web counter
 

Hangover II Character Posters Fully Express the Entire Range of the Film's Characters

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (14)

hangovercharacter6header.jpg

You get the feeling that the monkey is the only character in this movie with any dimension.

hangovercharacter1.jpg

hangovercharacter2.jpg

hangovercharacter3.jpg

hangovercharacter4.jpg

hangovercharacter5.jpg

hangovercharacter6.jpg










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance

← The New Kings of Non-Fiction edited by Ira Glass | This Week on British TV: Killing Time Ahead of "Doctor Who's" Return →









Comments

It looks like Emu Cooper was a split-second from pecking the camera lens out of confusion.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at April 15, 2011 10:19 AM

Did the fucking groom really have to come back for the sequel?

Posted by: Gitley at April 15, 2011 10:43 AM

I'm gonna make boots out of Bradley Cooper. The Sex and the City gang will shit their diapers when they see me prancing around in my fancy Emu Bradley Cooper footwear. They'll say, "We need these new styles to stay young," and I'll say, "Get outta here, ya ancient motherfuckers! I'm runnin' the City now! BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! *clickity-clickity-click*"

Posted by: Kballs at April 15, 2011 11:00 AM

That Tyson tat looks a lot better on Helms than Tyson.

Zach Galifianagabalavroo-.. Alan sure does have a helluva fucking skill for eye-fucking the shit out of a camera. I saw that piece of navel-gazing shit Gigantic a few years back where he played an imaginary murderous hobo, and fuck me I couldn't sleep on the streets for weeks he was so terrifying.

Posted by: zeke the pig at April 15, 2011 11:09 AM

Great. Now, not only do I have even less intention of seeing this, but I have an image of Kballs quick swishing down the street, resplendent in feathers, sequins, and rage.

Posted by: Groundloop at April 15, 2011 11:10 AM

I really like that they photoshopped it to the point that we can see their DNA strands through their pores but I'm not sure they used enough lens flare.

Posted by: Paultera at April 15, 2011 11:30 AM

Gigantic was terrible and I had no idea that hobo was Zach Galifiniakoctopus. He was terrifying and I bet he loved that role.

Posted by: Allison at April 15, 2011 11:34 AM

Everyone gets to the fourth poster and says, "Who the fuck was this guy in the first movie?"

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at April 15, 2011 11:45 AM

Sometimes I start to think that Bradley Cooper isn't that emuish, but then you see a photo like that and it's just undeniable. That guy IS an emu and no one will ever tell me otherwise.

Also, eeee, monkey!

Posted by: Figgy at April 15, 2011 12:59 PM

Why does everybody hate everything about this? I loved the first one and I haven't seen any evidence that the next one will be bad.

Posted by: Lucas at April 15, 2011 2:37 PM

Quick Query(based on my secret hypothesis that the only reason the "Arthur" remake got the green light was because Hangover exists:

Which is/will be worse: Arthur or Hangover II?

Posted by: JuiceinLA at April 15, 2011 3:30 PM

Is that Senior Cheng? I'll watch it if he's in it.

Posted by: beletseri at April 15, 2011 4:34 PM

To Lucas:

Because Pajiba is run by vegan, Prius-driving Sundance stalkers who get hard every time someone says the word "glee".

Posted by: Kris at April 15, 2011 11:49 PM

How are they going to work Ken Jeong's character into the Bangkok storyline?

Posted by: John G. at April 16, 2011 2:36 PM