free counter with statistics Gimme Some Pajiba, Baby! | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

evil%20dead%20ss%20ash%202.jpg

Gimme Some Pajiba, Baby

The Daily Trade Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | August 7, 2007 | Comments (70)


Can you believe this bullshit? I’ve been so busy tirelessly tracking the careers of Jim Carrey, Ron Howard, Adam Sandler, Will Ferrell, and the rest of the pudfucks that regularly show up in the trade news, along with the latest in remakes and video-game adaptations, that I somehow let a film that actually warrants discussion slip past me. And who merits our attention more than the greatest B-actor in the history of film: Bruce Campbell. He’s got a movie coming out in October, and I just didn’t know … I didn’t know! I feel like a so-called Star Wars geek who didn’t realize that Phantom Menace was opening until he walked up to the box-office window to purchase tickets to The Love Letter and saw that Episode I was playing at the same time (” … oh god, oh god. Which one do I go to? Tom Selleck vs. Jar Jar Binks. Kate Capshaw vs. a Green-Screen Ewan McGregor. Oh God. Please, Baby Jesus. Give me the strength to choose the right one … *two hours later* … damnit! Should’ve gone with the Ellen DeGeneres’ flick”). Anyway, coming this October, Bruce Campbell will direct and star in My Name is Bruce, a (Charlie) Kaufmanesque meta-flick written by Mark Verheiden (“Battlestar Gallactica”) in which Bruce Campbell, playing himself, is mistaken for his character Ash from the Evil Dead trilogy and abducted from his fictional trailer-park home and forced to fight against a Chinese war deity.

You could try to think up a better premise than that, but you’d fail. Every goddamn time. And please God let it be good — do you know how many Tyler Perry movies that’ll get me through if it is? Hell, if My Name is Bruce is decent, I’ll even subject myself to Alvin and the Chipmunks. Twice. As Bret Michaels says (and I’m paraphrasing here): “I sold my soul to the devil, but man, it was some hot lovin’.” Please, Mr. Campbell, bring me some hot lovin’ (cinematically speaking).

Not to be outdone by that fantastic premise, however, Ridley Scott — Alec Daniel to Tony’s Stephen — has put forward the best premise for a flick this site, in its three years of existence, has ever reported on. That’s right — Ridley, 3-time Oscar nominated director of such classic films as G.I.Jane, White Squall and 1492 (though he may have a decent flick or two in his filmography somewhere) has decided he wants to put together a film based upon the board game Monopoly. And no: I’m not making this shit up. He told the L.A. Times, people. To wit:

Monopoly is still the most popular board game — I might be misquoting! — in the world. So it’s really finding the universe for that game. Because clearly it ought to be humorous and for the family — the funny way it brings out, particularly when your uncle suddenly gets Park Lane and — in England, we have Park Lane, Mayfair and Barclay Square, what’s it in America? Park and Madison? So you watch people change. You’re witness to Jekyll and Hyde. Somewhere in that is a hysterically amusing and I think rather exciting film.

You’re so very right, Mr. Scott. If only we could get Todd Solondz to direct it, Vincent Gallo to star in it, Chloe Sevigny to play the Wheelbarrow, and feature the late Patrick “You’re My Boy Blue” Cranshaw as Rich Uncle Pennybags, that would be “hysterically amusing.” Like, so hysterically amusing, the Geneva Convention outlawed it. Otherwise, I’m gonna need a few sequels to My Name is Bruce before I can stomach sitting through a Ridley-Scott directed version of Monopoly, which I suspect will star Nicholas Cage and look an awful lot like National Treasure. (And how many of you nearly had to leave the theater rather than sit through the trailer for National Treasure 2 ahead of Bourne Ultimatum? I wouldn’t dare re-inflict it upon you here in the trailer watch.)

Of course, if Monopoly is not your thing, there’s always the Magic 8-Ball. That’s right. On the heels of the successful Transformers movie, Hollywood couldn’t simply leave bad enough alone. No sir. I’m just going to try the rip the Band-Aid off the still gore-oozing, air-sucking wound approach here and tell you that, in addition to a movie based on the Magic-8 Ball, these ideas are currently in development: A Hot Wheels movie, a Bratz sequel, an Uno TV show, a movie based on G.I. Joe, and either movies or TV shows based upon Candyland, the Ouija Board, and Trivial Pursuit. Well, we know what’s replacing torture porn, don’t we? The raping of childhood memories porn. I can’t wait to see what Eli Roth does with Chutes and Ladders.

On DVD this week, we give you: Are We Done Yet?, Disturbia, I Think I Love My Wife, and TMNT. I understand, too, that a director’s cut of Uwe Boll’s Alone in the Dark will soon be available for purchase. Save your Doubloons.

Finally, in the trailer watch, here is another one attached to Bourne Ultimatum, only I’m going to give you the international trailer, which is completely the same, except that this trailer offers a very brief glimpse of Angelina Jolie’s ta-tas to distract you from how shitty the animation looks and how unbelievably awful Beowulf will no doubt be. Get excited.


Pajiba Love 08/06/07 | Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmare



Comments

As the very first moments of the National Treasure 2 trailer flashed across the screen, my friend groaned and muttered "Oh my God, it's a sequel to National Treasure, isn't it?" We all watched in silent horror. Every time another reasonably good actor appeared on screen, I winced with pity.

Thanks for reminding me of that, Dustin. I thought the sheer mind-blowing awesome of the Bourne Ultimatum might permanently blot out bad trailer memories.

Also, was I the only one who thought, upon seeing the Beowulf trailer, that I'd rather not watch a movie with animation worse than most recent video games? If I want to watch that shit, I'll spend the evening watching my boyfriend play Zelda.

Posted by: Claire at August 7, 2007 9:09 AM

Bruce Campbell is my husbands hero. I think Bruce is the only guy he would leave me for. I fear telling him of the upcoming movie for the perpetual erection to follow that somehow will be my responsibility to take care of.

Damn you pajiba!

Posted by: wsapnin at August 7, 2007 9:25 AM

I am hoping against hope that My Name is Bruce is going to be good. I mean, c'mon, that damn "Hungry Like the Wolf" commercial is nothing but fantastic, so there has to be hope.

Seriously? Board game movies? Really? The hell...? Great, that's all I needed, a reason to not want to play board games anymore.

Posted by: Cody at August 7, 2007 9:32 AM

Isn't Neil Gaiman working on the script for Beowulf? I'm not into the story at all, and like someone said - why pay twice (actors voices and rendering) for the same movie, but Gaiman is a pretty servicable scriptwriter.

Then again, I am gleefully delighted with new advents in CG even when they don't work 100%, and I don't blame the technology for bad scripts and crap directing.

Posted by: twig at August 7, 2007 9:39 AM

So Bruce Campbell is playing the Tim Allen role in a remake of Galaxy Quest?

Posted by: John at August 7, 2007 9:40 AM

Well! Today's trade round up was a veritable rollercoaster ride of emotions. Buy why did you have to put it in that order, Dustin?

You build up our hopes with the fabulous Bruce so that for a couple of paragraphs at least we are free to fly, only to dash all of our dreams on the rocks of the most asinine movie concepts to have ever emerged from the oil slicked waters of Hollywood...

Yeah, no way can I keep the semi-nautical thing going on.

Monopoly looks like it's going to suck. Hard and long. And as for the rest of it well, I can hear weeping coming from above me. It pretty much looks like Hollywood just made the baby Jesus cry.


Is it a bad sign that I actually double checked my calender to make sure we haven't somehow entered a rip in the space/time continum and jumped back to the start of April when I first read this?

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 7, 2007 9:41 AM

Isn't a GI Joe movie essentially a really bad war movie? I would love to read the damned script for a Monopoly movie. I would agree that it will probably have Nicholas Cage (who apparently only does bad movies now) and I am going to go with ScarJo as the female lead.

Why make a sequel to National Treasure? So glad I never saw the first one.

I hated Beowulf when I had to read it in both high school and college. I hate Beowulf and have no intention of seeing this movie. Someone also needs to tell Angelina Jolie to 1.) eat a sandwich and 2.) just because it is a "historical" movie (i.e. Alexander, a movie that made me want to gouge my own eyes out after 15 minutes) does not mean it is a good movie. Anthony Hopkins (or as Gywnnie would say Ant-ony), what the hell are you thinking?

Should I expect the Epic of Gilgamesh any time soon? What about the plays of ancient Greece? Hollywood should have its movie making privileges revoked for a while until it presents a good idea and not a miserable piece of refuse like it is currently.

Posted by: Melody at August 7, 2007 9:42 AM

Speaking of Ridley...I did enjoy the trailer for American Gangster. Although I agree that a Monopoly movie sounds horrific.

And as much as I enjoyed Bourne, the unending flitting about of the camera was at times unwatchable. Maybe I was just too close to the screen, but there were times when all I could see was a swirl of moving bodies with no definition. And, well, that took away some enjoyment.

Posted by: Smello at August 7, 2007 9:49 AM

I fricking love Beowulf and wanted to bolt out of the theater when I saw the preview. The tag line for this movie is something like "Pride is the curse ... ." Which, yes, if you're talking about the building of Hereot. And maybe yes if you're talking about Beowulf himself--except for the part where IT'S ACTUALLY THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE.

And Angelina Jolie as Grendel's mother? I spit on her grave.

Arrgh, rage makes me inarticulate.

Posted by: wealhtheow at August 7, 2007 9:53 AM

Guh, Beowulf. Not a bad idea to adapt it for film, actually, but I continue to fail to see the point of going to all the trouble to gather a fine group of actors, a fine historical epic as the foundation, and a presumably good script, then trot out some scary-looking Polar Express technology to fuck it all up.

Here was their justification: "Well, in order to avoid that soulless eye thing from past CGI animation, we had eye-motion-tracking to make the characters lifelike." Two questions: (1) Did it make Anthony Hopkins lifelike? (2) HOW ABOUT JUST FILMING THEIR FUCKING EYES AND MAKING A GODDAMN MOVIE?

Bwuh. Thankfully, there was no NT2 trailer at our showing of The Bourne Ultimatum.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at August 7, 2007 9:56 AM

Sorry all you National Treasure haters--I have nothing but love for the movie. Not that I thought it was a great piece of cinema, but my kids loved it! It got them really interested in US history and made them want to go visit all the sites in DC. We took our trip this last May and had a blast. They can't wait for NT2 and have already planned it as our Christmas Day flick.

Posted by: wsapnin at August 7, 2007 10:01 AM

Should I expect the Epic of Gilgamesh any time soon? What about the plays of ancient Greece? Hollywood should have its movie making privileges revoked for a while until it presents a good idea and not a miserable piece of refuse like it is currently.

I, for one, am itching for an all-star big-screen adaptation of Lysistrata with Jessica Alba, Lindsey Lohan, Scarlett Johannesen (no I can't spell her name, no I will never learn) and of course the required Angeline Jolie in the main role.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 7, 2007 10:02 AM

Awww, I love Bruce Campbell! He is one of the (many) things I love about Burn Notice. I'm glad he seems to be having a resurgence of popularity--he deserves it way more than some of the schmucks that get a second chance nowadays (and he even did it without the dubious help of VH1!)

Posted by: Siege at August 7, 2007 10:04 AM

I get a healthy dose of Bruce Campbell lovin' from the beautifully logo-ed "Burn Notice" on USA. Cannot WAIT for another Campbell flick. If only I could save my pennies for the Brisco County Jr. DVD collection...

And hell, if I had known my love for National Treasure was so damn shame worthy I would have written an eloquent entry in the previous post. I'm with wsapnin on that one.

And word on the CGI horridness that is Beowulf. Angelina Jolie is still my one crossover babe, but even I won't sit through Harry-Potter-playing-quidditch style CGI ever again.


"So Bruce Campbell is playing the Tim Allen role in a remake of Galaxy Quest?"

Hilarious, John.

Posted by: lilianna28 at August 7, 2007 10:21 AM

Melody! The Epic of Gilgamesh! How many, many, frightening and, I thought, suppressed memories you awakened. As a Theatre (that's how "they" spelled it) major, I was roped into a modern dance version of such never-to-be-named-again Epic which, as mis-fortune would have it, was captured on "fil[e]m" (as pronounced by our resident self-appointed "cinema" critic).

Now I am going to have to report for therapy for Post Traumatic Shock Syndrome. Damn you Hollywood! Not even Bruce the Almighty will assuage my reawakened guilt and shame.

Posted by: rudy at August 7, 2007 10:35 AM

The Beowulf trailer looks like The Lord of the Rings threw up in a bad mid '90s copy of the Tomb Raider video game.

Posted by: Annie at August 7, 2007 10:37 AM

YAY for Bruce Campbell. Bubba Ho-Tep is one of my all-time favorites, and really, I can't say I've never not enjoyed anything he's done. (Whew, if you can get through all those negatives, then good on ya.)

I would leave my husband for Bruce. (not really; I would just beg my husband to let me have him for a week or so.)

Posted by: boo at August 7, 2007 10:38 AM

Alex, that would not even surprise me. I am waiting for the movie version of "Oedipus Rex". Angelina Jolie will have to play the mother, obviously.

Rudy, modern dance and Gilgamesh? That might be the worst idea ever. I thought my professor trying to drill the "brilliance" and "symbolism" into my brain was bad enough, but man, I am so sorry to bring back that memory. My sincerest apologies.

Was there anything else that was "re-interpreted" through the "art" of modern dance?

Posted by: Melody at August 7, 2007 10:47 AM

Wsapnin -

Once again, you and I are in agreement. I really enjoyed "National Treasure." Okay, so the premise was cheesy and Nicholas Cage can't act. I love that they took American history (which too many people think is dull...and it's NOT!!!) and made it interesting. They depicted places that we can visit and events and people that we can learn more about. Even better, they made it interesting to kids, making them more likely to want to learn about it in school. I'd say that's pretty darn awesome.

Besides, as an archivist, I find the idea of handling the Declaration of Independence absolutely droolworthy. I simply can't help imagining myself in their place. Forget the gold and all that other crap; give me some old documents!!

Posted by: Shannon at August 7, 2007 10:50 AM

I love the Bruce. I'm so seeing this movie.

Posted by: Gabs at August 7, 2007 10:51 AM

Shannon, have you ever seen "Liberty's Kids" cartoon? I bought them for my daughter when she's older- good historical stories told with kiddie flair. I like 'em.

Posted by: lilianna28 at August 7, 2007 10:52 AM

"Alex, that would not even surprise me. I am waiting for the movie version of "Oedipus Rex". Angelina Jolie will have to play the mother, obviously."

But she'll be so busy playing Medea and Electra, how on earth will she have time?!

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 7, 2007 10:54 AM

Oh Melody, You have no idea the depth of Pandora's Box that you have opened.

How about a modern Dance version of "Macbeth"--totally nude? Believe me, there is a reason God made dance belts. Some body parts just do not "get" the choreography. They have internal rythyms of their own. Five, Six, Seven, Eight...

Try a ballet based on "The Cherry Orchard". The last night I cracked and offered to buy everyone in the theatre tickets to Moscow just to see the damn thing end.

Oh, I could go on...but I won't. Except, one memorable production of "Applause" (the musical based on "All About Eve") gave our group its tag line that has remained with us for thirty years. Halfway through the run, directed by a man obessed--OBSESSED I TELL YOU--with symmetry, my good friend Mary Starr (real name)--a tall willowy gal dressed in a beige column sheath with a green capelet--appeared downstage right for the remaining performances. I concocted "stage business," on her debut night, to sidle up to her and ask what she was doing. She replied (and we all use this phrase frequently), "I am only here because the plant died" and pointed to the remaining ficus tree the director had placed downstage left.

Posted by: rudy at August 7, 2007 11:07 AM

Please, Mr. Campbell, bring me some hot lovin' ( NOT cinematically speaking)!!!

Sorry couldn't help it. The prospect of that movie just brightened my week, possibly my whole month.

Posted by: Jackers at August 7, 2007 11:10 AM

They always have ScarHo, Alba, Knightly, etc., essentially any disposable "actress" to fill the other roles. Angie gets the top billing though. Who plays the male leads?

Bring on more historical inaccuracy and shoddy screen writing. I loathe Hollywood.

Posted by: Melody at August 7, 2007 11:11 AM

Twig - Gaiman is one of the screenwriters and I had much higher (well, less low) hopes for this thing before I saw that trailer. How long have they been working on that thing? Because the animation already looks dated! Didn't someone say on the "If I were running Hollywood for a day" or whatever it was post, that nothing that can be done with good makeup and puppetry should ever be gratuitous CGI instead? This looks like a prime example.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at August 7, 2007 11:19 AM

wow..i've been looking forward to that movie ever since i read the book a year or 2 ago and saw that it was being made...

not excited anymore.

Posted by: Max at August 7, 2007 11:20 AM

wow..i've been looking forward to that movie ever since i read the book a year or 2 ago and saw that it was being made...

not excited anymore.

Posted by: Max at August 7, 2007 11:20 AM

You've started something now Melody in more ways than one. Male leads. My first thought was Dane Cook or Will Ferrell doing a "wacky" Oedopus and my head threatened to explode. Let's dial it down a little.

Hmmm let's see. Well Nic Cage is a must, obviously. We could have Clive Owen phoning in a performance, James McAvoy has to be in everything at the moment (seriously I think it's some kind of law) but I don't see him as a main, there's always Shia Leboeuf - he's very "hot" right now. Oooh we could get Kevin Smith to do a comedy cameo! Or put Johnny Depp in some eyeliner and feed him liquor - that always draws a crowd.

But hey: if the script is too bad for any of them we could always ask Jason Lee.

I'm not bitter.

Rudy: your life is my hell. Seriously, if any of the above ideas actually turns up on the big screen and the population of the right thinking world somehow decides that its my fault and lynches me the next thing I see after the hood is placed over my head will be someone performing interpretive dance.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 7, 2007 11:28 AM

Rudy, how are you not in therapy from all of that? I would have a therapist on speed dial after that much interpretive dance/modern dance.

Alex, if Hollywood ever took any of the god awful ideas that we have managed to come up with and brought them to fruition, I am sending my liquor and liver replacement bill to someone.

I am equally bitter at Jason Lee. I think it has to be CGI/animated schlock for him to participate. Dane Cook is on my list of "People who should go explore a black hole".

Posted by: Melody at August 7, 2007 11:35 AM

Having read Beowulf several times, in several different translations, who the hell is Angela Jolie playing? Grendell's mother is the only character I can think of, and she was supposed to be a giant, old hag. Oh wait. Nevermind.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 7, 2007 11:39 AM

Wait, are you all saying that you didn't take Alexander seriously? What was the problem? Surely when you read history at school, your first mental image was of a blond-wigged guy with a thick Dublin accent and a side-kick in heavy eye-liner?

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 7, 2007 11:40 AM

AtO, Unfortunately, the interpretive dance that you could see might well be a re-mounting of the entire Dance Department's (ballet, modern, AND flamenco; but, sadly not tap) of Hugo's masterpiece, "Le Bossu de Notre Dame" (wait. for. it. "The Hunchback of Notre Dame," which being the product of pretentious artistes was titled in French). It was a spectacle that although filmed at the time has been lost to the ravages of time on magnetic tape. For which we are all devoutly grateful.

Posted by: rudy at August 7, 2007 11:42 AM

PaddyDog you are mistaken, that's the famous "Greek Brogue" you're thinking of. Dublin indeed! Wherever do you get such crazy ideas? Next you'll be telling me that the famous Nottingham accent is, in fact, not British at all and instead is some form of American. Psha!

I cannot however suspend my disbelief to include the wig. No way, no how, not even with large amounts of mind altering substances.

What do you mean no tap?! Hmmm, maybe that's reserced for the special circle of hell where movie industry professionals reside...

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 7, 2007 11:49 AM

Ridley Scott did "Alien", "Blade Runner" and "Black Hawk Down". He can make crap for the rest of his life and still be better then 90% of the directors out there. And "American Gangster" looks fantastic.

"National Treasure" was a fun family adventure that I didn't hate. Part 2 looks as ridiculously stupid as I assumed the first one would be. Why is there a book with all of the US secrets in it? Why not burn that book if you don't want the secrets getting out? How is it relevant for the current President to know there was a conspiracy to kill Lincoln? Doesn't matter. It will make eleventy billion dollars and spawn a TV show.

On Board game movies: It's getting easier and easier to avoid the movie theaters now isn't it? I think Hollywood secretly wants us to spend more time at home. It's a bizarre liberal agenda to force us to spend more time with our families. Or possibly a social experiment to see just how bad a high concept blockbuster movie has to be before it fails to open at # 1.

Posted by: Rob at August 7, 2007 11:57 AM

Eli Roth does Chutes n' Ladders....GO!

4 girls are sitting around playing with themselves and playing with eachother. (Only 4 players in Chutes and ladders kids...sorry) Except, they find out that the hotel in which they are currently exploring all their lipstick lesbianism is a demented funhouse. Suddenly, with all 4 girls naked and oily, the floor opens and they slide down various sliding boards covered in razorblades and glass so their naughty bits get mutilated. When they reach the bottom of the slide they cry and scream and writhe...all the while the camera like a voyeur in the room. OO! What's this???? A light in a hallway reveals a ladder at the end! They walk towards it...still naked, still crying, still bloody...and JUST before they reach the ladder the floor opens up and they fall again....repeat torture. :End Scene: Eli Roth's Chutes and Ladders everyone! Give it a round of appluase!
Excuse me while I go get a brick for the next time he's in the Philly area.

Posted by: PissBoy at August 7, 2007 12:10 PM

Why did Angelina Jolie have a Transylvanian accent? Did I miss something when I read "Beowulf"?

Posted by: Geetch at August 7, 2007 12:20 PM

PaddyDog, do not forget the crying. Oh yes, I flipped the channel back to Alexander hours later to see just how bad it would get and he was crying over Jared Leto. Yes, crying. Sobbing even. I thought that this might have been someone's sick idea to follow up "My So-Called Life", but no.

My history buff husband asked how bad it was. I told him that since he had just finished a course on Alexander that the movie might make him go insane.

That wig was hilarious. Maybe this is what Beowulf is aspiring to beat.

Posted by: Melody at August 7, 2007 12:23 PM

I really didn't know what made me angrier about the Beowulf trailer--that the movie looked like six kinds of suck, or that it completely bastardized the actual poem. Can no one actually create a movie that at least somewhat resembles the literature? They've tried multiple times, and each time I hear something gapingly wrong about it. It's not as if the original work is lacking excitement. Being a huge nerd and thus having actually read most of the poem in the original Old English, I spent most of the trailer not only with my eyes threatening to rupture at the terrible CGI but also growling constantly under my breath, "That's not even in the poem, what the fuck are they doing??" Goddamn, Hollywood. Goddamn.

Posted by: kalexal at August 7, 2007 12:36 PM

Liliana28-

No, I haven't seen the "Liberty's Kids" cartoons. In fact, I'd never heard of them, but based on your recommendation I took a peek at them and just now put them in my Netflix queue. My daughter is only four and these may be too advanced for her, but I'll check them out myself beforehand. Thanks for the tip!

Posted by: Shannon at August 7, 2007 12:52 PM

Alex the Odd, ah yes, The Greek Brogue. Forgive me for thinking that it was Alexander as imagined by Roddy Doyle (although that would have been much more entertaining).

Melody: I'd forgotten about that weeping scene. I was so embarrassed for Colin Farrell that I just had to look away. Even more embarrassing were the teenage girls weeping right along with him. I suspect these were the same teenage girls who during Troy, when they found out there were men hiding inside the Trojan Horse, cried out "Awesome!" because apparently they had no idea that was coming. Insert your own comment about vapid teenage girls here.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 7, 2007 1:06 PM

Forget Brett Ratner. Robert Zemeckis is the biggest hack director working today. You will not find a more ham-fisted purveyor of mediocre Hollywood tripe. If anyone can ruin a script written by Neil Gaiman and Roger Avery (though the latter hasn't done much wothwhile since "Killing Zoe"), well then Mr. Z is your man.

It's been a great while since I read Beowolf. But the only scene in the trailer that I recognized from the poem was a glimpse of Beowolf entering a great hall where the bodies of those slaughtered by Grendal hang from the ceiling. That was by far the creepiest moment of the whole story and which is probably why it has stuck with me since I first had to slog through it in high school.

Forget the Angelina stunt casting, did anyone IMDB this and notice that Grendal will be played by none other than... CRISPIN GLOVER!!!

Holy shit. Now that's awesome.

Posted by: Alabamapink at August 7, 2007 1:15 PM

PaddyDog, you went to see it in a theater? I waited until it appeared on HBO and then only watched any of it to see if it was as bad as I thought. It was. The vapid teenage girls crying reminds me of seeing Titanic in the theater and all of them crying and thinking that the story told in the movie was the real thing.

Things like this make me sad for humanity.

Posted by: Melody at August 7, 2007 1:43 PM

If I want to watch that shit, I'll spend the evening watching my boyfriend play Zelda.

Posted by: Claire at August 7, 2007 9:09 AM

Claire! This is exactly how I feel about televised "professional" poker. Only difference is that I don't have to sit on the edge of my seat waiting for a guy to order another beer.

I find the video game style disturbing actually. It's also kind of weird seeing Ray Winstone's voice coming out of that character - or did Ray Winstone get on the "300" 12 pack diet?

Posted by: GinKirk at August 7, 2007 1:51 PM

Melody: Yes, sadly I saw both Troy and Alexander in theatres (full price tix too). Mr. PaddyDog has a weakness for any film offering in which men kill each other, but even he apologized for Troy.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 7, 2007 2:12 PM

Pajibans, Be afraid, be very afraid. The Beowulf website (ah, the sacrifices I make for you, The Beloved) promises: "Zemekis offers a unique vision of the Beowulf saga in a way that it has never been told before."

What? The original Old English encomium based on Norse legends was insufficiently "visionary"? WTF? It is going to be "reimagined" by Hollywood for the MTV generation? Yikes! Where is Hrunting when we need it to slay these desecrators?

Maybe they will combine modern Hollywood trends and "re-vision" Beowulf as an Austenian rom-com! Or, better yet, Beowulf, The Board Game, where these creative types can go all-multi-media on us.

Posted by: rudy at August 7, 2007 2:37 PM

Who even cares if My Name Is Bruce is a good movie? Even a bad Bruce Campbell movie will be at least twice as good as any of that other cinematic dreck Dustin reported on.

I mean, Ridley Scott's Monopoly?! What the fuck, over?

The next Hollywood earthquake can't strike soon enough, I say.

Posted by: Wes S. at August 7, 2007 3:33 PM

Monopoly! Holy shit, I cannot believe people are making a movie about Monopoly. I can't wait until we get "Risk: The Movie" or "Connect Four: The Jolly Good Time the Red and Black Circles Did not Play Checkers." I could look into my magical purse and find something more interesting upon which to base a movie. See look, I found keys in my magical purse, and we could call the movie "The Jingly-Jangly World of Keys." And each key would open a mystical and magical world of other keys. There could be a skeleton key or a lock-box key. Whatever, I am appalled but somehow not really surprised that some imbecile wants to make a movie about Monopoly. My only request is that it has Tim Curry in it. At least he was amusing in "Clue."

Posted by: Gigi Worthington at August 7, 2007 3:39 PM

Um, I'm embarrassed to admit I actually watched Alexander, but didn't Angelina Jolie have the SAME EXACT monologue in that movie??

Posted by: Helcat at August 7, 2007 3:41 PM

People, you know Hollywood hasn't a clue, this new spate of board game-based movies is probably because some 20 year old idiot with a nepotism-based job in a studio read online that a movie called Twister brought in a ton of money at the box office.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 7, 2007 3:51 PM

if it were physically possible, i would have bruce campbell's kids. that man has been my hero ever since i wrote him a fan letter in the fourth grade, and he wrote back! what a guy...as for the beowulf trailer, is it now a requirement that every single trailer use the 28 days later music, or does it just seem that way? people, compose some new songs.

Posted by: jordan at August 7, 2007 4:30 PM

You could try to think up a better premise than that, but you'd fail. Every goddamn time

Truer words have never been written on this site

Posted by: Brian at August 7, 2007 4:36 PM

If they're gonna bastardize boardgames, they should have adapted fuckin' Fireball Island.

But we'll probably get UpWords first.

Posted by: Bucko at August 7, 2007 5:42 PM

Thank god my showing of The Bourne Ultimatum traded out NT2 for We Own the Night. All I had to suffer was Beowulf, and my father conveniently entered the theater then looking for me, distracting me from the mess onscreen.

However, if it weren't Ridley Scott, I'd be pretty stoked about a Monopoly movie. I mean, think of the possibilities that offers (no, don't think of Jumanji). It could be a surreal trip fest, where the real world blends with the world of the game and messes with our protaganist's mind (it goes without saying all other characters would think he was insane, barring nefarious Moneybags), and......shit, that's turning into Jumanji.

Posted by: Hannah at August 7, 2007 6:09 PM

Please, Mr. Campbell, bring me some hot lovin' (cinematically speaking).

Why limit yourself that way? I say, whatever he is offering, I am taking.

This is about the only thing I want to focus on right now.

Posted by: Vermillion at August 7, 2007 6:11 PM

"....You could try to think up a better premise than that, but you'd fail...."


Damned straight, it's the Bruce baby. Oh and his piano playing commercial is, like, the best evar.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 7, 2007 6:27 PM

"Mr. PaddyDog has a weakness for any film offering in which men kill each other, but even he apologized for Troy."

I was made to sit through many a craptastic offering because of an ex-Mr TheOdd with the same penchant. He even made me suffer through only the battle scenes of King Arthur and Kingdom of Heaven without even so much as a "thank you" let alone an apology. I cannot even begin to tell you how horrifying I find it to watch something from anywhere other than the beginning. It was torture.

Again: I'm not bitter.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at August 7, 2007 6:30 PM

And let me just say that, in my opinion, the National Treasure (franchise ?) showcases ALL the elements that make Nicolas Cage an annoying jackass. His "manic guy" persona, the annoying speech affectations, and all the moronic shit that he's been doing and tries to pass off as acting.

Whatever happened to Raising Arizona Nic? I like that Nic.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 7, 2007 6:40 PM

Oh-ho-ho, rudy! I come from a country where we actually do spell it 'theatre'. But I agree, if you're not from a place where that's done, you look pretentious doing it, even if 'theater' looks strange to me, and feels weird to type. It's like hearing some American kid say 'bollocks' or something. And as for 'fil-em', ugh. Any other former English majors out there who had to sit through some ass who would constantly take on some George Plimpton-style patrician accent whenever he said 'li-tri-char'? *RAGE* I don't know if I have time to cock-punch all of these fools.

Posted by: M at August 7, 2007 7:06 PM

Ridley Scott's Monopoly

Am I to assume this will be a dystopia Monopoly scenario with replicants?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 7, 2007 7:51 PM

An UNO game show would rock. I bet if it works Ridley Sctt will option the movie.

Posted by: JP at August 7, 2007 10:46 PM

"The love letter" is much better than the "Phantom Menace", specially with that "Luke I am your father" twist at the end where Blythe Danner gave proof of her awesomeness.

Posted by: goldend at August 7, 2007 10:58 PM

barbadoslim--

While I do express love for Natl Treasure, I agree that I miss the Nic Cage of yore--mangled teeth and all. (Raising Arizona, hell, I even liked him in Valley Girl)

When and why he decided to make the crappiest movies out there is beyond me. I think it has something to do with the evil influence of Lisa Marie Presley. She gives me the creeps.

Posted by: wsapnin at August 8, 2007 9:14 AM

PissBoy at August 7, 2007 12:10 PM:

Oh my God, are you Eli Roth's screenwriter? It's actually frightening how, while reading that premise, I actually could almost see the trailer for the film.

Also, Hollywood needs to fuck off. Seriously, I can just hear the pitch for a movie adaptation of "Guess Who".

Although, they can't touch my favorite childhoos board game, "The aMAZEing Labyrinth". Damn that was fun. Hopefully David Bowie will convince them that an awesome Labyrinth movie has been made, and they will leave it alone.

Also, I throw in my worst possible interpretive dance experience: "The Lady of Shalott"

Posted by: kdm at August 8, 2007 12:52 PM

I HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE when shitty movies take the awesomely amazing and evocative scores from other awesomely amazing and evocative movies and fucking put them to some brand new fucking piece of garbage film and then you're FUCKED because everytime you hear that song you look and expect your favouritest movie to be on the TV or computer, BUT NO, it's some craptacular OFFAL and THAT is what you'll start associating the music with. FUCK YOU, UNORIGINAL WRITERS ADI*UL@$RERHIPDPYD*(_&_(&*&D&PIOE*()&ER^LT>GOLBERHO"{DFN{IOF[%^&$@%@^#$*&#^%@(^T#P&TGB


Ahem. I'm alright now. Just walk away.

Posted by: Lyric at August 8, 2007 1:30 PM

kdm! Did you really perform an interpretive dance of The Madwoman of Chaillot? Tell me someone else has that experience. Picture it...sophmore year of high school..madly in lust with the actress playing the chief whore...need a way to get into her []...That's it: agree to the interpretive dance segment in the graduation musical "Dear World" based on "Madwoman".

Yikes! What we do for lust. Thinking with the wrong head...again.

Posted by: rudy at August 8, 2007 1:57 PM

"National Treasure" was a fun movie, much better than "DaVinci Code". And as a HS social studies (read: History) teacher, anything that can get a kid interested in the past is a good thing. I'm actually looking forward to NT2.

Posted by: Adam C at August 8, 2007 7:59 PM

Why, Beowulf, why?!
I'm sorry, I am incoherant in my grief. From everything I have heard, they basically took the storyline and fucked with it as much as they possibly could. I was so excited when I first heard about this movie, and seeing the preview, I don't think I could possibly have been more disapointed. As usual, they took everything good about a story and bastardized it. It was all right there, Gaiman! Why'd you have to screw with it? They should have let Peter Jackson work on it somehow. Sure, it would have been overly long and completely devoid of anything delightful or entertaining, but at least it wouldn't rape your soul as you watched it.

Posted by: BiblioGeek at August 9, 2007 2:59 AM

Funny you say Todd Solondz, because I've been watching his movies and renting them on my Netflix account. Would love the boot in Monopoly to end up becoming a foot fetishist played by Phillip Seymour Hoffman who keeps guarding his green houses on the boardwalk.
Damn, I should write for Hollywood.

Posted by: Ben at August 9, 2007 7:48 PM

Uh, dude, Ridley Scott directed fucking Blade Runner. "A decent flick or two," my ass. I want a complete written apology and a 500 word essay on why your casual dismissal of one of the coolest movies EVER was wrong. I expect both of them on my desk on Monday morning.

Posted by: Mr. Awesome at August 10, 2007 8:38 PM