the-air free broadcasts, coaxial cable or fiberoptic cable subscriptions, or satellite packages — but the end result it to get TV programming pumped into your living room. But we’re getting ever closer to the day when that umbilical cord can be cut. Thanks to the proliferation of streaming through services like iTunes, Netflix, Amazon and individual station/network sites and applications, folks are relying less and less on their “old fashioned” means of television consumption. In fact, if it were not for sports, news and certain other live events programming, I suspect a greater number of folks would have already unplugged their TVs from any cable or satellite subscriber, and simply hooked it up to their Roku, computer, PS3, etc.

Anyway, HBO has had its HBO GO application out for a while now for iPhones and iPads, and it recently added it to the Roku, and it’s fucking fantastic. Every episode of every HBO is available on demand, instantly and at a high quality. It’s amazing. The catch, of course, is that the application is only available to HBO subscribers. And HBO’s Co-President, Eric Kessler, has apparently come out to say that, despite speculation to the contrary, HBO has no intention of ever making this service available to non-subscribers. Ever.

HBO’s strategy remains based on persuading already strapped consumers to add more to their cable bill while also forgoing so-called ‘cord cutters’ altogether. Kessler is undaunted, saying HBO regards cord cutting as a temporary phenomenon that will go away once the larger economy improves. He also says that HBO will flourish under its current model thanks to its star power (its latest coup is getting The Social Network’s Aaron Sorkin to pen a series) and because its partnership with cable companies allow it to avoid transaction costs like billing.

For a company that got it so right, relatively quickly, with the HBO GO app, read this line again: “HBO regards cord cutting as a temporary phenomenon that will go away once th elarger economy improves.”

That’s fucking idiotic.

Sure, some people have probably “cut the cord” because of money, and those people may come back when their financial situation improves. But over time, the proliferation, ease and quality of other distrubtion channels is only going to increase. There is a huge market of people who do not subscribe to HBO and will never subscribe to HBO, for many reasons, but who would readily throw down ten bucks a month to have the HBO GO library available to them. Are we really to be believe that HBO will never open that avenue of revenue?

I’m calling bullshit on Kessler. Complete and utter bullshit. I suspect this statement is made more to appease its various distribution partners, and to give it a leg up on future negotiating. Either that, or Kessler really just doesn’t get it. But I guarantee there will come a day, sooner rather than later, when HBO will do exactly what it’s currently saying it will never do. And I hope someone holds Kessler accountable for making this idiotic claim to the contrary.

(Source: News for TV Majors)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



35 Fascinating Scientific Facts Guaranteed to Blow Out Your Mindholes | Which of Johnny Depp's Leading Ladies Has Actually Aged Better than Depp?









Comments

Seriously, I'm not overpaying for another tier of cable to get HBO shows. I either wait for DVD years later, or skip it altogether. If they had HBO GO like a netflix service, I'd be all up on that shit... as the kids say.

Posted by: e at November 30, 2011 10:20 PM

Offering HBO Go at a lower price makes no sense for them. All it does it make a smaller incentive to pay for the whole thing. It's a "why buy the cow" issue. You aren't going to lure the pirates with something that isn't really cheap and your existing customers have more incentive to downgrade. HBO Go is a value adding service, it makes the bundle more attractive, but as it can substitute almost completely for the main service they won't and it isn't in their interest to offer it separately.

Posted by: ohlook at December 1, 2011 4:37 AM

This sucks hard for Aussies like myself who love HBO's programing, but since HBO itself is not available in our region, we either wait for it to be re-packaged by local cable companies like Foxtel (typically half a year late), on DVD release (even later) or simply torrent.

Sad fact is that it's driving MANY people to piracy. I buy the DVD/Blu-Ray box-sets when they are eventually released, but if HBO offered me streaming for $10-15 AUD a month, I'd hop on that shit in an instant. It's a damn shame too, because there's a huge untapped demographic who would never sign up to cable or buy physical media that HBO is not making any money from. But who might be swayed by a legitimate streaming contract.

Australia sucks balls with this sort of thing. No Netflix, Hulu, Spotify, Amazon Prime etc.

Posted by: Steve at December 1, 2011 5:42 AM

Cable sucks. Offer a la carte subscriptions or GTFO.

Posted by: the new transported man at December 1, 2011 8:16 AM

I seriously considered subscribing to cable and also paying extra for HBO when they purchased the rights to A Game of Thrones. But I didn’t because my hatred for Comcast far outweighs my love for TV programming. You know what I did? Drove over to my buddy’s house on Sundays and watched GoT there. Kessler’s statement is pure stupidity. I would have gladly paid them money for the HBO GO service. And I’m sure I would have kept my subscription long after GoT.

Idiots indeed.

Posted by: Scully at December 1, 2011 9:00 AM

Getting HBO Go available on PS3 for a fee WITHOUT having to subscribe through a TV provider would be HUGE. I would be perfectly happy to have about 15 channels total but unfortunately, HBO is one I really don't want to be without because it's one of the few I watch regularly. The only network channel I watch more than HBO is NBC. So not allowing you to subscribe without the over-head TV contract is stupid to say the least. Are they taking business tips from the Netflix executive team now?

Posted by: TylerDFC at December 1, 2011 9:01 AM

I don't think he's an idiot at all. If they offered HBO GO as a separate service, NOBODY would pay for the entire package. As ohlook said, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever for them to break it out as an a la carte service. Yes, it would be better for the consumer, but from a business standpoint, they'd lose their shirts. Then they wouldn't have all those big bucks to produce high-budget shows like Game of Thrones, Rome, etc., at which point the service itself wouldn't be attractive to anybody.

Of course, if I could get HBO Go separately, I'd do it in a heartbeat. As it is, I am an HBO subscriber, but my crappy cable company doesn't offer the GO service. So I use HBO On Demand when necessary. Or, you know, actually watch HBO.

Posted by: cydeleida at December 1, 2011 9:55 AM

My 65 year old parents would never drop their HBO subscription for HBO GO - I doubt they even know what HBO GO is. IF HBO offered HBO GO separately, they might lose a little money from people who have both dropping their cable subscription, and they would probably pick up some of people who don't currently have a cable subscription, but the vast majority would probably just do what they do now - keep their cable subscription and forget that they pay extra for HBO. Not everyone in the country is as tech savvy as the commenters on this blog.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at December 1, 2011 10:41 AM

I would happily pay just to get HBO Go. I mean, I won't even consider getting an HBO-included cable package, because fuck that noise. With my Roku, Netflix and Hulu Plus on it, what the hell do I need cable for? Because I'm giving up two or three shows on HBO? Well, screw them.

I mean, I get why they do it. It makes a stupid kind of sense. But they're missing out on a huge chunk of revenue from people like me who'd gladly pay for that one service from HBO.

Posted by: figgy at December 1, 2011 10:53 AM

Meh, I pay for HBO, but I've given my HBO Go password out to about a dozen different people so they don't also have to bite the bullet. Some of them will occasionally give me a fiver to help pay for my subscription. My bigger issue with HBO Go is that they supply the audio but not the visual if you try to hook your laptop up to a TV. That rather pisses me off

Posted by: Baboocole at December 1, 2011 4:55 PM

That's what I do Baboocole! Sharing is the way to go.

Posted by: SilverDeb at December 1, 2011 6:37 PM