free counter with statistics George Lopez is cordially invited to suck my Pajiba | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

gLopez.jpg


George Lopez is Cordially Invited to Suck My Pajiba

The Daily Trade Round-Up / The TV Whore
May 16, 2007

Trade News | May 16, 2007 | Comments (42)


Obviously, all the TV trade talk this week is primarily focused around the upfronts and all the news that comes out of that (here’s my discussion of NBC’s upfront, and here’s a write-up about ABC — check back later today for CBS, and tomorrow for Fox and the CW). But that doesn’t mean there’s nothing else to talk about. For example, did you know that this Friday ABC debuts its latest show? It’s got drama. It’s got intrigue. It’s got excitement. It’s got balls. It’s “National Bingo Night.” Bingo mother-Fers! Because nothing is more fun and exciting than watching folks play the bingo. The ABC press release says that each episode will include three “high action bingo games,” and you (yes, you!) can play along “for a chance to win,” by printing out your own Bingo cards from ABC’s website. Seriously, I would rather watch the blood slowly seep from my sliced wrists, mixing with the lukewarm bathwater, than watch this drek.

But ABC isn’t the only one debuting crap. Next month (Monday, June 18, 8 p.m.), the Peacock starts airing its latest reality show, “Age of Love.” Now this is a reality dating show with a “unique twist.” That twist? The 31-year-old bachelor will be looking at women between 21 and 48-years-old! As the press release explains it, there will be six “kittens” and seven “cougars.” …Yes, NBC’s press release actually called them cougars. Oh, and the show fucks with the guy by only introducing him to the cougars first, with him unaware of the show’s conceit. Sounds … whatever — NBC is bringing back “Friday Night Lights.” It’s got a mulligan from me for right now, and can do whatever the hell else it wants.

Now speaking of the upfronts, all us “Veronica Mars” fans thought we’d know the story of her continued existence, for better or for worse, this Thursday. Now … maybe not. Variety is reporting that the show has been canceled (despite earlier rumors about how much the network liked this season’s finale and the proposed FBI reboot). However, TV Guide’s egotistical douchebag network sycophant writer says that (a) yes, there are strong rumors that “Veronica” won’t be on the CW’s announced schedule this Thursday, but that (b) the network is delaying its final decision until sometime after the upfronts (by contract, the network has until June 15 to go one way or the other with the show). I’m not sure why this is, unless the network wants to see how much fan outrage there is over the presumed cancellation, to determine whether the show should come back. I dunno what the hell is going on here, and quite frankly, I just want this over with. Good news, or bad news (rip the band-aid off already!), let’s just get this over with already.

With the networks getting all the press this week, folks sometimes ignore the cable TV. But not here. Over at HBO, the folks are doing something a little fun before the June 11 return of “Big Love.” On May 28, the network will premiere a series of vignettes on its Comcast On Demand station (and they’ll hit other carrier’s HBO On Demand a week later, and then eventually show up on HBO.com). Called “Big Love: In the Beginning,” these will be three shorts showing how the family wound up in its current polygamous situation. As long as there is some actual content, and these aren’t just fluff, I quite dig this idea. Meanwhile, over at Showtime, “Brotherhood” is gearing up for its second season. Now I gave up watching rather early in the freshman run, but I heard it turned out quite well. And I may have to give it another shot now, when Showtime inevitably re-airs it before the second season premieres this fall, because Janel Moloney (Donna on “The West Wing”) has joined the cast. I like me some Janel Moloney. Lastly (on the cable front, anyways), last Thursday, Edward James Olmos made some comments about the next/fourth season of “Battlestar Galactica” being the final installment. However, exec producer David Eick came out later in the week to say that this isn’t necessarily true and that when he and exec producer Ron Moore make a decision, they’ll be sure to let folks know. This is the second time this month that a star has come out saying one thing about a show’s demise, only to be contradicted and brushed off days later (see, “Veronica Mars” and Enrico Colantoni’s comments). So is next season the last? I guess we just don’t know yet (but I’d bet my lunch money that it will be the end, and I’m surprisingly OK with it, should that be the case).

I’m happy to report that, while “American Idol” is still a ratings monster, there are some chinks in the armor. Last week’s performance night was the lowest rated performance show in two years, and continued a ratings slide this season has seen. To be sure, at least part of last week’s problem was the terrible (even by “American Idol” standards) Bee Gees/Barry Gibb theme. Just fucking terrible. But Variety says, and I agree, that it probably also has a little to do with a general dissatisfaction with the finalists. I mean, they’re just boring as hell this year, way more so than usual, right? I’m sure the ratings will be up as the end of the season lands on us, and this sucker surely isn’t going away anytime soon. But I still take joy in knowing that we may be past its half-life point.

Lastly, ABC just gave its upfront presentation yesterday, but there are already two new things to share. First, the Alphabet’s entertainment chief has admitted that the “Grey’s Anatomy” spin-off, “Private Practice,” isn’t perfect yet and that there’s “some work to do.” He blames the complaints about the two-hour episode of “Grey’s” on the unique hybrid introduction, and says things will be much better come this fall. Sounds like he’s trying to put out the just-starting-to-glow fires, you ask me. And speaking of putting out fires, can I be the first to piss on George Lopez and put him out? Please. See, Lopez is raging after the cancellation of his show. ABC’s position is that the show would’ve been a money pit for the network, had it been renewed, but Lopez says that’s crap. He feels entitled (entitled!) to another season so the show can wrap up loose storylines. Plus, because his show outperforms “Notes from the Underbelly” (which was renewed) he plays — you guesed it — the race card: “TV just became really, really white again.” (No, George, it just became ever-so-funnier again. Because even if everything new is total crap, crap is funnier than you.) And in reference to (mother fucking) “Cavemen,” Lopez said, “so a Chicano can’t be on TV, but a caveman can? And a Chicano with an audience already?” And here’s the kicker … the clincher … Lopez called his show “an important show.” … … Fuck you buddy. Long and hard. You egotistical, bitter, unfunny twit.

… I gotta go take a long walk, so let’s get to this week’s upcoming finales.

Wednesday (5/16)
“America’s Next Top Model” (CW, 8 p.m.)
“Bones” (Fox, 8 p.m.)
“Criminal Minds” (CBS, 9 p.m.)
“Crossing Jordan” (series finale, NBC, 9 p.m.)
“CSI:NY” (CBS, 10 p.m.)
“Medium” (NBC, 10 p.m.)
Thursday (5/17)
“The Office” (NBC, 8 p.m.)
“Ugly Betty” (ABC, 8 p.m.)
“Smallville” (CW, 8 p.m.)
“Supernatural” (CW, 9 p.m.)
“Scrubs” (NBC, 9 p.m.)
“CSI” (CBS, 9 p.m.)
“Grey’s Anatomy” (9 p.m.)
“ER” (NBC, 10 p.m.)
Friday (5/18)
“Numb3rs” (CBS, 10 p.m.)
Sunday (5/20)
“Extreme Makeover: Home Edition” (ABC, 7 p.m.)
“King of the Hill” (Fox, 7 p.m.)
“The Simpsons” (400th Episode alert, Fox, 8 p.m.)
“Family Guy” (Fox, 9 p.m.)
“Desperate Housewives” (ABC, 9 p.m.)
“American Dad” (Fox, 9:30 p.m.)
“Brothers & Sisters” (ABC, 10 p.m.)
Monday (5/21)
“24” (Fox, 8 p.m.)
“Heroes” (NBC, 9 p.m.)
Tuesday (5/22)
NCIS (CBS, 8 p.m.)
Dancing with the Stars (ABC, 8 p.m.)
Veronica Mars (…series finale?, CW, 8 p.m.)
Law & Order: Criminal Intent (NBC, 9 p.m.)
Law & Order: SVU (NBC, 10 p.m.)
Boston Legal (ABC, 10 p.m.)

And I’ll leave you with two clips from new NBC shows. The first is from “Life,” the show about the detective who spent over a decade in the clink, and the second is from “Chuck,” Josh Schwart’s spykid show. And I’ll, uhm, keep my comments to myself so you can form your own opinions:


theOrangLiverpoolWhore.jpg
Seth “the Orangutan” Freilich is Pajiba’s television columnist. He’s serious. He would bid on eBay for the opportunity to piss on George Lopez.


ABC's New Fall Schedule | Pajiba Love 05/16/07



Comments

My mom loves According to Jim and the George Lopez show. Now what will she do with her free time, besides sudoku? I sense a whole lotta HGTV coming our way. God help us that she doesn't redesign the entire home...

Posted by: BLA at May 16, 2007 8:16 AM

I can't watch the George Lopez show at all because it is patently unfunny. However, his stand-up is really funny. I wonder if he writes for his TV show...Ah, well. Go see George on stage. Not TV.

Posted by: NDA at May 16, 2007 8:34 AM

Speaking as a Hispanic Pajiba reader: I'd rather have the whitest television EVER if it's funny than ever, and I mean EVER, watching George Lopez.

Posted by: Armando at May 16, 2007 8:53 AM

I can't believe you used the word "chink".

Posted by: TK at May 16, 2007 9:20 AM

I laughed out loud when I heard George Lopez's comments reported last night -- and that's the only time "laugh out loud" and "George Lopez" have ever occurred in the same sentence to my knowledge. "It couldn't be that my show sucks bright red baboon ass; it must be because I'm Latino." Let me help you out, George: It's that your show sucks bright red baboon ass.

Lopez's ridiculous mewling reminds me of Ellen DeGeneres's whining when they canceled "Ellen": [paraphrasing] "The network just wasn't ready to deal with some resistance to unpopular topics." That's right Ellen, the resistance being us turning the channel to escape from your schtick, and the unpopular topics being that YOUR SHOW WASN'T FUNNY.

As much as television and Hollywood are a poster child for how NOT to be a good human being, one thing is for goddam sure: If you're a quadraplegic gay black Hindu of partial Polish Jew extraction with a raging case of Tourette's and psoriasis, you will still succeed if you can deliver ratings or box office on at least a sporadic basis.

Fuck you, George Lopez, for the same reason I say "Fuck you, Jim Belushi" and "Fuck you, Cavemen."

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 16, 2007 10:23 AM

Now that my rant is over, the preview for "Life" with Damian Lewis confirms my inkling that Lewis's quiet-integrity-smoldering-from-injustice, combined with his restrained sense of humor, could make the show work. He looks great for the role. I'll be watching!

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 16, 2007 10:27 AM

Seth...didn't you say the potential for comedy on Chuck could be better than out an out drama? i am mildly encouraged by the trailer.

Best dialogue on Family Guy ever...

Meg: "Chris, change the channel. I want to watch George Lopez."
Chris: "That show just furthers the stereotype that George Lopez is funny."

Posted by: PissBoy at May 16, 2007 10:28 AM

Yes to George Lopez finally getting kicked off the air. Hopefully forever.

Forming my own opinions: The clip from "Life" looks awful. Just awful. Guess I'll have to save that hour of my life for doing something more important, like watching that episode of The Family Guy that PissBoy referenced.

"Chuck" made me laugh a little. Guess that old adage about guys getting hit in the nuts always being funny is true, although I still don't see the appeal of America's Funniest Home Videos.

Posted by: JKo at May 16, 2007 10:50 AM

I liked that last shot from the "Life" clip, though it makes me wonder if the director used to do commercials.

I guess "Life" wins the clip wars for me, but they're both kinda 'meh.'

Posted by: Louise at May 16, 2007 11:16 AM

Finale Watch - you missed Lost for 5/16.

Is it just me or do next season's dramas sound even worse than usual? I think it's gonna be a bloodbath come November.

Posted by: Rob at May 16, 2007 11:27 AM

^ Lost's finale isn't this week. It airs the 23rd.

Never watched George Lopez, but pulling the race card? Bullshit.

Posted by: Gabs at May 16, 2007 11:46 AM

I have seen one episode of George Lopez in my LIFE, and it was one of the WORST shows I have ever seen. Not at all funny (but of course my ex boyfriend laughed). Glad it's getting cancelled.

Posted by: Genevieve at May 16, 2007 11:55 AM

George Lopez's show was just a crappy rip-off of My Wife and My Kids. There was nothing funny about the Lopez show, because his head is just too big for T.V.

Posted by: Daisy at May 16, 2007 12:27 PM

Aww, Lopez is just still pissed because Leno can't tell the difference between him and Paul Rodriguez.
The new NBC shows look pretty sucktastic to me. I can't see them stretching the premise for any of them for a whole season.

Posted by: audrey at May 16, 2007 12:30 PM

If George Lopez's show got canceled because he is Latino, wouldn't it make sense that the show would never have been put on TV in the first place for the same reason. I think that right there pretty much blows his theory right out of the water. Shut the fuck up, George! You're only making yourself look more and more like a little cry baby bitch every time you open your mouth.

Posted by: RAT at May 16, 2007 1:25 PM

TK - Hee! Well played, sir. Well played.


I've been gritting my teeth through all the National Bingo Night (wow that's a lot to type, but referring to it as "NBN" feels too affectionate, no? And I suppose it's shorter than the alternative string of expletives) previews - if I kill myself in despair over the show's very existence, do you think my estate could sue ABC? It's gotta fall under manslaughter or criminal negligence or something, right?

Posted by: Alanna at May 16, 2007 1:34 PM

By the way, isn't America Ferrera Latino. "Ugly Betty" is on ABC and it didn't get canceled did it. So, in order for George's conspiracy theory to hold water, wouldn't this show have to have been canceled also. Just a thought.

Posted by: RAT at May 16, 2007 1:39 PM

Actually, I find this season of Idol to be the only one where I care at all about the contestants. I love all the finalists. Especially my Blake.

Posted by: Cait at May 16, 2007 1:42 PM

Wait... so a painfully unfunny show that apes some of the worst stereotypes about Latinos is "important"?

Bite me, George.

Janel Moloney should have been on my list. I love her.

Posted by: TK at May 16, 2007 2:36 PM

I think George would say Ugly Betty has "whitewashed" latinos because the characters have office jobs.
The only color any TV studio cares about is green.

Posted by: The Stew at May 16, 2007 2:47 PM

I'm thrilled to hear that American Idol's ratings are slipping. I admit to watching this show, but this season I just put it on in the background while I play on the Internet. It's all downhill from here.

Posted by: Kristin at May 16, 2007 5:33 PM

It drives me nuts when actors say their shows/movies are "important". No, they're not. They're entertainment. And while entertainment is important, I rarely, if ever, change my views about anything because of a show or movie I've seen. I remember a while back, Demi Moore was in some flick and was telling some talk show host or something that it was "an important 'film'". These actors are so damned conceited.

Gag me.

You want important, Lopez? "The Muppet Show". That was important. Jim Henson was important. And you, sir, are no Jim Henson.

Posted by: Apathy at May 16, 2007 5:36 PM

The Chuck vid seems to have been yanked from youtube. I (unfortunately) went to NBC's site and they have an extended preview plus a couple scenes. The preview makes it look okay, but the scenes look like death. It can be found at http://www.nbc.com/Fall_Preview/Chuck/#

Posted by: zenhound at May 16, 2007 5:45 PM

I can't roar (or weep) anymore. Until f-ing CW quits jerking our chains, I've just given up hope. What kind of world do we live in when the Pussycat Dolls get better ratings than Veronica Mars?

Posted by: bonnie at May 16, 2007 6:04 PM

I have never watched The George Lopez Show, nor do I ever plan to watch it, for the same reason that I will never voluntarily watch According to Jim or Still Standing. (Yet I do enjoy The King of Queens. Hmm...)

However, the statement, "TV just became really, really white again" is still valid. Every new show next season has a predominantly, if not exclusively, white cast. Besides the Grey's spinoff, I can't think of any new shows with nonwhite people as the leads. And if there are any new shows next season with nonwhite women as the leads--and not as the token ethnic friend--I might pass out from shock.

I'm not saying that George Lopez isn't a little bitter and quite full of himself. I am saying that his show was important in at least one way: it put a Latino family on the TV screen, in broadcast, no less. As far as I know, there won't be any other shows next season that are centered around a Chicano family, or any Latino families in general. That fact might not be important to you, Seth. But it is important to a growing number of Americans, like me, who are underrepresented on the television screen.

You choose do diminish Mr. Lopez's assertion by accusing him of "playing the race card," which is an judgmental statement in any circumstance, especially coming from someone with color and gender privilege in this society. If Mr. Lopez's show does outperform Notes from the Underbelly and the latter show, with an overwhelmingly white cast, is getting renewed, then I'm not seeing the problem with making a racial comparison. It seems disturbingly easy for you to dismiss Mr. Lopez's claims of racial injustice on network television. Fortunately for you, Seth, I doubt the day will ever come when white males will be underrepresented on TV. Therefore, you personally will never have the opportunity to play the "race card" you seem to loathe.

Posted by: Bianca Reagan at May 16, 2007 6:44 PM

Bianca, you make some good points - you're right in that his show is somewhat important simply in and of itself... barely. However, it doesn't change the fact that Lopez IS "playing the race card", despite my dislike of that turn of phrase. And the reason he is is this: His show wasn't canceled because he's Latino... his show was canceled because it was BAD. And that's an important distinction. He would absolutely have a leg to stand on if there were ethnic motivations behind the shows cancellation, and I'd be the first one to get behind him if that were the case. But it's simply not.

The truth is, simply because it's a show with Latinos in it does not automatically make it important. It makes it somewhat unique, perhaps. simply due to the lack of similar demographics. If it were a show about Latinos that actually had something important to SAY... then, it would be important. Similarly, the Wayans brothers' movies are not important because they are black. They are simply movies made by black people. Spike Lee movies are important (well, most of them) because he is black, AND he makes an important statement with his films.

Posted by: TK at May 16, 2007 8:23 PM

My problem with Lopez playing the "race card" is that he must have poor hearing or be bullheaded: [Lopez] says the network told him it would lose money if the show was renewed. But Lopez tells the Los Angeles Times that his show did better than some of the series that were renewed.

They didn't say anything about ratings, they made a comment about production costs and salaries (and his show's ratings could be going down while the other's ratings could be going up, there is no mention of ratings movement).

So where exactly is the racial injustice? I don't see anyone here bad mouthing the show because it centers on a Latino family, but because they didn't find the show funny-- quite important for a comedy series. Underrepresented or not, I doubt anyone wants to be represented by crap.

Posted by: The Stew at May 16, 2007 8:38 PM

TK - there are loads of unimportant, - nay, crappy - shows starring anglos, and they're kept on if they rate well, which is why Lopez probably felt angry. I feel like you're saying that if the lead characters are non-white, the show has to be extra thoughtful and poignant to make up for it? Latinos enjoy sitcom trash just as much as white people, and perhaps the network should have thought about the "uniqueness" of Lopez's show before they pulled it.

I also think perhaps Lopez's comments were taken out of context, I think he was saying that it's important to have representation of non-white people on television, which you can't really argue with, whether his show sucks or not. He's classing his show as "important" because it's the only one of its type at the moment. I think people's dislike of this guy is clouding their judgements - people seem to be very gleefully throwing about the phrase "race card" (even if they preface it by saying, "much as I don't like to say it" - if you don't like to say it, don't. It's redundant bullshit and it makes you sound kind of ignorant to be honest.

Posted by: L2 at May 16, 2007 9:02 PM

The Wayans brothers movies are definitely not important, for a variety of reasons.

Posted by: AM at May 16, 2007 9:48 PM

I sort of agree with Bianca. TV, as many other forms of entertainment, and its quality is certainly in the eye of the beholder. So I don't agree that the argument, "Well, the show is crap, so he can't play the race card" really holds up. I've seen one episode, and it wasn't funny at all, but I don't think the assertion of "really white" TV is necessarily that off base. One thing doesn't negate the other, IMO. I'm sure there have been other shows that may have been money pits and continued on anyway (especially if the ratings were decent enough).

The GL show clearly had an audience, so someone thinks it's worth watching. I don't know - I think Heroes is quite crappy, if unintentionally hilarious, but that doesn't stop people from watching it and referring to it as the best.show.evah. It doesn't sound like Lopez is saying the show should go on forever - sounds like he wanted one more season to wrap things up. Granted, I don't know what overreaching story arcs could be THAT important in a sitcom, but that's just me.

And surely a show like Lost has to be high in production costs, so it can't be JUST money that drove the decision. I don't know the ratings, nor where the show stood, but I'd be questioning it too if a show with lower ratings (was the difference significant, I wonder?) was renewed.

In any case, whenever the race card is thrown out, it just puts all sides on edge. Said minority is hesitant because many may feel that you have to pick your battles, and it shouldn't be used too much (if racism! is decried at every perceived slight, then it does lose its meaning). Whites may be uncomfortable because, well, no one likes to be called racist since...how do you argue against that? Unfortunately, it seems hinder valid discussion of issues (TV being the current one) at times.

Posted by: Daphne at May 16, 2007 9:55 PM

D'oh! The last sentence was supposed to be:

Unfortunately, it seems to hinder valid discussion of issues (TV being the current one) at times.

Posted by: Daphne at May 16, 2007 10:00 PM

It is true that there are a lot of crappy shows centered around white people. I think for that reason, George Lopez could be pissed. And yet, these white-centric shows are not all about "Oooh. We are so white. Look at us in all our white-ness." Take Sex and the City for example (bear with me). The show is about four women who happen to be white, but the idea of the show is not about these women being white, but about these women being single women in New York City.

If we want to see more diversity on TV, I would prefer to see it integrated into a well-thought, interesting plot about many relevent experiences (and I'll be obnoxious and again hail Veronica Mars ) that do not incorporate race for race's sake.

For that reason, I was incredibly irritated with Crash.

Posted by: bonnie at May 16, 2007 11:21 PM

Bianca, I believe one of the shows for next season stars Lucy Liu...so at least one "non-white" person.

Posted by: Carly at May 17, 2007 12:36 AM

"I feel like you're saying that if the lead characters are non-white, the show has to be extra thoughtful and poignant to make up for it?"

Not true. He's the one that said his show is important, not me. I'm merely defining what, in my opinion, makes something "important". Shows starring Latinos, or blacks, or whites or asians don't have to be "extra thoughtful or poignant" - they have to be successful and cost effective, which his show apparently was not. But if you're (Lopez) going to use the word "important", then it better be something more relevant than just another family sitcom. I'd hazard to say that a genuine failure of the networks is more like a show like Firefly, which, I believe, WAS important, because it was smart, thought-provoking, original and fun... but the network fucked with it too much and led, directly or indirectly, to it's failure.

As for "playing the race card", it was lazy writing on my part. I don't like the phrase, it's true. But I was quoting Seth's use of it, not making it my own. I confess to simply being too lazy to think of a better turn of phrase.

That said, I stand by what I said. I think that for whatever reason his show was canceled, it's hard for me to believe that it's cancellation was racially motivated. Whether it was production costs, ratings, whatever, the network viewed it as a failure. Whether or not that judgment was fair is certainly subject to debate, but that's another discussion.

It frustrates me to no end that there is such a shortage of minority shows on television. It frustrates me even more that the ones that do exist are frequently insultingly stupid, i.e. Lopez, Martin, etc. Being a minority myself, I'd love to see more shows that showcase minority talent. But I don't want to see a continuous stream of crappy shows kept on the air simply because they star a black person, or a Latino person.

Perhaps this is why I barely 't watch TV in the first place... there's almost nothing, of any color, that I can tolerate.

And L2, I'm going to pretend that I didn't hear you call me ignorant. I had valid reasons for using the phrase, and resorting to cheap reactionary tactics like that is pretty weak.

Posted by: TK at May 17, 2007 9:00 AM

If diversity adds to the value of the medium, then great, and its absence is to be mourned -- for example, it breaks my heart that Dave Chappelle's show is not on, because it was fantastically entertaining and socially important. When was the last time a television show inspired so much discussion about the boundaries of comments or beliefs about race? I wish there were more shows like it -- hell, I wish ALL of TV was like it. But diversity for the sake of diversity, by itself, is not a defense to poor quality.

And that points up why Lopez's comments are so offensive: (1) His show was NOT important in any way, shape or form -- his show was taking up space where another show might get a try-out; (2) his selfish and baseless insertion of race into the dialogue undermines legitimate complaints of racism; and (3) his comments insult the viewing public by assuming that we can't see the reasons that TV shows get canceled -- it's not purely about ratings, though ratings are clearly the primary factor. A show that does more poorly in ratings but is cheap to make has a better shot.

And the comparison to "Lost" is, um, lost on me. That show makes tons of money and more importantly is a standard-bearer that creates scads of lateral publicity for the network. Even if it lost money, the buzz created for ABC would probably keep it on the air.

I hope we see TV shows with a wildly varied host of races and ethnicities, because that's a schedule that COULD be vibrant, exciting, and filled with possibilities for new and surprising entertainment choices. Unfortunately, most of it is going to be crap -- the white shows, the black shows, Asian, Latino, and all the rest of it.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 17, 2007 10:08 AM

The thing about Lopez is that it was not owned by ABC, so there is less return on investment. Why would ABC keep it alive ? They are not going to make anything on it in syndication. Never watched it myself...

Posted by: Kelly W at May 17, 2007 2:56 PM

Do you work for these networks, or are you just trying to impress them with your ignorace and sheer stupidity.It's sad that people waste their time listening to some brain dead jackass rant because deep down he's just jealous that he doesn't have the talent to do anything else.(I hope you choke on you pajiba and leave this world a better place.

Posted by: Victor Lopez at May 17, 2007 8:50 PM

The thing about Lopez is that it was not owned by ABC, so there is less return on investment. Why would ABC keep it alive ?

Ah....now this, I did not know. It puts the money issue in a whole new light for me.

Posted by: Daphne at May 17, 2007 9:44 PM

Um, does Ugly Betty not count? Seems like a happy Hispanic family of fun and well-written main characters there. Plus crazy Vanessa Williams. I wish I had more time to watch that show.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at May 17, 2007 10:37 PM

Admittedly I did forget Ugly Betty. I've never seen an entire episode because it conflicted with The Office this season. I keep hoping for a marathon on ABC Family, so I can watch all of them in a day or two. I'm eager to see more of that flamboyant cousin who likes show tunes. He's fun!

Posted by: Bianca Reagan at May 18, 2007 1:10 PM

Fuck all you niggas hatin on geroge lopez hes a moutha fuckin king all these white people dissin him and shit is the reason his show got cut cuz bitchs hate to much white people always thinkin of new ways to rip people off 90 percent of you fags will probably be all star struck if you saw george who the fuck wants to watch a show about cave man I'll fuck a bitch up for dissin my guy geroge like that brownwallstreet bitch east side LA what up the fence you know what it is

Posted by: Woodyloco at June 16, 2007 10:01 PM

your site sucks pajibas....and for everyone that keeps saying george "played the white card".... he was speaking the TRUTH!!!!!! Duh, how many latinos do you see on tv now that his show is gone?? Don't give me the ugly betty crap again...thats 1 show!!! And he was the first Latino to ever have HIS OWN sitcom...so the show was important. Maybe not to you, and maybe not to white america, but to a different audience... So , yeah, you know what... it did just get alot whiter AGAIn....think before you speak... ur idea of racism humors me...

Posted by: Jose Ruiz at August 31, 2007 1:07 AM